George Schultz was in his 90s when he was on the board of Theranos and has subsequently passed away.
Kissinger is 100 this year, so in his late 80s to mid 90s while on the board. (estimates for both, I'm terrible at math)
Relative to these guys, Mattis is young. He resigned from the board when he became Secretary of Defense, but lost the money he'd invested in Theranos.
From a NYT article about Mattis' testimony at EH's trial: James Mattis, a Theranos board member, 'didn't know what to believe,' he says in Elizabeth Homes trial: "Mr. Mattis said he had pushed the military to do a test program of Theranos analyzers to see how they performed alongside its existing systems before joining the board. “I wanted a comparative study on Theranos from Day 1 so we could bring it online,” he said. But no test materialized."
Another example about the extent to which EH completely controlled the fraudulent narrative and blatantly lied to convince investors and the board that everything was on track. None of those pharmaceutical companies could have validated the start-up's machines because they didn't work:
"Mr. Mattis said Ms. Holmes had been his primary source of information about Theranos and its technology. Prosecutors showed a presentation she had made to the board that said 10 of the 15 largest pharmaceutical companies had validated the start-up’s machines, alongside endorsements from researchers at Johns Hopkins University and the logos of the Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization.
Such presentations gave Mr. Mattis confidence in Theranos’s technology, he said, because “it wasn’t just Elizabeth talking about it.”
When he asked EH why she wanted him on the board since he had no expertise in any medical testing area, EH told him she wanted his leadership skills.
Kissinger is 100 this year, so in his late 80s to mid 90s while on the board. (estimates for both, I'm terrible at math)
Relative to these guys, Mattis is young. He resigned from the board when he became Secretary of Defense, but lost the money he'd invested in Theranos.
From a NYT article about Mattis' testimony at EH's trial: James Mattis, a Theranos board member, 'didn't know what to believe,' he says in Elizabeth Homes trial: "Mr. Mattis said he had pushed the military to do a test program of Theranos analyzers to see how they performed alongside its existing systems before joining the board. “I wanted a comparative study on Theranos from Day 1 so we could bring it online,” he said. But no test materialized."
Another example about the extent to which EH completely controlled the fraudulent narrative and blatantly lied to convince investors and the board that everything was on track. None of those pharmaceutical companies could have validated the start-up's machines because they didn't work:
"Mr. Mattis said Ms. Holmes had been his primary source of information about Theranos and its technology. Prosecutors showed a presentation she had made to the board that said 10 of the 15 largest pharmaceutical companies had validated the start-up’s machines, alongside endorsements from researchers at Johns Hopkins University and the logos of the Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization.
Such presentations gave Mr. Mattis confidence in Theranos’s technology, he said, because “it wasn’t just Elizabeth talking about it.”
When he asked EH why she wanted him on the board since he had no expertise in any medical testing area, EH told him she wanted his leadership skills.