PDA

View Full Version : Pregnant Woman Shoots Self To Abort Baby


Old Broad
06-29-2006, 11:46 AM
This is a very disturbing case, I can't imagine a 9 month pregnant woman being able to do this to herself. The baby could have so easily been put up for adoption!

http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=100369&ran=66485

Old Broad

Gmommy
06-29-2006, 11:56 AM
I can't believe she did that on the day she was due to give birth. I remember feeling a bit overwhelmed before having each of my children but not that overwhelmed. How sad for her and for the baby :(

curious1
06-29-2006, 12:44 PM
I just can't find any sympathy for this women. Why didn't she just shoot herself in the head? What a selfish, selfish act. No depression or nutz defense for thsi woman. She was sane enough and cared enough about herself to only shoot where she thought it would kill the baby.:furious:

lisag
06-29-2006, 02:25 PM
I have no sympathy for her either... My sympathy lies with an innocent baby who was killed by it's own selfish mother.

Amraann
06-29-2006, 02:42 PM
Clearly this women was mentally ill.
When do we have sypmathy for those that are clearly sick?
DOes it only exist when they only harm themselves? Like they could know better?

michelle
06-29-2006, 02:48 PM
I have no sympathy for her either... My sympathy lies with an innocent baby who was killed by it's own selfish mother.I agree.....

curious1
06-29-2006, 02:58 PM
Clearly this women was mentally ill.
When do we have sypmathy for those that are clearly sick?
DOes it only exist when they only harm themselves? Like they could know better?
I do not see this as being mentally ill, I see this as being selfish. In my opinion, if she were depressed she would have tried to end her life as well, but she didn't. Also, I do not think she was insane, she was sane enough to try something that she thought would only kill the baby and not here. She was able to 'reason' that out so in my mind, totally sane and totally selfish. But we all have or own take and that is just my :twocents: :twocents: worth.

ember
06-29-2006, 03:15 PM
whoa, this brings up all kinds of legal questions for me! Since abortion is legal, will she be charged with murder? I don't know if the abortion laws stipulate what method of abortion is acceptable and which is not. Personally for me, it's all murder, however I am pro-choice none the less, but only because I believe that each person should have the option of a safe choice. That being said, it is all very sad. This woman will still have to have the child removed, :( which I guess would be the same as giving birth, but she will never reap all of the rewards that come along after the birth. A very sad case. Rest in peace sweet child. :(

BillyGoatGruff
06-29-2006, 03:43 PM
If you don't want tohave the kid, get an abortion. It's legal, y'know.

Although I wonder who the hell the father was.The only male mentioned in the article is her dad. And that woman looks pretty damn rough for 22.

GlitchWizard
06-29-2006, 03:44 PM
It's going to be a legal nightmare for sure. Interesting concept - if someone shot her, it would be considered murder, but if she did it her self - possibly abortion. Hmm. It's certainly thought provoking - but no opinion of it jumps out of me at the moment.

But wait - isn't abortion illegal after a certain number of months of gestation? Certainly this was past that point.

TECE
06-29-2006, 03:46 PM
I wanted to add that abortion is only legal up to a certain point in the pregnancy. If I read this correctly the women was at the end of her pregnancy and the fetus was devloped enough to live on its own. Therefore this would not be comparable to an abortion.

ember
06-29-2006, 04:16 PM
Oh,OK. Thanks guys. That clears some things up for me. I thought it was shot down when they wanted to ban partial birth aka late term abortions...I thought they were still legal. Must of missed that. Then that makes it murder charges, right? Oh my, this could get really complicated....

Amraann
06-29-2006, 04:31 PM
I do not see this as being mentally ill, I see this as being selfish. In my opinion, if she were depressed she would have tried to end her life as well, but she didn't. Also, I do not think she was insane, she was sane enough to try something that she thought would only kill the baby and not here. She was able to 'reason' that out so in my mind, totally sane and totally selfish. But we all have or own take and that is just my :twocents: :twocents: worth.

I don't know why you say that shooting herself in the stomache proves she thought she would only kill the baby??
Plenty of gunshot wounds to the stomache are fatal.
Did you read the article and what it said about pregnant woment who do this?
Specifically THIS womens history of mental health and depression.

Jeana (DP)
06-29-2006, 04:41 PM
Oh,OK. Thanks guys. That clears some things up for me. I thought it was shot down when they wanted to ban partial birth aka late term abortions...I thought they were still legal. Must of missed that. Then that makes it murder charges, right? Oh my, this could get really complicated....


I was of the impression that if the fetus was viable (i.e., capable of living outside the womb) and its killed, that its murder.

michelle
06-29-2006, 04:42 PM
I was of the impression that if the fetus was viable (i.e., capable of living outside the womb) and its killed, that its murder.Thats what I thought as well.

Masissy
06-29-2006, 05:05 PM
I have a feeling that there are a lot of hidden secrets about the father. Obviously this 22 year old had ill will toward her baby.

ljwf22
06-29-2006, 10:16 PM
I was of the impression that if the fetus was viable (i.e., capable of living outside the womb) and its killed, that its murder.
I agree! The 'mom' did this ON her due date, so the baby girl certainly was viable.

SieSie
06-30-2006, 12:05 AM
Skinner was arrested and charged with illegally inducing an abortion, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony and filing a false police report, police spokeswoman Lt. D.J. George said. If convicted, Skinner faces as much as 13 years in prison and a year in jail, plus more than $100,000 in fines.
Source: home.hamptonroads.com (http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=100369&ran=66485)

I wonder why the arrest is "illegally inducing an abortion" instead of "murder" ??

Rest in peace, little one.

bakerprune64
06-30-2006, 12:48 AM
I wonder why the arrest is "illegally inducing an abortion" instead of "murder" ??

Rest in peace, little one.
I think that depend on the state.

richandfamous
06-30-2006, 08:06 AM
Hey, what if....she didn't do it and her s/o did and she is covering for him???

curious1
06-30-2006, 08:58 AM
It would not be the first time a woman has put a man before her child.:mad:

GlitchWizard
06-30-2006, 09:06 AM
I've met lots of men. None of them are worth more than a child.

LButler
06-30-2006, 10:22 AM
OK, here's a good spot for my soap box!! This has got INSANITY written all over it for some greedy defense lawyer.

At what point do we start labeling people as they really are:

PERVERTS
MURDERERS
IDIOTS
THIEVES
DRUGGIES
....

Just like this Andrea Yates thing, she's a MURDERER x 5. Insanity has nothing to do with it. If you deserve to be locked up, you should be locked up. And, in most cases, throw away the key!!

This woman in this thread is a murderer as well. Was she INSANE? Doesn't matter. She's a murderer!!

Jeana (DP)
06-30-2006, 10:27 AM
Just like this Andrea Yates thing, she's a MURDERER x 5. Insanity has nothing to do with it. If you deserve to be locked up, you should be locked up. And, in most cases, throw away the key!!




That's up for the jury to decide.

bykerladi
06-30-2006, 06:37 PM
If she wanted to kill herself, she would have. We women are pretty resourceful and determined people, aren't we? And if we want to kill ourselves, we usually succeed.


My big problem is why the heck was she pregnant in the first place? If she had depression and was "insane", why did she get pregnant? AND if her "insanity" caused her to want to kill the baby, why didn't she shoot herself 9 weeks ago? To me, this clearly isn't a case of post partum depression or attempted suicide. I agree with the other posters - this is pure selfishness. She didn't want to be bogged down with the baby, and, rather than taking the time to have the baby and give it up for adoption, she chose to shoot herself to kill the baby. I hope they amend the charges to murder and put her away for good.


Which, actually, brings up another point. I don't think that women who kill their children should be allowed to have more children. (that'll open up a can of worms...)

concernedperson
06-30-2006, 07:58 PM
The human condition is rough. Everyone has good points but where do we draw the line? I think Andrea Yates was severely mentally ill but I also think the children's deaths could have been avoided.

I believe along the lines that someone is shirking responsibilty in most cases. With that said, there are some who have this figured out and are murderers. Tough stuff, anyway you look at it.

When there is a pattern there is a need for a closer look. But, you have to educate about patterns. Some need a bang on the head and some need guidance. If we don't do this then we are going to repeat everything over and over. Think the movie "GroundHog Day".

In everything we do education is the answer. Then people can make judgement calls based on accurate info.Just trying all the time.

MSM
06-30-2006, 11:04 PM
My big problem is why the heck was she pregnant in the first place? If she had depression and was "insane", why did she get pregnant?
Umm, are you saying that anyone who suffers from depression should not be allowed to get pregnant? What if the pregnancy was unintentional? What if she wasn't depressed when she got pregnant? What if she was depressed, but it was under control? What if it was the pregnancy itself that triggered depression?

Also...if she WAS depressed and psychotic when she got pregnant, are you saying that she was simultaneously capable of rational thought and did this on purpose? Mentally ill women can be taken advantage of by men. It happens in psychiatric facilities with some regularity.

OneLostGrl
07-01-2006, 02:21 AM
Umm, are you saying that anyone who suffers from depression should not be allowed to get pregnant? What if the pregnancy was unintentional? What if she wasn't depressed when she got pregnant? What if she was depressed, but it was under control? What if it was the pregnancy itself that triggered depression?

Also...if she WAS depressed and psychotic when she got pregnant, are you saying that she was simultaneously capable of rational thought and did this on purpose? Mentally ill women can be taken advantage of by men. It happens in psychiatric facilities with some regularity.

After I was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder I got my tubes tied.. not only because I knew I shouldn't have more children for *my* sanity but because any child I give birth to automatically has a 60% chance (I used to think it was only 50% but found out from my shrink on Fri. that it's 60%) of having Bipolar Disorder.

I didn't want to *do* that to any child. It's hard enough knowing my 12 y/o will probably end up with it.

I think there should come a time in a mentally ill persons life, ANY persons life for that matter, that we accept responsibility for our past, present and our future and the future of any children we bring into this world!

*Stepping down from my irrational soap box*

luckyevan93
07-01-2006, 03:50 AM
OneLostGrl - it's a good thing that you were able to know this about your bipolar disorder and make the rational choice about having more children.
I've seen a few persons diagnosed who were not of a rational mind whether it was through their having 'felt fine' and just quit taking their meds or because their doctor(s) could not get their condition in balance through their medications. Either way, they were in no condition to be responsible for much of anything, much less deciding whether to become pg or not.

I thought this interesting of the article, "Larry Skinner said earlier this week that his daughter’s mental health problems are as much of a concern as her physical condition. Tammy Skinner had surgery to remove the baby and for the bullet wound soon after she was taken to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital.

Prenatal depression and depression throughout pregnancy can be as dangerous as postpartum depression, according to the “Expectant Mother’s Guide,” a printed and online resource for women.

In the United States, Sanford said, women are often criminally prosecuted rather than offered mental health treatment. It’s different in other countries.

“In England, if a mother kills her child within the first two years of the child’s life, she is not prosecuted; she’s given mental health treatment,” Sanford said."

Interesting to note how in other countries the pre and post depression is treated with so much more compassion than in the U.S. Makes me rather sad somehow that we have such a 'Hang em high' mentality.

lynie
07-01-2006, 11:58 AM
I wonder why the arrest is "illegally inducing an abortion" instead of "murder" ??

Rest in peace, little one.Don't they sometimes arrest on one charge until the investigation is complete, or the grand jury meets?

I think they will change the charges in the next couple of weeks, but they could hold her with this arrest...

Could be waaaaay wrong though!

Lynie

bykerladi
07-01-2006, 03:47 PM
Umm, are you saying that anyone who suffers from depression should not be allowed to get pregnant? What if the pregnancy was unintentional? What if she wasn't depressed when she got pregnant? What if she was depressed, but it was under control? What if it was the pregnancy itself that triggered depression?

Also...if she WAS depressed and psychotic when she got pregnant, are you saying that she was simultaneously capable of rational thought and did this on purpose? Mentally ill women can be taken advantage of by men. It happens in psychiatric facilities with some regularity.
I'm saying that if a woman is depressed and suicidal, then she should not engage in consensual unprotected sex. Rape is a whole different issue, and noone has claimed the pregnancy in this case was a result of rape. What my understanding was from the article was that she was depressed and suicidal for at least the past year. Hence, I do not believe she should have gotten pregnant.

MSM
07-01-2006, 04:45 PM
Then you are assuming that someone who is depressed and suicidal will be able to think rationally enough to avoid unprotected sex (and how do we know it was unprotected and not that birth control failed). In an ideal world, that would be true, but I think it's unrealistic to expect someone who is already so psychologically impaired to make sound judgements when it comes to sex. Saying that she should be able to do so does not make it so.

bykerladi
07-01-2006, 07:43 PM
If she is unable to think rationally then she should've been institutionalized or hospitalized or medicated until she could think rationally. I'm sorry, but I'm never going to agree that mentally ill people should have a carte blanche to procreate when they cannot take care of themselves or their children - that goes for non-mentally ill persons as well. And mental illness is NOT a reason to excuse someone for murder of a child.

concernedperson
07-01-2006, 08:51 PM
I'm saying that if a woman is depressed and suicidal, then she should not engage in consensual unprotected sex. Rape is a whole different issue, and noone has claimed the pregnancy in this case was a result of rape. What my understanding was from the article was that she was depressed and suicidal for at least the past year. Hence, I do not believe she should have gotten pregnant.

And there are people responsible for the welfare of others. Be it family members who choose to obscure when it is in their faces or CPS when they choose to obscure. Regardless, this wasn't unknown by some or maybe many.

Patterns, patterns everywhere. It has to be acted on and protect society from infliction of someone else's action. If it is known, than the web is further increased not decreased.

MSM
07-01-2006, 09:03 PM
If she is unable to think rationally then she should've been institutionalized or hospitalized or medicated until she could think rationally. I'm sorry, but I'm never going to agree that mentally ill people should have a carte blanche to procreate when they cannot take care of themselves or their children - that goes for non-mentally ill persons as well. And mental illness is NOT a reason to excuse someone for murder of a child.
In this country, the laws are such that you cannot be institutionalized unless you are a danger to yourself or others. The criteria are fairly strict, and that is why there are so many homeless people with psychiatric illnesses out there who cannot take care of themselves. Also, it is up to the individual to take their medications; they cannot be forced to do so unless they are institutionalized.

I never said that mental illness was a reason to excuse the murder of a child. You are misunderstanding what I am saying, which is that there is no way to prevent people in that situation from getting pregnant unless you want to legislate who can and cannot be allowed to procreate or to force sterilization.

MSM
07-02-2006, 01:07 PM
I didn't realize at first that the shooting occurred in February. An article from May 9 states that the abortion charge was dismissed because the statute specifically applies to a third party:

Skinner’s attorney argued at a preliminary hearing that the charge is meant to be used against a third party and that the same offense with similar wording has been tested in courts in both Florida and Georgia and failed. It simply does not govern an expectant mother doing something to herself, Kevin E. Martingayle said.

..................

Skinner was found guilty Monday of filing a false police report, a misdemeanor for which the judge sentenced her to 30 days in jail, all suspended. Prosecutor Marie Walls requested that Skinner repay the cost of the police investigation. A hearing July 10 will decide whether she’ll have to pay the estimated $750 to $1,500 .


http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=104124&ran=195201

JBean
07-02-2006, 01:11 PM
I didn't realize at first that the shooting occurred in February. An article from May 9 states that the abortion charge was dismissed because the statute specifically applies to a third party:

Skinner’s attorney argued at a preliminary hearing that the charge is meant to be used against a third party and that the same offense with similar wording has been tested in courts in both Florida and Georgia and failed. It simply does not govern an expectant mother doing something to herself, Kevin E. Martingayle said.

..................

Skinner was found guilty Monday of filing a false police report, a misdemeanor for which the judge sentenced her to 30 days in jail, all suspended. Prosecutor Marie Walls requested that Skinner repay the cost of the police investigation. A hearing July 10 will decide whether she’ll have to pay the estimated $750 to $1,500 .


http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=104124&ran=195201Oh this jogged something in my memory. I think a young couple did something similar. The bf helped the expectant gf to kill the baby prior to birth by hitting her belly or something. But IIRC, this same thing happened, where HE was charged and convicted, but nothing could be done to her because she wasn't a 3rd party. I'll have to look for that but it is this same principle.