Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, NSW, 12 Sept 2014 - #11

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes it seems this Jeffrey Hillsley was Bill Speddings brother in law.
Both arrested by Gary Jubelin. This case just gets worse and worse, if that's even possible.
Good on Detective Jubelin !
 
THATS your defense? Really?? That is the most despicable excuse I have ever heard. No one in their right mind is going to buy that. What possible 'innocent acts' could have lead to those injuries?

Yes, those medical reports are like the elephant in the room. Waiting for Spedding's defense to address it?!
 
Yes it seems this Jeffrey Hillsley was Bill Speddings brother in law.
Both arrested by Gary Jubelin. This case just gets worse and worse, if that's even possible.
Good on Detective Jubelin !

possibly the reason he was brought into this case??
 
Wow all of a sudden my websleuths page has changed format ect ?????
 
I wonder if this Jeffrey Hillsley was the other man that the victims were passed onto by Bill Spedding.
 
Possibly good motivation for a mother and sister to claim it was someone else?
 
At the time they say the abuse occurred March/April 1987 - Hillsley was in Gaol

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2005/652.html

In October 1984 he was sentenced in the Sydney District Court to an effective term of imprisonment for eight years, with a non-parole period of four years, for the kidnapping and what is described as the assault of a five-year-old girl. He had persuaded the girl to accompany him to some unoccupied premises at Parramatta, where he had anal intercourse with her. He was released on parole in December 1986 but his parole was revoked in the following month, following a report which expressed concern about what Gallop J described as his “inappropriate and potentially dangerous behaviour towards young girls”. It is not necessary for present purposes to recount that behaviour, which is summarised at p9 of his Honour’s judgment. He was released when his sentence expired, presumably by remission, in December 1989.
 
Remember Jubelin made that comment regarding WT and 'worlds colliding' ??
 
As shocking as this is becoming by the minute, I'm guessing it's nowhere near as bad as what's still to come.
 
Could the victims have requested the suppression??? For their privacy and their own families privacy?

It could very well be the case. I can imagine cameras thrust into their faces and their children must live a protected innocent life, it's NOT the victims fault.

I can understand why the victims would be very protective over the welfare of their children considering what has been endured.
I am proud of their strength in this.
 
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/bill-sped...a-murdering-rapist-court-told-20150617-ghnx8h

Bill Spedding's ex-brother-in-law a murdering rapist, court told

An accused paedophile questioned over the disappearance of toddler William Tyrrell is related to a murdering rapist.

Bill Spedding, 63, was arrested in April and was charged with five counts of sexually abusing two girls, aged three and six, in the 1980s.

He applied for bail before the NSW Supreme Court on Wednesday, where his defence argued his alleged victims may have come into contact with his former brother-in-law, Jeffrey John Hillsley.
 
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/bill-sped...a-murdering-rapist-court-told-20150617-ghnx8h


He applied for bail before the NSW Supreme Court on Wednesday, where his defence argued his alleged victims may have come into contact with his former brother-in-law, Jeffrey John Hillsley.

I don't understand, how could they come into contact with Jeffrey if he was in jail?

ETA keep forgetting this was back in the 80s before he was sentenced. Still, pretty convoluted defense
 
At the time they say the abuse occurred March/April 1987 - Hillsley was in Gaol

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2005/652.html

In October 1984 he was sentenced in the Sydney District Court to an effective term of imprisonment for eight years, with a non-parole period of four years, for the kidnapping and what is described as the assault of a five-year-old girl. He had persuaded the girl to accompany him to some unoccupied premises at Parramatta, where he had anal intercourse with her. He was released on parole in December 1986 but his parole was revoked in the following month, following a report which expressed concern about what Gallop J described as his “inappropriate and potentially dangerous behaviour towards young girls”. It is not necessary for present purposes to recount that behaviour, which is summarised at p9 of his Honour’s judgment. He was released when his sentence expired, presumably by remission, in December 1989.

Why then would this be even mentioned by his defence? Is he an idiot?
 
At the time they say the abuse occurred March/April 1987 - Hillsley was in Gaol

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2005/652.html

In October 1984 he was sentenced in the Sydney District Court to an effective term of imprisonment for eight years, with a non-parole period of four years, for the kidnapping and what is described as the assault of a five-year-old girl. He had persuaded the girl to accompany him to some unoccupied premises at Parramatta, where he had anal intercourse with her. He was released on parole in December 1986 but his parole was revoked in the following month, following a report which expressed concern about what Gallop J described as his “inappropriate and potentially dangerous behaviour towards young girls”. It is not necessary for present purposes to recount that behaviour, which is summarised at p9 of his Honour’s judgment. He was released when his sentence expired, presumably by remission, in December 1989.

Good work !
 
At the time they say the abuse occurred March/April 1987 - Hillsley was in Gaol

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2005/652.html

In October 1984 he was sentenced in the Sydney District Court to an effective term of imprisonment for eight years, with a non-parole period of four years, for the kidnapping and what is described as the assault of a five-year-old girl. He had persuaded the girl to accompany him to some unoccupied premises at Parramatta, where he had anal intercourse with her. He was released on parole in December 1986 but his parole was revoked in the following month, following a report which expressed concern about what Gallop J described as his “inappropriate and potentially dangerous behaviour towards young girls”. It is not necessary for present purposes to recount that behaviour, which is summarised at p9 of his Honour’s judgment. He was released when his sentence expired, presumably by remission, in December 1989.

Why then would this be even mentioned by his defence? Is he an idiot?
 
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/bill-sped...a-murdering-rapist-court-told-20150617-ghnx8h

Bill Spedding's ex-brother-in-law a murdering rapist, court told

An accused paedophile questioned over the disappearance of toddler William Tyrrell is related to a murdering rapist.

Bill Spedding, 63, was arrested in April and was charged with five counts of sexually abusing two girls, aged three and six, in the 1980s.

He applied for bail before the NSW Supreme Court on Wednesday, where his defence argued his alleged victims may have come into contact with his former brother-in-law, Jeffrey John Hillsley
.


bbm: it also begs the possibility that the victims were abused by both BS and JH as JH was out on bail in 1989 and out for a month Dec 1986
 
At the time they say the abuse occurred March/April 1987 - Hillsley was in Gaol

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/nsw/NSWSC/2005/652.html

In October 1984 he was sentenced in the Sydney District Court to an effective term of imprisonment for eight years, with a non-parole period of four years, for the kidnapping and what is described as the assault of a five-year-old girl. He had persuaded the girl to accompany him to some unoccupied premises at Parramatta, where he had anal intercourse with her. He was released on parole in December 1986 but his parole was revoked in the following month, following a report which expressed concern about what Gallop J described as his “inappropriate and potentially dangerous behaviour towards young girls”. It is not necessary for present purposes to recount that behaviour, which is summarised at p9 of his Honour’s judgment. He was released when his sentence expired, presumably by remission, in December 1989.

Thank you for posting this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
67
Guests online
2,660
Total visitors
2,727

Forum statistics

Threads
592,492
Messages
17,969,825
Members
228,789
Latest member
Soccergirl500
Back
Top