Darlie's case on Court TV - April 6th

[Shamrock]

Court TV is airing a special on Darlie's case on April 6th at 10:00 p.m. Eastern time.

[Shamrock]

Here's a link. The show is called The Wrong Man?

http://www.courttv.com/onair/shows/the_wrong_man/episodes/a_cry_for_help.html

[Dena]

"Darin and Darlie Routier were happily married with three young children, living in an upscale suburb of Dallas, Texas. But one night in 1996, Darlie and her two sons were stabbed in their own home. Darlie says that she fought off the intruder, who escaped from the house after brutally attacking her and killing her two children. She had bruises and stab wounds on her forearms and neck. But police soon became suspicious of the mother. Bloodstains invisible to the eye were found in and around the sink indicating a clean-up of the crime scene. Then Darlie’s fingerprints are found on the murder weapon. She convicted of murder and sits on death row for a crime she says she did not commit. Now, new evidence suggests that not only may Darlie be innocent, but her husband, Darin, might be the one responsible for the murders."

WTF? Sounds like it was directed by Mama Darlie.

[Jeana (DP)]

It sounds like the person who wrote it doesn't know what "upscale" is.:innocent:
The person also doesn't know that Darlie says she never fought off any intruder(s). She was "frightening."

[JimPence]

"Now, new evidence suggests that not only may Darlie be innocent, but her husband, Darin, might be the one responsible for the murders."

Hmmmmm. Are they finally throwing Darin under the bus?

[Jeana (DP)]

Hmmmmm. Are they finally throwing Darin under the bus?

Finally???? LOL He's been 1/2 way under for years.:rolleyes:

[michelle]

Finally???? LOL He's been 1/2 way under for years.:rolleyes:
Hi Jeana. Do you think darin was in on these murders or just came down and seen what darlie did and helped cover it up?

[cami]

Hi Jeana. Do you think darin was in on these murders or just came down and seen what darlie did and helped cover it up?

I for one don't believe Darin was in on the murders. I think he helped her with covering it up...

I won't get this in Canada unless it shows up on Discovery or TLC some day. I'd be ever so grateful if someone would tape it for me either vhs or dvd. I'd gladly pay for your postage and tape or whatever to Canada.

[Shamrock]

I for one don't believe Darin was in on the murders. I think he helped her with covering it up...

I won't get this in Canada unless it shows up on Discovery or TLC some day. I'd be ever so grateful if someone would tape it for me either vhs or dvd. I'd gladly pay for your postage and tape or whatever to Canada.

I will record it if I can. I'm technologically retarded, so assuming my husband knows how to turn a tivo'd show onto a DVD, you're all good. :)

[Bootsie]

Hello - Does anyone know if this channel is available via Sky in the UK ?

[cami]

I will record it if I can. I'm technologically retarded, so assuming my husband knows how to turn a tivo'd show onto a DVD, you're all good. :)


Oh that would be wonderful. I am still in the stone age with a vcr. But I do have a dvd player so it's all good.

[Dena]

I can try to record it, I'll probably want a copy for myself anyway. That is, if I remember it is on. I'll have to set it to autotune on my guide.

[Jeana (DP)]

Hi Jeana. Do you think darin was in on these murders or just came down and seen what darlie did and helped cover it up?

I think Darlie murdered them alone.

[IrishMist]

It sounds like the person who wrote it doesn't know what "upscale" is.:innocent:
The person also doesn't know that Darlie says she never fought off any intruder(s). She was "frightening."

Now, now, Jeana. I do believe that in one of her stories, she says she fought with the intruder.

[Dena]

Now, now, Jeana. I do believe that in one of her stories, she says she fought with the intruder.

In the transcripts she denies adamantly that she ever said fighting. She stands firmly that she said frightening, not fighting.

Frightening makes more sense to me. This one time I was being held up and instead of punching the guy, I went BOOGEYBOOGEYWOOGEY BOO! He was so scared and ran off.

I think I just solved the whole mystery. Think about it.

PS - that was sarcastic.

[Ms Suzanne]

Hi
They did not show Darlie crying at her sons funeral in the video.They need to look at her husband Darin.I read this story a little bit.Darin was outside when the police arrived?Who's blood was on Darins jeans and a good reason why it was there?Darin's hair was on a murder weapon?they say the knife used in the death of Devon was not the same one used on Damon and Darlie and none of his blood was found on the weapon used. According to the defense, this second knife was never recovered. The experts for the prosecution, including the medical examiner for the county, refute this claim by the defense saying that the knife presented could have easily made the wounds to all three involved and did not eliminate this knife as the murder weapon for either boys.
I say One of her son's blood was not on the murder weapon?I feel very strongly his blood would have been on the knife.why two knives?she was accused of killing only one of her sons.who killed her other son?this is what they need to go back and find out.I don't think the prosecution had a good case.she needs a new trial.Is she getting a new trial?

suzanne

[michelle]

Hi
They did not show Darlie crying at her sons funeral in the video.They need to look at her husband Darin.I read this story a little bit.Darin was outside when the police arrived?Who's blood was on Darins jeans and a good reason why it was there?Darin's hair was on a murder weapon?they say the knife used in the death of Devon was not the same one used on Damon and Darlie and none of his blood was found on the weapon used. According to the defense, this second knife was never recovered. The experts for the prosecution, including the medical examiner for the county, refute this claim by the defense saying that the knife presented could have easily made the wounds to all three involved and did not eliminate this knife as the murder weapon for either boys.
I say One of her son's blood was not on the murder weapon?I feel very strongly his blood would have been on the knife.why two knives?she was accused of killing only one of her sons.who killed her other son?this is what they need to go back and find out.I don't think the prosecution had a good case.she needs a new trial.Is she getting a new trial?

suzanneHi Suzanne how are you? I dont think she is getting a new trial. :confused:

[Dena]

Hi
They did not show Darlie crying at her sons funeral in the video.They need to look at her husband Darin.I read this story a little bit.Darin was outside when the police arrived?Who's blood was on Darins jeans and a good reason why it was there?Darin's hair was on a murder weapon?they say the knife used in the death of Devon was not the same one used on Damon and Darlie and none of his blood was found on the weapon used. According to the defense, this second knife was never recovered. The experts for the prosecution, including the medical examiner for the county, refute this claim by the defense saying that the knife presented could have easily made the wounds to all three involved and did not eliminate this knife as the murder weapon for either boys.
I say One of her son's blood was not on the murder weapon?I feel very strongly his blood would have been on the knife.why two knives?she was accused of killing only one of her sons.who killed her other son?this is what they need to go back and find out.I don't think the prosecution had a good case.she needs a new trial.Is she getting a new trial?

suzanne

I have never heard a lot of the things you stated, where did you hear this? Even if all that IS true, then Darlie is still where she needs to be, but Darin isn't. I don't think she is deserving of a new trial, she killed her kids.
She is going to state her innocence til the day she dies. At this point, what else can she do?

[IrishMist]

In the transcripts she denies adamantly that she ever said fighting. She stands firmly that she said frightening, not fighting.

Frightening makes more sense to me. This one time I was being held up and instead of punching the guy, I went BOOGEYBOOGEYWOOGEY BOO! He was so scared and ran off.

I think I just solved the whole mystery. Think about it.

PS - that was sarcastic.

She went with a different story for the transcripts, yes.

And as far as the frightening thing? I'll have to tell my girls about that. What a waste of money it was, buying them pepper spray when they went away to school! :doh:

[White Rain]

This makes me SO angry. I think I have yet to see even ONE documentary/show/whatever-the-hell-you-wanna-call-it that is NOT PRO-DARLIE.[/SIZE]
This is unbelievable! How can so many people just choose to look over obvious incriminatory evidence? Every single piece of evidence points to Darlie. I do not for one second believe Darin murdered the kids...covered it up, yeah, but murder, no.[/SIZE]
Although lie detector test results are not used in court I wish just one reporter would ask Darlie about hers...I wish one reporter would ask her why her voice could turn from tears to perfectly straight back to tears in an instant on the 911 call when she said "Darin, someone intenionally did this..." Impossible, if you're crying real tears.[/SIZE]
So now they are blaming Darin...so is Darlie going to admit she knew Darin did it the whole time, or is she going to keep up the story that she chased him through the house, into the garage, etc...if so HOW did Darin sneak back in the house and upstairs without her seeing him? Why didn't he go on and kill her, why did he let her live if it was him? It wasn't him, that's why.[/SIZE]
But I tell you what, I don't feel the least bit sorry for Darin or his family, except for poor Drake. I wonder whose side Sarilda Routier will come out swinging on now?[/SIZE]

[Shamrock]

What did everyone think of the show? Just curious of everyone's opinions.

[Dena]

It was fairly interesting.

I was annoyed at parts honestly. These investigators are so interested in this case, yet everything that someone told them - that most people already know reading about the case - they acted like it was brand new evidence.
Prior to cutting to a commercial they say they heard a story about Darin that could blow the lid off the case. The story about Darin was that he planned to hire someone to burglarize the house. Not big news.

The only semi interesting part was their interview with Darlie. Still no tears, but when asked if she were freed right now, would she be with Darin, she said no. When asked why, she claimed because she heard that he planned to hire someone to burglarize the house.

Cami, I recorded it on DVD, but missed the first two or 3 minutes while it was initializing. If you want to PM me your address, I can put it in the mail on Monday. I haven't stopped recording it, so now it's on Power, Privelege, and Justice. This one looks pretty good.

[txsvicki]

Nothing new was said in this program except that I hadn't heard that Darin's hair was on the knife. I did notice that Darin still has a mullet type haircut and Darlie's hairstyle looks horrible.

[philamena]

The program was 85% pro Darlie. The retold facts were misleading if one didn't know the case.
(I still say Darlie did it and Darin helped cover up. And for gawd's sake can someone tell Darren that mullets went out of style 20 years ago. :waitasec:)

[Dena]

It's pretty funny because he didn't used to have a mullet right? He's going a bit backwards there. I bet Darlie thinks she looked real pretty.
Gigantic boobs just make you look piggish in a white jump suit.

ITA that it was misleading if people haven't done their own research on the case.

[philamena]

...

ITA that it was misleading if people haven't done their own research on the case.

Exactly. ;)

[evelyn24]

"Darin and Darlie Routier were happily married with three young children, living in an upscale suburb of Dallas, Texas. But one night in 1996, Darlie and her two sons were stabbed in their own home. Darlie says that she fought off the intruder, who escaped from the house after brutally attacking her and killing her two children. She had bruises and stab wounds on her forearms and neck. But police soon became suspicious of the mother. Bloodstains invisible to the eye were found in and around the sink indicating a clean-up of the crime scene. Then Darlie’s fingerprints are found on the murder weapon. She convicted of murder and sits on death row for a crime she says she did not commit. Now, new evidence suggests that not only may Darlie be innocent, but her husband, Darin, might be the one responsible for the murders."

WTF? Sounds like it was directed by Mama Darlie.

I do NOT like this show at all. What is dishonest about it is the man who is suppose to be doing a so-called investigation to see if the cops got "the wrong man" is a hired gun for defense attorneys. You should check out his website.
"The wrong man" is a half truths spun into a defense story.
I've seen several Investigators-"The wrong Man" shows, and every single show I watched the guy always comes to the conclusion the person was wrongfully convicted.:rolleyes:

[Gozgals]

it was misleading if people haven't done their own research on the case.


I wholeheartedly agree with you and most here. I found the investigators to be pro-defense too. I did not learn very much new information on this case and quite frankly did not like the program. I was happy they did interview Darlie though and realized once again she does not shed tears over the death of her children.

I still believe she is the prime suspect and Darin is covering for her.

I was very letdown to say the least. I am hoping when we watch other shows of "The Wrong Man" they will be more enlightening.

Happy Easter all

Gozgals

[Ms Suzanne]

Hi
They said in the show Darins hair was on the knife?Do you know what else they said on this?

suzanne

[izzyB]

i think both darlie and darin are covering up what really happened in terms of who actually killed the boys, but both were involved to a greater or lesser degree. there was no intruder. and if a man/men had come to stage a break-in and move all the furniture out of the home, place it in a U-Haul until darin could collect the insurance $ and get out of his debt, they would NOT have killed the little boys FIRST and then gone after the mother, who claims that she only woke up after both boys had already been stabbed. no, i think they would have quickly left and then make darin explain everything to darlie.

now, all of that said, it is my belief that due to the numerous errors in the original transcript of the trial, she should not be on death row, but rather LWOP.

also to the poster who asked about why she was only charged with the murder of one of the children. it is common in texas to "split" the charges, so if she was found innocent in the death of one child, let's say, they could still bring her up on charges for the other child and have another trial. they did the same thing with andrea yates.

[izzyB]

Hi
They said in the show Darins hair was on the knife?Do you know what else they said on this?

suzanne

since the knife/murder weapon was taken from a set of knives setting on the counter of their VERY OWN kitchen!!!....i would expect that there would be plenty of darin's DNA all over the knifes, including his hair.

[Cassata11]

What did everyone think of the show? Just curious of everyone's opinions.

I think this show's purpose is just another example of trying to free Darlie based on conflicting police/LE work, rather than the evidence of the actual crime.

Fact is, Darlie IS past her 10 year mark on death row. People, including Court Tv, know that her death warrant is soon. Why not get the buzz started now. It will be a media circus once again.

In my opinion, I think it is a disrespect to the boys. There is no new evidence about the brutal murder!

The whole show just made me very angry.... :mad:

God bless those boys...

[StellaTravers]

Initially, it looked like this program was going to be unbiased, when they brought up the points about the bruises on her arms and why didn't the intruder punch her in the face. I always wondered why an attacker would waste time causing bruising on her arms when she could have been more efficiently disabled, even if the intent was not to kill her. I wasn't shocked when the "investigators" took the turn to pro-defense though because the whole point of the show is to show the "wrong man" has been convicted. I don't think they really care about clearing up the question if someone was rightly or wrongly convicted-they just want to show the "wrong man" was convicted. If any of these shows in this series don't come out pro-defense, I will be shocked. I want to know what was on the rest of the interview she had done. For a 40 minute interview, they only show 10 minutes? I can't imagine they went to all the trouble of getting permission for the 40 minutes of allowed interview time and only did 10? I felt like these guys started out on the right track but did a quick turn around to make sure the show came out pro-defense.
The best thing about this was her comment about Darin. Maybe now he will realize his butt is firmly under the bus and he had better start turning the tables.

[Shamrock]

Nothing new was said in this program except that I hadn't heard that Darin's hair was on the knife. I did notice that Darin still has a mullet type haircut and Darlie's hairstyle looks horrible.

BWAHAHAHAHAAAA!!! :crazy:

[JimPence]

The best thing about this was her comment about Darin. Maybe now he will realize his butt is firmly under the bus and he had better start turning the tables.

Agreed. The only new thing I heard was Darlie's comment about not going back to Darin if she were set free.

What makes that particularly interesting is (correct me if I'm wrong on this) that they are still married. Has Darin "faithfully" stood by his woman (at least in public) because he believes in her innocence or because he knows that Darlie could at the very least implicate him in a cover up?

By saying that she wouldn't go back to Darin, are Darlie and company setting the stage for a last ditch attempt to save her?

Jim

[detectivewannabe]

Maybe the reason he hasn't filed for divorce is because isn't there a law stating that a husband/wife can't testify against their wife/husband?

[SadieMae]

Maybe the reason he hasn't filed for divorce is because isn't there a law stating that a husband/wife can't testify against their wife/husband?
A husband or wife CAN testify against each other voluntarily. They can't be MADE to if they don't want to testify. At least that's how I thought if worked.

[Jeana (DP)]

Hi
They said in the show Darins hair was on the knife?Do you know what else they said on this?

suzanne

Well, the knife was on the floor of their home for some time. How difficult would it be for a bloody knife to pick up a stray hair of someone who lived there? Let's be realistic. If Darin murdered the boys, there would be something besides a single hair on a bloody knife.

[Jeana (DP)]

My comment and what made my laugh hysterically during the show was Darlie's "little girl voice." I mean it came and it went and it came and it went depending on what she was asked. When they started accusing her of doing the deeds, she certainly grew up fast enough to get her grown up voice in a big hurry, didn't she? I'd like to hear from some of her neighbors. I mean did she talk like that all the time?????? COME ON!!!!!! Wouldn't you want to smack her?

[Jeana (DP)]

Agreed. The only new thing I heard was Darlie's comment about not going back to Darin if she were set free.

What makes that particularly interesting is (correct me if I'm wrong on this) that they are still married. Has Darin "faithfully" stood by his woman (at least in public) because he believes in her innocence or because he knows that Darlie could at the very least implicate him in a cover up?

By saying that she wouldn't go back to Darin, are Darlie and company setting the stage for a last ditch attempt to save her?

Jim

I think that he "faithfully" stood by his woman because, as he said, he doesn't want to change places with her and she's the only one who can accomplish that. He's hiding something and she knows what it is. Only she can put him in prison and only he can guaranty her a trip to the gurney. If she's granted a second trial and he testifies against her, he may end up in prison as an accompliss, but she's gonna die.

[Ms Suzanne]

Hi
I am reading this case and am I right to assume they convicted Darlie on her own words she touched the knife.There were no prints on the knife?Darlies prints were not on the knife?I really do not see where there is a case here against her.I'm sorry.
suzanne

[Jeana (DP)]

Hi
I am reading this case and am I right to assume they convicted Darlie on her own words she touched the knife.There were no prints on the knife?Darlies prints were not on the knife?I really do not see where there is a case here against her.I'm sorry.
suzanne


Read the transcripts and you'll see why she was convicted.

[JimPence]

I think that he "faithfully" stood by his woman because, as he said, he doesn't want to change places with her and she's the only one who can accomplish that. He's hiding something and she knows what it is. Only she can put him in prison and only he can guaranty her a trip to the gurney. If she's granted a second trial and he testifies against her, he may end up in prison as an accompliss, but she's gonna die.

The only thing I can't quite understand about all of this is, if Darlie "has" something on Darin (and I agree with you -- I think she does), what does she gain by keeping her mouth shut? She doesn't strike me as the kind of person who is dripping with altruism and kindness.

The only motivation for her silence I can think of would be so that Drake still has a daddy. But that strikes me as kind of lame, given the fact that she's convicted of killing her other two children.

Any thoughts?

[Jeana (DP)]

The only thing I can't quite understand about all of this is, if Darlie "has" something on Darin (and I agree with you -- I think she does), what does she gain by keeping her mouth shut? She doesn't strike me as the kind of person who is dripping with altruism and kindness.

The only motivation for her silence I can think of would be so that Drake still has a daddy. But that strikes me as kind of lame, given the fact that she's convicted of killing her other two children.

Any thoughts?


Well, she can't implicate Darin without saying exactly what her part in all this was. That would pretty much do her in. I don't think she cares at all about Drake having a father. I just think that in order to come clean about Darin, she'd have to tell the whole truth and that would certainly get her executed and quick. She's trying to throw him under the bus, but since its pretty obvious that she's unwilling to come 100% about what she knows, that won't happen.

[JimPence]

Well, she can't implicate Darin without saying exactly what her part in all this was.

Yeah, I guess that does pose a bit of a problem for her, doesn't it? Since she's the innocent victim in all this, it wouldn't do to have to admit her own guilt. My sleuthing brain was asleep on that one. :doh:

[StellaTravers]

I want to know why they didn't bring up the blood spots on her gown. They started out like they were really going to consider everything but didn't continue in that vein. They spoke of how the 911 tape showed how upset she was, but they didn't discuss the part where she suddenly went from hysterical to calm ("Someone just came in here and did this,Darin" or something to that effect) Seems her voice changes are not a new trait.
What I hate about these shows are they don't tell the whole story yet they purport to. They made such a big deal of looking at the transcripts, but it sure didn't look like they read the whole thing.

[Ms Suzanne]

Hi
I read the transcripts.I really honestly do not see why they convicted her.It's not a good case against her at all.I just pray they really find out what happened to these little boys if something else happened to them.God knows and he's watching over them and holding them now.

suzanne

[dottierainbow]

I am not part of the popularity vote but I do agree with you Suzanne. I don't care for Darlie but do not agree she is guilty.
I think Darren knows what happened.
And as for the show "Wrong Man" I have seen an episode where the detectives inquired into a different murder case and ended up thinking that the right man was behind bars.
Hi
I read the transcripts.I really honestly do not see why they convicted her.It's not a good case against her at all.I just pray they really find out what happened to these little boys if something else happened to them.God knows and he's watching over them and holding them now.

suzanne

[Jeana (DP)]

Hi
I read the transcripts.I really honestly do not see why they convicted her.It's not a good case against her at all.I just pray they really find out what happened to these little boys if something else happened to them.God knows and he's watching over them and holding them now.

suzanne

If you can't see all of the evidence after reading the transcripts, darlin, then there's nothing we can tell you that you'll understand. Its an excellent case against her and she had the best defense counsel available. God knows and the boys know, and Darin knows that their mother killed them. They watched her plunge that knife in over and over and over.

[IrishMist]

If you can't see all of the evidence after reading the transcripts, darlin, then there's nothing we can tell you that you'll understand. Its an excellent case against her and she had the best defense counsel available. God knows and the boys know, and Darin knows that their mother killed them. They watched her plunge that knife in over and over and over.

Couldn't have said it better myself, Jeana! :clap:

[cami]

I have never heard a lot of the things you stated, where did you hear this? Even if all that IS true, then Darlie is still where she needs to be, but Darin isn't. I don't think she is deserving of a new trial, she killed her kids.
She is going to state her innocence til the day she dies. At this point, what else can she do?

It's just spin from the defence Dena that's all. When you read the transcripts, you know why Darin was outside. Darin lived in the home, his dna, hair, fibres from his clothes should be all over the place. The jeans were tested, etc.

[cami]

It was fairly interesting.

I was annoyed at parts honestly. These investigators are so interested in this case, yet everything that someone told them - that most people already know reading about the case - they acted like it was brand new evidence.
Prior to cutting to a commercial they say they heard a story about Darin that could blow the lid off the case. The story about Darin was that he planned to hire someone to burglarize the house. Not big news.

The only semi interesting part was their interview with Darlie. Still no tears, but when asked if she were freed right now, would she be with Darin, she said no. When asked why, she claimed because she heard that he planned to hire someone to burglarize the house.

Cami, I recorded it on DVD, but missed the first two or 3 minutes while it was initializing. If you want to PM me your address, I can put it in the mail on Monday. I haven't stopped recording it, so now it's on Power, Privelege, and Justice. This one looks pretty good.

Yippie...thanks so much. I can't wait to see it....

[cami]

Hi
I am reading this case and am I right to assume they convicted Darlie on her own words she touched the knife.There were no prints on the knife?Darlies prints were not on the knife?I really do not see where there is a case here against her.I'm sorry.
suzanne

There's a ton of evidence that convicted her...mostly blood and fibre evidence...not just fingerprints on a knife. The knife was not conducive to fingerprints but Darlie didn't know that. You need to learn the totality of the evidence not just a piece here and there.

[Kalypso2012]

Did anyone else notice she had FALSE EYELASHES on? When she looked down and to the side, NO ONE'S real eyelashes could be that thick~!

I wonder how she got them. Prisoners can order stuff from vendor catalogs, cheap makeup, etc but I've never heard of any being able to obtain false eyelashes!

Her vanity is something to be beheld!!

[Kitty5001]

This show was so rediculous! First of all when the jail interview was done it looked very much like the whole thing was staged and rehearsed ahead of time. I felt like I was watching a play or something-that was bad acting. At the end of the credits it stated that ' all information gathered for the show was gathered from the defense team.

I however would like to know a couple of things

1. They stated that the 'mystery' DNA was from an unknown male. Where does it state that it was differetiated between female and male -instead of just unknown?

2. Darlie states that she would not go back to her husband because she had recently found out that he had set someone up to steal her Jag. First of all, she has known this for a while and I think she knew about it when it was first set up-like Darin is not going to tell her the whole insurance scam plot -please- your spouse is the one that would help plan the whole thing out. And Second-she just made herself look like a huge liar because after all they have been through the years she would not go back to her husband because he was going to have her car stolen? Oh yeah that's grounds for divorce considering you are sitting on death row for murder. She is not going back to him as we all very well know for reasons not related to an attempted stolen car. Please-- nice way to make yourself look like a total liar.

They kept soooo many facts out of this program-they even stated that the house was ransacked - if you call a flower arrangement tipped over and a pushed over glass top of a table ransacked then my house probably needs to be demolished.

[philamena]

This show was so rediculous! ...

They kept soooo many facts out of this program-they even stated that the house was ransacked - if you call a flower arrangement tipped over and a pushed over glass top of a table ransacked then my house probably needs to be demolished.
I know! I was amazed that the show was shown with so little correct facts stated. The so called investigators who did the show, never discussed the amt of blood found on the carpet and the fact that the foot prints found on the carpet and floor were DARLIES! Kinda hard for a mysterious intruder to leave that much blood but leave no footprints. :banghead:

They also never mentioned the fact that one of the boys blood was found on the back of Darlie's shirt. The entire show imo was a joke.

[dasgal]

Oh my! I get busy for a few months and miss everything.

Same old same old throwing of Darin under busdom, only I'd like to hear more on the Darin Hair.

EVEN if it were true, why the hell WOULDN'T his hair be there. Hell, it's prolly all in the carpet (where she put the knife down and switched hands) and the kitchen floor (which she states that she was too busy running back and forth to ).

I'm still waiting for them to rip each other's hair out. It's dangerous for both, but I'm honestly starting to think it's coming.

[Kalypso2012]

This show was so ridiculous! First of all when the jail interview was done it looked very much like the whole thing was staged and rehearsed ahead of time. I felt like I was watching a play or something-that was bad acting. At the end of the credits it stated that ' all information gathered for the show was gathered from the defense team.

You are so right about the bad acting!!! You could just tell that they coached her, "OK, now we are going to attack you really hard in this next segment and say stuff about your lack of tears.." She looked so self-conscious just like a bad actor does and you could see how hard she was trying to act.

I wasn't surprised about the facts being left out because it was made to be one-sided. Are they having the other side presented next week?

[JimPence]

Did anyone else notice she had FALSE EYELASHES on? When she looked down and to the side, NO ONE'S real eyelashes could be that thick~!

I wonder how she got them. Prisoners can order stuff from vendor catalogs, cheap makeup, etc but I've never heard of any being able to obtain false eyelashes!

Her vanity is something to be beheld!!

I noticed that, too. I do prison ministry in the Texas prison system (although I've never been to Darlie's unit), and I was a bit surprised that she was wearing them. I'm wondering if it was a special concession for the cameras (although Texas is not known for making such allowances). Very curious.

[gbarney04]

It was so one-sided to make it appear that there was a chance that her husband did it. They showed three seconds of the graveyard video - why not show the whole thing if she has nothing to be ashamed of? Darlie couldn't even shed a single tear over her boys. I don't care if 100 years had passed, if it were my boys I wouldn't be able to keep myself together discussing their murder. I can't believe the support she's receiving. I simply don't understand it at all. I think I've cried more for her boys than she could ever be capable of. I don't support the death penalty very often but I honestly can't wait for this ***** to die. Giving her LWP would be pointless because she wouldn't spend the years regretting her loss - she never cared for those boys. However, she seems to value her life.

[Kalypso2012]

I noticed that, too. I do prison ministry in the Texas prison system (although I've never been to Darlie's unit), and I was a bit surprised that she was wearing them. I'm wondering if it was a special concession for the cameras (although Texas is not known for making such allowances). Very curious.
I think she has the false eyelashes on in that photo on the "fordarlieroutier" site, too.
Someone with her natural light brown hair does not normally have such BLACK, thick eyelashes naturally. Perhaps if she were Italian, but I doubt that. Very curious that the state of Texas would allow such a luxury.

[Kalypso2012]

It was so one-sided to make it appear that there was a chance that her husband did it. They showed three seconds of the graveyard video - why not show the whole thing if she has nothing to be ashamed of? Darlie couldn't even shed a single tear over her boys. I don't care if 100 years had passed, if it were my boys I wouldn't be able to keep myself together discussing their murder. I can't believe the support she's receiving. I simply don't understand it at all. I think I've cried more for her boys than she could ever be capable of. I don't support the death penalty very often but I honestly can't wait for this ***** to die. Giving her LWP would be pointless because she wouldn't spend the years regretting her loss - she never cared for those boys. However, she seems to value her life.
I really agree with you. My gut just tells me that she knew that her husband had tried to hire a burglar, and being the spoiled brat that she is, she was getting tired of waiting for that to happen and had a fit of greed-driven rage in which she decided to take things into her own hands and somehow thought she would profit from this.

[ladygator]

Darlie's Mom {DPSKEE} showed up at the CTV message boards lastnight....

http://boards.courttv.com/showthread.php?threadid=294044&perpage=40&pagenumber=7

I don't post here very often, but find WS to be the best spot for Darlie information and have read here often enough to know that some people call her "Mama Kee' - "Mama Darlie' and when the above linked new nic showed up, I was pretty sure it was her.

After browsing through here tonight, I came across an old thread where a poster here bought a book from her on EBAY.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16321

[Kalypso2012]

Darlie's Mom {DPSKEE} showed up at the CTV message boards lastnight....

http://boards.courttv.com/showthread.php?threadid=294044&perpage=40&pagenumber=7

I don't post here very often, but find WS to be the best spot for Darlie information and have read here often enough to know that some people call her "Mama Kee' - "Mama Darlie' and when the above linked new nic showed up, I was pretty sure it was her.

After browsing through here tonight, I came across an old thread where a poster here bought a book from her on EBAY.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16321
Both are very good finds, thank you. I enjoyed them much. Especially where she calls us the "bored women on Websleuths." (Heck, bored is exactly what I never am!)

Also, in the second link a moderator makes a good case for buying that book, Media Tried, Justice Denied. She said the pictures and the court transcripts in it are worth 100 books on the subject. I hope it's still available on Amazon, or Half.com, or DeepDiscounts.com - one of those places.

I had a male friend who married a female murderer in prison and he thought everyone in prison was innocent. He contacted "Mama Kee" and gave her lots of emotional support. Made me sick. :sick:

[Crimson Sky]

was it a new interview?? I missed it. Would love to see what she looks like now.

[Kitty5001]

was it a new interview?? I missed it. Would love to see what she looks like now.

Still trashy but at least they coached her on lightening up or being a little more subdoed on the make up-loved the shiny lip gloss though it added just the right touch of 'trash' -not that I don't like lip gloss but on DR being interviewed and watched by millions you should tone it down a bit.

[Kitty5001]

You are so right about the bad acting!!! You could just tell that they coached her, "OK, now we are going to attack you really hard in this next segment and say stuff about your lack of tears.." She looked so self-conscious just like a bad actor does and you could see how hard she was trying to act.

I wasn't surprised about the facts being left out because it was made to be one-sided. Are they having the other side presented next week?

Oh I loved the part when they went back and reviewed their interview with her and said 'and look how much emotion she has' well DUH she is on Death Row -you idiots -:loser:

[Jeana (DP)]

was it a new interview?? I missed it. Would love to see what she looks like now.

Jail house floozy. I think the make up and the hair styles are a little bit different in the big house than they are in the burbs.:doh: :doh: :doh:

[Kalypso2012]

Still trashy but at least they coached her on lightening up or being a little more subdoed on the make up-loved the shiny lip gloss though it added just the right touch of 'trash' -not that I don't like lip gloss but on DR being interviewed and watched by millions you should tone it down a bit.
Eeew...her makeup was subdued? I still say she had false eyelashes on. If I ever find a video of that segment, I'll cut out some frames and prove it.:p

[Kalypso2012]

Jail house floozy. I think the make up and the hair styles are a little bit different in the big house than they are in the burbs.
I once saw a Christmas letter online that she wrote to the Women on Death Row site (forgot the URL right now). It was on gawdy stationary (if Christmas stationary can be gawdy). The only way prisoners get stationary like that is when friends write to them in pencil on it and then the prisoner erases it. So, someone is really spending time on finding her stationary that meets with her (ahem) "subtle" taste. :loser:

[Kitty5001]

Eeew...her makeup was subdued? I still say she had false eyelashes on. If I ever find a video of that segment, I'll cut out some frames and prove it.:p


Yeah but have you ever seen this pic?

http://t2.images.live.com/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1116285709625&id=7caae4b6420fda2ee0d8e6667e6ec208

Now you have to admit that her make up was subdoed!

[Kitty5001]

Yeah but have you ever seen this pic?

http://t2.images.live.com/images/thu...d8e6667e6ec208 (http://t2.images.live.com/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1116285709625&id=7caae4b6420fda2ee0d8e6667e6ec208)

Now you have to admit that her make up was subdoed!

[StellaTravers]

I really was trying not to get into the aspects of her appearance, but since no one else mentioned it: What about the big mascara blob underneath the left eye? Or was it a big blob of eyeliner? And yes there are definitely false eyelashes. Haha, I don't even have to see the clips or watch the show again, since it is imprinted in my mind. The only thing I want to know is WHY?!!! What would possess someone in prison to wear false eyelashes?

[JimPence]

The only way prisoners get stationary like that is when friends write to them in pencil on it and then the prisoner erases it.

Not necessarily. Texas inmates can receive stationery, envelopes and a limited number of other supplies, provided they are sent directly from the store or manufacturer. Mama Darlie could have ordered the stationery and had it sent in to her.

[Gozgals]

I know! I was amazed that the show was shown with so little correct facts stated. The so called investigators who did the show, never discussed the amt of blood found on the carpet and the fact that the foot prints found on the carpet and floor were DARLIES! Kinda hard for a mysterious intruder to leave that much blood but leave no footprints. :banghead:

They also never mentioned the fact that one of the boys blood was found on the back of Darlie's shirt. The entire show imo was a joke.


:mad: I watched the show with someone who only knows the history from me and what I have told the person from what has been on the board. With all the factual information left out, it was stated to me that after the one-side show, he could not give Darlie the DP. That is what made this show such a joke. It was so unfair to leave out most of the facts, and show the investigators being so pro-defense.


It was not even worth watching. I guess since she is so close to death, any measures taken to gather more support to keep her alive seemed to be the objective.

Gozgals

[Kalypso2012]

Yeah but have you ever seen this pic?

http://t2.images.live.com/images/thu...d8e6667e6ec208 (http://t2.images.live.com/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1116285709625&id=7caae4b6420fda2ee0d8e6667e6ec208)

Now you have to admit that her make up was subdued!
You are kidding, aren't you? She's got so much blue eyeshadow and pancake makeup on there.

I ran the video on the Court TV site of clips of "The Wrong Man" and I was able to stop it where you can really see her false eyelashes well, but I tried to copy the frame and it was copyright protected somehow. Those eyelashes are SO thick, they remind me almost of the ones we used to wear on Halloween as kids.

[Kitty5001]

You are kidding, aren't you? She's got so much blue eyeshadow and pancake makeup on there.

I ran the video on the Court TV site of clips of "The Wrong Man" and I was able to stop it where you can really see her false eyelashes well, but I tried to copy the frame and it was copyright protected somehow. Those eyelashes are SO thick, they remind me almost of the ones we used to wear on Halloween as kids.

Of course I was being sarcastic. :rolleyes:

[Shamrock]

Of course I was being sarcastic. :rolleyes:

That's the problem with the written word. Sarcasm doesn't always come across very well. I have the same problem as I'm an incredibly sarcastic person. I sit here and read my posts over and over to make sure what I say isn't coming across in a bad way!

[Kalypso2012]

That's the problem with the written word. Sarcasm doesn't always come across very well. I have the same problem as I'm an incredibly sarcastic person. I sit here and read my posts over and over to make sure what I say isn't coming across in a bad way!
haha, that's ok. The internet is not always a good communication tool!

[Mary456]

That's the problem with the written word. Sarcasm doesn't always come across very well. I have the same problem as I'm an incredibly sarcastic person. I sit here and read my posts over and over to make sure what I say isn't coming across in a bad way!

Oh, I'm so glad to hear that, because my sarcasm bombs a lot. Every time I click "post", I cringe. The worst is when you're on a board that doesn't allow you to delete or edit your message. It causes a lot of stress!

[Mary456]

I really was trying not to get into the aspects of her appearance?

Me too, but let's do it anyway, heh heh heh.

but since no one else mentioned it: What about the big mascara blob underneath the left eye?

I noticed that, too. It looked like smeared mascara at first, but then later in the interview it was gone. They must have shot the fake interrogation in two parts.

The only thing I want to know is WHY?!!! What would possess someone in prison to wear false eyelashes?

A really cute C.O?

[Kalypso2012]

Me too, but let's do it anyway, heh heh heh.

I don't think Darlie's vanity is off-topic at all. I think it's part of her motivation; of what killed those boys. I think that she was (is) a very "high maintenance" lady, and because of her vanity and materialism, she flew into a homocidal rage over their money problems.

[Jeana (DP)]

Oh, I'm so glad to hear that, because my sarcasm bombs a lot. Every time I click "post", I cringe. The worst is when you're on a board that doesn't allow you to delete or edit your message. It causes a lot of stress!

Mary, darlin, anytime you need to edit or delete a post, you come see me.

[cami]

That's the problem with the written word. Sarcasm doesn't always come across very well. I have the same problem as I'm an incredibly sarcastic person. I sit here and read my posts over and over to make sure what I say isn't coming across in a bad way!

me too! I work on it. We used to do this year's ago ***turning sarcasm on*** /or off, LOL. Maybe they can create a smilie for sarcasm?

[cami]

You are kidding, aren't you? She's got so much blue eyeshadow and pancake makeup on there.

I ran the video on the Court TV site of clips of "The Wrong Man" and I was able to stop it where you can really see her false eyelashes well, but I tried to copy the frame and it was copyright protected somehow. Those eyelashes are SO thick, they remind me almost of the ones we used to wear on Halloween as kids.

Speaking of photos, check this out on the .org and the blurb beside it. Will they stop at nothing to try and deceive the public.

http://www.fordarlieroutier.org/HerProof/CourtTV.html

[Shamrock]

me too! I work on it. We used to do this year's ago ***turning sarcasm on*** /or off, LOL. Maybe they can create a smilie for sarcasm?

HA!! Good idea!!

[StellaTravers]

I need that sarcasm smiley. I hadn't read on here for awhile, came back and didn't know everyone, so when I read one post I mistook the sarcasm for one of her staunch defenders. My fault though because I could have read some earlier posts and figured out it was sarcasm. I have heard the zaniest defenses coming from sincere believers before, though, so I thought the person was serious,lol.

So does everyone think she was forewarned about the interrogation? The response didn't look natural but I had heard she was upset after they interviewed her and felt like they had attacked her, taken her off guard when she thought they were coming in there to support her claims of innocence. Supposedly, there was no smoothing over before or afterwards. But remember all the other interviews when she is talking in the "little girl" voice? IMO in a lot of the other interviews she managed to affect a hung dog look. Still looks fake, but this reminded me of her quick turn around on that 911 call from the crying to the calm determined voice she had when talking to Darin "someone came in and did this" voice. I wish some of those other interviewers on the other shows had turned more accusatory. I would love to see how quick she can go from that little girl voice to a pissed off voice. I'm telling you, there was more to this interview. we saw ten minutes. They said they were allowed 40 minutes. I want to see the parts that were clipped. THAT is why I watched this. I thought the men had put her through the wringer and I would see a range of her emotions. I'm not impressed with this show. All I have ever asked is show ALL of the facts. I am not against her side coming out and I am not against evidence being reconsidered. But I don't want to see things painted to show a certain picture

[Shamrock]

I don't think she knew about it in advance but that's just my opinion. Remember too that we only saw a few minutes of this 'interrogation'. It was probably a much longer interview that was edited.

[Jeana (DP)]

I need that sarcasm smiley. I hadn't read on here for awhile, came back and didn't know everyone, so when I read one post I mistook the sarcasm for one of her staunch defenders. My fault though because I could have read some earlier posts and figured out it was sarcasm. I have heard the zaniest defenses coming from sincere believers before, though, so I thought the person was serious,lol.

So does everyone think she was forewarned about the interrogation? The response didn't look natural but I had heard she was upset after they interviewed her and felt like they had attacked her, taken her off guard when she thought they were coming in there to support her claims of innocence. Supposedly, there was no smoothing over before or afterwards. But remember all the other interviews when she is talking in the "little girl" voice? IMO in a lot of the other interviews she managed to affect a hung dog look. Still looks fake, but this reminded me of her quick turn around on that 911 call from the crying to the calm determined voice she had when talking to Darin "someone came in and did this" voice. I wish some of those other interviewers on the other shows had turned more accusatory. I would love to see how quick she can go from that little girl voice to a pissed off voice. I'm telling you, there was more to this interview. we saw ten minutes. They said they were allowed 40 minutes. I want to see the parts that were clipped. THAT is why I watched this. I thought the men had put her through the wringer and I would see a range of her emotions. I'm not impressed with this show. All I have ever asked is show ALL of the facts. I am not against her side coming out and I am not against evidence being reconsidered. But I don't want to see things painted to show a certain picture


She knew the investigators were coming to interview her. Even if she just wore false eyelashes, all that makeup and an updo on a normal day-to-day basis, I believe she's got to approve visitors. Its not like anyone can just go and visit a death row inmate.

As for your comment about wanting to see the rest of the interview, I'm with you!!!!

[Shamrock]

And what I meant was that I don't think she knew they were going interrogate her like they did. I'm sure she knew they were coming for an interview, not just the type of interview she expected.

[StellaTravers]

She knew the investigators were coming to interview her. Even if she just wore false eyelashes, all that makeup and an updo on a normal day-to-day basis, I believe she's got to approve visitors. Its not like anyone can just go and visit a death row inmate.

As for your comment about wanting to see the rest of the interview, I'm with you!!!!


Oh, yeah, no doubt about her knowing and approving the interview. It was a process to get it approved and her attorneys had played a major role in her doing the interview. I'm just saying what she claims is that she had no idea the format of the show involved the interrogation style that the interviewers used. She was expecting an interview where they went over the key points for her being "the wrong man". Supposedly, she was taken aback when they used this approach. I assume she thought she was going to be handled with kid gloves like the other interviews have done. Poor Darlie where she could whine and smile wistfully. Supposedly, afterwards, she was angry and thought she had been misled. However, as we all know, in the camp of Darlie, we never know what is true :liar: THAT is why I wanted to see the interview. I want to see all of her reactions to EVERYTHING they asked her. No way is this all of it. I want to know why more wasn't shown if it was so convincing of her innocence. If there had been more of the interview that was convincing of her innocence, they wouldn't have wasted all that time with Barney.

[Cassata11]

Oh, yeah, no doubt about her knowing and approving the interview. It was a process to get it approved and her attorneys had played a major role in her doing the interview. I'm just saying what she claims is that she had no idea the format of the show involved the interrogation style that the interviewers used. She was expecting an interview where they went over the key points for her being "the wrong man". Supposedly, she was taken aback when they used this approach. I assume she thought she was going to be handled with kid gloves like the other interviews have done. Poor Darlie where she could whine and smile wistfully. Supposedly, afterwards, she was angry and thought she had been misled. However, as we all know, in the camp of Darlie, we never know what is true :liar: THAT is why I wanted to see the interview. I want to see all of her reactions to EVERYTHING they asked her. No way is this all of it. I want to know why more wasn't shown if it was so convincing of her innocence. If there had been more of the interview that was convincing of her innocence, they wouldn't have wasted all that time with Barney.

They can't show the rest of the interview. I assume if they did, it would end up like MTJD. More fans for the prosecution.

:boohoo: yet another song and dance for Darlie.

[StellaTravers]

LOL. That is my take on it. I made myself watch the part with her interview again and I am not even sure they showed 10 minutes. But at least I got to see more of the silly string than I have before, which is next to nothing. I do feel sorry for the sister, if she is feeling some guilt over that because she brought the silly string. Contrary to their belief, I don't see silly string as being responsible for her being on death row. I think that played a minor role with all the other evidence shown.

[Mary456]

Mary, darlin, anytime you need to edit or delete a post, you come see me.

Oh, I didn't mean WS, Jeana. No complaints about this forum.

I can edit to my heart's content, which is a lifesafer for a naturally sarcastic personality, lol!

[enigma]

[quote=White Rain;1423830]This makes me SO angry. I think I have yet to see even ONE documentary/show/whatever-the-hell-you-wanna-call-it that is NOT PRO-DARLIE.[/size]
If you get a chance to see "Invisible Intruder" you will see a show that is anti, but has such an insane IMO scenario I had to laugh.

[cami]

I don't think she knew about it in advance but that's just my opinion. Remember too that we only saw a few minutes of this 'interrogation'. It was probably a much longer interview that was edited.

Oh she knew alright. This program was supposed to be broadcast in February....when her family was interviewed but it was delayed. She's just a con artist like all good psychopaths.

[cami]

[quote=White Rain;1423830]This makes me SO angry. I think I have yet to see even ONE documentary/show/whatever-the-hell-you-wanna-call-it that is NOT PRO-DARLIE.[/size]
If you get a chance to see "Invisible Intruder" you will see a show that is anti, but has such an insane IMO scenario I had to laugh.


What's the insane theory? Just out of curiosity.

[Shamrock]

[quote=White Rain;1423830]This makes me SO angry. I think I have yet to see even ONE documentary/show/whatever-the-hell-you-wanna-call-it that is NOT PRO-DARLIE.[/size]
If you get a chance to see "Invisible Intruder" you will see a show that is anti, but has such an insane IMO scenario I had to laugh.

Is this a documentary about Darlie?? I don't think I've ever heard of it.

[StellaTravers]

I liked the Invisible Intruder, but haven't seen it on lately. I don't remember much about it other than it actually was saying Darlie did it. It was a nice change of pace from the "Poor Darlie" imo. Cami, you don't know why it was delayed from showing in Feb, by any chance? Her interview was completed back in December, so I wouldn't think it had anything to do with that. UNLESS it took that long to chop out all the parts of her interview:waitasec:

[enigma]

Oh she knew alright. This program was supposed to be broadcast in February....when her family was interviewed but it was delayed. She's just a con artist like all good psychopaths.

Just curious, how did you find out her family was interviewed in Feb? I knew that Darlie was interviewed in Dec, and the house footage was obviously filmed in Dec, unless they leave the Christmas lights up for months?

By the way, did anyone see the Dateline interview with Diane Zamora? I think she is at the same prison as Darlie, just not on Death Row.

[cami]

[QUOTE=enigma;1442221]

Is this a documentary about Darlie?? I don't think I've ever heard of it.

Invisible Intruder is a Documentary about Darlie. It's a half hour on Forensics Files on Court TV. It's the only program that shows the forensics that got her convicted...blood and fibre evidence, etc.

It's an eye opener that's for sure.

[cami]

I liked the Invisible Intruder, but haven't seen it on lately. I don't remember much about it other than it actually was saying Darlie did it. It was a nice change of pace from the "Poor Darlie" imo. Cami, you don't know why it was delayed from showing in Feb, by any chance? Her interview was completed back in December, so I wouldn't think it had anything to do with that. UNLESS it took that long to chop out all the parts of her interview:waitasec:

Oh sorry no I don't.

[cami]

Just curious, how did you find out her family was interviewed in Feb? I knew that Darlie was interviewed in Dec, and the house footage was obviously filmed in Dec, unless they leave the Christmas lights up for months?

By the way, did anyone see the Dateline interview with Diane Zamora? I think she is at the same prison as Darlie, just not on Death Row.


I'm sorry, I am trying to find my mail that I received from someone on it and I can't..I deleted it, LOL. I am mistaken obviously...it was supposed to air in February...I stand corrected. That's trusting my very poor memory and it failed, LOL.

I saw some of it on Zamora...not much. Just another liar and killer, IMO

Waiting for you to tell me the "insane theory" or whatever words you used..re: Invisible Intruder.

[enigma]

I'm sorry, I am trying to find my mail that I received from someone on it and I can't..I deleted it, LOL. I am mistaken obviously...it was supposed to air in February...I stand corrected. That's trusting my very poor memory and it failed, LOL.

I saw some of it on Zamora...not much. Just another liar and killer, IMO

Waiting for you to tell me the "insane theory" or whatever words you used..re: Invisible Intruder.

I found the part where they showed the actress running around the house staging the crime scene while she was on the phone with 911 to be a bit insane, if it was staged it was done earlier, I don't think there was any staging while she was on the phone or while Darin was there, unless he was doing it. JMHO...
On Zamora, I loved the part where they gave her the polygraph results. Now she sure has aged in there.

[Shamrock]

[QUOTE=Shamrock;1442785]

Invisible Intruder is a Documentary about Darlie. It's a half hour on Forensics Files on Court TV. It's the only program that shows the forensics that got her convicted...blood and fibre evidence, etc.

It's an eye opener that's for sure.

Oh okay, I probably have seen it then. I was thinking it was some independent documentary or something.

And why is it quoting enigma as having asked that question when it was me?? Hmmmmm.....

[StellaTravers]

Aw, I missed the Zamora interview. She did seem really evil. Didn't realize that was in Texas. It's a shame people cause so much pain and sorrow to other people out of selfishness.

[tezi]

I found the part where they showed the actress running around the house staging the crime scene while she was on the phone with 911 to be a bit insane, if it was staged it was done earlier, I don't think there was any staging while she was on the phone or while Darin was there, unless he was doing it. JMHO...
On Zamora, I loved the part where they gave her the polygraph results. Now she sure has aged in there.

I think Darlie is as guilty as sin. I don't get Court TV, so I didn't get to see the program.

I saw the one on Diane Zamora, and she needs to be sitting on Death Row next to Darlie. Man, what a con artist.

[Jeana (DP)]

I think Darlie is as guilty as sin. I don't get Court TV, so I didn't get to see the program.

I saw the one on Diane Zamora, and she needs to be sitting on Death Row next to Darlie. Man, what a con artist.



Hey darlin!!! How's it going?

You didn't miss much except a good laugh or two. I will never get over Darlie's "little girl" voice and that she actually believes anyone will buy it! LOL I think it adds to her schizophrenia-like personality, but its pretty funny to watch.

[Shamrock]

Hey darlin!!! How's it going?

You didn't miss much except a good laugh or two. I will never get over Darlie's "little girl" voice and that she actually believes anyone will buy it! LOL I think it adds to her schizophrenia-like personality, but its pretty funny to watch.

ANS did that little girl voice too. What do you think that is???

[Jeana (DP)]

ANS did that little girl voice too. What do you think that is???

I think its her attempt to try and look "meek and mild." LOL Instead, all she accomplished was looking like a fake and a phoney when they accused her of killing the kids and lying about everything when she came out with her normal voice, which appeared to be hard and cold. From what we've heard during the course of this case from those who apparently knew her and were unimpressed, she was anything but meek and mild. She apparently was a beyotch who had no problems using her "grown up voice," and screaming her head off! LOL

[cami]

I found the part where they showed the actress running around the house staging the crime scene while she was on the phone with 911 to be a bit insane, if it was staged it was done earlier, I don't think there was any staging while she was on the phone or while Darin was there, unless he was doing it. JMHO...
On Zamora, I loved the part where they gave her the polygraph results. Now she sure has aged in there.

Oh that part, the tape analyst, Barry Dickey, testified that the acoustics showed Darlie moving between three rooms, tiled, carpeted and concrete while on the call so that's where that came from.

Oh yes, the poly, LOL. She failed eh? I didn't watch that much but Dena did and she's given me the rundown. Diane was trying to control her breathing during it?

[tezi]

Oh that part, the tape analyst, Barry Dickey, testified that the acoustics showed Darlie moving between three rooms, tiled, carpeted and concrete while on the call so that's where that came from.

Oh yes, the poly, LOL. She failed eh? I didn't watch that much but Dena did and she's given me the rundown. Diane was trying to control her breathing during it?

That's what Stone Phillips said, that Diane was trying to control her breathing. She failed every question about the murder.

Jeana, it's going. Only eight more weeks before the grandbaby gets here!

[Jeana (DP)]

Jeana, it's going. Only eight more weeks before the grandbaby gets here!

Well, keep us posted!!! We need a baby around here. Some good news for a change!!! I'd love to see pictures! Can you email me some????

[tezi]

Yep, PM me your eMail addy. We have some ultrasound ones. There are pretty well defined. I need to scan them.

We may be having her a little early. The doctor wants to induce her four weeks early.

[nicola]

Hi
They did not show Darlie crying at her sons funeral in the video.They need to look at her husband Darin.I read this story a little bit.Darin was outside when the police arrived?Who's blood was on Darins jeans and a good reason why it was there?Darin's hair was on a murder weapon?they say the knife used in the death of Devon was not the same one used on Damon and Darlie and none of his blood was found on the weapon used. According to the defense, this second knife was never recovered. The experts for the prosecution, including the medical examiner for the county, refute this claim by the defense saying that the knife presented could have easily made the wounds to all three involved and did not eliminate this knife as the murder weapon for either boys.
I say One of her son's blood was not on the murder weapon?I feel very strongly his blood would have been on the knife.why two knives?she was accused of killing only one of her sons.who killed her other son?this is what they need to go back and find out.I don't think the prosecution had a good case.she needs a new trial.Is she getting a new trial?

suzanne
Better l8 than never but I hope I can clear up some stuuf 4 u.
U stated that Darin was outside when police arrived, this is not true Darin was not outside -listen to 911 transcript- although I heard that there was supposed to be someone that claimed to be Darin outside also, whoever this was it was not Darin. Darins jeans were covered in blood, the defense would also like to know whose blood this is aswell, as Darin tryed to administer CPR to his sons it would not be surprising to find thier blood on his jeans. I never heard that Darins hair was on murder weapon but I did read that a female police officers hair was found in the screen. The fact that only one boys blood was found on murder weapon and the wounds differed could be down to two things (apart from the obvious assumption that there was another weapon). Firstly there could be a possibility that the blood from the first victim could be 'wiped' away whilst the second boy was stabbed. Secondly, sometimes a knife can make different wounds depending on how deep the wound is , the angle of the knife anf the force used. (Personally I think there may well be another weapon - maybe the knife found near the bloody tube sock). She was only tryed for the murder of one son because if she was found 'not guilty' she could be charged with the other murder. By the prosecution doing it this way there is double the chance of getting a conviction.

[CyberLaw]

The one thing that I do recall from all of the CSI shows, is that people lie and tell self serving stories and are not truthful, but the evidence does not lie, it is only evidence, so Darlie and everyone else in the "she did not do it camp" can go to everyone in the US and tell a story, but look at the evidence, the evidence that convicted her. I love it on the CSI shows, when someone lies and then "bam" they are hit with the conflicting evidence.

I have no doubt, never will that Darlie killed her boys, and that Darin help her cover it up, because she did not plan it, and that she she just snapped, sho somehow that was justified in his mind. The kids were nothing more then mere possessions to Darlie, not living breathing innocent children.