She commented on my blog a few days ago.
Hint: Freeh is a lot more important than I am.
JJ: I'd like to read that. What's the name of your article she posted under?
Thanks!
She commented on my blog a few days ago.
Hint: Freeh is a lot more important than I am.
JJ: I'd like to read that. What's the name of your article she posted under?
Thanks!
Legacy Protection.
I annoy her quite a bit, which is ironic, since I've actually said she probably is one of those people that tried to do the right thing in 1998.
She also said: Would others, myself included had Ray not decided to handle the case personally, perhaps have decided to forge ahead with what was known at that time? While its impossible to say with 100% certainty without knowing what else transpired after Ray took over the case, that's quite
possible.
Read more here: http://www.centredaily.com/2012/07/08/3255159/legacy-protection.html#storylink=cpy#storylink=cpy
I said that "legacy protection" has two problems in the RFG case:
1. It hurts the chances of solving the case.
2. It almost never works.
I think you can see the second point coming true today.
Yes, one of your best articles! I still don't see her under the comments at your article. Can you give me a steer?
Aargh! Have downloaded the report (thinks for the link) and seached for two names- dranov and raykovitz-
Nothing.
It appears that Freeh confined his report tightly within Penn State .
I'm disappointed that nothing is said about the responsibilities of these men.
OTT, its a great report.
I'm very pleased that there was not a link between RFG and the Big Four in 1998.
doesnt mean that such a link didnt occur. freeh was charged with penn state, not anything or anyone else.
sunny hostens doesnt get it that some are STILL supporting penn state.
i can explain it sunny.
they are football fans.
fan = fanatical.
fan = my ego is irretrievably tied to football at my school of choice........ (penn state, for example)
these people see anything said that might be construed as negative about "their" program as a personal attack on them.
post freeh report response from PATERNO family...note that at the end they try to dilute Joes responsibility by saying :"everyone" shares in the responsibility...well i've heard the report summarzied and it doesnt point to"everyones" responsibility, but to the responsibility of four men---joe paterno is one of those men...the Paterno family remains in obscuration mode, no matter what.
snipped for length
Speaking personally, Huck said Sandusky has “done some wonderful things in his lifetime and we should try to help him ... We all make little mistakes in our lives.”
I read a comment on the Huffington Post that said the victims weren't rape victims, but were underage prostitutes. They kept "coming back for more" and are now going to be millionaires. I hate rape culture. :banghead:
I read a comment on the Huffington Post that said the victims weren't rape victims, but were underage prostitutes. They kept "coming back for more" and are now going to be millionaires. I hate rape culture. :banghead: