PDA

View Full Version : Arrest in 23 year old murder in Winnipeg!


Ranter
05-17-2007, 12:41 AM
From the Globe & Mail:

WINNIPEG — For 23 years, Wilma Derksen has wondered what happened to her 13-year-old daughter.

Candace Derksen was walking home after school on Nov. 30, 1984, when she was abducted from a busy Winnipeg street. She wasn't seen again until mid-January when an employee looking for an old saw found her frozen body in a remote shed, less than half a kilometre from her parent's home.

More than two decades after the mystery began, Winnipeg police believe they've cracked Candace's case through DNA testing.

As police detailed the arrest Wednesday of Mark Edward Grant, 43, Ms. Derksen sat glassy-eyed, her mouth in a thin line until asked about her daughter.

(...)

This moment came because their daughter's case was assigned to the newly formed Winnipeg police Cold Case Unit in 2006, said Chief Jack Ewatski.

Chief Ewatski said investigators re-examined the forensic evidence in the case, sending the results to an independent Canadian lab for testing. He gave few details.

Based on DNA tests, officers in the unit arrested Grant Wednesday morning. Grant has been charged with first-degree murder.
Read the complete article here: http://tinyurl.com/2ua747

I remember this case like it was yesterday. I grew up in Manitoba, and it was on the news every night from shortly after she went missing until 7 weeks later when they found her body. I was the same age as Candace, so all us kids were following the case closely. It was probably the second-highest profile murder ever to happen in Winnipeg, after the 1981 Barbara Stopel murder.

I'm reading the book written by Candace's mother, Wilma Derksen, right now. It's called Have You Seen Candace? It's an hour by hour account of what she and her husband went through after her daughter's disappearance. It's been on my shelf for a couple years, but I just opened it up after news of this arrest.

The police incompetence and arrogance early in the case really jumps out at the reader. They kept insisting she was a runaway for days after she went missing. Meanwhile, she was freezing to death, bound and gagged in a shed about 500 yards from her home. It was the community that rallied around the family early on, organizing search parties while the police were still telling them that Candace would likely show up for school on Monday morning. After the body was found, they decided that Candace's own father was their chief suspect. They really didn't have a clue.

Thank God for DNA. I hope this scumbag spends a long and miserable existence in prison, and I hope the other prisoners use him to satisfy their own perverted desires.

timetravel
05-17-2007, 05:16 AM
how did candace die? Did she freeze to death? If so, I would blame the police, partially at least, for treating it so lightly......the poor child.....amazingly, her parents stayed together.....

Ranter
05-17-2007, 09:57 PM
In fairness to the police, back in 1984 in Winnipeg, abductions "just didn't happen". None of the police had even run across an abduction case before. They had zero experience with it. But of course they had all seen runaway teens, lots of them.

Winnipeg is a city on the Canadian prairies of about 650,000, (it's not much bigger today) and was considered a low crime city. No one even really considered predators would be prowling the streets looking to abduct a teenager. The journalists all refer to this crime as "the one that stole Winnipeg's innocence". Today, Winnipeg is known as a fairly high crime city by Canadian standards, although this is mostly due to the gang problem in the inner city. There's never been a high-profile serial killing there.

As to your question, yes, Candace froze to death, either that night or the next morning. It was frigid that night and on the following days. By the time the search parties were organized the next day, she was probably dead. She was not physically or sexually assaulted. It is believed that the guy that tied her up had planned to return to rape her and probably kill her, but for some reason didn't come back. Here's some more articles from the Winnipeg Sun and one more from the Globe & Mail:

http://www.winnipegsun.com/News/Winnipeg/2007/05/17/4186911-sun.html

http://www.winnipegsun.com/News/Winnipeg/2007/05/17/4186912-sun.html

http://www.winnipegsun.com/News/Winnipeg/2007/05/17/4186913-sun.html

http://www.winnipegsun.com/News/Winnipeg/2007/05/17/4186914-sun.html

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070517.wcold17/BNStory/National/home

Taximom
05-17-2007, 11:34 PM
Are there other cold cases this guy might be guilty of?

That poor girl. I hope the rest of his life is absolutely miserable.

SewingDeb
05-18-2007, 02:24 AM
Ranter, I wonder what kind of DNA they tested if he did not rape her.

Ranter
05-18-2007, 10:51 AM
SewingDeb, they had collected strands of hair from the the shed that did not belong to Candace. Exactly where those hairs were in the shed (on her body? in her hands?) and whether they found his DNA elsewhere on her or around her, the police aren't saying. They've actually had the entire shed stored in evidence all these years.

I don't think the case is as tight as they'd like it. Finding hair in shed isn't exactly an airtight case. Presumably they've got other evidence on him as well. Another possibility is they questioned him about being in the shed and he denied it, thus catching him in a lie. I don't know that for a fact, but that's fairly standard police questioning - to let the guy paint himself into a corner with his own words.