Search results

He reckons that Madeleine was snatched by a passing paedo as she went looking for her parents. Interesting theory and could be part right. Sh probably fell down those steps and I bet thats where they (Gerry and co) found her. Either way, their culpability is finally confirmed! Damn them...

I think thats right, but in the case of the McCanns, there is Government connection (and he is a Coonsultant in the NHS - they are treated like Gods!). Next interesting item is the Channel 4 'documentary' - run by the McCanns, next Thurday.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090430/tuk-mother-remanded-over-chloe-s-murder-6323e80.html I wonder why some scouse Mothers are easily accepted as having harmed their children where others are considered 'incapable' of such an act? Is it something to do with their income? Maybe Mothers...

http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/world/mccanns+campaign+wins+eu+handout/3116292 Not their campaign, they hijacked it - but I wonder what this money will be spent on, I wonder who benefits? I wonder if Brian Kennedy has any financial interests?

He certainly is the devils own! The meek will never inherit the earth! He doesnt seem to have antything other than contacts - his logic is flawed, his intelligence is in doubt, he reflects the intellect of the Sun newspaper - I wonder if he is connected to rupert Murdoch?

If Clarence is indeed off the payroll, is it known what his income is from now? It would be very interesting indeed to know what he now does. Media advisor to the newly-emerged-as-a-Philanthropist Brian Kennedy? Does he actually still work for Government? What made him (Kennedy) drop the...

Hairs must be split! It is essential that we examine in detail all information relating to the neglect and loss of Madeleine - to make sure that parents understand that they are responsible for their children, not the state. I am highly suspicious of these odd reports where Madeleine is...

I disagree emphatically. These people are either time wasters or they have some agenda. I believe these reports, on the basis of their odd similarities with the many other reports from across theworld, are being generated deliberately. They should be investigated thoroughly - as should...

Yes I'm sure that anyone who had abducted a child who had been plastered all over the worlds press would let her play in a public square! Amazing how a 77 year old who had never seen the real child (except in an oddly limited number of old photos - note how few pictures have been circulated...

The timing was changed. Gerry didnt say 9:15 PM at first. He said this when Jane Tanners story began to fall apart (as the pictures of the abductor began to become almost photographic!). I think his lawyers realised that Tanner was the weak area and Gerry had to distance himself. The problem...

http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2009/04/niggle-and-strange-tale-of-robert-murat.html ...and please read this. Tanner is the weak link in the T9 and Gerry had to contradict her statement.

Again you are making assumptions or perhaps seeking to divert the debate? The definition of the word is not in question. Once again, your statement is. These were not two independant accounts. Gerry McCann knew when he made his blog that Jane Tanner had said on Panorama (some weeks...

I'm afraid you begin with an incorrect premise which results in the rest of your thinking being fatally flawed. You say 'the only thing we know for certain is that she was taken from the flat and without concrete evidence that she was dead at the time, I believe that would be abduction until...

Exactly right. They were never formall cleared as they hadnt been formall charged, jsut investigated. Clearly anyone who is shadowed at all times by UK security personnel is not going to be the subject of justice are they! McCann was a government advisor - his name appeared on many committee...

...and of course they wouldnt have had the opportunity to obtain money would they! Many people forget they actually paid their mortgage from the fund! Why would such a well off pair need to do that! This may well reveal an even more unpleasant reason for the disappearance of Madeleine McCann!

www.oprah.com Dont let them get away with telling their lies! have your say!

I just dont understand. People continue to post here and elsewhere in blind support of the McCanns. They claim abduction with no evidence. They support parents who disgrace the description - people who even blamed their little just-under-four year old for crying and calling them out of...

Just for clarity, is April claiming that Madeleine was abducted? I'd love to see the evidence of that, not seen any yet!

These pro-McCanns! They always want everyone else to prove their Holy Duo guilty rather than accept that their is no evidence of abduction and plenty of evidence of neglect and worse! :rolleyes: