I was under the impression she had an interest in jury duty not necessarily a juror in this case. :waitasec:
I was under the impression she had an interest in jury duty not necessarily a juror in this case. :waitasec:
Greetings everyone!
OK, I've been following this case off and on since way back. Had meant to stay silent but just overwhelmed with the urge to join in the discussion!
Can anyone tell me why ICA looks angry today?
I look forward to being part of this community.
But now she has said twice that "everyone is talking about this" - so if she hasn't been talking to people then how is she hearing "everyone talking about' it? KWIM?I think she may have meant how a trial actually works:twocents:
Greetings everyone!
OK, I've been following this case off and on since way back. Had meant to stay silent but just overwhelmed with the urge to join in the discussion!
Can anyone tell me why ICA looks angry today?
I look forward to being part of this community.
True but if it were me I wouldn't open a facebook email due to the judges orders not to be on facebook.
oh wait - hold up
PJ was asked if she wanted to be on this jury and she said yes.
When asked why - she said she'd always had an interest in this. hhhmmmmm......yet no knowledge of the case at all?
I didn't like that - threw me a red flag
does it act like a chiwawa?
Yeah, sounds like she doesn't work but does nursing rotationals as part of school.