Recent content by candy

Shylock posted " Wrong. What right's are those Candy? They have the right to be arrested?...LOL. Sure, the Rammers have that right, everybody does. But the right to due process does not extend to people who WANT to be arrested and can't find a law enforcement agency to accomodate them." Whose...

I take it you have never studied in depth cases of right to privacy. Regardless whether or not a dead body is found in your home or not each citizen is still entitled to a right of privacy. Although not expressly stated in the Constitution, it is a fundamental right commonly acknowledged by...

You have no idea what you are talking about at all. The Ramseys have due process rights under the Constitution of the United States as citizens. They can assert them at any time.

You can assert your due process rights as a U.S. Citizen under the Constitution of the United States at any time, you don't have to be charged with a crime to assert them. It's a fundamental right under the U.S. Constitution.

162. High-ranking Boulder Police officials believed to be among the unknown Boulder Police co-conspirators, as a matter of custom, policy and practice, have allowed members of the Boulder Police Department, including Defendant Thomas and the unknown Boulder Police co-conspirators, to leak...

Have you ever read the complaint against ST? It has an entire section devoted to Deprivation of Constitutional Rights. COUNT FOUR - 42 U.S.C. § 1983 DEPRIVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS 144. Plaintiffs John and Patsy Ramsey hereby incorporate, adopt and re-allege Paragraphs 1 through 28 of...

If you knew what due process is, you would not even be asking a question like that. Among other things, it is the RIGHT, not suggestion A RIGHT of a defendant to confront evidence and accusers against them IN COURT, in an orderly process, indictment, arraignment, etc. not in Vanity Fair...

I'm talking about these posters deliberately smearing the truth about leaks in this case, just like they did at the public forum until Jameson locked them all out. As Darnay said, it's amazing they didn't get sued for fraud. I posted evidence about his leaks being a violation of their due...

148. Prior to the publication of the hardback book, Defendant Thomas and the unknown Boulder Police co-conspirators expressly or impliedly entered into an agreement to deny Plaintiffs John and Patsy Ramsey their constitutional rights to privacy, due process of law and equal protection of the...

The Ramsey case was not "arbitrarily" taken away from the police. The BPD gave it up after threat of a lawsuit from the Ramseys. There is real liability for the police in such issues as leaks, a violation of the Ramseys right to due process, among other things.

http://www.bouldernews.com/bdc/home/article/0,1713,BDC_2396_2847181,00.html Governor says no need for special prosecutor in Ramsey case By Associated Press April 29, 2004 DENVER — Gov. Bill Owens said Thursday he welcomes a visit by people who believe the parents of JonBenet Ramsey were...

This is a brand new article today.

[/b] http://www.longmontfyi.com/regionstate.htm#story2 Ramsey case won’t get special treatment By Travis Henry The Daily Times-Call BOULDER — In the enclave of Boulder — where crime stories seem to take on a life of their own — the University of Colorado recruiting scandal and the...

ST on "Good Morning America, 4/10/00: ST: The indentation, for example, on the sign-off. "It's up to you now John," exclamation point; indented, "Victory!"; indented, "S.B.T.C." We were able to find in prior writings of Patsy, for example, how she would almost consistently sign off with the...

ST Hardback, p. 262: One of the first things he (Professor Donald Foster) picked up on was Patsy's habit of using acronyms and acrostics in her communications. She often signed off with her initials,PAPR, and used such phrases as "To BVFMFA from PPRBSJ", which meant "To Barbara J. Fernie...