Drew Peterson To Be On Matt Lauer AGAIN 11/19/07 WHY????

[curiositycat]

Why is this guy going on the Today Show AGAIN tomorrow as just reported by Geraldo Rivera on Fox?
What do you all think?
I think he is trying to spin this as if she was really missing and possibly with another man.
The things he has said today seem to me a deliberate attempt to make people think that he really believes she is gone with another man.
"I have lost 30 lbs" (Like he is sending her a message..."I am not as fat anymore"
"Call my attorney"
I think it's deliberate spin.
This guy is SLICK.

[haypaula]

I think it's wonderful!!! The more interviews he does, the better!!! Keep talking Drew, as you will undoubtedly further incriminate yourself with each new interview.

:clap: :clap: :clap:

I envision these interviews being played at Drew's trial just as Scott's interviews were played for his jury. Drew Peterson thinks he's smarter than the rest of us, overestimating himself, while underestimating everyone else. His arrogance will be his undoing.

[Sedona]

Looking for a link on this now, unless you have it?

[Jaded]

I'm wondering if he's not going to take his newly retained attorney with him to do some damage control. Unfortunately, words are timeless. Once they are out there you can never take them back.

[ketel0ne]

Will he be there live or are they going to play the secondary interview they got Thursday when Meridith Viera I believe inteviewed him for a tape. I thought it was for a dateline or another NBC magazine show, but maybe they are just gonna run with it.

I would love to see him live again.

[Tom'sGirl]

Looking for a link on this now, unless you have it?




Tribune staff report 7:10 PM CST, November 18, 2007 http://m1.2mdn.net/viewad/817-grey.gifhttp://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/trb.chicagotribune/news/local;tk=11587;ptype=s;slug=chi-peterson_webnov19;rg=ur;ref=websleuthscom;pos=1;sz =88x31;tile=2;ord=80345756? (http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/trb.chicagotribune/news/local;tk=11587;ptype=s;slug=chi-peterson_webnov19;rg=ur;ref=websleuthscom;pos=1;sz =88x31;tile=2;ord=80345756?)
Drew Peterson, whose fourth wife, Stacy, has been missing since Oct. 28, will make a second appearance on the "Today" show Monday morning, according to the show's producers.

Peterson, 53, will join "Today" show host Matt Lauer for a live interview during the first hour of the NBC show, which starts at 7 a.m., to answer questions about the latest developments in the case. Peterson will not be in the studio, but he will participate from an undisclosed location, joined by his attorney, Joel Brodsky, of the Chicago firm Brodsky & Odeh, said Megan Kopf, a spokeswoman for the show

http://tinyurl.com/2ak5ez

[curiositycat]

Thank you kindly for the link!:blowkiss:


Tribune staff report 7:10 PM CST, November 18, 2007 http://m1.2mdn.net/viewad/817-grey.gifhttp://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/trb.chicagotribune/news/local;tk=11587;ptype=s;slug=chi-peterson_webnov19;rg=ur;ref=websleuthscom;pos=1;sz =88x31;tile=2;ord=80345756? (http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/trb.chicagotribune/news/local;tk=11587;ptype=s;slug=chi-peterson_webnov19;rg=ur;ref=websleuthscom;pos=1;sz =88x31;tile=2;ord=80345756?)
Drew Peterson, whose fourth wife, Stacy, has been missing since Oct. 28, will make a second appearance on the "Today" show Monday morning, according to the show's producers.

Peterson, 53, will join "Today" show host Matt Lauer for a live interview during the first hour of the NBC show, which starts at 7 a.m., to answer questions about the latest developments in the case. Peterson will not be in the studio, but he will participate from an undisclosed location, joined by his attorney, Joel Brodsky, of the Chicago firm Brodsky & Odeh, said Megan Kopf, a spokeswoman for the show

http://tinyurl.com/2ak5ez

[Jaded]

Guess I'll be watching this spectacle. One thing that keeps sticking in my head from the first interview (other than the majority of the malarkey that he spewed) is his comment about speaking with the state police about Kathleen's death, and his comment he had told them the story and then corrected himself to say to he had told them what happened. It might be a reach, but story to me means "made up".

Tomorrow should be interesting.

[Mygirlsadie]

What else possibly could he say? He don't search for his missing wife he don't even mention her when he does talk to media..it's all about him. Soooo really? He hates the media so much why do all these Matt Lauer interviews?

[Taximom]

I imagine the lawyer will be talking about Baden as well as their "entertainment" claim.

It'll be feel-sorry-for-Drew time.http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/15/15_5_6.gif (http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb001_ZNxdm824YYUS)

I hope they ask why he didn't attend the vigil.

If anyone from the Today show is reading here, please leave the camera on him at all times!

[Kadie]

What else possibly could he say? He don't search for his missing wife he don't even mention her when he does talk to media..it's all about him. Soooo really? He hates the media so much why do all these Matt Lauer interviews?

I read that he loves Matt Lauer. That's why he agreed to do the first interview. Let him keep talking!

[TGIRecovered]

I think he just likes to see himself on national TV and he knows Matt won't be too tough on him. NBC doesn't care what he says as long as he keeps talking.
I don't know WHAT that new lawyer is thinking.

Susan

[Tom'sGirl]

Thank you kindly for the link!:blowkiss:

More than welcome :D

[SuziQ]

I think he just likes to see himself on national TV and he knows Matt won't be too tough on him. NBC doesn't care what he says as long as he keeps talking.
I don't know WHAT that new lawyer is thinking.

Susan

LE has got to be loving this. He's saying more to the Media than he is to them. As someone said, his arrogance will be the end of him.

[NascarMom]

I think it's wonderful!!! The more interviews he does, the better!!! Keep talking Drew, as you will undoubtedly further incriminate yourself with each new interview.

:clap: :clap: :clap:

I envision these interviews being played at Drew's trial just as Scott's interviews were played for his jury. Drew Peterson thinks he's smarter than the rest of us, overestimating himself, while underestimating everyone else. His arrogance will be his undoing.

I'm still waiting for the new girlfriend to come forward. There's GOT to be one, with his history of "overlapping females". I wonder if he trades in his car as often as his wife...

Back to the interview, WHAT ON EARTH IS HIS ATTORNEY THINKING??? Helllloooooo? And why does he need an attorney? His wife just ran off with another guy, remember?
:rolleyes:

[ThoughtFox]

I think it's wonderful!!! The more interviews he does, the better!!! Keep talking Drew, as you will undoubtedly further incriminate yourself with each new interview.

:clap: :clap: :clap:

I envision these interviews being played at Drew's trial just as Scott's interviews were played for his jury. Drew Peterson thinks he's smarter than the rest of us, overestimating himself, while underestimating everyone else. His arrogance will be his undoing.

Yes!!!!! I was thinking exactly the same thing! :woohoo:

While it may seem horrible that someone like that is given an interview, guilty people often talk, talk, talk, and seal their own fate. This guy is just like Scott - arrogant and used to talking his way out of situations. He thinks he is smarter than everyone else, but he's not.

Keep talking Drew! :boohoo:

[Vegas Bride]

The more he runs his mouth the better IMO.
He must be enjoying the attention and now that he's retired maybe thinking he'll get a new career in front of the camera.

VB

[SuziQ]

I'm still waiting for the new girlfriend to come forward. There's GOT to be one, with his history of "overlapping females". I wonder if he trades in his car as often as his wife...

Back to the interview, WHAT ON EARTH IS HIS ATTORNEY THINKING??? Helllloooooo? And why does he need an attorney? His wife just ran off with another guy, remember?
:rolleyes:

There really does have to be a GF out there. And we know she's got brown hair, big brown eyes and a pretty smile. The big question is...how old is she?

[Vegas Bride]

There really does have to be a GF out there. And we know she's got brown hair, big brown eyes and a pretty smile. The big question is...how old is she?

She'll be young enough so that his line of bull he'll be selling her will work, for a while anyway. Someone who'll be impressed with the attention and the gifts. I'd like to know where he's going when he drives off on his motorcycle?

VB

[mysteriew]

I can tell you why he is going on Lauer again. It is in his history:

He really led a double life. But what fed his ego was his line of work, how he could deceive people,"
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-peterson_16_nov16,1,5731711.story?page=2&track=rss

He thinks he can "deceive." The first interview didn't go over so well, this one will be "open, emotional and honest" or at least his version of it. Likely he will show anger at Stacy, frustration, hurt at her leaving. But honest? I don't think so. Funny that his attorney will actually be there, it's actually a little late for that. Maybe a sign he will be coached for this interview.

Anyway, I have a feeling that this interview won't be nearly as revealing as the previous one. The only thing I expect to hear that is new is that he may make allegations about a "boyfriend" and how he heard about it.

Except I don't really believe there was a "boyfriend."

[Jaded]

<snip>
Except I don't really believe there was a "boyfriend."

And neither did he for a millisecond. He couldn't remember if she told him there was one or not. OUCH! Foiled himself on national television.

[mysteriew]

And neither did he for a millisecond. He couldn't remember if she told him there was one or not. OUCH! Foiled himself on national television.


LOL, that could very well be the reason for the second interview and is why I think he will talk about the alleged "boyfriend."

[philamena]

Goodie goodie goodie!
Let the man talk. He will hopefully talk himself into a frenzy....like Scott P. did.
Bet the cops will be watching him with baited breathe. Especially since his 3rd wives death has been ruled a homicide. (Source, On The Record with Greta. Dr. Baden did NOT say Drew Peterson killed wife #3. He merely said her death was a homicide. In fact, he specifically said on ON THE RECORD on Friday night that he could not tell from the autopsy — he could only tell the manner of death......

[Jaded]

Goodie goodie goodie!
Let the man talk. He will hopefully talk himself into a frenzy....like Scott P. did.
Bet the cops will be watching him with baited breathe. Especially since his 3rd wives death has been ruled a homicide. (Source, On The Record with Greta.

He's too much of a blow hard to let his attorney lead the conversation. DP is a "media sensation" in his words, so he will no doubt run off at the mouth and we'll get some more GREAT slips.

[SuziQ]

The Today show the day after Drews interview was not flattering at all. So why is he going back? And what kind of Yahoo attorney is going to let him? And I can't wait to see what happens tomorrow!

[cheko1]

All they're going to do is attempt to humanize DP. Try to make people like him!!!!
They'll bash Dr Baden & once again ask the media to leave them alone!

His lawyer will say there is no case against DP he is a innocent man. No proof he killed KS & Stacy left on her own accord & her hubby DP loves her dearly.
Dr Baden already had him guilty on Greta.
The kids need there Mom to come home.

[mysteriew]

LOL, here we all sit with baited breath just waiting for DrewP's words. But not for the reasons that DrewP likes attention!

[Taximom]

Scheduled for Monday's show:
Faith Hill
Moon Bloodgood (actress from "Journeymen"
McCaughey Septuplets
Robert F Kennedy Jr.


Not sure how old the septuplets are but they better keep an eye on them!

Poor Faith Hill! Hope she's back to blonde hair.

Moon Bloodgood:
http://starland.com/sf-sc/sf06/images/Bloodgood-herself.jpg

NOW I see why he wants to go back on the Today show. :doh:

[WindChime]

I'm sure he will also try to do damage control regarding his statement about Stacy being spoiled and that she got what ever she wanted a boob job,braces,hair,jewerly and her hair cut and styled. I can't recall it word for word what was aired after the interview.

[Mygirlsadie]

WOW he calls that spoiled? Besides the boobs I call that daily life....:waitasec:



I'm sure he will also try to do damage control regarding his statement about Stacy being spoiled and that she got what ever she wanted a boob job,braces,hair,jewerly and her hair cut and styled. I can't recall it word for word what was aired after the interview.

[sunny]

I watched Geraldo last nite and heard him say that DP will be on Today Show again this mornin but the article below says he left Chicago last nite to be on Good Morning America so maybe he is pleading his sorry case on BOTH SHOWS???
LINK...
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=local&id=5768354
SNIP
Peterson allows reporter inside his home
November 18, 2007 - Drew Peterson, a suspect in the disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, invited an ABC7 Chicago reporter inside his home Sunday night to show what life has like for him in recent days.

No cameras were allowed inside the home during the brief visit. It is possible that the whole purpose of inviting ABC7's Sarah Schulte inside was to try to show how normal life is inside of the Bolingbrook home.

Drew Peterson took Schulte into his kitchen where all of his children and his nephew were having dinner. In brief conversation with Stacy Peterson's two children, who are 2 and a half and four, Schulte asked them when their birthdays were, and they were all very talkative.

Drew Peterson, obviously, is warming up to the media. He left his home late Sunday night and will appear on another nationally show, Good Morning America, on Monday morning.

[cheko1]

WOW he calls that spoiled? Besides the boobs I call that daily life....:waitasec:


Come on Sadie.....he says he spoiled her!!! LOL His definition of spoiled is different then most peoples. He claims he even bought her high buck jewelry. I've sat many a day wondering what the heck is high buck
jewelry? Must mean he bought her diamonds / rubies / sapphires like some husbands do. Or does it mean it never came from a bubble gum machine?

[mysteriew]

ROFLMBO!!! He the same as took the 5th!! Laur would ask a question, the attorney would answer just like a little ventriliquist. When Laur insisted on answers from Drew P, the attorney would give Drew P a hand signal. Obviously they didn't realize they were on full shot.

Though I was right about being well coached, I was wrong about any emotion. The only emotion that was shown was a hurried complaint about Dr. Baden by the attorney and the mention of entertainment. My take on it, they are really concerned about those autopsies.

I think the whole purpose of the interview was to get the complaint about FOX News on air, and so the attorney could get a little of the media attention for himself. IMO they seem to think when the attorney is talking, it isn't "entertainment."

Laur's questions were not quite as 'nice and polite' as his first interview and he did comment on the fact that Drew P wasn't answering any questions.

[Taximom]

I missed it? Drats.

Hopefully it's online soon. How was his lawyer?

[busybee]

DP always looked like he was on the verge of laughing to me. This guy is so full of himself he is just awful!:razz:

[mysteriew]

LOL, Laur would ask a question like how do you feel about this or that Drew- Mr. Peterson. The attorney would answer. How are the children- the attorney answered. When Matt commented on the fact that he would like to hear from Drew- the attorney gave Drew P a hand signal.

IMO Drew P appeared coached, he made no attempt or indication that he would answer a question until the attorney gave the hand signal. The attorney himself only gave very general answers to questions. Except for the complaint about FOX neither Drew P nor the attorney showed any emotion. The complaint about Dr. Baden and FOX was brought up by the attorney, without any questions or provocation by Matt.

[mysteriew]

Has he been on GMA? Is anybody watching?

[JerzWhim]

DP always looked like he was on the verge of laughing to me. This guy is so full of himself he is just awful!:razz:

You got that right! He does look like he is laughing/smirking over it all (but then again he is self-admittedly a jokester).

I saw the Today segment and he is definitely feeling a bit more defensive though. Gone now is the free-wheeling, face-to-face talks he has with interviewers. He will now probably always have a lawyer by his side.

He had a cheesy lawyer today, too. The guy was focusing on much of an entertainment item this whole thing is, that now the lawyer's name can be google'd with most results showing his attachment to DP, that he was in the Singapore News --- as if everything going on is secondary to the media event surrounding his client. I don't think Matt was impressed.

Of course, it took Matt to ask DP how he felt that his ex-wife may have been murdered. DP + lawyer started out by discrediting the autopsy guy as serving only an entertainment purpose.

Sigh.

[cheko1]

What a waste of time for the Today show! Hope they learnt there lesson & refuse to even look the side DP ior his lawyer is on again.

I hope LE charges him real soon. He is to cocky for his own good. He sure makes a mockery out of LE!!!!!! He is a total disgrace. If he is as innocent as his lawyer says why does he need a lawyer?????

[cheko1]

You got that right! He does look like he is laughing/smirking over it all (but then again he is self-admittedly a jokester).

I saw the Today segment and he is definitely feeling a bit more defensive though. Gone now is the free-wheeling, face-to-face talks he has with interviewers. He will now probably always have a lawyer by his side.

He had a cheesy lawyer today, too. The guy was focusing on much of an entertainment item this whole thing is, that now the lawyer's name can be google'd with most results showing his attachment to DP, that he was in the Singapore News --- as if everything going on is secondary to the media event surrounding his client. I don't think Matt was impressed.

Of course, it took Matt to ask DP how he felt that his ex-wife may have been murdered. DP + lawyer started out by discrediting the autopsy guy as serving only an entertainment purpose.

Sigh.

Yeah him & his entertainment......I'm sure Dr Baden & Greta will not be impressed with the jerk & his dog fight lawyer. The interview was a joke!I'd like to wipe that smirk right off DP's face what a azzhole he is!

[mysteriew]

Remember in the first interview how the analyst commented about Drew P tapping his foot? He didn't move this am. Didn't move at all, didn't tap his foot, didn't change the angle of his head, didn't move his hands.

[busybee]

Yeah him & his entertainment......I'm sure Dr Baden & Greta will not be impressed with the jerk & his dog fight lawyer. The interview was a joke!I'd like to wipe that smirk right off DP's face what a azzhole he is!

Don't worry I am sure that smirk will go away one day I don't think prisoners take to well to former cops and one day Bubba will make that smirk go bye bye!:)

[SuziQ]

It's only 6:30 here, so I haven't seen the interview yet. Going by what you all are saying...I can't wait till the psych experts weigh in on this one!

[SuziQ]

I wonder how well Drew's smirky, arrogant attitude is going over with the grand jury? The arrogance this guy has is astounding.

[Taximom]

I didn't see anything w/DP on GMA after 8 a.m. He may have been there earlier though.

[busybee]

I wonder how well Drew's smirky, arrogant attitude is going over with the grand jury? The arrogance this guy has is astounding.

Doesn't it just make you sick to watch him? I have never seen anyone so cold or arrogant in my life. At least SP tried to act upset, he would never win an award for his acting skills mind you but at least he tried. DP is just plain evil!:eek:

[cheko1]

I didn't see anything w/DP on GMA after 8 a.m. He may have been there earlier though.

His 1st wife is going to be on GMA.

[busybee]

Not really on subject but while looking at other forums I saw a really sick post.....some woman actually said well at least SP was hott......:slap: What is wrong with people??:bang:

[SuziQ]

Speaking of TV shows, does anyone know which one Ric is supposed to appear on? In chat the other night, IIRC, he said he is about to talk about corruption in BB on natl tv.

[cheko1]

I wonder how well Drew's smirky, arrogant attitude is going over with the grand jury? The arrogance this guy has is astounding.

He feels he is smarter then the average people & has the know how to get away with murder. I don't think they'll ever find Stacy's body & thats the reason he is smirking & laughing in LE's face.

Where is the FBI && why haven't they been called in to assist?

[cheko1]

Doesn't it just make you sick to watch him? I have never seen anyone so cold or arrogant in my life. At least SP tried to act upset, he would never win an award for his acting skills mind you but at least he tried. DP is just plain evil!:eek:

Even SP family was all over TV stating he was innocent.

I hope anyone ever convicted of anything by DP goes after the state of Ill. He is one cold / cruel SOB / way to cocky & cold to be allowed to get away with these callous cold acts. Can you imagine living with this cruel SOB???? ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

[Taximom]

His 1st wife is going to be on GMA.

This morning? I've been watching since 8 (well, listening) and haven't seen her.

[busybee]

Even SP family was all over TV stating he was innocent.

I hope anyone ever convicted of anything by DP goes after the state of Ill. He is one cold / cruel SOB / way to cocky & cold to be allowed to get away with these callous cold acts. Can you imagine living with this cruel SOB???? ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

His poor kids!!
Does anyone stand up for this guy? I have heard of noone defending him :waitasec:

[Taximom]

The interview with his first wife is here:
http://abcnews.go.com/gma scroll down to "most popular" "viewed" video title: Peterson's first wife speaks

Is this the right thread for this link?

[SuziQ]

I just watched Drew and his attorney on Today. OMG, if Drew is innocent, why are they so freaked out by Kathleens autopsy results?

[Camper]

I thought Matt was brilliant, more so than the attorney. The attorney had zero inflection he is certainly no Mark Geragos!!!

I observed their ages, appears we have Pete and a Re-Pete kinda guys here, the atty and DP.

One thing that was brought out AFTER the interview was that Stacey had started Nurses Training a few weeks before she went missing.

DP obviously has learned to keep his mouth shut, he has a 'mouthpiece now'.

The attorney brought out that MANY People drown in their bath tubs - brought forth stats on numbers of people that do drown in their tubs. HE of course did not mention all of the INJURIES to Kathleen that were defensive injuries.

Anyone know how come DP's friend was the one to find Kathleen in the tub dead????? I really want to know that??

I am tuned into GMA, but may be too late to see what may have been done already ????

.

[mysteriew]

Another 'Today' appearance

http://www.suntimes.com/news/peterson/657518,peterson111907a.article


Drew Peterson Speaks On 'Today Show'
http://www.nbc5.com/news/14636236/detail.html

[mysteriew]

Peterson responds to suspicions, but just barely
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21879476/



On TV This Morning: The Peterson Story

Sunday, Savio's father and brother say Saturday's findings are not different from the first coroner's report, even though a coroner's jury concluded her death was accidental.

"It's actually the same thing they found on the first coroner so that's why we say 'why does it bother him'…it just doesn't make sense," said Henry Savio, father of Kathleen Savio.

http://www.wbbm780.com/On-TV-This-Morning:-The-Peterson-Story/1226935

copies of the videos of the first wife and of Drew P's interview with Matt at link.

[curiositycat]

Different man today, coached by his look-alike attorney.

They can forget discrediting Dr. Baden. The man is considered one of the two best.
He doesn't need the Fox gig. I think, if it goes to trial, Dr. Baden's record of accuracy will stand for itself.
DP looked like he was on a massive amount of tranquilizers to me. It could just be that he needs to sleep. His body wasn't as expressive as usual, IMHO

[golfmom]

LOL, he wouldn't say "BOO" without permission from his attorney today.

[ISPTRAX]

Omigaw... just watched the Lauer interview... what a pair!!! Could that attorney be any more nervous???

[cheko1]

I wonder what Drew baby would of said if the question was Mr Peterson, if Stacy were to come home would you willingly give her the 2 kids? Would you be willing to pay her child support? Bet we'd of seen him go to battle then! He & his lawyer are azzes!!!

[Elphaba]

Come on Sadie.....he says he spoiled her!!! LOL His definition of spoiled is different then most peoples. He claims he even bought her high buck jewelry. I've sat many a day wondering what the heck is high buck
jewelry? Must mean he bought her diamonds / rubies / sapphires like some husbands do. Or does it mean it never came from a bubble gum machine?

He's probably referring to what is called "fine" jewelry: pieces that have been made of the best grade of metal, and/or has finer cuts and settings of natural or well cultured gemstones. Think 24k gold, De Beers diamonds, rare natural pearls, well cultured pearls like the Mikimoto Pearls... real emeralds from places like Africa and Colombia, Tiffany's 925 silver.

DP's need to say he bought her high end jewelry could be considered a telling statement... and I don't mean a "see, I gave her the good stuff, so obviously I was good to her" statement... what I am getting at: it may be a part of his MO: part of his getting, controlling and keeping tactic of having way younger women in his life, by lavishing them with expensive goodies.

Speculation is that he probably has a hidden girlfriend: well... if buying high-end jewelry is his way of wooing and getting his claws into young women, perhaps if LE follows his financial trail they may be able to pick up on expensive jewelry purchases that do not connect back to being for Stacey. Just a thought...

[DebC]

I wonder what Drew baby would of said if the question was Mr Peterson, if Stacy were to come home would you willingly give her the 2 kids? Would you be willing to pay her child support? Bet we'd of seen him go to battle then! He & his lawyer are azzes!!!

I think he would probably say "Yes", just because he knows that this will never happen. He is a pathological liar after all. IMO

[Taximom]

Did anyone catch this? ML wanted DP's gut reaction "from the heart" (gag) re: how does he feel that perhaps his 3rd wife was murdered? Attorney argued but finally let DP answer when ML asked again:
"Are you upset to hear that she may have been murdered?"

Drew responds: "Yes, I'm upset to hear something like that said. Very much so."

He's not upset that she might have been murdered! He's upset with that being "said"!!! Keep talking, Drew.

There was another question put to him asking if he's concerned for Stacy's well-being at this stage.

He responds: You're wife leaves you, you have kids at home, you're very much worried about her." NOT "I'm very much worried about her." BECAUSE HE ISN'T WORRIED ABOUT HER!!! :mad:

His attorney wouldn't let him respond to ML's question about telling Vicki that he could kill her and make it look like an accident. What innocent man wouldn't stand up and say he never said that to any woman!! Nope, Drew can't because he's said it and everyone knows it.

Oh Lord, at the end, ML practically had to force DP to say he was worried about Stacy not coming back to be the mother of his children. DP actually paused and had to think about it.

Sheesh, the attorney googled his own name. I thought this was going to be all about Drew! lol

[IdahoMom]

Why did Drew Peterson even bother showing up for this "interview"? :waitasec: :rolleyes:

Why would the attorney even mention googling his name? What a dweeb!

Drew is a freak! "Basically, I'd like for her to publicly show herself so that we can clear all this up".

[Vegas Bride]

I just watched the interview and am so angry! I wanted to reach through the screen and choke him when he said "children need a mother" I have no doubt he is the one responsible for taking 2 mothers away from their children yet he has the gall to say this... ohhh I'm so mad I could just spit! Those poor kids, the older ones have now had 2 mothers taken away from them, has he ever once thought about how his actions will affect them for the rest of their lives? Please Lord bring us a miracle and let Stacy's body be found!! Shine a bright light on everything DP has done so the world can know just who and what he is.

VB

[IdahoMom]

I thought Matt was brilliant, more so than the attorney. The attorney had zero inflection he is certainly no Mark Geragos!!!

I observed their ages, appears we have Pete and a Re-Pete kinda guys here, the atty and DP.

One thing that was brought out AFTER the interview was that Stacey had started Nurses Training a few weeks before she went missing.

DP obviously has learned to keep his mouth shut, he has a 'mouthpiece now'.

The attorney brought out that MANY People drown in their bath tubs - brought forth stats on numbers of people that do drown in their tubs. HE of course did not mention all of the INJURIES to Kathleen that were defensive injuries.

Anyone know how come DP's friend was the one to find Kathleen in the tub dead????? I really want to know that??

I am tuned into GMA, but may be too late to see what may have been done already ????

.

Matt did do a great job, but I wish he'd have brought up the defensive injuries that Kathleen sustained as she was being MURDERED.

Matt was clearly perturbed at DP's attorney.

If DP's atty googles his name and reads a bit, maybe he'll wind up here at Websleuths? :rolleyes:

[lorann]

I was prepared to be upset when I turned this on - and I was. What made me the maddest, when talking about the children he said, yes, kids need a mom (he didn't say their mom). So I guess as long as he keeps killing and replacing these moms, it's ok? Who want to be next?

[TGIRecovered]

Joel Brodsky is his name. I say we should call him Joel Brodsky every time we refer to Joel Brodsky instead of saying '"his attorney".Joel Brodsky can google all he wants.Hello Joel Brodsky ! Your client Drew Peterson needs to take a plea and tell us where Stacy is to save his innocent children from further heartache. Let them at least have the legacy that in the end, their father finally learned to tell the truth. Better to be a reformed murderer than to die a lying heartless monster. Does Drew truly want to burn in hell?You need to get him to think about this, Joel Brodsky. He's gonna die someday whether he goes to prison or not. Later, Joel Brodsky !Susan

[TGIRecovered]

Dang computer is messing with the spacing again. I really do know how to make a paragraph. I leave spaces between sentences too. What's up with that?Susan

[ISPTRAX]

Why did Drew Peterson even bother showing up for this "interview"? :waitasec: :rolleyes:

Why would the attorney even mention googling his name? What a dweeb!

Drew is a freak! "Basically, I'd like for her to publicly show herself so that we can clear all this up".

I loved how Matt was obvious about the interview going NOWHERE. He even said something to that affect "Well, I can see this is going nowhere", lol. The Attorney googled his name to make sure he let it be known that the media was blowing everthing out of proportion and how ridiculous it was that the "story" spans all the way to Singapore now. Funny how "Snott" Peterson and the media frenzy has not been brought up yet

[Taximom]

I was prepared to be upset when I turned this on - and I was. What made me the maddest, when talking about the children he said, yes, kids need a mom (he didn't say their mom). So I guess as long as he keeps killing and replacing these moms, it's ok? Who want to be next?

That's exactly what I thought when he said that! :loser:

[curiositycat]

You are right on with this comment Elphaba!!

These guys all do that. Been there and done that and now help other women who are DV victims.

If they don't kill you before you take them to court then they turn that around on you and say "She took me to the cleaners and put me in debt" In an attempt to let the judge think you were only after them for their money!

So classic DV abuser talk!




He's probably referring to what is called "fine" jewelry: pieces that have been made of the best grade of metal, and/or has finer cuts and settings of natural or well cultured gemstones. Think 24k gold, De Beers diamonds, rare natural pearls, well cultured pearls like the Mikimoto Pearls... real emeralds from places like Africa and Colombia, Tiffany's 925 silver.

DP's need to say he bought her high end jewelry could be considered a telling statement... and I don't mean a "see, I gave her the good stuff, so obviously I was good to her" statement... what I am getting at: it may be a part of his MO: part of his getting, controlling and keeping tactic of having way younger women in his life, by lavishing them with expensive goodies.

Speculation is that he probably has a hidden girlfriend: well... if buying high-end jewelry is his way of wooing and getting his claws into young women, perhaps if LE follows his financial trail they may be able to pick up on expensive jewelry purchases that do not connect back to being for Stacey. Just a thought...

[Taximom]

Dang computer is messing with the spacing again. I really do know how to make a paragraph. I leave spaces between sentences too. What's up with that?Susan

That happens with news articles I try to post sometimes. Seems like I'm editing forever!

[curiositycat]

I agree IM!

That attorney was "googling" his name and dumb enough to say that on national TV.

If that's the best DP can do for an attorney

Then he's going to :behindbar, IMHO


Why did Drew Peterson even bother showing up for this "interview"? :waitasec: :rolleyes:

Why would the attorney even mention googling his name? What a dweeb!

Drew is a freak! "Basically, I'd like for her to publicly show herself so that we can clear all this up".

[TGIRecovered]

Where is Judge Judy when we need her? Poor Nancy Grace is probably chomping at the bit. I am glad she is taking time to be with those sweet little babies, but don't you know she'd rip Drew's pathetic lies to pieces!No softball for her.Susan

[IdahoMom]

Joel Brodsky is his name. I say we should call him Joel Brodsky every time we refer to Joel Brodsky instead of saying '"his attorney".Joel Brodsky can google all he wants.Hello Joel Brodsky ! Your client Drew Peterson needs to take a plea and tell us where Stacy is to save his innocent children from further heartache. Let them at least have the legacy that in the end, their father finally learned to tell the truth. Better to be a reformed murderer than to die a lying heartless monster. Does Drew truly want to burn in hell?You need to get him to think about this, Joel Brodsky. He's gonna die someday whether he goes to prison or not. Later, Joel Brodsky !Susan

Hahaha! I was thinking we need to use Joel Brodsky's name around here more often myself!

So, Joel Brodsky, if you're reading here, welcome to Websleuths. In my humble opinion, you have an @ss for a client!

[cheko1]

This morning? I've been watching since 8 (well, listening) and haven't seen her.

I missed her too but seen her on the GMA video.....

[cheko1]

Where is Judge Judy when we need her? Poor Nancy Grace is probably chomping at the bit. I am glad she is taking time to be with those sweet little babies, but don't you know she'd rip Drew's pathetic lies to pieces!No softball for her.Susan

I'd love to see that too. Can you imagine Joel Brodsky up against Nancy? LOL She'd get him.....

[cheko1]

He's probably referring to what is called "fine" jewelry: pieces that have been made of the best grade of metal, and/or has finer cuts and settings of natural or well cultured gemstones. Think 24k gold, De Beers diamonds, rare natural pearls, well cultured pearls like the Mikimoto Pearls... real emeralds from places like Africa and Colombia, Tiffany's 925 silver.

DP's need to say he bought her high end jewelry could be considered a telling statement... and I don't mean a "see, I gave her the good stuff, so obviously I was good to her" statement... what I am getting at: it may be a part of his MO: part of his getting, controlling and keeping tactic of having way younger women in his life, by lavishing them with expensive goodies.

Speculation is that he probably has a hidden girlfriend: well... if buying high-end jewelry is his way of wooing and getting his claws into young women, perhaps if LE follows his financial trail they may be able to pick up on expensive jewelry purchases that do not connect back to being for Stacey. Just a thought...

I think what he was trying to say was he bought & paid for her.He owned her / boobs / tummy tucks / braces / high buck jewelry. Yep he gave her the world now he owns her.

I also am convinced he has a girlfriend. He probably has given her all of Stacy's high buck jewelry too.

[Vegas Bride]

I'm sure a girlfriend has been showered with gifts, that's how he got Stacy, it's been said he gave her a car, what 17 year old wouldn't be blinded with things like that.
As he said, kids need A mom so in his mind he's doing good by lining the next 1 up for them.

VB

[Lisa Too]

Remember in the first interview how the analyst commented about Drew P tapping his foot? He didn't move this am. Didn't move at all, didn't tap his foot, didn't change the angle of his head, didn't move his hands.

Yes, well, it is obvious that his attorney has coached him on keeping his "body language" in check. Body language, even eye movements, are very telling. And his attorney seems very much the drip! How ridiculous for him to appear on national tv, answering all the questions for Drew, as if he couldn't speak for himself! What a waste of the network's time and money! I'd rather they reran the Wizard of Oz! At least the cowardly lion speaks for himself!

[KOOL LOOK]

Why is this guy going on the Today Show AGAIN tomorrow as just reported by Geraldo Rivera on Fox?
What do you all think?
I think he is trying to spin this as if she was really missing and possibly with another man.
The things he has said today seem to me a deliberate attempt to make people think that he really believes she is gone with another man.
"I have lost 30 lbs" (Like he is sending her a message..."I am not as fat anymore"
"Call my attorney"
I think it's deliberate spin.
This guy is SLICK.

Because it's my Birthday, keep talking Drew. Make my day! What a pressie? I think his ego is sooooooooo big, he thinks he ranks up there in prestige as Matt Lauer, probably has been watching him for years, and it's a macho ego thing for him. To be on tv with Matt.

Which I personally don't care for Matt myself, but I think Drew thinks he's all that and he's doing something great by being on the show. It's a macho man thang. Image! Can't wait to see how dressed up he will look. First interview was advertising for a lawyer, this second interview in my opinion is advertising for a new young girl, again! Out with the old, in with the new.

[Taximom]

What's that saying...birds of a feather flock together?

Keep googling, Mr Brodsky!

IMO heh

[WindChime]

Just a heads up everyone I posted a sticky at the top of the front page of Stacy's forum. There will be NO name calling of ANYONE involved in this case.
Thank you,
WindChime

[browneyedgirl]

Because it's my Birthday, keep talking Drew. Make my day! What a pressie? I think his ego is sooooooooo big, he thinks he ranks up there in prestige as Matt Lauer, probably has been watching him for years, and it's a macho ego thing for him. To be on tv with Matt.

Which I personally don't care for Matt myself, but I think Drew thinks he's all that and he's doing something great by being on the show. It's a macho man thang. Image! Can't wait to see how dressed up he will look. First interview was advertising for a lawyer, this second interview in my opinion is advertising for a new young girl, again! Out with the old, in with the new.

Happy Birthday to you, Kool Look:HappyBday

[curiositycat]

:HappyBday


:dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance:

Because it's my Birthday, keep talking Drew. Make my day! What a pressie? I think his ego is sooooooooo big, he thinks he ranks up there in prestige as Matt Lauer, probably has been watching him for years, and it's a macho ego thing for him. To be on tv with Matt.

Which I personally don't care for Matt myself, but I think Drew thinks he's all that and he's doing something great by being on the show. It's a macho man thang. Image! Can't wait to see how dressed up he will look. First interview was advertising for a lawyer, this second interview in my opinion is advertising for a new young girl, again! Out with the old, in with the new.

[Leila]

I wanted to see the Today Show video before responding. All I can say is that Matt is an excellent interviewer, asking all the right questions, and DP has a fool for a lawyer.

Although the attorney didn't attack Dr. Baden's credentials, he did attack Dr. Baden's intention and motive for doing the autopsy. And, there seemed to be a little desperation to stick to the original "accidental" ruling in Kathleen Savio's death. Now, how are they going to respond when the ME who were hired by Will Co. to do the second autopsy on the exhumed remains of KS, come to the same conclusions at Dr. Baden?

Throughout the entire interview, it was so evident that it was a very controlled interview and DP's attorney isn't smart enough to tell his client to show a little emotion. And that's what gets me.........the complete lack of any emotion!

[Leila]

:HappyBday Kool Look! :)

[SuziQ]

From Greta's blog. VEDDY interesting.he was only suspended 3 months for this…have fun, bloggers

Lmao, Greta might have well said...rip him apart!

[curiositycat]

Any link to this blog. I went to Foxnew.com, Greta Wire and couldn't find it:confused:



Lmao, Greta might have well said...rip him apart!

[SuziQ]

Any link to this blog. I went to Foxnew.com, Greta Wire and couldn't find it:confused:

I'm hunting this down. I now don't think that came from Greta, but a commenter on her site. As soon as I find it. I'll link it.

[i.b.nora]

I'm hunting this down. I now don't think that came from Greta, but a commenter on her site. As soon as I find it. I'll link it.
Is this what you are looking for?

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2007/11/19/monday-morning-2/#comments

Comment by laura
November 19th, 2007 at 11:47 am

when you really have no more to say about the suspect…try his attorney

On May 8, 2001 the Administrator filed a one-count complaint against Respondent Joel Alan Brodsky alleging that he forged a signature on bank forms in order to withdraw client funds from the bank, falsely endorsed a cashier’s check issued by the bank, failed to deposit the proceeds in a separate identifiable trust account and kept the funds for his own purposes. He was charged with the following misconduct:

conversion;

failure to deposit and maintain client funds in a separate identifiable trust account in violation of Rule 1.15(a) and 1.15(d) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct;

committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer by committing the

PAGE 2:

crime of forgery in violation of 720 ILCS 5/17-3 in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(3);

conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(4);

conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice or bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771.

he was only suspended 3 months for this…have fun, bloggers

[SuziQ]

Thank you Nora!

[curiositycat]

Thank you kindly!

[Schmerty_Jones]

Thank you! Good to know!:rolleyes:

[Jaded]

Info re: DP's attorney:

M.R.19007
-
In re: Joel Alan Brodsky. Disciplinary Commission.
The petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission for leave to file exceptions to the report and recommendation of the Review Board is denied. Respondent Joel Alan Brodsky is suspended from the practice of law for three (3) months, as recommended by the Review Board. Respondent Joel Alan Brodsky shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension. Order entered by the Court.

Source: http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/announce/2004/Pdf/Ann0120.pdf

[Jaded]

Is this what you are looking for?

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2007/11/19/monday-morning-2/#comments

Comment by laura
November 19th, 2007 at 11:47 am

when you really have no more to say about the suspect…try his attorney

On May 8, 2001 the Administrator filed a one-count complaint against Respondent Joel Alan Brodsky alleging that he forged a signature on bank forms in order to withdraw client funds from the bank, falsely endorsed a cashier’s check issued by the bank, failed to deposit the proceeds in a separate identifiable trust account and kept the funds for his own purposes. He was charged with the following misconduct:

conversion;

failure to deposit and maintain client funds in a separate identifiable trust account in violation of Rule 1.15(a) and 1.15(d) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct;

committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer by committing the

PAGE 2:

crime of forgery in violation of 720 ILCS 5/17-3 in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(3);

conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation in violation of Rule 8.4(a)(4);

conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice or bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute in violation of Supreme Court Rule 771.

he was only suspended 3 months for this…have fun, bloggers


Thanks for reposting this. I was looking for it earlier, and apparently this was deleted by admin. *shrugs* I must have been posting while you were, IB...I did provide the IL state source FWIW.

JOEL ALAN BRODSKY, Wilmette: Brodsky, who was licensed in 1982, was suspended for three months. In order to close a probate estate's bank account and receive the funds, he signed the dead executor's name to bank documents needed to release the funds.
Source: http://www.isba.org/association/042h.htm

[Camper]

I wanted to see the Today Show video before responding. All I can say is that Matt is an excellent interviewer, asking all the right questions, and DP has a fool for a lawyer.

Although the attorney didn't attack Dr. Baden's credentials, he did attack Dr. Baden's intention and motive for doing the autopsy. And, there seemed to be a little desperation to stick to the original "accidental" ruling in Kathleen Savio's death. Now, how are they going to respond when the ME who were hired by Will Co. to do the second autopsy on the exhumed remains of KS, come to the same conclusions at Dr. Baden?

Throughout the entire interview, it was so evident that it was a very controlled interview and DP's attorney isn't smart enough to tell his client to show a little emotion. And that's what gets me.........the complete lack of any emotion!



--->>>Well his attorney could not help him with emotion because he did not show any either.

To our dear moderator, MAY we feel free to call DP's attorney J.A.B. since those are his initials er uh, could we just use JAB without the periods ?, it does seem appropriate.

.

[chicoliving]

Sure JAB is fine as is DP or any other principles initials. I prefer Drew P myself :)

[Taximom]

ROFL I just got it. Drew P. I had to say it fast. LOL

[mysteriew]

It has been my personal mantra every morning for the last week.

DrewP, DrewP, DrewP
When you show your face today, what will we see?

DrewP, DrewP, DrewP
Is today the day they will arrest thee?

Say it fast.

[SuziQ]

Has this been posted yet? Peterson/Brodsky interview with the Today Show:

http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=...b-b67547eec529 (http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-US&brand=msnbc&vid=a9b3497d-00c5-4529-99eb-b67547eec529)

[mysteriew]

INTERVIEW A 'COMPLETE DISASTER'
SPOKESWOMAN: DREW PETERSON'S TELEVISION APPEARANCES UPSET FAMILY OF HIS MISSING WIFE

http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/658571,4_1_JO20_MISSING_S1.article

I'm not shouting, that is the headline