Dude.
Look at the WHOLE picture.
I am looking at the whole picture, without any pre-conceived decision about his guilt. If he didn't originate the call from the landline to his cell phone, then he didn't kill her.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude.
Look at the WHOLE picture.
Yeah, he just screwed up. Unless he can show Nancy didn't eat after 7:00 PM, he has to show that Nancy vomited. Or her body would have had food in her stomach if she was killed when she got home. So the lack of alcohol in her system and the lack of food would indicate she wasn't killed when she got home.
Thanks DogWood. So the judge did verbally tell the jury to disregard Kurtz's accusation of changing stories.
Based on the digestion times and the ME identifying it in her stomach, and if you believe Brad that she went running at 7am - she had to have ate onion sometime after 3 am at the earliest. Maybe she had an onion sandwich with her morning coffee (tongue firmly in cheek)..:crazy:
This might be just his style, but it might be camoflage too. Never underestimate a country boy. That slow drawl might be to throw someone off guard about how much smarter they are, then before they know it they have been backed into a tight corner. Given BC's apparent appreciation for his own intelligence... this would be a perfect weapon for him.
Huh? Not if the assault wasn't planned. If someone saw someone jogging by and decided to grab them, that wouldn't have been planned. If it wasn't BC, it wasn't a planned murder.
Well...there's your barf evidence.
:rocker:
Wouldn't it seem if she had time to change clothes after the party she wasn't killed immediately upon returning? BC wouldn't have thrown her dress in the hamper IMO, and he would have known it was green, and it wouldn't have been there when the police showed up. 4am is looking more and more likely if so IMO.
That's assuming that she did change clothes. I'm not sure that I can assume that she did or didn't. Since all the laundry was washed, all evidence of what she did with her clothes the night before is gone except that one picture showing the dress sticking out under that laundry basket.
Wouldn't it seem if she had time to change clothes after the party she wasn't killed immediately upon returning? BC wouldn't have thrown her dress in the hamper IMO, and he would have known it was green, and it wouldn't have been there when the police showed up. 4am is looking more and more likely if so IMO.
I feel sure there will be testimony about what she had to eat or drink at the party. I know they found what could be onion. Onion takes a long time to digest, but I know of at least one case in NC where the victim ate chicken and rice for dinner, and was killed at least 6 hours after eating it, but there was still rice in the stomach. This caused a lot of consternation during the trial, because rice usually digrests very quickly. No explaination was ever accepted about why it had not digested, but it tended to point to him having been killed earlier than believed, which could have implicated his wife in the murder.
But why (if he killed her when she walked in the door) would the dress be thrown in the hamper? He wouldn't have done that while re-dressing her, and he wouldn't have just left it there IMO.
Why do you say he wouldn't throw it the hamper?
Since the dress was in the hamper, and assuming he didn't see it there or put it there himself... maybe she was killed in the middle of the night- like 4am after changing clothes.
But then why would he have washed it???
Why do you say he wouldn't throw it the hamper?
IIRC, Brad DID produce it for CPD, and it had been washed.Because it would have been evidence? And the suggestion is he cleaned it to hide bodily fluids from the murder. So I imagine he would have done something with it while cleaning up the crime scene instead of throwing it in a dirty clothes hamper.
Well...there's your barf evidence.
:rocker:
To cover the fact it wasn't stained at the party? Brad seems to be the only one who knew her dress was stained and wet at the party...
Any crime lab peeps on the states witness list?Another hypothetical since I am very good at them - what if vomit was found in the jogging bra Nancy was found in or on the underside of the key table in the foyer or even in the vase where the bamboo sticks were located on Friday ?