View Full Version : F. Lee Bailey: Paper proves OJ Simpson's innocence
Dark Knight
01-11-2011, 11:53 AM
YARMOUTH, Maine – Evidence of O.J Simpson's innocence was held back in the 1995 trial in which he was acquitted in the murder of his ex-wife and her friend in Los Angeles, one of his former lawyers says in a new document.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110111/ap_on_re_us/us_f_lee_bailey_simpson
Cubby
01-11-2011, 12:22 PM
From the article:
Bailey was disbarred in Florida in 2001 for mishandling $6 million worth of stock for a client. After reviewing the Florida case, Massachusetts disbarred him two years later.
Imo the above says it all. Sounds like the man may be having some financial problems. I can't imagine why he would put this info out here now.
Also from the article:
In the document, Bailey said the defense was prepared to call four people who never testified — a forensic scientist, an expert on battered women, a blood expert and the person whose possible testimony he says is the most important of the four: a man who might have seen the killers.
BBM. Really? if this were true and CREDIBLE why reveal this more than a decade later when he could have spared his reputation ages ago.
Puhlease! :puke:
Dark Knight
01-11-2011, 12:37 PM
From the article:
Bailey was disbarred in Florida in 2001 for mishandling $6 million worth of stock for a client. After reviewing the Florida case, Massachusetts disbarred him two years later.
Imo the above says it all. Sounds like the man may be having some financial problems. I can't imagine why he would put this info out here now.
Also from the article:
In the document, Bailey said the defense was prepared to call four people who never testified — a forensic scientist, an expert on battered women, a blood expert and the person whose possible testimony he says is the most important of the four: a man who might have seen the killers.
BBM. Really? if this were true and CREDIBLE why reveal this more than a decade later when he could have spared his reputation ages ago.
Puhlease! :puke:
Exactly, why WOULDN'T you call those people during the trial? Or at least make O.J. aware of them? Lame.
LinasK
01-11-2011, 02:03 PM
From the article:
Bailey was disbarred in Florida in 2001 for mishandling $6 million worth of stock for a client. After reviewing the Florida case, Massachusetts disbarred him two years later.
Imo the above says it all. Sounds like the man may be having some financial problems. I can't imagine why he would put this info out here now.
Also from the article:
In the document, Bailey said the defense was prepared to call four people who never testified — a forensic scientist, an expert on battered women, a blood expert and the person whose possible testimony he says is the most important of the four: a man who might have seen the killers.
BBM. Really? if this were true and CREDIBLE why reveal this more than a decade later when he could have spared his reputation ages ago.
Puhlease! :puke:
If so, then why was he convicted of the very same crime in civil court???:banghead:
capps
01-11-2011, 03:25 PM
Bailey is a sleaze. I would not trust him for a minute.
Cubby
01-11-2011, 11:23 PM
We should tag this thread so he knows his news is only getting attention in the archives. Nah, he doesn't deserve the celebrity of a tag.
I was honestly surprised he was still alive..... but that's another topic similiar to the Cubs and their making the centurian mark.
jmo
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.