View Full Version : Jeff Ashton, George and Cindy Anthony, Book Deals/Non WS Members Can Vote
Tricia
09-11-2011, 03:43 PM
WELCOME TO THE PUBLIC POLL FORUM ON WEBSLEUTHS.COM
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO PASS THIS LINK ALONG ON OTHER FORUMS AND INVITE EVERYONE TO VOTE
YOU CAN VOTE EVEN IF YOU ARE NOT A MEMBER OF WEBSLEUTHS
The title of the poll only allows for a limited number of characters. The full question is below:
"Do you think Anthony Lead Prosecutor Jeff Ashton has a right to write a book about the Anthony case more than George and Cindy Anthony?"
There are rumors that Cindy Anthony may write a book. Nothing confirmed..
On the other hand former lead prosecutor Jeff Ashton in the Casey Anthony trial has his book about the case coming out at the end of November.
Amazon.com: Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony (9780062125323): Jeff Ashton: Books@@AMEPARAM@@http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51csmxMEj2L.@@AMEPARAM@@51csmxMEj2L
Some feel Jeff Ashton's book is inappropriate and others feel if one or both of the Anthony's wrote a book it would be inappropriate and would refuse to buy it.
Casey Anthony writing a book has nothing to do with the question. It's only George and/or Cindy plus Ashton.
The poll will be open for a week and then we will send out a press release with the results.
Thank you for participating
Melanie
09-11-2011, 09:09 PM
I voted "NO" because I think anyone can write a book on the case. I believe it's more of a matter in who the public is interested in hearing from. For me, personally, it's JA. For others it may be the ANT's. However, I suspect we'll prolly see dozens of books on the shelves by jurors, witnesses, and others.
MOO
Mel
runsdeep
09-11-2011, 09:10 PM
i am a no because of our freedoms. any of us have the right to write a book.
Beyond Belief
09-11-2011, 09:23 PM
Thats a loaded question. I went with NO because everyone and anyone has a right to write a book if they choose. Maybe I'll write one, lol. ;)
Evan's Mom
09-12-2011, 08:29 AM
I voted no.
Jeff Ashton has as much right to write a book as anyone does, but he doesn't have more of a right.
Aedrys
09-12-2011, 10:12 AM
I voted yes because the A's book would be filled with nothing but excuses or lies. Jeff is telling the truth. I think that gives him more of a right to write a book. He dealt with the defense and the A's for the three years. He has more of a right than anybody to write a book about it.
Now if the A's actually told the truth, then this would be more even. But they never will. It's always lies and spin to make Casey look better. And no one wants to read their garbage anyway.
I think the question should have been, does Jeff Ashton have more of a right to profit off of a book than the A's do. Heck yes. No one should profit off of lies and spin, especially at the expense of their granddaughter. Jeff Ashton is going to honor Caylee and tell the truth, and that's what needs to happen here. I hope he makes more money than the A's will ever see in their lifetime.
I won't be buying anyones book about Caylee. The gravy train is stopping at my house. How much and how many people is the death of this child going to benefit? It is wrong for anyone to make a cent off this mess. JA included. He was a state employee and that gave him special insight to this case. If I recall correctly he came out of retirement or semi-retirement to try this case. Seems fishy to me. One day after the verdict he takes his place on every talk show on tv. I don't like it. I won't buy a book. It just seems wrong coming from him.
I like JA. I think he tried to convict Casey. It was his job for the state of Florida to do so. It just sits badly with me that he or any other in this case profit from it.
I'm sorry if I am in the minority and I offend. I don't mean to. I am just sick of the Caylee gravy train being passed around.
neesaki
09-12-2011, 12:45 PM
I voted yes because I want to hear the inside story. He put his heart and soul into this case and tried to convict Casey Anthony. In my opinion he's not making money off of the death of Caylee, he's making money off of a sociopath, Casey Anthony.
Nette
09-12-2011, 02:07 PM
I Voted No
Anyone As The Right To Write A Book.. But I Cannot Wait The Read Jeffs Book, Roll On November
MissJames
09-12-2011, 06:58 PM
I voted yes. Legally they probably each have the same rights,but JA has the truth on his side.
I would not expect anything from the Anthony's to be credible.
LetJusticePrevail
09-12-2011, 07:43 PM
I voted yes because Jeff Ashton has shown more compassion for Caylee than the grandparents, or her whole family combined. And for that, I must say I'm sorry for this beautiful angel Caylee.
CrimeBella
09-12-2011, 10:28 PM
I don't know if "has more of a right" is exactly what I'm feeling - but I do feel his book would be more of an honest read. Cindy has lied to the public/police/herself since the day Caylee went missing, possibly before that, so why would I pay to be lied to? It was bad enough watching it for free - sure as heck don't feel like shelling out money for it.
When Sharon Rocha wrote her book, it was almost a love story about her fight for her daughter and grandson. I bought one for myself and more as gifts. What is Cindy going to tell us? Not interested in anything she didnt' share with the police - as all of her "information" isn't going to help get justice for Caylee now. Atleast Jeff tried.
animlzrule
09-12-2011, 10:31 PM
I won't be buying anyones book about Caylee. The gravy train is stopping at my house. How much and how many people is the death of this child going to benefit? It is wrong for anyone to make a cent off this mess. JA included. He was a state employee and that gave him special insight to this case. If I recall correctly he came out of retirement or semi-retirement to try this case. Seems fishy to me. One day after the verdict he takes his place on every talk show on tv. I don't like it. I won't buy a book. It just seems wrong coming from him.
I like JA. I think he tried to convict Casey. It was his job for the state of Florida to do so. It just sits badly with me that he or any other in this case profit from it.
I'm sorry if I am in the minority and I offend. I don't mean to. I am just sick of the Caylee gravy train being passed around.
THIS POST EXACTLY!!! You took the words out my head! :seeya: Well, except for the "sorry if I am in the minority and I offend" part. In my RL, these sentiments are not minority opinions. And there's nothing offensive about thoughtfully and respectfully voicing your opinion.
cluciano63
09-12-2011, 11:26 PM
I vote "no" because I don't believe it should be a matter of a right to write a book. Anyone has the right to do so. I don't have any interest in reading any book by anyone involved in the case. If a book came out by a truly neutral party I might read it. (not Ann Rule, can't stand her books, lol).
Dignity4Victims
09-12-2011, 11:30 PM
Jeff Ashton has several important factors to his credit that the Anthonys do not.
1) Ability and willingness to tell the truth
2) Morality
3) Reality
4) Upstanding character
All of which qualify Mr. Ashton in a far superior way than they do the Anthonys.
LCoastMom
09-12-2011, 11:43 PM
Jeff Ashton put his retirement plans on hold for three years to fight for Justice for Caylee.
The A's OTOH spent those same three years obstructing justice. They should slink away quietly into oblivion, their work is done, FCA was found Not Guilty. They must be so proud.
logicalgirl
09-12-2011, 11:57 PM
I have no interest in reading a book from CA and GA - because they have not tried to even understand why OCA was charged with killing Caylee and have done everything possible to hide evidence, lie about evidence or to attempt to destroy it. I have seen them do nothing to honor their grandchild that doesn't involve having their faces in front of the media. Therefore I believe they have no right to write a book. Or if they do - I won't be reading it.
Now Jeff laboured over this prosecution as if Caylee was his own. He took this case personally and after three years, you could see the fatigue etched on his face at trial.
I think his book will be honest, give us a look at the case and the prosecution from the inside and I truly hope it will be cathartic so he can finally let go of it and get on with his life.
Because I think he believes he let Caylee down.
Ricki
09-13-2011, 12:01 AM
I vote that anyone can write a book. I will read JA's but I will not read CA's if she writes one. That is my choice, I am not into spin and tired of CA's ever changing stories. JA's will be truthful as to the discovery, and evidence whether it is circumstantial or not. He has the inside story of the DF teams shenanigans. He put his heart and soul into this sad case hoping to get Caylee the justice she deserved and was very passionate about it. He delayed his retirement because of little Caylee. Not a small sacrifice.
Since anyone can write a book how about WS writing a book on how a group of strangers met on this forum and came together for three years because of a precious baby who needed people to be her voice. We poured over all the doc, depos, interviews and even evidence everyday for 3 years. We cried together, we worked together we were a team united because of one child we grew to love. Then give the proceeds to TES or some other legitimate organization that dedicates their lives to missing children. We have the same right as any of them.
dog.gone.cute
09-13-2011, 12:25 AM
ABSOLUTELY YES !
Mr. Ashton has MORE of a right to write a book than the Anthony's because he was on the side of "Justice for Caylee" ... and was on the side of the TRUTH !
The Anthony's were on the side of "Casey" ... NOT on the side of "Justice for Caylee" ... and the A's "fabricated" lie after lie after lie ...
MOO ...
Cindy's "obstruction of justice" began on Day 31 ... she committed "perjury" on the witness stand during the trial ... and she continues to "fabricate" "stories" about her daughter ...
George LET the DT "throw him under the bus" ... he KNEW it was coming ... and he did NOTHING to stop it ... weak ... very weak ... Oh ... and George's statement that he would do ANYTHING to save his daughter ... and he did just that ...
The Anthony's HAD their chance at the trial ... that one last chance to fight for "Justice" for the "murder" of the granddaughter ... as well as a chance to sort of redeem themselves for their 3 years "previous behaviors" while they were "obstructing justice" etc. ... but they did NOT fight for "Justice" ... they fought for the "felon's" freedom ...
The Anthony's let Caylee down ... and they will NEVER have that opportunity again ... that ship's already sailed ! NOTHING they can say or do now will change that ...
They have ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT to "write" a book ...
MOO MOO MOO ...
Azcrabcakes
09-13-2011, 12:57 AM
I voted yes, but I'm not thrilled with the question! I don't think legally, anyone has more of a right to write a book than anyone else. My question would be whose book would most people read? Probably most people would not care to read an Anthony book - who wants another fairy tale? However, there is a small fringe who would read an Anthony book. These would be the same people who send money to the Anthony "Foundation" and KC's jail account. These people are in the minority. The majority, folks interested in the truth, would read Jeff Ashton's book. I will want to read Ashton's book.
MaryNo
09-13-2011, 01:17 AM
I voted "No".
No matter how you slice it - it's blood money. Besides, he was a terrible prosecutor and didn't do his job.
princesspjs
09-13-2011, 01:19 AM
Jeff Ashton has just spent the last 3 years of his life fighting and arguing to have justice for Caylee.
The grandparents have just spent the last 3 years of their lives into figuring out how to make a mockery of our justice system to get the person who is responsible for Caylee's death out of trouble so that there can never be justice for Caylee.
I believe that it is much more tasteful and "right" for Jeff Ashton to write a book about Caylee's murder trial because he is on Caylee's side and her grandparents clearly are not. Above all else, it would be TRUTHFUL!
I would not believe a single word of a book written by -or for- the Anthony's.
Whisperer
09-13-2011, 02:34 AM
CA doesn't know how to communicate. Did you read her myspace? She writes in the third person. She can't even take responsibility for her own typed words.
2goldfish
09-13-2011, 07:20 AM
I notice some have voted NO because "everyone has the right to write a book", perhaps the poll should substitute the word PUBLISH for the word WRITE :)
Patty G
09-13-2011, 07:36 AM
I voted yes, even though everyone has a right to write a book about anything they wish to write about.
jane the dood
09-13-2011, 09:02 AM
Anything the Anthonys write will be pure fiction, unless it's a how-to book on spinning an intricate web of lies. I wouldn't read anything they fabricated.
I voted YES for Jeff, if only because I think he is a man of honor and has an interesting story to tell. I'll definitely read his book; I just can't afford to buy it. When my local library finally orders it, I'm sure I'll have to take a number and wait in a very long line to read it.
NoeticSoul
09-13-2011, 09:02 AM
I voted YES and have already pre-ordered Jeff's book on Amazon. I'm looking for TRUTHS and that does not include anything from ANY Anthony's. (imo)
com n sense
09-13-2011, 09:19 AM
I voted yes. The Anthonys have every right to write a book, but it should be titled fiction.
We will read the whole truth in JA's book. JA, G, & Linda were the only ones who fought with everything they had to get justice for Caylee.
Someone thought it suspect that JA retired right after the verdict. JA wanted to retire 3 years ago.... but he stayed to fight the good fight for Caylee. Bless him,, G & Linda for being there for that baby when everyone else turned their back on her.
I hope Linda writes one too. We want the truth!!!
Kavya01
09-13-2011, 09:46 AM
Jeff Ashton dedicated three years of his life to find Caylee Marie Anthony Justice; the A's spent three years obstructing that baby's justice.
In my mind, it's not even a question. Granted, even though I suppose anyone can mostly write whatever the heck they want in this country, NO self respecting publisher ought to EVER publish anything an A ever spews forth.
MOO.
grammieto5
09-13-2011, 10:01 AM
I voted YES! As far as I'm concerned CA and GA have no rights. They lost any rights when they failed to protect Caylee.
krkrjx
09-13-2011, 10:40 AM
I voted yes, that JA has more of a right to write the book.
If we are talking about constitutional rights, everyone has the same right to write a book. The reason I voted for JA having more rights is that I believe his book will be non-fiction, and non-fiction is what this story requires.
The As or A-supporters will write from their viewpoint, or will write what they want people to hear whether it is factual or not, IMO. They will embellish and they will continue to excuse KC's behaviors as well as the behaviors of all the Anthonys and the defense. It would, IMO, be a work of fiction pretending to be non-fiction. And that is inappropriate in more ways than I can say.
Anyone who wants to publish the truth has not only the right but the responsibility to do so, IMO. Anyone who wants to publish lies also has the right--but it would be very irresponsible, IMO.
I voted yes .A book by Jeff Ashton will be truthful .A book by the anthony's will be a book of lies . I will never buy or read a book by any of the anthony's or the defense team or the Jury. I don't watch any of them on tv . Just not interested in any of the BS and lies .
MarthaM
09-13-2011, 12:57 PM
I voted 'no', because I think anyone has the right to write a book. And I don't just mean 'right' in the legal or constitutional sense. People with very different perspectives write books about notable events all the time. Each puts his/her own spin on it for his/her own reasons. I don't see any reason why this should be any different. Ashton's book would be his spin, the Anthonys' book would be theirs, another person's would be their own. That's just how it is.
I think most who have voted here are thinking of 'right' to sort of mean 'entitled'. My sense is that the majority of people on this forum think that Ashton and others on the prosecution team are the only ones who are entitled to write a book or who have earned the honor of writing a book about the case. There seems to be a feeling that writing about Caylee belongs only to those people. I disagree with that, of course, but it explains the poll results.
Scamperoo
09-13-2011, 01:04 PM
I want to read a book by Jeff Ashton, I want to know his thoughts and a little of what went on behind the scenes. I don't think Jeff is on the gravy train to line his own pockets, he fought long and hard for justice that was denied Caylee. Writing is cathartic and I think he was emotionally bound, as we all were in the whole worthless debacle, I think he just needs to do this.
As for Cindy I wouldn't cross the road to read what she has written, she is untruthful, delusional and greedy. There is just no point to her writing a book that reiterates all the lies, obstruction and pure peevishness that is Cindy Anthony.
cyberborg
09-13-2011, 01:17 PM
I voted yes, even though everyone has a right to write a book about anything they wish to write about.
I completely agree.
It is semantics, both have a right to write about the case from their viewpoints and experiences. Jeff has a right, and there is interest because he was the prosecutor in the case and has that viewpoint. The A's have a more general right, to write about the family, Casey and Caylee ... but what brought them into the spotlight was the crime.
Now ... whether I'd read the A's book since it is more likely to be half truths and mistruths with an agenda?
While there is bias on both sides, the Prosecution seeks to shine a spotlight on the truth while the Defense seeks to blur it.
It is interesting that, like OJ, many talking heads still openly talk about FCA killing Caylee as if it is accepted public fact on-the-record rather than exercize some caution given the NG verdict.
Sedona722
09-13-2011, 02:58 PM
I voted yes. JA spent three years of his life putting this case together. He had access to all the evidence. Some of it was considered prejudicial and therefore not permitted into evidence. I want to read every word he writes, because it will be the truth.
I don't care one fig what the A's think or what they would write. Although it would be a good psychological study from the standpoint what CA would write. On second thought, she has given the public much insight into how her mind works.
JBounds
09-13-2011, 03:59 PM
He absolutely has a right to.
PlainJaneDoe
09-13-2011, 05:57 PM
I voted "yes," because IMO the Anthonys have had their chance to say their piece, and I don't want to see them profit any more from Caylee's life or death.
MarthaM
09-13-2011, 07:03 PM
I think most who have voted here are thinking of 'right' to sort of mean 'entitled'. My sense is that the majority of people on this forum think that Ashton and others on the prosecution team are the only ones who are entitled to write a book or who have earned the honor of writing a book about the case. There seems to be a feeling that writing about Caylee belongs only to those people. I disagree with that, of course, but it explains the poll results.
I thought about this some more, and I think that an even better phrase than 'entitled to' is 'deserve to'. I think that a lot of people feel Ashton deserves to write a book (and profit from it) while others don't. Sort of like saying that he's earned it and the others didn't.
Kavya01
09-13-2011, 07:38 PM
I thought about this some more, and I think that an even better phrase than 'entitled to' is 'deserve to'. I think that a lot of people feel Ashton deserves to write a book (and profit from it) while others don't. Sort of like saying that he's earned it and the others didn't.
Chalk me up as one of "those" people. The A's have earned only the right to hang their heads in shame and vanish with the last little bit of grace they can muster.
MOO
Mamabear1963
09-13-2011, 09:34 PM
All along during the pretrial hearings and trial I said I would buy 3 books...
LDB
Jeff Ashton
HHJP
Jeff is retired so is able to publish...already ordered! I feel it will give some insight to the investigation and why the DP was put back on the table...JA will be able to say what he couldn't say during the trial.
runsdeep
09-13-2011, 10:28 PM
I notice some have voted NO because "everyone has the right to write a book", perhaps the poll should substitute the word PUBLISH for the word WRITE :)
i agree that the wording of the question could be different...maybe who is more righteous in putting out a book, something along those lines.
I voted yes. Everyone has the right but this book should be one of truth. The Anthonys are not capable of that. J.Ashton and L.D.Burdick brought forth the truth in the trial. They stood up for Caylee, the ONLY VICTIM. They wanted justice for her. I would not buy a book by anyone else. I would never contribute one penny towards the others.
I vote that anyone can write a book. I will read JA's but I will not read CA's if she writes one. That is my choice, I am not into spin and tired of CA's ever changing stories. JA's will be truthful as to the discovery, and evidence whether it is circumstantial or not. He has the inside story of the DF teams shenanigans. He put his heart and soul into this sad case hoping to get Caylee the justice she deserved and was very passionate about it. He delayed his retirement because of little Caylee. Not a small sacrifice.
Since anyone can write a book how about WS writing a book on how a group of strangers met on this forum and came together for three years because of a precious baby who needed people to be her voice. We poured over all the doc, depos, interviews and even evidence everyday for 3 years. We cried together, we worked together we were a team united because of one child we grew to love. Then give the proceeds to TES or some other legitimate organization that dedicates their lives to missing children. We have the same right as any of them.
---------------
:clap::clap::clap::tyou::clap::clap::clap:
I added this post because all the people on W.S. worked soooo hard! (where is M.M.). I marveled how they looked in every nook and cranny for info.. I am in awe of their dedication, leaving no stone unturned. I am only good at reading and remembering a few things. It will be hard to break from this case. I'm already in withdrawl...Yes to TES and Mark Klaas.
Tricia
09-14-2011, 09:13 AM
Please feel free to take this link to other forums and inviting people to vote
Nefriahaia
09-14-2011, 12:07 PM
I voted YES. Sure the Anthonys have the right to write a book about anything they choose. I would consider anything they write to be PURE FICTION and I would exercise MY right to boycott and ignore anything and everything those people have to say in print or in person.
Omachka
09-14-2011, 01:53 PM
I voted yes. Morally (not legally) he has more of a right than the A's because he stood up for Caylee when she needed it most. He fought for justice for her and I know he will tell the truth. I am really looking forward to reading his book.
nssherlock
09-14-2011, 02:47 PM
I'm not sure that "right to" is the way I'd put it........but I KNOW I'm more interested in reading Jeff's book because it'll be more objective and accurate for sure. On the other hand I would read nothing written by KC, GA, CA or anyone on the defense team because none would be capable of TruthTelling.
chefmom
09-14-2011, 04:54 PM
I voted yes although technically they are equally entitled to write a book if they so wish. My vote of yes for JA is because his book would be truthful and factual, and any book by CA and GA would be more lies and spin. No need for more fiction from them. moo
Leila
09-14-2011, 05:43 PM
"Do you think Anthony Lead Prosecutor Jeff Ashton has a right to write a book about the Anthony case more than George and Cindy Anthony?"
I vote no on this specific question. I don't think Jeff Ashton has more of a right to write a book about this case. Anyone has the right to write a book.
But I think the public's interest is going to be focused on Jeff Ashton's book because his book will be objective, written by someone who had all the evidence at hand and his prosecution of the case was motivated by a sense of justice. Jeff Ashton is seen as a hero in this case.
The Anthonys, on the other hand, are disliked by the vast majority of the public due to their behavior as the case unfolded, their dishonesty, and their seizing the opportunity to financially profit from the death of their grandchild. But, they still have the right to write a book, although that book probably won't be well received by the public.
For clarification...............I DID vote yes in the poll. But when it comes to the question of rights......anyone has the right. I may have misunderstood the question as I was addressing "rights." I would never read a book by any of the Anthonys, but would read a book written by Jeff Ashton, Yuri Melich, LDB, or Kathy Belich. And, I look forward to a book written by His Honor Belvin Perry, if he wrote a book after he retired on the major cases in his career.
robmom
09-14-2011, 08:13 PM
Technically, of course, everyone has a right to write whatever they want. I personally think it's disgusting for anyone to profit off a case when they've done all they can to let a murderer walk free. A prosecutor who spent his life trying to put murderers in prison...I have no problem with them writing a book about their case. I'll buy it.
Jeff Ashton was on Caylee's Team. Cindy Anthony was on Casey's team, in my opinion.
I am so glad Jeff is writing the book! He deserves every :twocents:
Truth Seeker
09-14-2011, 10:19 PM
I voted yes for JA. I will buy and read his book. I wouldn"t read or buy anything CA writes even if it's FREE!!
SuperChick
09-14-2011, 10:46 PM
I voted no, because of the questions wording. They all have a right. Now, if the poll had asked:
Is the thought of Jeff Ashton collecting book royalties following this case less
repulsive than the Anthony's?
my answer would have been yes.
Lera213
09-15-2011, 01:18 AM
I voted yes because I believe JA's book will be mostly about the law, and the court process. Where as the A's would be only trying to find how to make money with more lies.
Thats a loaded question. I went with NO because everyone and anyone has a right to write a book if they choose. Maybe I'll write one, lol. ;)
I agree with BB (and others) here - anyone has the RIGHT to write a book Are we sure this is the word we want to use here?
Intermezzo
09-15-2011, 07:24 PM
Since the poll asks , does Mr Ashton have MORE RIGHT than George and Cindy to write a book? then I will have to answer NO. Legally, he does not have more right. They all have the right to write a book.....
BUT.....
I have a RIGHT to chose which book I will read and which book I will not waste my money and time reading.
OneLostGrl
09-15-2011, 09:25 PM
I voted no. I think this book writing thing has gotten out of hand. We watched all this stuff on TV, saw the trial, what more could we possibly need to know? Like more paper needs to be wasted on this case..
Zoe Bogart
09-16-2011, 06:57 AM
I'd rather read what Jeff Ashton says (or any of the prosecutors or law enforcement) than I would anything from the paws of Cindy and even George. I want to read the truth.
The A family will do what they want to do anyway, doesn't mean I'll watch them, read about them, or pay good money to read their side of anything.
I'm so dunnnnnnnn with these people that I have no interest in what they are doing. Yes, I know the word is really "done" but where they are concerned, everything is upside down anyway.
I've had enough of CFCA and I'm not sure if I could read an entire book about her saga at this time (or even in November) and if there are pictures of her, I'll be ill. :sick:
Know what I mean?
TxLady2
09-16-2011, 09:14 AM
Jeff Ashton has just spent the last 3 years of his life fighting and arguing to have justice for Caylee.
The grandparents have just spent the last 3 years of their lives into figuring out how to make a mockery of our justice system to get the person who is responsible for Caylee's death out of trouble so that there can never be justice for Caylee.
I believe that it is much more tasteful and "right" for Jeff Ashton to write a book about Caylee's murder trial because he is on Caylee's side and her grandparents clearly are not. Above all else, it would be TRUTHFUL!
I would not believe a single word of a book written by -or for- the Anthony's.
The person who was responsible for Caylee's death was their daughter. That makes a difference. Jeff Ashton did not care more about Caylee, he never knew her... how could he have more compassion for her than the two people who raised her from birth? It was just a case to him.... a prosecutor's passion is in trying to win a case. The victim is secondary. Yes, I'm sure they care about justice, but no one loved this child more than Cindy and George did, and it's insulting to Caylee's memory to say otherwise. And I bet she would be very sad to see how they've been criticized and ridiculed, because they are the two people she loved the most.
I don't plan to buy Ashton's book, because I don't think he deserves to make money off this case, any more than anyone else does. I'm not interested in his story, any more than I am in Baez's story. I wouldn't buy a book Casey wrote either. But the point is, Ashton is not a god, it's embarrassing to see all this hero worship heaped on him. He's just a human being, like everyone else. And considering the speed with which he cranked this book out, it's been in the works for awhile, probably wrote the last chapter as soon as the verdict was read. Big whoop... he lost the case. Justice was denied. How does that make him a hero? He doesn't deserve it, IMO. He makes money, while the state has to SUE to get reimbursement for their investigative costs? Is that screwed up or what? Maybe they should sue HIM instead of Casey.
lonetraveler
09-16-2011, 12:54 PM
Jeff Ashton has no reason to spout lies about the Casey Anthony trial. George and especially Cindy have proven over and over again that they have no problem with using any lie possible to cover up for Casey murdering Caylee. Why waste the ink to read the Anthony's lies? Would the Anthony's book be considered fiction or non-fiction???
Carla Lashelle
09-16-2011, 04:44 PM
I voted no. I suppose everyone has the same "right" to write a book revolving around the case. However, its just as crass and commercial for a prosecutor to write about it as would the defense attorney. Honestly if anyone had a "right" to tell THEIR own story it would be Casey. Although that is equally as crass and commercial.
oceanblueeyes
09-18-2011, 11:15 AM
I voted 'yes' and have already pre-ordered Jeff Ashton's book and wait with much anticipation for it to be delivered in November.
Anyone and everyone is entitled to write a book......this is America after all. If Ann Rule wrote about the Anthony case she would make load of money off of this tragic case. I don't care about the money Jeff makes. I care about the story he will tell and I think he has every right to write his thoughts down in a published book. Moreso than some others who will probably wind up writing books.
It is up to the individual person whether they wish to obtain any book. My individual choice is to buy the book written by Jeff. It is also my choice not to buy any book that other parties may write in the future. I sure wouldn't buy one if Casey Anthony was attached to it in any way.
The reason why is simple. I have much respect and admiration for Jeff and have from the very beginning. That opinion has not changed. In fact it has only gotten stronger. It wasn't his fault Caylee didn't receive justice. This particular jury drawn wouldn't have given any prosecutor a conviction. Jeff fought long and hard for Caylee and that will never be forgotten by me ever or how hard Frank and Linda fought to bring justice to her too.
The main reason I am buying this book is Caylee will not be forgotten and will remain tjhe victim in the eyes of Jeff Ashton. He will not disrespect Caylee's memory. His book will always be there to remind others of the tragedy of it all and how justice was denied to a little child that deserved so much more.
Jeff Ashton did not have to know Caylee to have compassion for her. He saw what her mother did to her and that will affect any human being ......especially a father.
And frankly he showed a lot more compassion than Cindy Anthony did/does. She was willing to perjure herself in order to get the one off that killed Caylee. Now she totally dismisses and trivializes everything that happened to Caylee.
Good luck Jeff and God bless.
Tricia
09-18-2011, 04:03 PM
OK EVERYONE, Thank you so much for your participation. We will be letting everyone know about our results in the next few days.
Listen to Websleuths Radio tonight, Sunday Sept. 18th 8 PM Eastern/5 PM Pacific to find out our next poll.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/websleuths/2011/09/19/websleuths-radio
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
0