Lee Has An Attorney! REVISIT OLD THREAD

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lavanda Dolce said:
A thought dawned on me last night. Maybe George and Cindy were not covering up for Casey afterall? MAYBE they were covering up for Lee? The mere thought of their entire household being deceased or incarcerated would be motive enough.

Remember, that thought occured to us all in the beginning. What I would like to know is the following:

1. What woods was George seen a few months back walking outside of and then saying he was looking for a site for a fundraiser or gathering? Was it the same woods that Caylee was found?

2. Why has Lee been so adament to not provide DNA? Did he help Casey dispose of Caylee?

3. Did Lee end up taking a lie detector test or did he refuse that, as well?

These are some troubling thoughts. What are your opinions?
Click to expand...

Nice to *see* you, Lavanda.

1) Different area
2) He did, after being served w/ a Court Order, submit DNA, as well as fingerprints
3)No - refused, as did the A's


My opinion is still open re: LA - I do not believe his hands are totally clean, so to speak, but, I just haven't formed a cohesive opinion about this elusive A. Still mulling it over.
 
Lavanda Dolce said:
snipped...

1. What woods was George seen a few months back walking outside of and then saying he was looking for a site for a fundraiser or gathering? Was it the same woods that Caylee was found?

2. Why has Lee been so adament to not provide DNA? Did he help Casey dispose of Caylee?

3. Did Lee end up taking a lie detector test or did he refuse that, as well?
Click to expand...

Good questions!
1. Different woods.
2. I think he wants KC to think he is on her side so she'll reveal something to him. He has nothing to do with the crime. He's an undercover brother. :) My opinion.
3. He refused.
 
Lavanda Dolce said:
A thought dawned on me last night. Maybe George and Cindy were not covering up for Casey afterall? MAYBE they were covering up for Lee? The mere thought of their entire household being deceased or incarcerated would be motive enough.

Remember, that thought occured to us all in the beginning. What I would like to know is the following:

1. What woods was George seen a few months back walking outside of and then saying he was looking for a site for a fundraiser or gathering? Was it the same woods that Caylee was found?

2. Why has Lee been so adament to not provide DNA? Did he help Casey dispose of Caylee?

3. Did Lee end up taking a lie detector test or did he refuse that, as well?

These are some troubling thoughts. What are your opinions?
Click to expand...

i think we may be complicating a very simple situation. Just like we, moi included, complicated the body disoposal site speculation, by "over-thinking" and crediting the various As with too much intelligence. So, we all missed the obvious. The place right down the street.

Here's my take on LA:

The WHOLE family has tried to derail the investigation, to continue to present thier Ozzie and Harriet image. They would rather never know what happend to Klee than be known by the whol world as as "the monster-mother's family." My family would have done the same, as would most "closed-system" families. CA does it by obfuscating. LA is ruder and more abrupt. He just does it by refusing and rebelling.
 
I do not like Lee. That high five with his sister...really freaked me out. it's an image that's been seared into my brain forever.
 
Brini said:
i think we may be complicating a very simple situation. Just like we, moi included, complicated the body disoposal site speculation, by "over-thinking" and crediting the various As with too much intelligence. So, we all missed the obvious. The place right down the street.

Here's my take on LA:

The WHOLE family has tried to derail the investigation, to continue to present thier Ozzie and Harriet image. They would rather never know what happend to Klee than be known by the whol world as as "the monster-mother's family." My family would have done the same, as would most "closed-system" families. CA does it by obfuscating. LA is ruder and more abrupt. He just does it by refusing and rebelling.
Click to expand...
agree 100%!!
 
Well...he can high five his way through all the BS that will come his way very soon. Good thing he has lawyered up, imo.
 
LinasK said:
I totally agree! Lawyering up is what Guilty people do, not innocent ones...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I entirely (and respectfully) disagree. Not lawyering up (especially in a twisted mess like this one) is what NAIVE people do! Innocent people sometimes are found guilty and vice versa depending, in part, on the prowess of their legal representation. Although I like to think it doesn't happen often, it does happen.
 
carrie said:
I entirely (and respectfully) disagree. Not lawyering up (especially in a twisted mess like this one) is what NAIVE people do! Innocent people sometimes are found guilty and vice versa depending, in part, on the prowess of their legal representation. Although I like to think it doesn't happen often, it does happen.
Click to expand...

Getting a lawyer is much different than needing a lawyer. Why would Lee get a lawyer? Why would Lee NEED A lawyer?
 
It doesn't appear in the last several days since news of this was released that he needs a lawyer per se. Regardless of the who, where, what and why... Why wouldn't Lee get a lawyer? Any reasonable person in this situation would.
 
PhoneBoothBandit said:
It doesn't appear in the last several days since news of this was released that he needs a lawyer per se. Regardless of the who, where, what and why... Why wouldn't Lee get a lawyer? Any reasonable person in this situation would.
Click to expand...



I agree. Fact is, their whole family is now embroiled in a criminal investigation and now have to deal with the law in one form or another. Makes sense one hires a lawyer for many reasons...if not merely to consult with them on the law.
 
Perhaps LE gave them a heads up and they lawyered up. There was a LOT of evidence removed from the home that they spent the last 6 mos in while Caylee was missing. Tampering with evidence would be my first thought on their involvement.
 
PhoneBoothBandit said:
It doesn't appear in the last several days since news of this was released that he needs a lawyer per se. Regardless of the who, where, what and why... Why wouldn't Lee get a lawyer? Any reasonable person in this situation would.
Click to expand...

We haven't heard anything about a search warrant for Lee's house or car.If he was physically connected it seems like that would have happened by now.
Does anyone know if they asked for Mallory's fingerprints since she was seen in the A's home?Just to rule her out,of course.
 
Linda7NJ said:
I do not like Lee. That high five with his sister...really freaked me out. it's an image that's been seared into my brain forever.
Click to expand...


Yeah, that was something else, eh?
Don't forget, the high five ended with the two of them grinning ear to ear .. :rolleyes:


What a sight! :furious:
 
MissJames said:
We haven't heard anything about a search warrant for Lee's house or car.If he was physically connected it seems like that would have happened by now.
Does anyone know if they asked for Mallory's fingerprints since she was seen in the A's home?Just to rule her out,of course.
Click to expand...

Yes, I read that they took her prints, but I don't remember where.
 
3dogmom said:
I thought he retained legal counsel long ago.

I do not think this makes him suspicious, just smart. An attorney can help guide through situations you are not familiar with. The lay person has no idea how to conduct themselves in the legal arena/circus. Also an attorney can verify no public statements are unintentionally damaging.
Click to expand...

The truth costs nothing and doesn't require legal intervention. It's also a foreign concept to the A's so yeah, I guess he would need a lawyer to tell him what to say. :crazy:
 
kaRN said:
The truth costs nothing and doesn't require legal intervention. It's also a foreign concept to the A's so yeah, I guess he would need a lawyer to tell him what to say. :crazy:
Click to expand...

Would this also apply to JG?
 
Just my opinion here....... In a high profile WEIRD case like this, I think even the innocent would benefit from legal representation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 159 more.
Total: 1,952 (members: 160, guests: 1,792)

Online statistics

Members online
160
Guests online
1,792
Total visitors
1,952
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
594,766
Messages
18,011,677
Members
229,493
Latest member
kingfish8877
Back
Top