View Full Version : Brooke Bennett, 12 years old Randolph VT #14
jnodrog
07-08-2008, 01:47 PM
I'm sure he knew her work habits. But I really think he took her somewhere else.
or maybe whoever posted earlier that Denise was out of town.
maybe the date this was supposed to happen had to change because Denises trip out of town was changed by her employer.
That would cause them to postpone the kidnapping for a few days etc...
Allen
Medea
07-08-2008, 01:48 PM
i don't either, but it's possible they were "wannabe sophisticated"......just sickening....i don't know how many times to say that word...sickening!...i must say though, i'm glad all these folks are, for the most part, stuck on stupid....
My theory is that Jacques ability to control AR and brainwash her fed into his delusions of being a master criminal...he could have done a couple of google searches and found out that the fake messages would track back to him if the police ever checked. This plot was destined to fail from the beginning.
DianeB
07-08-2008, 01:49 PM
He's been abusing AR for 5 years in the house he shares with Denise, she has found lubricant, porn, sex toys and her daughter in a towel upstairs with Jacques and a dry shower...and none of this apparently registered with her, so why would Jacques worry about her?He appears to have been more concerned about Brooke's mother and sister than he was about his wife, and frankly I can see why if she bought the story that her daughter was holding sex toys "for a friend". I would love to have seen the look on the investigators' faces when she came out with that one.
cheko1
07-08-2008, 01:50 PM
Yeah, I didn't spend a lot of time pouring over those communications since in the affidavits FBI said it was Gagnon & Jacques's computers and phone record communications at the time. I think it was all hoaxed by Gagnon & Jacques.
Except maybe for the one msg from JUVENILE 1. But there again she was so 100% totally lied to about everything for her entire life (according to affidavits) she was living in a realm that never existed.
Juvie 1 was lied to from the time she was 9 yrs old.
She is now 14 yrs old does anyone know her birth date? When she'd be 15?
I understand she was lied to for 5 yrs. / I also understand the mental abuse she was under. But at what age would she become an accomplice? I don't buy the fact she just did what she was told to do by MJ & others & that Breckenridge was a government organization.
She was having sex with MJ / her boyfriend / & apparently whoever else she was told to have sex with. I find this hard to believe, am I the only one?
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 01:50 PM
Hi Chica - Thanks for the info, I was trying to piece this all together.
As far as Denise goes is I were "her" and had NO prior knowledge of my husband sexually abusing my daughter and found out he had been for 5 years and sexually abused & KILLED my niece.....you wouldn't see me standing by the POS in a court room....BUT you wold hear my sreaming from my lungs I want the harshest punishment possilbe and I didn't know and had no involvement what so ever.
I think she knew WAYYYYYY more and it will come out soon......
MN what a great place :-)
I'm not sure she was there to support Jacques.
Adalena935
07-08-2008, 01:51 PM
Seems to me that you can't have it both ways...
Some seem to think that there is some huge child porn operation that has been going on for years, including filming, sale, distribution, ties to russian porn industry, etc..
However, the ineptitude with regard to computers/internet of the part of these guys is pretty staggering:
Logging in to someone else's myspace account from a public library (and/or from your home/work computer)?!?
Telling LE "Oh yeah, by the way, I *did* have child porn, but it's gone now." Hello?!? why even mention it if he thought that it had been "disposed of"?
Even if these guys were involved in just VIEWING/downloading child porn for any length of time, you would think that they would have to know about IP address anonymizers (as mentioned in these threads), etc, etc. I would expect that if they wanted to distribute this stuff, their potential "customers" would try to make sure that they at least knew what they were doing.
Certainly doesn't sound like "big time", to me.
I think a lot of child porn criminals are unsophisticated. I don't think it's a matter of having it one way or the other. I think there's a wider grey area to be considered.
How sophisticated does a man have to be to rape a 6 yr old, take pictures, be on news groups, use codes to sell the pictures he took of his home manufactured child porn? Then several thousand others do the same and sell it around to the news group pals using pre-arranged codes to belong to the news groups in the first place for this purpose; and him buy theirs?
I was googling last nite and reading on how the FBI and International law enforcement agencies track these people and it was interesting. But no one has to be particularly bright to belong to one of these news groups on the net or go undetected for years.
It took a child's murder.
becca
07-08-2008, 01:54 PM
My theory is that Jacques ability to control AR and brainwash her fed into his delusions of being a master criminal...he could have done a couple of google searches and found out that the fake messages would track back to him if the police ever checked. This plot was destined to fail from the beginning.
Just because they were stuck on stupid doesn't mean others weren't just as stupid. Stupid flocks together when it comes to these POS. AR said she was with other men besides MJ... we know about RG so who else was that stupid in that little town? She said she was drugged... do we believe that they didn't know about GHB? Do we really believe that only two men were involved ?
Stupid has a way of attracting others that are just as stupid..... there are more and they will go down on a wide range of charges from sex with a minor, to kiddie porn ... owning, distributing it ....
DianeB
07-08-2008, 01:54 PM
But at what age would she become an accomplice?
Stockholm syndrome? She seems to have been identifying with her tormentor.
I'm not sure she was there to support Jacques. Nor am I.
mercibeaucoup
07-08-2008, 01:55 PM
I've been scratching my head about something since we first heard it and it really bugs me ....
Does anyone have a reasonable explanation as to *WHY* Gagnon EVER admitted to LE, in the first place, that he possessed (any) Porn?? :confused:
I feel that he was trying to throw LE off by saying he had porn and it was in a (never existing, IMO) safe that had been thrown away somewhere in San Antonio... knowing that he has no more child porn anywhere in the state of Texas, and that without evidence they can't prosecute him for child porn no matter what he says.
SeriouslySearching
07-08-2008, 01:57 PM
Maybe Jacques had photos of their encounter with AR the previous year?I think so. I think they both did.
Gevalia's (french name i can't type, lol)....i always empty the packages & put it in a 'tight lock' canister, after opening....i love this stuff...strong, but soooo good.....cheers!
:coffeecup: :toast:
Me too! Right into the "Lock n Lock" it goes!
SailorMoon
07-08-2008, 01:59 PM
Afternoon all. I'm reading and trying to keep up..just not posting much. Appreciated the pics the IMBY posted. Question and it may have been covered already. Saw a uhaul truck in the rental house drive. What's up with that?
I think this is the tip of the iceburg. People are probably so creeped out...I mean..what else could a person say? Have we determined if AR is in foster care or away from the MOM who was supposed to be raising and taking care of her??
I was in the area again today there are a few little logging type roads that head up into the woods on the east side of Crocker Rd. This sugarhouse could be up one of those.
The location of the old shack that IMBY had a picture of doesnt look all that disturbed.
What is thought to be a screen on the roof, looks to me like a porch roof skylight thing, really hard to tell though.
Also there was a person walking the woodline behind the MJ home, and 2 vehicles in the old farmhouse yard, the black one doesnt look like its moved from when i was there saturday, the other a silver vehicle.
Allen
philamena
07-08-2008, 02:00 PM
I'm not sure she was there to support Jacques.
Why not? She's married to him! :steamed:
LI_Mom
07-08-2008, 02:00 PM
I think a lot of child porn criminals are unsophisticated. I don't think it's a matter of having it one way or the other. I think there's a wider grey area to be considered.
How sophisticated does a man have to be to rape a 6 yr old, take pictures, be on news groups, use codes to sell the pictures he took of his home manufactured child porn? Then several thousand others do the same and sell it around to the news group pals using pre-arranged codes to belong to the news groups in the first place for this purpose; and him buy theirs?
I was googling last nite and reading on how the FBI and International law enforcement agencies track these people and it was interesting. But no one has to be particularly bright to belong to one of these news groups on the net or go undetected for years.
It took a child's murder.
It's probably not so much that they're stupid but that their 'addiction' is so out of control that they take greater & greater risks.
Carrington
07-08-2008, 02:01 PM
I would think child porn sites work the same as regular porn sites, only more secret.
I imagine it would be like getting into any other pay site. Legit E-mail address and credit card.
I have never tried to find child porn sites. I guess you would start by changing your security level to none.
IMO
edgeofnight
07-08-2008, 02:03 PM
Thank-you VTNance for the defintions of skittles. I am more naive than I thought I thought it was the candy called skittles. The last name of Gagnon is a very common name where I grew up in Wisconsin, pronounced differently. Must admit Denise is prettier than I thought she would be. I really think also that she knew what was going on in her house maybe not everything, but at least a good amount. I am wondering if she will show up at the funeral, with fake crying and concern.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 02:04 PM
I was in the area again today there are a few little logging type roads that head up into the woods on the east side of Crocker Rd. This sugarhouse could be up one of those.
The location of the old shack that IMBY had a picture of doesnt look all that disturbed.
What is thought to be a screen on the roof, looks to me like a porch roof skylight thing, really hard to tell though.
Also there was a person walking the woodline behind the MJ home, and 2 vehicles in the old farmhouse yard, the black one doesnt look like its moved from when i was there saturday, the other a silver vehicle.
Allen
interesting....thank for this info:)
i'm going to check out those other pics again....
Carrington
07-08-2008, 02:04 PM
I'm not sure she was there to support Jacques.
I would have told the press that, and removed all doubt. If that was the case. :eek:
DianeB
07-08-2008, 02:04 PM
I think so. I think they both did.
So who was holding the camera?
CarpeDiem
07-08-2008, 02:04 PM
Juvie 1 was lied to from the time she was 9 yrs old.
She is now 14 yrs old does anyone know her birth date? When she'd be 15?
In October, it's in the documents.
gigi2009
07-08-2008, 02:05 PM
I would think child porn sites work the same as regular porn sites, only more secret.
I imagine it would be like getting into any other pay site. Legit E-mail address and credit card.
I have never tried to find child porn sites. I guess you would start by changing your security level to none.
IMO
Child porn is extremely valuable to these people. They file share is how they pass it along to each other. There are thousands of file sharing sites. Very little cost to become a member. Most of the child porn files are coded/named certain ways in order to be recognized and downloaded. They also trade files through web based emails. The more you share, the more you receive.
LI_Mom
07-08-2008, 02:05 PM
Afternoon all. I'm reading and trying to keep up..just not posting much. Appreciated the pics the IMBY posted. Question and it may have been covered already. Saw a uhaul truck in the rental house drive. What's up with that?
I think this is the tip of the iceburg. People are probably so creeped out...I mean..what else could a person say? Have we determined if AR is in foster care or away from the MOM who was supposed to be raising and taking care of her??
I don't know who that house belongs to.... it's possible they had things there & wanted to remove it before it's stolen by curiosity seekers?
None of the pics seemed to be an ongoing crime scene.
There hasn't been any news about ANY of the minors (AR, BF, siblings of Brooke or AR) as far as I know.
angelwngs
07-08-2008, 02:06 PM
snip~He could have refused to help Jacques and then destroyed all of his porn. How then could Jacques have harmed him? It would only be the word of a child rapist and killer againt his. His porn and photos of AR would be gone. AR is already pretty far gone...he could have denied it.~snip
There could be video or photographic evidence of him with AR in MJ's possession.
LI_Mom
07-08-2008, 02:06 PM
So who was holding the camera?
Could have been a tripod.
VTNance
07-08-2008, 02:07 PM
I think 'Sam' was intended to be someone who attended a school somewhere in the area but wasn't necessarily from there. The fake 'skittlemeup' email says "I hate that I won't see u til ur classes start again in the fall", which makes me think he was supposed to be older, maybe in college?
That's a good point, there is a small college, Vermont Technical College, in Randolph Center. They could have been trying to make it seem like a student from the college was involved, just to further complicate the issue. The planted semen may never have been intended to be traced to Juve2; merely to deflect suspicion from MJ, because what were they going to do, DNA test every male in the town? If Juve2 would not have had any other reason to come under suspicion...his DNA only serves to throw LE off the track from MJ.
But I think the ruses set up in the MySpace page were different from the ruses used on Brooke. The "skittlemeup" message was intended to be read by LE and others, not Brooke.
I think "Sam" refers to a local boy that Brooke may have liked, someone from school or a nearby school,... maybe a friend of Juve2. It sounded to me like they thought that the mention of "Sam" was really going to spark a response in Brooke.... that he was a known quantity. If so, he may have no idea they were using his name as a lure.
gigi2009
07-08-2008, 02:07 PM
Lots of the laptops also have web cams built in. The lens is so small you, miss it if you weren't looking. A laptop can be sitting on the desk open and you'd have no idea you were being filmed or broadcast.
SeriouslySearching
07-08-2008, 02:07 PM
So who was holding the camera?Tripod or webcam...take your pick.
cheko1
07-08-2008, 02:08 PM
In October, it's in the documents.
Thank you!
I've read them several times but must of over looked that.
murdershewrote
07-08-2008, 02:08 PM
from Court TV website...
Nolan said Brooke's death was a homicide, but he didn't say how she was killed. No one has been charged with her death. State police say it could take eight weeks before autopsy results are available.
so at least her death has officially been ruled a homocide...gosh, 8 weeks seems a long time for autopsy results. But I know to take that long I guess they would be waiting for tox results, I wonder if she was drugged? I'm sure they want to get every bit of information they can so they can throw the book at these monsters.
petra
07-08-2008, 02:09 PM
Gevalia's (french name i can't type, lol)....i always empty the packages & put it in a 'tight lock' canister, after opening....i love this stuff...strong, but soooo good.....cheers!
O/T...gevalia's is svenska...swedish, now owned by kraft...just needed to add as a matter of national pride!:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gevalia
cheko1
07-08-2008, 02:10 PM
Is any of our posters from Vermont going to the visitation or funeral?
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 02:14 PM
Why not? She's married to him! :steamed:
If my husband was arrested for such a thing...I woudn't be in court to support him. I might go so I could hear all the charges against him.
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 02:15 PM
It's probably not so much that they're stupid but that their 'addiction' is so out of control that they take greater & greater risks.
I agree.
Cornflower
07-08-2008, 02:16 PM
O/T...gevalia's is svenska...swedish, now owned by kraft...just needed to add as a matter of national pride!:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gevalia
OT continues: I was just about to correct that too :)
cheko1
07-08-2008, 02:17 PM
If my husband was arrested for such a thing...I woudn't be in court to support him. I might go so I could hear all the charges against him.
I'd make sure the media was WELL AWARE of the fact divorce papers was filed & he was soon to be an EX. :furious:
Medea
07-08-2008, 02:17 PM
If my husband was arrested for such a thing...I woudn't be in court to support him. I might go so I could hear all the charges against him.
I don't see anything that Denise could say publicly that would help her.
If she says she 'had no idea' about Jacques and her daughter, nobody will believe her. The smartest thing she can do is keep her mouth shut.
I know a couple local ppl that only live down the road have said they think shes involved.
Allen
That is such an incredibly disturbing thought -- I've been trying (really hard) to give her the benefit of the doubt thus far. Mainly because I just don't want to believe it. I don't want to believe a mother could just turn her head and allow her own flesh and blood to be sexually abused and raped!
In trying to give her that benefit, it crossed my mind that perhaps these sisters, Denise and Cassandra, were raised under similar circumstances of extreme sexual perversion, to the point of thinking it's only natural. Gawd, could this be possible?
Thanks for your local input, Allen, regarding this and the info about Denise's workplace being so close to home.
cheko1
07-08-2008, 02:18 PM
I don't see anything that Denise could say publicly that would help her.
If she says she 'had no idea' about Jacques and her daughter, nobody will believe her. The smartest thing she can do is keep her mouth shut.
We all know she isn't very smart......I've been waiting for her to explode.
petra
07-08-2008, 02:19 PM
I think a lot of child porn criminals are unsophisticated. I don't think it's a matter of having it one way or the other. I think there's a wider grey area to be considered.
How sophisticated does a man have to be to rape a 6 yr old, take pictures, be on news groups, use codes to sell the pictures he took of his home manufactured child porn? Then several thousand others do the same and sell it around to the news group pals using pre-arranged codes to belong to the news groups in the first place for this purpose; and him buy theirs?
I was googling last nite and reading on how the FBI and International law enforcement agencies track these people and it was interesting. But no one has to be particularly bright to belong to one of these news groups on the net or go undetected for years.
It took a child's murder.
:furious: Yes, and more than just one child's muder or critical injury on international scale. One major problem, imo, is that althought interpol and other agencies are aware of handfuls of pedeos, they seem to wait üntil they can catch 'the big fish''. That is one reason this goes on for years, or way too long until they do a wide sweep of pedeo ring arrests.
Amster
07-08-2008, 02:20 PM
Supposedly, Brooke was in the store with MJ to set up the phony story she was going to tell her mom....meet a friend, go visit friends relative in the hosp., etc. Again, supposedly, MJ asked the clerk if Brookes friend didn't show up, could Brooke use the phone to call someone to come and pick her up. So....they leave the store and go their separate ways. MJ and A.R. could have circled the block and picked her up. Makes more sense than Brooke wandering around town. Unless, MJ told her to "be seen". But why? Did Brooke even know about the made up story to mom? Personally, I'm nowhere near believing everything A.R. has said about that morning and day.
Also, RG said he had porn of girls as young as 5 years old....where did the info come from about "5 years worth of Russian porn"?
I'm starting to believe that Denise was on a business trip. That would be a reason for MJ to be home that day.....to be with the kids. ick. Cassandra said Brooke wasn't allowed to be at MJs home without another adult being there. Maybe Denise left that morning, early, and Brooke was supposed to go home. But, she wanted to stay for the "party"?
This is too confusing....
petra
07-08-2008, 02:21 PM
OT continues: I was just about to correct that too :)
Tack eller takk...:)
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 02:22 PM
I'd make sure the media was WELL AWARE of the fact divorce papers was filed & he was soon to be an EX. :furious:
Oh, I would certainly file for divorce...not sure about alerting the media. In our Community we had three teenagers killed in a car accident. In our Community everyone knows everyone or they are kin to them. The media drove us crazy even setting up outside the funerals. So I'm not fond of the media.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 02:24 PM
I feel that he was trying to throw LE off by saying he had porn and it was in a (never existing, IMO) safe that had been thrown away somewhere in San Antonio... knowing that he has no more child porn anywhere in the state of Texas, and that without evidence they can't prosecute him for child porn no matter what he says.
hmmm, & that KG in TX went along with this?...i think he admitted that RG called him & told him to get rid of the safe....& that he threw it in a dumpster.....why get KG involved? (confused)
CarpeDiem
07-08-2008, 02:24 PM
If my husband was arrested for such a thing...I woudn't be in court to support him. I might go so I could hear all the charges against him.
Me too. Many people also go to court to face the one(s) that caused such harm, to make the perp uncomfortable, because they feel a duty to the victim to be there. More telling than wether she was at court, would perhaps be where she sat. On his side or the other?
petra
07-08-2008, 02:25 PM
Is any of our posters from Vermont going to the visitation or funeral?
I will be with Brooke in spirit, that is for sure. I will be lighting a candle in honour of her short and sweet life.
Chica
07-08-2008, 02:26 PM
That is such an incredibly disturbing thought -- I've been trying (really hard) to give her the benefit of the doubt thus far. Mainly because I just don't want to believe it. I don't want to believe a mother could just turn her head and allow her own flesh and blood to be sexually abused and raped!
In trying to give her that benefit, it crossed my mind that perhaps these sisters, Denise and Cassandra, were raised under similar circumstances of extreme sexual perversion, to the point of thinking it's only natural. Gawd, could this be possible?
Thanks for your local input, Allen, regarding this and the info about Denise's workplace being so close to home.
I have to add my two cents. My personal feeling (and hope!) is that the occurrance with the towel and device found in AR's bedroom happened VERY recently, and THAT is the reason she has been talking to AR's father and scheduling counseling sessions for her and AR. The fact that MJ allegedly told AR (as a third person, of course) that he 'heard around town' that Denise had been talking about divorcing MJ also alludes to the strong possibility that there was big trouble in the marriage - and I am hopeful that she was seriously talking divorce. Just imo, of course!
Adalena935
07-08-2008, 02:26 PM
Juvie 1 was lied to from the time she was 9 yrs old.
She is now 14 yrs old does anyone know her birth date? When she'd be 15?
I understand she was lied to for 5 yrs. / I also understand the mental abuse she was under. But at what age would she become an accomplice? I don't buy the fact she just did what she was told to do by MJ & others & that Breckenridge was a government organization.
She was having sex with MJ / her boyfriend / & apparently whoever else she was told to have sex with. I find this hard to believe, am I the only one?
Oh well I referenced the affidavits 2X's in my post. U.S. codes (laws) are named in the affidavits.
I understand you disagree with what laws say is adult age. According to existing law though no one under age 18 can consent to sex, period. The affidavits say she doesn't remember a time when she wasn't sexually assaulted (raped).
She told authorities in those affidavits she was threatened with death and the death of her Mother if she failed to comply. Adults calling sexual assault of children under threat of death; "..having sex.." is a part of the problem of chlid rape and porn manufacturing and distribution in my opinion. Also music to pedophile's ears. There are groups who purport that agressively and I will never subscribe to it. We are a nation of laws and our laws are in place for a reason. We have collectively as a society agreed this is how we shall live.
Your representatives are there as public servants. You shoud petition them for adult age to be lowered to your liking for sexual gratification purposes of sick-minded violent men who threaten children with death if that's what you subscribe to. It would have no bearing on this case even if you did happen to succeed.
http://blackpearl.wcax.com/documents/Gagnon_affidavit.pdf (http://blackpearl.wcax.com/documents/Gagnon_affidavit.pdf)
Gagnon affidavit
http://blackpearl.wcax.com/documents/Jacques_affidavit.pdf (http://blackpearl.wcax.com/documents/Jacques_affidavit.pdf)
Jacques affidavit
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=5300619&page=1 (http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=5300619&page=1)
Federal prosecutors allege that Jacques used a pair of online identities to manipulate his young accomplice into thinking she was working with several men who were planning to initiate Bennett into a secret sex training program called "Breckenridge." , The unnamed girl, who is a minor
http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/ceos/...guide_porn.html (http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/ceos/citizensguide_porn.html)
It is irrelevant that the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state might be lower than 18.
Close, "stuck on stoopid" .... lol
I can't tell you how many times since this case started unfolding that I hear ol' Ted Williams repeating that phrase. ;)
petra
07-08-2008, 02:29 PM
That is such an incredibly disturbing thought -- I've been trying (really hard) to give her the benefit of the doubt thus far. Mainly because I just don't want to believe it. I don't want to believe a mother could just turn her head and allow her own flesh and blood to be sexually abused and raped!
In trying to give her that benefit, it crossed my mind that perhaps these sisters, Denise and Cassandra, were raised under similar circumstances of extreme sexual perversion, to the point of thinking it's only natural. Gawd, could this be possible?
Thanks for your local input, Allen, regarding this and the info about Denise's workplace being so close to home.
Same here.
And thanks to all the locals for all their input and great pictures.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 02:32 PM
I have to add my two cents. My personal feeling (and hope!) is that the occurrance with the towel and device found in AR's bedroom happened VERY recently, and THAT is the reason she has been talking to AR's father and scheduling counseling sessions for her and AR. The fact that MJ allegedly told AR (as a third person, of course) that he 'heard around town' that Denise had been talking about divorcing MJ also alludes to the strong possibility that there was big trouble in the marriage - and I am hopeful that she was seriously talking divorce. Just imo, of course!
ya know, i noticed that also, while reading last night....:waitasec:
..glad you brought that up
SailorMoon
07-08-2008, 02:32 PM
You're not kidding. My kids always get me doing something stupid and I forget its there all the time.
Lots of the laptops also have web cams built in. The lens is so small you, miss it if you weren't looking. A laptop can be sitting on the desk open and you'd have no idea you were being filmed or broadcast.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 02:33 PM
Close, "stuck on stoopid" .... lol
I can't tell you how many times since this case started unfolding that I hear ol' Ted Williams repeating that phrase. ;)
:p
.
Adalena935
07-08-2008, 02:35 PM
Supposedly, Brooke was in the store with MJ to set up the phony story she was going to tell her mom....meet a friend, go visit friends relative in the hosp., etc. Again, supposedly, MJ asked the clerk if Brookes friend didn't show up, could Brooke use the phone to call someone to come and pick her up. So....they leave the store and go their separate ways. MJ and A.R. could have circled the block and picked her up. Makes more sense than Brooke wandering around town. Unless, MJ told her to "be seen". But why? Did Brooke even know about the made up story to mom? Personally, I'm nowhere near believing everything A.R. has said about that morning and day.
Also, RG said he had porn of girls as young as 5 years old....where did the info come from about "5 years worth of Russian porn"?
http://blackpearl.wcax.com/documents/Gagnon_affidavit.pdf (http://blackpearl.wcax.com/documents/Gagnon_affidavit.pdf)
Gagnon affidavit
http://blackpearl.wcax.com/documents/Jacques_affidavit.pdf (http://blackpearl.wcax.com/documents/Jacques_affidavit.pdf)
Jacques affidavit
I'm starting to believe that Denise was on a business trip. That would be a reason for MJ to be home that day.....to be with the kids. ick. Cassandra said Brooke wasn't allowed to be at MJs home without another adult being there. Maybe Denise left that morning, early, and Brooke was supposed to go home. But, she wanted to stay for the "party"?
This is too confusing....
close_enough
07-08-2008, 02:36 PM
He appears to have been more concerned about Brooke's mother and sister than he was about his wife, and frankly I can see why if she bought the story that her daughter was holding sex toys "for a friend". I would love to have seen the look on the investigators' faces when she came out with that one.
me toooooo...
CarpeDiem
07-08-2008, 02:38 PM
I have to add my two cents. My personal feeling (and hope!) is that the occurrance with the towel and device found in AR's bedroom happened VERY recently, and THAT is the reason she has been talking to AR's father and scheduling counseling sessions for her and AR. The fact that MJ allegedly told AR (as a third person, of course) that he 'heard around town' that Denise had been talking about divorcing MJ also alludes to the strong possibility that there was big trouble in the marriage - and I am hopeful that she was seriously talking divorce. Just imo, of course!
That whole scenario with the Mom talking to the real Dad, IMO, is a LIE. He tells her in the email not to tell or let on to the Mom that she knows about said contact with "FATHER" because it will cause trouble or a fight and the Mom would find a way to blame the stepdad(dad) if she did. Much of that long paragraph also puts down the Mom in various ways, and he says she has nothing to complain about, etc., etc. The whole thing was meant to play with AR's mind again and make her resent or dislike her Mom, to cause distance and problems in that relationship. AR replies to the crap that she would kill her Mom if she left the stepdad.
(above emails referenced starting on Page 7 of Adnoids link, http://www.websleuths.com/adnoid/bennett/BT11210673.pdf)
close_enough
07-08-2008, 02:38 PM
Just because they were stuck on stupid doesn't mean others weren't just as stupid. Stupid flocks together when it comes to these POS. AR said she was with other men besides MJ... we know about RG so who else was that stupid in that little town? She said she was drugged... do we believe that they didn't know about GHB? Do we really believe that only two men were involved ?
Stupid has a way of attracting others that are just as stupid..... there are more and they will go down on a wide range of charges from sex with a minor, to kiddie porn ... owning, distributing it ....
good point, becca...
philamena
07-08-2008, 02:42 PM
If my husband was arrested for such a thing...I woudn't be in court to support him. I might go so I could hear all the charges against him.
MCDRAW,
Me too. I'd be there to hear the charges.
I definitely wouldn't go to support him. :mad:
Honestly, I would be ashamed for people to know he was my husband.
Something tells me Denise isn't ignorant to the sex ring.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 02:46 PM
It's probably not so much that they're stupid but that their 'addiction' is so out of control that they take greater & greater risks.
yep, another good point made...
VTNance
07-08-2008, 02:46 PM
MCDRAW,
Me too. I'd be there to hear the charges.
I definitely wouldn't go to support him. :mad:
Honestly, I would be ashamed for people to know he was my husband.
Something tells me Denise isn't ignorant to the sex ring.
IF there are bigger players involved in this, AND she knew what was going on, it makes more sense for her to 'stand by her man' and show her support, because otherwise she may face retribution?
IMO, she WAS involved simply by the fact of allowing children to be around that man. Even if the towel incident happened only a few weeks previous, she should have kicked him out, or packed herself and the kids up and left.... IMO!!!!
Amster
07-08-2008, 02:48 PM
Denise needs to deal with the fact that MJ married her to gain access to her daughter....I wonder what part of "registered sex offender" she didn't understand?
Adalena935
07-08-2008, 02:51 PM
I don't know. I still can't see *why* when he was contacted by LE that he would spill his guts about having 5 years worth of Russian child porn on his computer and immediately implicate himself, when he had no prior record. I mean he could have just said, I was doing my ex-bil a favor, trying to change some dates on my step daughter's my space account. And why was he so explicit about the type of porn?
UNless, for some reason, RG knows IF he doesn't implicate himself and get himself arrested and incarcerated into protective custody of sorts, he's going to be one big fat dead duck.
KWIM?
I don't know what to say outside what I've already said I'm guessing the reason is.
He was already implicated in a child's murder with a live child saying the killer and he had sexually assaulted her under threat of death of she and her mother. That carries the death penalty by federal law.
I think he was trying to cop a plea with the investigators to escape state execution. They already had the goods on him and he was gonna die anyway at hands of the state. I don't think he was afraid of the skinny weasel Jacques. I have guns in my home for self-protection. I know what sporting chance I'd give Jacques and I'm just a lil' old lady 100#s.
A life sentence in federal prison and possibly state execution by the feds is a bit much just because you feared a skinny weasel the likes of MJ in my opinion. That's just how I assess the situation though for what it's worth.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 02:52 PM
O/T...gevalia's is svenska...swedish, now owned by kraft...just needed to add as a matter of national pride!:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gevalia
hi petra:Banane19:
hope you're doing good....
http://www.gevalia.com/Gevalia/catalog/product_detail.aspx?product_id=209
this is the flavor i was talking about....lol, i couldn't spell it..
(i love swedish meatballs:))
DianeB
07-08-2008, 02:52 PM
I'm almost afraid to ask... doesn't AR have a younger stepsister? How old is she?
Medea
07-08-2008, 02:53 PM
IF there are bigger players involved in this, AND she knew what was going on, it makes more sense for her to 'stand by her man' and show her support, because otherwise she may face retribution?
IMO, she WAS involved simply by the fact of allowing children to be around that man. Even if the towel incident happened only a few weeks previous, she should have kicked him out, or packed herself and the kids up and left.... IMO!!!!
She should have packed her kids up when he went to prison for aggravated rape and kidnapping. End of story.
Adalena935
07-08-2008, 02:54 PM
Denise needs to deal with the fact that MJ married her to gain access to her daughter....I wonder what part of "registered sex offender" she didn't understand?
I so agree. There was some speculation I read somewhere that she may have found him with herself a willing pen pal while he was still in prison. But who knows.
Also, RG said he had porn of girls as young as 5 years old....where did the info come from about "5 years worth of Russian porn"?
Oops, I said that. :iamashamed0005:
So sorrreee
:bowdown:
So much info. So little sleep.
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 02:55 PM
I'm almost afraid to ask... doesn't AR have a younger stepsister? How old is she?
Yes, MJ and Denise's child together. I hope he didn't molest her. If he hadn't yet, it wouldn't be long before he did. IMO
philamena
07-08-2008, 02:56 PM
SNIP
IMO, she WAS involved simply by the fact of allowing children to be around that man. Even if the towel incident happened only a few weeks previous, she should have kicked him out, or packed herself and the kids up and left.... IMO!!!!
Absolutely.
I just finished rereading the afidavits...:furious:
Yep, there was a towel incident, a find the KY Jelly incident,
and a find the dildo incident.
Denise can't be that stupid. :scream::yuck:
nanandjim
07-08-2008, 02:56 PM
Ray has a degree in Mechanical Engineering and they all had "respectable" jobs. I have a feeling that MJ's money and land partly came from some inheritance from the family. His family is well connected in the community and has maintained successful businesses there for many, many years.
Didn't MJ and his father rape the sister/daughter? Didn't they go to prison for this offense? It seems to me that the father may have raped MJ. If not, the sexual offenses were out there in the open for MJ to do this to his sister. What a sick, sick family. I don't see how they were not run out of town.
nanandjim
07-08-2008, 02:58 PM
Absolutely.
I just finished rereading the afidavits...:furious:
there was a towel incident, a find the KY Jelly incident,
and a find the dildo incident.
Denise can't be that stupid. :scream::yuck:
Even if AR said that she was holding things for a friend, why wouldn't Denise call the friend's mother? I know that I would call AR's bluff because I would be quite suspicious of my young daughter running around with a towel on with my RSO husband in the house with her. Couple that with the other finds and the alarm bells would be sounding loudly.
I suspect that Denise was naive in that she probably questioned AR over and over again. AR is apparently an accomplished liar and probably convinced her mother that nothing was going on. The boyfriend was probably added to the mix and might have calmed the mother's suspicions. I wonder if the boyfriend was MJ's idea.
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 02:59 PM
Didn't MJ and his father rape the sister/daughter? Didn't they go to prison for this offense? It seems to me that the father may have raped MJ. If not, the sexual offenses were out there in the open for MJ to do this to his sister. What a sick, sick family. I don't see how they were not run out of town.
They didn't go to jail for raping the sister. She wouldn't testify. So the charges were dropped.
VTNance
07-08-2008, 03:00 PM
She should have packed her kids up when he went to prison for aggravated rape and kidnapping. End of story.
Except she wasn't even married to him yet.... she married him after he got out! And, IIRC, not long at all after he got out....so maybe they had become pen pals. Although, I believe they are both lifelong residents of the area.... probably already knew each other?
nanandjim
07-08-2008, 03:01 PM
I'm almost afraid to ask... doesn't AR have a younger stepsister? How old is she?
I think that she has a younger half-sister that is 8 years old.
calidreamin
07-08-2008, 03:01 PM
Yes, MJ and Denise's child together. I hope he didn't molest her. If he hadn't yet, it wouldn't be long before he did. IMO
I had forgoten about MJ and Denises child, I think she is 8. That is just about the age that MJ started abusing AR.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:02 PM
I don't know what to say outside what I've already said I'm guessing the reason is.
He was already implicated in a child's murder with a live child saying the killer and he had sexually assaulted her under threat of death of she and her mother. That carries the death penalty by federal law.
I think he was trying to cop a plea with the investigators to escape state execution. They already had the goods on him and he was gonna die anyway at hands of the state. I don't think he was afraid of the skinny weasel Jacques. I have guns in my home for self-protection. I know what sporting chance I'd give Jacques and I'm just a lil' old lady 100#s.
A life sentence in federal prison and possibly state execution by the feds is a bit much just because you feared a skinny weasel the likes of MJ in my opinion. That's just how I assess the situation though for what it's worth.
that does make sense...that part was in an affidavit i read last night..
Adalena935
07-08-2008, 03:02 PM
:furious: Yes, and more than just one child's muder or critical injury on international scale. One major problem, imo, is that althought interpol and other agencies are aware of handfuls of pedeos, they seem to wait üntil they can catch 'the big fish''. That is one reason this goes on for years, or way too long until they do a wide sweep of pedeo ring arrests.
I think law enforcement needs more funding from congress. They seem understaffed for the way this crime is mushrooming out of control. Frightful implications.
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 03:02 PM
Even if AR said that she was holding tihngs for a friend, why wouldn't Denise call the friend's mother? I know that I would call AR's bluff because I would be quite suspicious of my young daughter running around with a towel on with my RSO husband in the house with her. Couple that with the other finds and the alarm bells would be sounding loudly.
I suspect that Denise was naive in that she probably questioned AR over and over again. AR is apparently an accomplished liar and probably convinced her mother that nothing was going on. The boyfriend was probably added to the mix and might have calmed the mother's suspicions. I wonder if the boyfriend was MJ's idea.
Some parents are very trusting. They believe what ever their kids tell them. I on the other hand very rarely believe what my kids say. I have friends that will believe what their kids say even when it makes no sense. :waitasec:
nanandjim
07-08-2008, 03:02 PM
They didn't go to jail for raping the sister. She wouldn't testify. So the charges were dropped.
I wonder how screwed up this sister is. I also wonder if the grandfather continued to molest people. It usually doesn't stop. What a nighmare.
Pinkhammer
07-08-2008, 03:04 PM
On FOXnews this morning, Megyn Kelly said that more arrests are expected, and she mentioned the Grosenheiders.
calidreamin
07-08-2008, 03:04 PM
Except she wasn't even married to him yet.... she married him after he got out! And, IIRC, not long at all after he got out....so maybe they had become pen pals. Although, I believe they are both lifelong residents of the area.... probably already knew each other?
Yuck! What in all that is holy would make that woman be a pen pal to a sex offender? She brings that kind of a man into her house with her own children there?:eek:
philamena
07-08-2008, 03:05 PM
SNIP
I suspect that Denise was naive in that she probably questioned AR over and over again. AR is apparently an accomplished liar and probably convinced her mother that nothing was going on. The boyfriend was probably added to the mix and might have calmed the mother's suspicions. I wonder if the boyfriend was MJ's idea.
I totally agree nanandjim.
nanandjim
07-08-2008, 03:05 PM
Some parents are very trusting. They believe what ever their kids tell them. I on the other hand very rarely believe what my kids say. I have friends that will believe what their kids say even when it makes no sense. :waitasec:
I am one of the trusting types. I believe whatever people tell me. I might not now since I have been reading these boards, but it is in my nature to want to believe that everyone is telling the truth. I just don't understand how people can lie and worse. Honestly...I don't know what happened to make people like this...
I also do not understand why MJ would want to have sex with young, unwilling girls. He was married to an attractive woman, much more attractive than he. Yet, I agree with all others who have said that he merely married this woman to have access to her daughter. I think the same goes for RG and his marriage to Cassandra. It was not a coincidence.
CarpeDiem
07-08-2008, 03:06 PM
Some parents are very trusting. They believe what ever their kids tell them. I on the other hand very rarely believe what my kids say. I have friends that will believe what their kids say even when it makes no sense. :waitasec:
I have one of my four that can snow me, the little white lie stuff. The other's I can tell in an instant when they are fibbing. It scares me I can't tell very well with the other. :eek:
VTGirl007
07-08-2008, 03:09 PM
I'm trying to catch up here, so please forgive me if someone else has pointed this out:
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080708/NEWS01/80707017&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL
in the comments, someone knows (from a source they refuse to quote) that Denise walked in on MJ and AR in the act and walked out and never said anything. Seems to me that LE should be tracking that commenter down and finding out who that source is and what else Denise has told them. IMO, if she knew what was happening and did nothing she's just as guilty as the rest of them.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:10 PM
That's a good point, there is a small college, Vermont Technical College, in Randolph Center. They could have been trying to make it seem like a student from the college was involved, just to further complicate the issue. The planted semen may never have been intended to be traced to Juve2; merely to deflect suspicion from MJ, because what were they going to do, DNA test every male in the town? If Juve2 would not have had any other reason to come under suspicion...his DNA only serves to throw LE off the track from MJ.
But I think the ruses set up in the MySpace page were different from the ruses used on Brooke. The "skittlemeup" message was intended to be read by LE and others, not Brooke.
I think "Sam" refers to a local boy that Brooke may have liked, someone from school or a nearby school,... maybe a friend of Juve2. It sounded to me like they thought that the mention of "Sam" was really going to spark a response in Brooke.... that he was a known quantity. If so, he may have no idea they were using his name as a lure.
ooooh, interesting....i like to read all info from folks in VT...
and welcome:)
i agree about the "skittlemeup" message...
Medea
07-08-2008, 03:11 PM
i don't think she questioned AR over and over again, i think when something was right in her face, like a sex toy that she's never seen before, or her daughter in a towel with a dry shower that she asked a minimum of questions and whatever ridiculous answer she was given, she was satisfied. she did everything in her power not to have to know what was going on.
I don't know what to say outside what I've already said I'm guessing the reason is.
He was already implicated in a child's murder with a live child saying the killer and he had sexually assaulted her under threat of death of she and her mother. That carries the death penalty by federal law.
I think he was trying to cop a plea with the investigators to escape state execution. They already had the goods on him and he was gonna die anyway at hands of the state. I don't think he was afraid of the skinny weasel Jacques. I have guns in my home for self-protection. I know what sporting chance I'd give Jacques and I'm just a lil' old lady 100#s.
A life sentence in federal prison and possibly state execution by the feds is a bit much just because you feared a skinny weasel the likes of MJ in my opinion. That's just how I assess the situation though for what it's worth.
The caffeine is beginning to work. ;)
I think I'd been ignoring facts that are now re-surfacing in my (small) mind lol .... that MJ was already in custody; that most likely LE were grilling RG using strong-armed type interrogation tactics. Probably playing one against the other and all. Added to the fact that RG was probably pretty stunned when they apprehended him that day. Kinda caught him with his pants down, so to speak. ;) He was probably freaking out, bigtime, and just spillin'!
Yep, I'm finally getting it. ;) Thanks to you, others here, and the caffeine!
Thanks everyone! :)
Adalena935
07-08-2008, 03:12 PM
It's probably not so much that they're stupid but that their 'addiction' is so out of control that they take greater & greater risks.
I think that's exactly the case.
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 03:12 PM
I am one of the trusting types. I believe whatever people tell me. I might not now since I have been reading these boards, but it is in my nature to want to believe that everyone is telling the truth. I just don't understand how people can lie and worse. Honestly...I don't know what happened to make people like this...
I also do not understand why MJ would want to have sex with young, unwilling girls. He was married to an attractive woman, much more attractive than he. Yet, I agree with all others who have said that he merely married this woman to have access to her daughter. I think the same goes for RG and his marriage to Cassandra. It was not a coincidence.
I probably would be the trusting type but I have a brother that is a drug addict. He lies about everything. He is a con. People fall for his lies all the time. I will say he has gotten better at it over time so he really is very convincing. Then we are all mad when he dupe's us again. Because of this I really don't trust my teenagers....I verify as much as I can.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:14 PM
I'm trying to catch up here, so please forgive me if someone else has pointed this out:
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080708/NEWS01/80707017&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL
in the comments, someone knows (from a source they refuse to quote) that Denise walked in on MJ and AR in the act and walked out and never said anything. Seems to me that LE should be tracking that commenter down and finding out who that source is and what else Denise has told them. IMO, if she knew what was happening and did nothing she's just as guilty as the rest of them.
below is a comment also, from the site you linked.....
Brooke's mother, Cassandra Gagnon, responded to critisism she was at least partly to blame for her daughters death "to hell with people who think that, I can't be with my kids 24/7"
well, it's a response to the above quote...
eta...."In an interview on Saturday's WCAX newscast" for the above, per BusterT's comment at 11:58 today.....
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 03:16 PM
I'm trying to catch up here, so please forgive me if someone else has pointed this out:
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080708/NEWS01/80707017&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL
in the comments, someone knows (from a source they refuse to quote) that Denise walked in on MJ and AR in the act and walked out and never said anything. Seems to me that LE should be tracking that commenter down and finding out who that source is and what else Denise has told them. IMO, if she knew what was happening and did nothing she's just as guilty as the rest of them.
In my opinion, if this really happened then the "source" should be telling the F.B.I. this and not commenting on the computer. Second, if it happened and the "source" learned about it and didn't go to LE then they are just as guilty, IMO. People sometimes say they know something they don't just to get attention.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:19 PM
I'm trying to catch up here, so please forgive me if someone else has pointed this out:
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080708/NEWS01/80707017&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL
in the comments, someone knows (from a source they refuse to quote) that Denise walked in on MJ and AR in the act and walked out and never said anything. Seems to me that LE should be tracking that commenter down and finding out who that source is and what else Denise has told them. IMO, if she knew what was happening and did nothing she's just as guilty as the rest of them.
i read that, & i agree with you.....thanks for the link:seeya:
Pinkhammer
07-08-2008, 03:20 PM
Someone on the previous thread had a question about Anniston, Alabama. John Mark Karr was from this area. Is Anniston near Cullinan?
http://starpolice.blogspot.com/2007/12/one-time-suspect-in-ramsey-killing.html
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 03:21 PM
I have one of my four that can snow me, the little white lie stuff. The other's I can tell in an instant when they are fibbing. It scares me I can't tell very well with the other. :eek:
I have one like that too. The truth always comes out but it takes me awhile.:rolleyes:
Just announced on Fox that Bill O'Reilly is going to re-examine Vermont's Sex Crime Laws.
Kudos to him!
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 03:22 PM
Someone on the previous thread had a question about Anniston, Alabama. John Mark Karr was from this area. Is Anniston near Cullinan?
http://starpolice.blogspot.com/2007/12/one-time-suspect-in-ramsey-killing.html
I think they are about 100 miles apart.
Pinkhammer
07-08-2008, 03:23 PM
Except she wasn't even married to him yet.... she married him after he got out! And, IIRC, not long at all after he got out....so maybe they had become pen pals. Although, I believe they are both lifelong residents of the area.... probably already knew each other?
WHY would any woman with a young daughter at home marry a known sex offender AFTER he got out?
I believe we will learn soon that the two women, Denise and Cassandra, were also involved in the porn ring, and that they pimped their daughters to the step-fathers.
(My Opinion Only.)
Pinkhammer
07-08-2008, 03:25 PM
I think they are about 100 miles apart.
Just a coincidental connection to Karr? Or is Alabama full of these perverts??
Amster
07-08-2008, 03:26 PM
Oops, I said that. :iamashamed0005:
So sorrreee
:bowdown:
So much info. So little sleep.
Noooo....you were correct! It's in the affidavit!
:clap:
Amster
07-08-2008, 03:28 PM
Not only did Denise marry the perv right after his release, IIRC, but he was still in "treatment" ......and molesting A.R. while in "treatment" which he passed with flying colors! :furious::furious:
VTGirl007
07-08-2008, 03:29 PM
In my opinion, if this really happened then the "source" should be telling the F.B.I. this and not commenting on the computer. Second, if it happened and the "source" learned about it and didn't go to LE then they are just as guilty, IMO. People sometimes say they know something they don't just to get attention.
That may well be the case, and I can't say I disagree with you.
I'm simply pointing out that if there's someone out there who was in fact told this by Denise, LE might want to talk to them to see what else she knew, and when.
I wouldn't be one bit surprised to find that many people in town had heard about what was happening in this family and just wrote it off as a rumor or said nothing because they didn't want to get involved. It certainly wouldn't be the first time.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:30 PM
Even if AR said that she was holding tihngs for a friend, why wouldn't Denise call the friend's mother? I know that I would call AR's bluff because I would be quite suspicious of my young daughter running around with a towel on with my RSO husband in the house with her. Couple that with the other finds and the alarm bells would be sounding loudly.
I suspect that Denise was naive in that she probably questioned AR over and over again. AR is apparently an accomplished liar and probably convinced her mother that nothing was going on. The boyfriend was probably added to the mix and might have calmed the mother's suspicions. I wonder if the boyfriend was MJ's idea.
yikes!...i never thought of that...:eek:
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 03:30 PM
Just a coincidental connection to Karr? Or is Alabama full of these perverts??
I don't think Alabama has any more perverts than any other state. I think they just move from state to state.
Noooo....you were correct! It's in the affidavit!
:clap:
I am??? lol I thought that was what I'd read; but then, after your post, I thought I was getting confuzzled from TMI.
Well then, in that case ... :waitasec:
What a coinkydink that MJ was abusing his step-daughter for 5 yrs, and Gagnon just happened to have had 5 yrs worth of child porn. hmmmm .....
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 03:36 PM
WTG, Dark!! Amazing when we can't get one from the media! Great job! Cat will be out of the bag finally!
Thanks, Vermontn for letting us know.
Yes, he was on the front page of the Burlington Free Press again today. Sorry I couldn't scan it! Darn moving!
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:37 PM
The caffeine is beginning to work. ;)
I think I'd been ignoring facts that are now re-surfacing in my (small) mind lol .... that MJ was already in custody; that most likely LE were grilling RG using strong-armed type interrogation tactics. Probably playing one against the other and all. Added to the fact that RG was probably pretty stunned when they apprehended him that day. Kinda caught him with his pants down, so to speak. ;) He was probably freaking out, bigtime, and just spillin'!
Yep, I'm finally getting it. ;) Thanks to you, others here, and the caffeine!Thanks everyone! :)
it's helped me also!:D
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 03:39 PM
http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/1060/78795388ex8.jpg
There ya go - the TN SO named Gagnon (http://www.ticic.state.tn.us/sorinternet/SOFind.aspx?strhold=n=gagnon)
Not sure if this was posted yet (I have a lot of catching up to do) but that is definitely NOT Raymond Gagnon. Raymond Gagnon actually has darker colored skin, similar to those of Middle Eastern heritage.
philamena
07-08-2008, 03:43 PM
Not sure if this was posted yet (I have a lot of catching up to do) but that is definitely NOT Raymond Gagnon. Raymond Gagnon actually has darker colored skin, similar to those of Middle Eastern heritage.
And how do you know that?
None of US have seen his picture. We've only seen the sketch.
Starr58
07-08-2008, 03:43 PM
Out of respect to Brooke I believe LE and the FBI are waiting until after the funeral before releasing any more info
RIP dear Brooke
it's helped me also!:D
:smiliecup:
Almost at full-functioning brain level now. lol
Medea
07-08-2008, 03:44 PM
I think so too, I'd say they have a handle on what her COD is at this point but aren't going to release it until they're ready to file the murder charges.
Also, no reason to release it before her funeral, especially if its gruesome as some think.
I think she was strangled.
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 03:46 PM
Why not? She's married to him! :steamed:
If this were any of us and we TRULY did not know...wouldn't divorce papers have made their way to his cell by now? And wouldn't you want the world to know that you are not supporting this POS and that you are divorcing him ASAP!?
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:47 PM
Yes, he was on the front page of the Burlington Free Press again today. Sorry I couldn't scan it! Darn moving!
has a real picture been released of RG????
VTGirl007
07-08-2008, 03:47 PM
And how do you know that?
None of US have seen his picture. We've only seen the sketch.
His picture has been on the cover of the Burlington Free Press twice now, I believe.
If this were any of us and we TRULY did not know...wouldn't divorce papers have made their way to his cell by now? And wouldn't you want the world to know that you are not supporting this POS and that you are divorcing him ASAP!?
I think i'd kill myself if i learned all this about my husband.
philamena
07-08-2008, 03:49 PM
If this were any of us and we TRULY did not know...wouldn't divorce papers have made their way to his cell by now? And wouldn't you want the world to know that you are not supporting this POS and that you are divorcing him ASAP!?
Yes, indeedy.
Adalena935
07-08-2008, 03:50 PM
I would think child porn sites work the same as regular porn sites, only more secret.
I imagine it would be like getting into any other pay site. Legit E-mail address and credit card.
I have never tried to find child porn sites. I guess you would start by changing your security level to none.
IMO
I was reading about some cases FBI and international LE have worked on in the past and they operate in news groups with codes. The most informative article I found regarding how they operate was an affidavit by FBI but in parts it's so disturbingly graphic. I'm afraid to post the link.
It's a case out of Georgia; Bart Husky child porn case. Walker county messenger is the publication that published the affidavit telling about the codes and how they escape detection by LE. It's on the FBI's web site so I guess it's okay to google it. I was a type of net nanny when the net first started and I have to tell you; my idea of child abuse was using a bad word for a child to see. I'm really shocked and sickened by what goes on. These people are the worst of the worst.
Not sure if this was posted yet (I have a lot of catching up to do) but that is definitely NOT Raymond Gagnon. Raymond Gagnon actually has darker colored skin, similar to those of Middle Eastern heritage.
Nope, no one has posted about this pic who has seen RG's pic yet.
Thanks, VTGirl.
philamena
07-08-2008, 03:51 PM
His picture has been on the cover of the Burlington Free Press twice now, I believe.
Gosh, could you PLEASE bring it here?
We've been looking for his picture since this first happened. We have no idea what he looks like.
TIA.
becca
07-08-2008, 03:51 PM
I think i'd kill myself if i learned all this about my husband.
after I offed him...
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 03:52 PM
If this were any of us and we TRULY did not know...wouldn't divorce papers have made their way to his cell by now? And wouldn't you want the world to know that you are not supporting this POS and that you are divorcing him ASAP!?
Maybe she's thinking there's no hurry...he isn't getting out any time soon, hopefully never.
Medea
07-08-2008, 03:52 PM
it seems to me there are two classes of child porn makers...there are the amateurs who abuse people around them and post pictures or film and/or trade them among small groups...this is what I think Jacques and Gagnon were doing....then there are the professionals who are organized and are making large quantities of child porn, the people that are running the web sites and making the real money. to me, it appears that nobody ever gets caught except the amateurs.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:53 PM
His picture has been on the cover of the Burlington Free Press twice now, I believe.
dang!...why hasn't it been posted here?....is this probably the picture that DS is going to post, when she gets home from work?
VTGirl007
07-08-2008, 03:53 PM
Gosh, could you PLEASE bring it here?
We've been looking for his picture since this first happened. We have no idea what he looks like.
TIA.
If I had a scanner, I would! I have no idea why they haven't had a photo of him on their website yet. I just tried a google images search but all I found was some football coach who doesn't look to be the same guy.
philamena
07-08-2008, 03:54 PM
Vermont must be a sex offenders dream. If I lived there I'd ask wtf is going on!
http://www.sexcriminals.com/registration-notification/us/vermont/
Check this out:
Vermont Sex Offender Registry
Overview
Access to sex offender information in Vermont is provided to the public as the result of the Jacob Wetterling Registration Act, which was passed by the United States Congress and Megan's Law, which requires states to release relevant information about registered offenders to protect the public.
Access Type / NotificationAvailableCommunity notification?No
Online searchable directory?No
Online browseable directory? No
Online maps of offender residence locations? No
Information available by visit to law enforcement agency? No
Information available by phone? No
Adalena935
07-08-2008, 03:54 PM
I think so too, I'd say they have a handle on what her COD is at this point but aren't going to release it until they're ready to file the murder charges.
Also, no reason to release it before her funeral, especially if its gruesome as some think.
I think she was strangled.
Yes, that's what he did to his victim yrs ago & went to prison for. rope around her neck. Altho, a knife is a fairly safe guess too since he's said to have threatened that also in this case. Past acts is always a fairly good indicator of future behavior.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:55 PM
If I had a scanner, I would! I have no idea why they haven't had a photo of him on their website yet. I just tried a google images search but all I found was some football coach who doesn't look to be the same guy.
oooh, ok....i see you're talking about the paper itself:)
this has got to be the pic that DS will share with us....imo
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 03:56 PM
And how do you know that?
None of US have seen his picture. We've only seen the sketch.
Because, as I have mentioned numerous times, his picture has been on the front page of the Burlington Free Press on Sunday and again today. I am local and I know someone who works at the paper...trust me, this is not him.
philamena
07-08-2008, 03:56 PM
If I had a scanner, I would! I have no idea why they haven't had a photo of him on their website yet. I just tried a google images search but all I found was some football coach who doesn't look to be the same guy.
VTGirl,
Can you post a link to the article??
close_enough
07-08-2008, 03:57 PM
Yes, that's what he did to his victim yrs ago & went to prison for. rope around her neck. Altho, a knife is a fairly safe guess too since he's said to have threatened that also in this case. Past acts is always a fairly good indicator of future behavior.
yeah, as it escalates....:(
edgeofnight
07-08-2008, 03:57 PM
Some people for what ever reason knowing allow child rapists into their home. While visiting my dad last Nov in Wisconsin, he mentioned the lady across the street who is in her 40s with a teen daughter and 8 year old son who I have known many, many years has this guy who lives around the corner come everyday and do chores. I became curious when my dad said he can't ever see his kids. I looked up RSO and sure enough he had raped a very young girl. I made copies of everything and talked to one family who is friends with my dad who have a small girl. She called his probation officer who said don't worry he won't do anything unless he becomes very familiar with the child. To make a long story short he is still doing chores for the widowed woman she is aware of what he did, but it is obvious she doesn't care she just needs to get all her work done. I did my best, but it just doesn't seem to register. I have been so worried something is going to happen and I guess no one else is. It makes me so sick.
Chica
07-08-2008, 03:58 PM
Gosh, could you PLEASE bring it here?
We've been looking for his picture since this first happened. We have no idea what he looks like.
TIA.
Unfortunately, I believe she stated yesterday that she recently moved and her scanner is not set up yet. Dark Shadows said she has a pic that she will post when she gets home today!
has a real picture been released of RG????
I think that's how Dark_shadows has the pic that she is going to scan for us later.
Amster
07-08-2008, 03:59 PM
I've searched all over the Burlington Free Press and can't find a pic of Gagnon....maybe the online version is different than the paper version.
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 03:59 PM
Unfortunately, I believe she stated yesterday that she recently moved and her scanner is not set up yet. Dark Shadow said she has a pic that she will post when she gets home today!
Yes, Chica, that is correct. Thank you.:blowkiss:
Medea
07-08-2008, 03:59 PM
Yes, that's what he did to his victim yrs ago & went to prison for. rope around her neck. Altho, a knife is a fairly safe guess too since he's said to have threatened that also in this case. Past acts is always a fairly good indicator of future behavior.
Possibly, but given his elaborate cover up plans, I don't think he used knife...too much blood. I think she was dead within a very short time, and that he intended to hold her hostage..move to her Texas, Alabama, the sugar shack, who knows, I don't think he intended her to be dead on the 25th and I think she was.
My top two guesses are strangulation or blunt force trauma to the head.
I'm hoping that more grotesque ideas of her death are not true.
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 04:00 PM
Does DS get out of work late? I could take a picture of the picture with my digital camera...at least it would be something until DS can get a better picture.
has a real picture been released of RG????
I think that's how Dark_shadows has the pic that she is goinn to scan for us later.
Eta: Philamena, apparently from what I understand it isn't provided in the online edition.
philamena
07-08-2008, 04:01 PM
Because, as I have mentioned numerous times, his picture has been on the front page of the Burlington Free Press on Sunday and again today. I am local and I know someone who works at the paper...trust me, this is not him.
Sorry, I must have missed your post.
Does DS get out of work late? I could take a picture of the picture with my digital camera...at least it would be something until DS can get a better picture.
I don't think we know when DS gets off work but I say "Go for it, VTGirl"!!
We're sitting here on the edges of our seats waiting to see that pos of a perp!
Chica
07-08-2008, 04:02 PM
Does DS get out of work late? I could take a picture of the picture with my digital camera...at least it would be something until DS can get a better picture.
I say YOU GO GIRL!! :blowkiss:
close_enough
07-08-2008, 04:03 PM
Does DS get out of work late? I could take a picture of the picture with my digital camera...at least it would be something until DS can get a better picture.
it would work for me, till DS gets here:)
VTGirl007
07-08-2008, 04:04 PM
Vermont must be a sex offenders dream. If I lived there I'd ask wtf is going on!
http://www.sexcriminals.com/registration-notification/us/vermont/
Check this out:
Vermont Sex Offender Registry
Overview
Access to sex offender information in Vermont is provided to the public as the result of the Jacob Wetterling Registration Act, which was passed by the United States Congress and Megan's Law, which requires states to release relevant information about registered offenders to protect the public.
Access Type / NotificationAvailableCommunity notification?No
Online searchable directory?No
Online browseable directory? No
Online maps of offender residence locations? No
Information available by visit to law enforcement agency? No
Information available by phone? No
Yes, it is searchable: http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/
An example of Vermont favoring criminal rights over child safety:
A RSO, convicted of lewd and lascivious conduct w/a child is living next to the busiest bus stop in our little town, where young boys and girls in the 8-12 age range walk by his house, which is right on the road, to get home every day. he moved here after being run out of his home town. I only knew because my friend told me, and sure enough, he's in the registry.
it's wretched enough to allow someone convicted of that kind of crime to live next door to the bus stop, but they didn't even TELL US. I have always picked my kids up at the bus, but there are many who just assume it's safe here and make them walk home and stay alone until they get home from work. Ugh.
philamena
07-08-2008, 04:05 PM
Lots of pics, not ONE of Gagnon. grrrrr
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/gallery?Site=BT&Date=20080702&Category=NEWS&ArtNo=807020801&Ref=PH&Params=Itemnr=11
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 04:07 PM
Some people for what ever reason knowing allow child rapists into their home. While visiting my dad last Nov in Wisconsin, he mentioned the lady across the street who is in her 40s with a teen daughter and 8 year old son who I have known many, many years has this guy who lives around the corner come everyday and do chores. I became curious when my dad said he can't ever see his kids. I looked up RSO and sure enough he had raped a very young girl. I made copies of everything and talked to one family who is friends with my dad who have a small girl. She called his probation officer who said don't worry he won't do anything unless he becomes very familiar with the child. To make a long story short he is still doing chores for the widowed woman she is aware of what he did, but it is obvious she doesn't care she just needs to get all her work done. I did my best, but it just doesn't seem to register. I have been so worried something is going to happen and I guess no one else is. It makes me so sick.
My neighbor let the RSO convince her he was innocent. I think their mentatlity is it won't happen to us.
Amster
07-08-2008, 04:09 PM
I've searched about 20 other sites that are talking about this case....nobody has a pic of Gagnon.....isn't that strange?? Especially, if his pic has been out there since Sunday!!
WS might be the first!!
Medea
07-08-2008, 04:09 PM
Does NO ONE feel squeemish about putting the name of Jacques sister, an alleged vicim of child rape on this board or the name of an alleged boyfriend of AR's who are not known to have any connection with this crime????
close_enough
07-08-2008, 04:09 PM
Yes, it is searchable: http://170.222.137.2:8080/sor/
An example of Vermont favoring criminal rights over child safety:
A RSO, convicted of lewd and lascivious conduct w/a child is living next to the busiest bus stop in our little town, where young boys and girls in the 8-12 age range walk by his house, which is right on the road, to get home every day. he moved here after being run out of his home town. I only knew because my friend told me, and sure enough, he's in the registry.
it's wretched enough to allow someone convicted of that kind of crime to live next door to the bus stop, but they didn't even TELL US. I have always picked my kids up at the bus, but there are many who just assume it's safe here and make them walk home and stay alone until they get home from work. Ugh.
oh yeah...some laws really need to be changed there in VT:(
...i just noticed phil's post within yours.....
jnodrog
07-08-2008, 04:11 PM
Does NO ONE feel squeemish about putting the name of Jacques sister, an alleged vicim of child rape on this board or the name of an alleged boyfriend of AR's who are not known to have any connection with this crime????
his sisters name has already been posted more than once, and the BF may definetly be involved.
i think we were looking for all information and possibilities.
Allen
jnodrog
07-08-2008, 04:12 PM
the name Corey is also mentioned in an email, in one of the affidavits.....
yep and she did have a BF with that name, just not sure if that is now.
Allen
Jaded
07-08-2008, 04:13 PM
I was reading about some cases FBI and international LE have worked on in the past and they operate in news groups with codes. The most informative article I found regarding how they operate was an affidavit by FBI but in parts it's so disturbingly graphic. I'm afraid to post the link.
It's a case out of Georgia; Bart Husky child porn case. Walker county messenger is the publication that published the affidavit telling about the codes and how they escape detection by LE. It's on the FBI's web site so I guess it's okay to google it. I was a type of net nanny when the net first started and I have to tell you; my idea of child abuse was using a bad word for a child to see. I'm really shocked and sickened by what goes on. These people are the worst of the worst.
You're not kidding. I found the article, and am beyond disgusted.
Medea
07-08-2008, 04:13 PM
his sisters name has already been posted more than once, and the BF may definetly be involved.
i think we were looking for all information and possibilities.
Allen
Speaking for myself, I think its wrong to drag in the names of minor sex crime victims onto a public board and I think its wrong to put the name of any current or former boyfriend of AR on a public board, whether or not its public record or easy to find or on myspace and I'm not too comfortable with assuming that just because Person A has the last name of Person B that they are related.
But, that's just me.
TisHerself
07-08-2008, 04:13 PM
He appears to have been more concerned about Brooke's mother and sister than he was about his wife, and frankly I can see why if she bought the story that her daughter was holding sex toys "for a friend". I would love to have seen the look on the investigators' faces when she came out with that one.
Huh? What? She told them AR was holding sex toys for a friend?:bang:
jnodrog
07-08-2008, 04:14 PM
his sisters name has already been posted more than once, and the BF may definetly be involved.
i think we were looking for all information and possibilities.
Allen
i belive on top of that someone posted her husbands myspace profile back a while ago.
Allen
close_enough
07-08-2008, 04:14 PM
Does NO ONE feel squeemish about putting the name of Jacques sister, an alleged vicim of child rape on this board or the name of an alleged boyfriend of AR's who are not known to have any connection with this crime????
wellllll, yeah a bit......but i don't want to know AR's sisters' name though...
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 04:16 PM
OK, it's coming up! Do I have to load it into photobucket or something first or can I just upload it straight to here?
TIA!
jnodrog
07-08-2008, 04:16 PM
wellllll, yeah a bit......but i don't want to know AR's sisters' name though...
and i said i would not post that even though i know it.
on top of all this my niece was murdered in Barre at age 15 and ive been through all this they need to fry the ppl.
Allen
TisHerself
07-08-2008, 04:19 PM
It's probably not so much that they're stupid but that their 'addiction' is so out of control that they take greater & greater risks.
Yep! that's why he planned on torturing and killing Brooke it was the next step in his sick addiction!
lizzybeth
07-08-2008, 04:19 PM
I've been following this since Brooke went missing. I'm trying really hard to keep up but on busy days I just can't. Can someone tell where the nfo is about MJ's sister and father?
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 04:20 PM
Hmmm...it won't let me insert an image.
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 04:20 PM
Does NO ONE feel squeemish about putting the name of Jacques sister, an alleged vicim of child rape on this board or the name of an alleged boyfriend of AR's who are not known to have any connection with this crime????
We are protecting AR, we should protect the others.
Spazkat9696
07-08-2008, 04:22 PM
Hmmm...it won't let me insert an image.
Uplode it to photobucket then post it to WS from photobucket
jnodrog
07-08-2008, 04:24 PM
well AR name was posted back day 1 almost i think we all know it, as was the others.
my info came fist hand from someone who actually spoke to a family member only a few days ago.
I am local to this and the town is right next door.
i refuse to be the one to be blamed for putting out info.
so as a local person i will not post anymore information i recieve.
Allen
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 04:24 PM
Let's try this...
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/amorgan8173/BFPPhoto-GoodQuality.jpg
Amster
07-08-2008, 04:24 PM
I think everyone here has been careful with naming juveniles. Some of us have known who A.R. is since almost the beginning of this horror....and to my knowledge, nobody has used her name.
believe09
07-08-2008, 04:25 PM
I'm trying to catch up here, so please forgive me if someone else has pointed this out:
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080708/NEWS01/80707017&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL
in the comments, someone knows (from a source they refuse to quote) that Denise walked in on MJ and AR in the act and walked out and never said anything. Seems to me that LE should be tracking that commenter down and finding out who that source is and what else Denise has told them. IMO, if she knew what was happening and did nothing she's just as guilty as the rest of them.
The same whistle blower commentator of the Denise catching AR and MJ also stated that MJ's relative (the one assaulted by him whom we are assuming is his sister) committed suicide.
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 04:25 PM
his sisters name has already been posted more than once, and the BF may definetly be involved.
i think we were looking for all information and possibilities.
Allen
AR is definitly involved but we use her initials. I think we should protect juvenile 2 the same as juvenile 1. So far, to me, it looks like they were using him to frame him for Brooke's murder. He should be protected, IMO.
Amster
07-08-2008, 04:26 PM
Let's try this...
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/amorgan8173/BFPPhoto-GoodQuality.jpg
:woohoo:
THANK YOU!!
galvino
07-08-2008, 04:27 PM
Thanks VTGirl007!
Creepy that in this picture he doesn't look, well, creepy!
Uncle Creepy sure does tho!
philamena
07-08-2008, 04:27 PM
Thank you VTGirl81.:blowkiss:
Finally a face to the perv. :furious:
MistyGirl
07-08-2008, 04:28 PM
AR is definitly involved but we use her initials. I think we should protect juvenile 2 the same as juvenile 1. So far, to me, it looks like they were using him to frame him for Brooke's murder. He should be protected, IMO.
I agree but isn't "AR" the same as "Juvenile 1" and "Juvenile 2" is another minor NOT AR or Juvenile 1??????????????????????????????
Medea
07-08-2008, 04:28 PM
AR is definitly involved but we use her initials. I think we should protect juvenile 2 the same as juvenile 1. So far, to me, it looks like they were using him to frame him for Brooke's murder. He should be protected, IMO.
I agree. I just don't approve of using people's real names when we are speculating about what happened to them, whether they ever dated AR, and so forth. All that does then is motivate people to get the full name, then look them up, then dig into their myspace page, then look them up to see if they have any arrest record, look up their family...and ALL they may have done is happen to have dated this poor girl in the past, or not....
But, I'm a big believer in privacy and I don't think these kids have any clue of the ramifications of the stuff that they post on myspace and facebook.
End of rant.
Spazkat9696
07-08-2008, 04:29 PM
I agree but isn't "AR" the same as "Juvenile 1" and "Juvenile 2" is another minor NOT AR or Juvenile 1??????????????????????????????
I'm pretty sure AR and Juv 1 are the same person
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 04:29 PM
Thanks VTGirl007!
Creepy that in this picture he doesn't look, well, creepy!
Uncle Creepy sure does tho!
Actually, there are two of us VTGirl's on here...myself (VTGirl81) and then VTGirl007...we are two different people. Just wanted to let everyone know that it's not the same person! :)
nanandjim
07-08-2008, 04:30 PM
...He was already implicated in a child's murder with a live child saying the killer and he had sexually assaulted her under threat of death of she and her mother. That carries the death penalty by federal law.
Wasn't this a "he said/she said" type of situation? Do you think that there may be proof in the form of photos of the tryst? If not, why couldn't RG just deny his participation?
Surely, they have something on him to make him just confess to raping a young girl and possessing child porn. Why didn't he get rid of everything after MJ called him?
Chica
07-08-2008, 04:30 PM
well AR name was posted back day 1 almost i think we all know it, as was the others.
my info came fist hand from someone who actually spoke to a family member only a few days ago.
I am local to this and the town is right next door.
i refuse to be the one to be blamed for putting out info.
so as a local person i will not post anymore information i recieve.
Allen
Actually Allen, I have seen AR's name several times on this Board and elsewhere. I don't think there is a problem naming names, as you always make it clear that it is 'what you heard'. I personally appreciate receiving information from a local - thank you!!
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 04:30 PM
well AR name was posted back day 1 almost i think we all know it, as was the others.
my info came fist hand from someone who actually spoke to a family member only a few days ago.
I am local to this and the town is right next door.
i refuse to be the one to be blamed for putting out info.
so as a local person i will not post anymore information i recieve.
Allen
I don't think anyone was blaming you. I know I wasn't blaming you. I just hate it when juvenile's names are released. The associated press is the worst...they say we don't name sexual assault victims but their names have already been in the press so here their names are again. Please continue to post what info. you get.
VTGirl007
07-08-2008, 04:31 PM
Thanks VTGirl007!
Creepy that in this picture he doesn't look, well, creepy!
Uncle Creepy sure does tho!
It was actually VTGirl81 who posted the photo- I didn't notice that there was another VTGirl here before I registered- my bad.
believe09
07-08-2008, 04:31 PM
Does NO ONE feel squeemish about putting the name of Jacques sister, an alleged vicim of child rape on this board or the name of an alleged boyfriend of AR's who are not known to have any connection with this crime????
:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:
I think that this case has pushed all of us to the edge for sure; however I have to remind myself that the the named perps are MJ and RG for now. Speculation about who might be next to be named is appropriate of course, but the rest are victims-some by action, some by inaction...I think we have to draw the line somewhere when it comes to bashing them.
TOS does not allow us to post the names of people who are not attributed with the commission of the crime unless they have been named by the public media and you can show a link, I believe.....
MCDRAW
07-08-2008, 04:33 PM
I agree but isn't "AR" the same as "Juvenile 1" and "Juvenile 2" is another minor NOT AR or Juvenile 1??????????????????????????????
Juvenile 2 is the boyfriend.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 04:33 PM
You're not kidding. I found the article, and am beyond disgusted.
same here, jaded:mad:
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/06/17/child_porn_arrest.html?cxntlid=homepage_tab_newsta b
thank goodness, the FBI isn't through investigating the "tara series".....
That photo of RG doesn't look at all like the sketch we saw the other day. Wonder how long ago that picture was taken?
Interesting,
fran
Chica
07-08-2008, 04:34 PM
Actually Allen, I have seen AR's name several times on this Board and elsewhere. I don't think there is a problem naming names, as you always make it clear that it is 'what you heard'. I personally appreciate receiving information from a local - thank you!!
Plus - you didn't say the last name!
:)
VTGirl007
07-08-2008, 04:34 PM
The same whistle blower commentator of the Denise catching AR and MJ also stated that MJ's relative (the one assaulted by him whom we are assuming is his sister) committed suicide.
Well, as I said, it could be BS and it could be useful. Just thought that it may warrant a mention.
VTNance
07-08-2008, 04:34 PM
I agree but isn't "AR" the same as "Juvenile 1" and "Juvenile 2" is another minor NOT AR or Juvenile 1??????????????????????????????
AR is the same as Juvenile 1. Juvenile 2 is a boyfriend of AR's.
Does anyone know if AR had ever met Brooke's stepfather, Gagnon? Would she have known him, or known him from pictures seen at Brooke's house? Or did he mostly stay down in Alabama?? MJ and RG were gaslighting her with the "Raoul" character....she seemed to think she was in love with him. RG could have "played the part" of Raoul when he showed up in Royalton or wherever else they did their nasty business, and poor AR would have thought that this was her wonderful top-secret spy boyfriend that she rarely got to see. Just another level of deception and manipulation to be sick over, if so.
SailorMoon
07-08-2008, 04:34 PM
Good job. Sure looks like the SO in Tenn could be his brother, that's for sure....Hmmmm....looks like your average every day Joe. I've been thinking a lot about how someone said, the boogeyman doesn't look like a boogeyman, but the person next door. Whoa.
Let's try this...
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/amorgan8173/BFPPhoto-GoodQuality.jpg
close_enough
07-08-2008, 04:37 PM
thanks VTGirl!....you did great with your digital!....you can even read the line under the pictures.....& he fits the sketch...
Chica
07-08-2008, 04:38 PM
Good job. Sure looks like the SO in Tenn could be his brother, that's for sure....Hmmmm....looks like your average every day Joe. I've been thinking a lot about how someone said, the boogeyman doesn't look like a boogeyman, but the person next door. Whoa.
You are not a-kidding! VTgirl - thank you so much for the pic - I just never imagined he would look so 'normal'!! He really does look like the 'guy next door' . . .:eek:
Tom'sGirl
07-08-2008, 04:38 PM
Let's try this...
Thank you so much for doing this for us VTGirl81! :smoochiesmilie:
I've posted your scanned photo on the Photo Link
w1df10wr
07-08-2008, 04:39 PM
Thank you VTGirl81 :)
VTGirl81
07-08-2008, 04:39 PM
thanks VTGirl!....you did great with your digital!....you can even read the line under the pictures.....& he fits the sketch...
Glad to help! :blowkiss:
Thanks for the pic, VTGirl81!
Allen, and other locals, please do keep providing the local info you get!
:blowkiss:
Scary how normal Gagnon looks!
There is a picture of Denise Jacques, who was present in court yesterday at this link :
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080708/NEWS01/80707017&referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL
Could someone post this picture in the Photo Thread? thxs
Wow. You know how you picture somebody in your mind? This is not how I pictured she would look.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 04:40 PM
That photo of RG doesn't look at all like the sketch we saw the other day. Wonder how long ago that picture was taken?
Interesting,
fran
oooh, see i think it does....from what we see from an almost side-view in the sketch...i'd say the picture wasn't taken real recently...but who knows?
Jaded
07-08-2008, 04:40 PM
You are not a-kidding! VTgirl - thank you so much for the pic - I just never imagined he would look so 'normal'!! He really does look like the 'guy next door' . . .:eek:
That's the frightening thing...you just don't know who is a sicko. Stranger Danger is the guy next door, or Uncle Creepy.
TisHerself
07-08-2008, 04:40 PM
That may well be the case, and I can't say I disagree with you.
I'm simply pointing out that if there's someone out there who was in fact told this by Denise, LE might want to talk to them to see what else she knew, and when.
I wouldn't be one bit surprised to find that many people in town had heard about what was happening in this family and just wrote it off as a rumor or said nothing because they didn't want to get involved. It certainly wouldn't be the first time.
If this has been going on for 5 yrs in Denise's own home I do not believe for one second that she did not know about. Or that she did not walk in on something at any given time over those 6 yrs.
texas48
07-08-2008, 04:41 PM
Juvie 1 was lied to from the time she was 9 yrs old.
She is now 14 yrs old does anyone know her birth date? When she'd be 15?
I understand she was lied to for 5 yrs. / I also understand the mental abuse she was under. But at what age would she become an accomplice? I don't buy the fact she just did what she was told to do by MJ & others & that Breckenridge was a government organization.
She was having sex with MJ / her boyfriend / & apparently whoever else she was told to have sex with. I find this hard to believe, am I the only one?Checko1...Here I am! I totally agree with you. And please don't call me heartless for not buying into the fact AR is 100% victim here. She was a victim at age 9. I am a grandmother of 7 and these kids are my world. God forbid ANYONE having any part in hurting them in any way. AR could have done alot to prevent Brooke from being hurt/killed.
DeltaDawn
07-08-2008, 04:44 PM
AR is definitly involved but we use her initials. I think we should protect juvenile 2 the same as juvenile 1. So far, to me, it looks like they were using him to frame him for Brooke's murder. He should be protected, IMO.
If Juvenile 2 is 18, then he is in alot of trouble. An 18 year old should not be having sex with a 14 year old. I don't need to know his name. I can only imagine what type of 18 year old he must be to hang out with this family. It sounds to me like the whole town knew these people had a past history of sexual abuse. If he is 18 I would imagine he is cooperating fully with LE.
close_enough
07-08-2008, 04:44 PM
and i said i would not post that even though i know it.on top of all this my niece was murdered in Barre at age 15 and ive been through all this they need to fry the ppl.
Allen