PDA

View Full Version : TX TX- Weatherford - White Female 227UFTX, 35-55, Wig And Glasses, Oct'98



vanillasky
10-31-2005, 09:04 PM
I was browsing the Doe Network tonight, and came across a missing person whose face really rang a bell with an unidentified reconstruction photo I've seen. The unidentified face has always stayed with me since she was found in Weatherford, Texas - about 20 minutes from where I used to live, so I'm always searching looking for a possible match.

Now, I highly doubt this is a match due to the length of time Teresa Lanette Barnett has been missing compared to when this body was found.

However, I wanted to post it anyway, just to show the eerie resemblance. (IMO) This is probably stupid to even think so :blushing: ... but I wonder if there is any way they got the approximate time since death wrong on the unidentified woman, because the summers there are very intense, and the extreme heat would really speed up decomposition.


http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/996dftx.html


Unidentified woman:
http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/mpch/UnidentifiedDetails.asp?id=U9810001

NanaMcZoo
10-31-2005, 09:24 PM
Wow! Just Wow ! Maybe she staged her absence..went on to lead another life...and then got killed? Stats all work...age,size,etc...

vanillasky
10-31-2005, 09:39 PM
Possibly! I think I may call it in just in case, even though it's a long shot.

Another thing that had me wondering is the glasses found w/ the unidentified woman. I am assuming the glasses in the facial reconstruction are either identical or are the ones found near the body. IMO, those glasses seem to be more like an 80's style, not a style someone would have been wearing in 1998.

NanaMcZoo
10-31-2005, 09:43 PM
Can't hurt to know for sure...I had glasses like that in the 80's and upper 90's. Some people just like big frames.

vanillasky
10-31-2005, 10:02 PM
That's true! :)

I just went to the websites of the Marshall PD, and also Weatherford PD, and emailed them both with the information, "just in case".

docwho3
10-31-2005, 10:20 PM
I was browsing the Doe Network tonight, and came across a missing person whose face really rang a bell with an unidentified reconstruction photo I've seen. The unidentified face has always stayed with me since she was found in Weatherford, Texas - about 20 minutes from where I used to live, so I'm always searching looking for a possible match.

Now, I highly doubt this is a match due to the length of time Teresa Lanette Barnett has been missing compared to when this body was found.

However, I wanted to post it anyway, just to show the eerie resemblance. (IMO) This is probably stupid to even think so :blushing: ... but I wonder if there is any way they got the approximate time since death wrong on the unidentified woman, because the summers there are very intense, and the extreme heat would really speed up decomposition.


http://www.doenetwork.us/cases/996dftx.html


Unidentified woman:
http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/mpch/UnidentifiedDetails.asp?id=U9810001
I agree that there is a strong resemblance and so far I only have one thing that makes me doubt: I would think that even if she had been alive all the time since her disappearance and finally recently killed, I would think that there would be some changes after all that time but the two images look like time stood still. However, I suppose it could not hurt to tip L.E. And let them make the determination if you want to.

shadowangel
10-31-2005, 10:52 PM
Also keep in mind that the dates may not be correct. Several of us have ran into this very problem. Try to find other info on the two cases to verify the dates.

vanillasky
11-02-2005, 04:27 PM
I got a response back from the Marshall PD today. :)


Thanks for your interest in the case but the comparison has already
been made and is not a match.

Thank You,

Marilynilpa
11-02-2005, 04:43 PM
I got a response back from the Marshall PD today. :)


Thanks for your interest in the case but the comparison has already
been made and is not a match.

Thank You,
Sorry it wasn't a match. I thought the picture and the reconstruction looked pretty similar.

Keep up the good work, though, because the next time, you might get a match!

jodierenee
06-05-2007, 08:44 PM
The face of this woman is always in the back of my mind. The Doe Network has some great info on her.

http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/227uftx.html

My take is that she possibly was a cancer patient and maybe had a masectomy. The method of death was suicide. Maybe she found out her cancer had returned, and couldn't bear the thought of going through it again? She also had $30-35,000 worth of dental work done on her.

One weird thing is that a wig was found in her bag. Maybe she was in hiding? Also, the labels were cut out of her clothing. Sounds like she really did not want to be identified.

I couldn't find a thread for this poor woman so I am making my own. Feel free to post any comparisons. There is too much info for this case to be unsolved.

Kymistry35
06-05-2007, 11:04 PM
Interesting that you posted this tonight. I was just looking at this earlier. It seems that she should be identifiable. Her dental work alone should be a big clue.

Spazkat9696
06-06-2007, 10:25 PM
I think it was in 98 not 88 it would be nice if there was a picture with her mouth shut.

sloane
06-13-2007, 10:38 AM
I think it was in 98 not 88 it would be nice if there was a picture with her mouth shut.
I think you're right, SpazKat. She is listed on the TXMPCH Unidentifieds site as well, and they list her date of discovery as 1998.

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/mpch/UnidentifiedDetails.asp?id=U9810001

It's likely they sculpted her with her mouth smiling to show off all that expensive dental work. I'm curious, though, as to why you would like to see it the other way...? :)

Spazkat9696
06-13-2007, 11:13 AM
Because closed mouth helps me see the lips and chin better. Both are good but a lot of missing posters only have a snap shot and the teeth are not usually showing to that degree. Just one of those things

sloane
06-13-2007, 12:30 PM
That makes sense. And, smiling does change the lines of the cheeks and under the eyes.
Yes, sadly, many times the photos on the missing posters are not the best ones. Sometimes that speaks to a possible reason they may have gone missing or run away willingly in the first place. If the family life is so bad that they don't even have a decent picture of their kid, or at least a school shot, sometimes LE will rely on friends for a snapshot...

Sable
08-23-2007, 05:26 PM
What do you guys think of this as a potential match?

The Doe Network:
Case File 1127DFFL

http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/DHarris.jpg http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/DHarris1.jpg http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/DHarris2.jpg http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/DHarris3.jpg http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/DHarris4.jpg http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/DHarris5.jpg http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/DHarris6.jpg http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/DHarris7.jpg http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/DHarris8.jpg
Far Left: Harris wearing a wig ; Harris, circa early 1970's
Diana Lynn Harris
Missing since August of 1981 from Monroe County, Florida.
Classification: Endangered Missing

Vital Statistics

Date Of Birth: October 6, 1953
Age at Time of Disappearance: 27 years old
Height and Weight at Time of Disappearance: 5'4" - 5'6"; 125 lbs.
Distinguishing Characteristics: White female. Reddish-brown/blonde hair; blue eyes. Harris is fair-skinned.
Dentals: Dentals are not available. She wore full or partial dentures at the time of her disappearance.
Other: Sometimes wears wigs.
DNA: Her child has DNA on file with the FBI.

Circumstances of Disappearance
Harris disappeared from the Florida Keys in 1981. Foul play is suspected in her disappearance. Harris is originally from Owosso, Michigan.
The families of Diana Lynn Harris and Thomas Stump (http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/1299dmfl.html) believe the cases are connected.

Investigators
If you have any information concerning this case, please contact:
Monroe County Sheriff's Office
Detective Mark Coleman
Special Investigations Division
305-289-2410
Agency Case Number:
K81 6103 or 95-104235
NCIC Number:
M-103871516
Please refer to this number when contacting any agency with information regarding this case. Source Information:
The Doe Network
More Case Information (http://www.realcrimes.com/)
Florida Department of Law Enforcement (http://www3.fdle.state.fl.us/fdle/mpersons_res_detail.asp?item_seq=106160852)

LisainWV
08-23-2007, 06:03 PM
Your Diana wore dentures which is obviously not a match because of the Doe's extensive dental work.

LisainWV
08-23-2007, 06:05 PM
PS To temper my negativity somewhat, she does LOOK like her.

Sable
08-23-2007, 06:06 PM
I guess I must have overlooked that.

LisainWV
08-23-2007, 11:15 PM
Don't feel bad Sable, I get really excited sometimes and spot a potential match and the 2 weren't even living on earth at the same time. It's hard to look at all the details and I guess that's one reason why these remains are so hard to put names on.

froggierintexas
08-24-2007, 12:30 AM
http://www.theyaremissed.org/ncma/gallery/ncmaprofile_all.php?A200502315S

Are they sure it was suicide? Is it possible it was made to look that way?

LisainWV
08-24-2007, 09:32 PM
I'm a little confused on this one. They list time of death as being 1-4 weeks. Then they list her as possibly having had a mastectomy.

If she had been dead only 1 week, wouldn't she likely have some soft tissue left? My mother had breast cancer, had her breast removed and you can definitely tell. If this woman had any soft tissue, I would think you could tell that.

I guess I'm curious as to whether she was just skeletal remains....

concernedperson
08-24-2007, 10:02 PM
I'm a little confused on this one. They list time of death as being 1-4 weeks. Then they list her as possibly having had a mastectomy.

If she had been dead only 1 week, wouldn't she likely have some soft tissue left? My mother had breast cancer, had her breast removed and you can definitely tell. If this woman had any soft tissue, I would think you could tell that.

I guess I'm curious as to whether she was just skeletal remains....

I am thinking so as they were unable to get fingerprints. It seems to me that the mastectomy aspect was because of the clothing vs. evidence left at the scene.

SeriouslySearching
08-25-2007, 12:30 AM
Hmmm...when looking for the amnesia woman's identity...I ran across a missing woman who had a double mastectomy. I need to find her again.

This woman's jawline is rather unusual looking to me for some reason. Almost masculine...very squared off from the side view. Weird looking...but I can't put my finger on it yet.

Also, resale clothing stores often cut out the tags/labels. (Not sure why...but I guess some of those places feel labels aren't important or they have people's names on them perhaps.)

froggierintexas
08-25-2007, 03:09 PM
http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/mpch/findme/0tenspot.htm
Teresa Lanette Barnette?

jodierenee
08-26-2007, 02:30 PM
Julie Wilkinson

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/mpch/mpdetails.asp?id='M10/3/200112:10:02PM' (http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/mpch/mpdetails.asp?id=%27M10/3/200112:10:02PM%27)

Angel4Alpha
09-10-2007, 12:35 AM
Hi, ive been reading here at websleuths a while before joining (nice to meet you all) and a thought keeps occuring to me when i see this one.

The reconstructive model to me looks like what seriously searching said above, "almost masculine" and thats part of my thinking on this.

Is it possible that the person could have once been a man? From the description given about the unidentified its stated "Sutures in her pelvic region possibly suggest a hysterectomy, and either two breast implants or prosthetic breasts. Her bra was a "pocket bra" with a facing on the inside to hold prosthetic breasts. This may suggest a possible mastectomy. "

I am wondering if the sutures in the pelvic region could also "suggest" a sex change operation because of also being combined with a "pocket bra" to hold prosthetic breasts and to me this might also explain why the person would be wearing a wig.

I dont know what all they do during an autopsy or how closely this aspect would have been examined or how evident superficially a sex change operation would be to one who didnt know one had occured but also have heard that this kind of thing can cause depression in individuals who maybe regretted it afterward.

Anyway thats just been a thought ive had about it because the model does look very masculine to me.

kitty
09-10-2007, 07:07 PM
That's a very interesting thought, Angel!


I was also thinking that the UID may have been wearing the wig because of hair loss due to cancer treatments (hence the possible hysterectomy/mastectomy).


I work at an OB/GYN, so that stuff kind of pops out at me. :)

jodierenee
09-10-2007, 11:44 PM
never thought about the possibility of a man...but it does make sense. Hmmm.

Angel4Alpha
09-14-2007, 08:36 PM
Ive been trying to read up on that procedure because i am wondering how evident it would be after surgery - one thing that stuck me also - that when a person is going to have that done they are suppose to go ahead and live for a while as the opposite sex while they are preparing for the surgery which to me would explain the wig (while growing out ones own hair and to complete the look )and prosthetic breasts- it might also explain why the labels might be cut out of the clothing depending on what they wanted family members to know at that point.

I also read that there is a great deal of depression involved also and its not uncommon for one to become suicidal after this kind of surgery. Its very expensive and usually only one of means can afford it which would explain the extensive expensive dental work also.

Anyway, i could be totally off the wall here too , its just a thought that occured to me looking at the model. It just really looks very masculine.

Angel4Alpha
12-13-2007, 02:45 AM
I was looking at this one again - i knew it kept bugging me that i had seen someone who resembled the model and had recently had a hysterectomy also and it was this one - http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/1951dftx.html -the dates dont match but goodness this woman resembles the figure and it says she recently also had a hysterectomy - is it possible the dates could be off and they could be the same person?

Gina_M
12-13-2007, 03:35 AM
That's an interesting theory about her being transgendered. I believe the medical examiner would be able to tell gender (that is, what gender a person was born with) by looking at things such as the hip bones - they are different in men and women. Perhaps since she was found with female clothing it was just assumed she was a woman and they didn't consider that.

absinthe
12-13-2007, 03:44 AM
This is a strange one.

Is it possible she was in the federal witness protection program? Is there any way to find that out?

Chloekins
12-13-2007, 05:13 PM
That's an interesting theory about her being transgendered. I believe the medical examiner would be able to tell gender (that is, what gender a person was born with) by looking at things such as the hip bones - they are different in men and women. Perhaps since she was found with female clothing it was just assumed she was a woman and they didn't consider that.

You are right, sex could be determined based on the width of the pelvis. The female pelvis is both wider and broader. It has a butterfly shaped pelvic opening. You can also see differences in the overall thickness of the bones as females tend to have thinner bones than men.

They also use cranial differences between men and women. Its too detailed to go into right now but there are many differences between the shape of the male and female skull.

I think we can take the information at face value. She most certainly was a woman who underwent a hysterectomy. There are very few surgical scars that mimic those that are found with hysterectomies. Of course there are exceptions to every rule!
:crazy:

Angel4Alpha
12-14-2007, 10:55 PM
This is a strange one.

Is it possible she was in the federal witness protection program? Is there any way to find that out?


Thats an interesting thought too- only the FBI would know that - i wonder if they keep up with people in that way afterward?

Angel4Alpha
01-07-2008, 09:11 AM
This is one ive been looking at for a while now :

I came across this and her smile looks like this model to me and also says she wore large framed glasses and had a hysterectomy - http://www.nampn.org/cases/medlin_sharon.html
Missing Since: May 2, 1998 from Greer, South Carolina
Classification: Endangered Missing
Date Of Birth: April 14, 1948
Age: 50
Height: 5'0"
Weight: 125 lbs.
Hair Color: Brown
Eye Color: Brown
Race: White
Gender: Female
Distinguishing Characteristics: Dyed hair (red).
Wears glasses with brown large plastic frames or contacts.
Cesarean Section scar on abdomen, hysterectomy scar,
scar in the shape of a half circle on forearm, pierced ears.
http://www.nampn.org/cases/images/medlin_sharon.jpg http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/227UFTX5.jpg Located on October 7, 1998

Angel4Alpha
01-09-2008, 01:38 PM
what do you all think about that one?

jodierenee
01-09-2008, 02:32 PM
I think it's a good match. The height bothers me though, because it's a little off.

I think a quick glance at dental records can tell if this is a match or not.

barb0301
01-10-2008, 05:07 AM
I think its a good one, you should follow up on it. The height bothers me a bit, and no mention of any possible mastectomies. But, I vote follow up on it. :clap:

Christine81
05-11-2008, 02:45 AM
My Mom, Diana Harris did wear glasses like this unidentified. I have no proof of her dentures, although I am going by what some family members have told me. I have looked at this lady also because if my Mom was alive still at the time, she very well may have been in hiding. I do not think it's her, but does look like her some. Can't see her living in hiding all that time and not contacting anyone.

Christine81
05-11-2008, 02:54 AM
I compared the unidentified to the picture of my Mom with her glasses on and I can see now a lot more resemblance. The mouth area looks just like my Mom's. I was told that my Mom had only partial dentures, either full on top or bottom, no one in my family seems to know for sure. I don't see the unidentified as having dentures on top or bottom with expensive dental work on the opposite side. She does look an aweful lot like her though. I wish they'd have made one too with no smile.

Christine81
05-11-2008, 02:58 AM
The height and weight would be right. In 1998 my Mom would have been 45. She had relatives in Austin, Tx, at the time. Mom has not been heard from since July 15, 1981. She disappeared after telling her MI. friend of a drug bust about to happen in the Florida Keys where she disappeared from.

Salem
05-11-2008, 04:30 PM
Christine81 - I am so sorry about your mother. Do you know if she has a thread here on websleuths? Also, do you know if she is listed in all the missing persons websites? There is a thread here on websleuths that give a very good list of resources, ideas, etc. for use when a person has a missing loved one. I'll go get the link.

Here's the link: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31441

If we do not have a thread for your mother, we can make one if you like. There are many people here that have lost or are missing loved ones and they are a great support resource, not to mention smarter then heck at searching and following up on leads, etc. Please let us know how we can help you.

Prayers to you and your family,

Salem

JupiterAmmon
01-08-2011, 11:10 PM
Bumping, was Medlin ever compared to this JD?

Cubby
01-09-2011, 09:55 AM
bump to move

Sugie
02-09-2011, 04:46 PM
There is an UID in Texas that was found 22 yrs after Ms Reyes went missing. Long way between TX and NJ, the ages would be off if age of UID correcdt, but can't help noticing the resemblance. What do you wonderfully talented comparison sleuths think? I'm not very good at this. Please let me know if this has been looked at before.
Thanks.
www.doenetwork.org/cases/227uftx.html (http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/227uftx.html) vs http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/513dfnj.html

Cubby
02-09-2011, 04:54 PM
The dates are way off. The UID was believed to be deceased only a few weeks and the MP was ill and very weak when she went missing. It doesn't sound as if she was well enough without medical attention to leave and remain alive over 20 yrs elsewhere.

jmo

Sugie
02-09-2011, 05:14 PM
Yeah that's what I was thinking, but you never know. The UID was obviously hiding her identity for whatever reason and I think there is a resemblance to Ms. Reyes. Just wondering if anyone else thought that there might be a possibility that she did run away and survived her illness for that length of time. She would have been 70 which is quite a bit older than the 35-55 estimated for UID. Just had to run it past someone else. Thanks Cubby.

Reannan
02-10-2011, 11:23 PM
This case is nagging at the periphery of my mind!!! I think the UID and the possible match with Reyes look very similar. The biggest problem I see is the age difference. What do we know??

The UID: Found Oct 7, 1978 in Weatherford, Parker County, Texas.
Perceived to be fairly young - 35 - 55 years old. (Missing Maria Reves would have been 70 years old).
Possible breast implants or prosthetic breast because of the bra that was with her. The bra had pockets for something.... which equals prosthetic breast IMHO. Why would you have surgery and then need a bra with prosthetic breast pockets??? Unless the surgery was recent..... (Maria Reves had undergone a recent masectomy prior to her disappearnce 22 years earlier). Found with brown wig and sunglasses, as if trying to disguise herself.

Demographics: 5'3"-5'7"; 130-160 lbs.

Expensive dental work, estimated at $30,000-$35,000

Maria Reyes - Missing since March, 1976 from Pompton Lakes, Passaic County, New Jersey.
48 years old at time of disappearance (March 1976), which would have made her 70 years old at the time the UID was found.
Known to be a small woman, she was 80-90 pounds at her disappearance.
Had recently undergone mastectomy at time of disappearnce - (1998 - 1976 = 22 years before UID found).

Summary - they do look similar.
- Maria Reyes had a mastectomy, and the UID possibly did (probably did).
- Maria would have been 70 years old when the UID was found. The UID was thought to be 35-55.
- Maria has no mention of expensive dental work. The UID had expensive dental work

It seems very unlikely, but not completely ridiculous. Carlk, Snuf, other WS'ers????

CarlK90245
02-10-2011, 11:33 PM
It seems very unlikely, but not completely ridiculous. Carlk, Snuf, other WS'ers????


I don't see it. Aside from the masectomy, they don't have that much in common.

Although generally, skeletal age estimates are more difficult to pin down the older the person is, they shouldn't have any trouble differentiating the bones of a 70-year old from those of a person between 35 and 55

Reannan
02-11-2011, 12:10 AM
I don't see it. Aside from the masectomy, they don't have that much in common.

Although generally, skeletal age estimates are more difficult to pin down the older the person is, they shouldn't have any trouble differentiating the bones of a 70-year old from those of a person between 35 and 55

Thank you Carlk!!! I totally respect your opinion, and I agree. The age difference is just too much in this case. Now, I am obsessed with finding out who the UID really was, however!! Aghhh!!!! She obviously had a life that allowed her good dental work, so why is she not in a Missing Person's database???? As if I needed another case to obsess over!!

Donjeta
02-11-2011, 03:30 AM
There seems to be some margin of error. Like this case in which the initial report said a skeletal discovery was a woman in her late thirties and it turned out she was 62.
Identified! WA-Woman's skeletal remains found - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community

What I don't understand is, if the UID could have died one week before she was discovered, how come they're just suggesting "possible hysterectomy" and "possible mastectomy". Could the body have been decomposed to such an extent in a week that they couldn't tell for sure if all the organs were there or not?

tatertot
02-11-2011, 10:34 AM
If sutures were visible in her pelvic region, wouldn't that indicate a very recent hysterectomy or other pelvic surgery? I believe there is a type of suture thread that dissolves naturally in the body, so if the coroner could see the thread itself, wouldn't that mean she'd had surgery very recently?

ETA: After doing some research online (yegads, don't Google this stuff at work!) I learned that some manufacturers do sell clear silicone "breast forms" to be worn in a pocket bra and they closely resemble the type used in surgery. See: http://www.breastformswholesale.com/
That would explain why the coroner couldn't determine if the breast forms were implants or simply worn in the bra pockets.

Donjeta
02-11-2011, 11:47 AM
I still don't understand how you can have a body that has been dead for maybe a week and have the bra and the breasts so decomposed that you can't tell whether the silicone thingy is inside fleshy tissue or inside the bra. I suppose the fillings could have fallen off the bra pockets and they also might have fallen off the body if the tissue holding them in place decomposed but does that happen so completely in a week or does it suggest that she had been dead for a longer time?

Reannan
02-11-2011, 12:23 PM
The UID was a suicide, right??? Could it be that she shot herself in the chest with a shotgun or something?? Maybe that would explain why the coroner couldn't tell where the implants originally were located.

webrocket
02-11-2011, 06:08 PM
I still don't understand how you can have a body that has been dead for maybe a week and have the bra and the breasts so decomposed that you can't tell whether the silicone thingy is inside fleshy tissue or inside the bra. I suppose the fillings could have fallen off the bra pockets and they also might have fallen off the body if the tissue holding them in place decomposed but does that happen so completely in a week or does it suggest that she had been dead for a longer time?

I hear you and totally agree Donjeta. In fact, implants should survive the decomposition process altogether.

webrocket
07-18-2011, 06:38 PM
here is the Namus page for this UID:

https://identifyus.org/cases/3572

here are the official rule-outs:

Susan Adams 1947 Idaho
Elizabeth Allen 1957 Washington
Elizabeth Bryant 1960 Virginia
Wilda Cross 1953 Louisiana
Traci Kelley 1965 Texas
Tina Ledet 1958 Louisiana
Jordan Loucks 1966 Texas
Mary Miller 1932 Utah
Bonnie Schultz 1951 Indiana
Agnes Shoe 1942 New York
Nancy Snow 1936 Maryland
Sandra Sollie 1955 New York
April Vlk 1954 South Carolina
Charlene White 1958 California
Sheri White 1964 Alaska
Joyce Yost 1946 Utah

JupiterAmmon
02-29-2012, 07:27 PM
I still think someone should submit the Medlin tip....I think she looks very similar to the JD.

I also think that the transgender theory is very interesting...how in-depth do autopsies for Jane Does really go? Would they have determined her gender medically or just assume that the doe was in fact female? I recall other cases where Does were originally thought to be one gender but ended up being the other, but I think the few cases I remember were children...not adults...It just makes one wonder how much time they really spend on the autopsies of unidentified bodies.

Also perhaps she was a female to male transgender...as F-M often undergo mastectomies as well as hysterectomies...and as she seemed to be perhaps trying to hide her identity (removed the clothing tags, no id) maybe she dressed as a woman again (wig, prosthetic breasts) to make certain she would not be identified.

Also I wonder if she really did wear glasses. Since they were described as very inexpensive, perhaps she got them at a thrift store (or stole them), in order to hide her identity even further. I just find it odd that a person with 30k + worth of dental work would wear a very cheap pair of eyeglasses.

CarlK90245
02-29-2012, 07:35 PM
If the person was transgendered, the DNA testing would reveal the person's birth gender. Or if the person was a hermaphrodite, that would be revealed in the DNA testing also.

jodierenee
04-04-2012, 05:58 PM
bumping for this UID.

CherBearSTL
10-24-2012, 01:57 PM
I just came across this lady and wanted to get your opinion.

Doris Inzunza
http://www.charleyproject.org/images/i/inzunza_doris4.jpgHttp://Www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/227UFTX5.jpg

She had breast implants, a gold tooth, abdominal surgery, pierced ears, glasses and is the correct age and height. I can't justify the date LkA difference though.

Http://Www.charleyproject.org/cases/i/inzunza_doris.html
Sent from my myTouch_4G_Slide using Tapatalk 2

carbuff
10-24-2012, 05:00 PM
I just came across this lady and wanted to get your opinion.

Doris Inzunza
http://www.charleyproject.org/images/i/inzunza_doris4.jpgHttp://Www.doenetwork.org/cases/images/227UFTX5.jpg

She had breast implants, a gold tooth, abdominal surgery, pierced ears, glasses and is the correct age and height. I can't justify the date LkA difference though.

Http://Www.charleyproject.org/cases/i/inzunza_doris.html
Sent from my myTouch_4G_Slide using Tapatalk 2

Well, her date last known alive is before the UID was found -- and it certainly leaves enough time to get to Texas. With everything else so close, I can't see not submitting it .

jodierenee
10-25-2012, 11:24 AM
Wow! Great find! Keep us posted!

hannah1988
06-01-2013, 09:34 AM
Any updates?