Hi Colonel M,
I too perceived OP as a very immature individual.
As for the boating accident… it is certainly possible… but if anything was wrong with OP because of it, you can bet Roux would have brought evidence in that regard.
The fact is that for such evidence to be presented, a neuro-specialist would have to scan OP brain and determine the presence of lesions or similar damage… then, based on the lesions, a psychiatrist would have to diagnose OP with a mental condition.
The only thing Roux and OP could wrangle up is GAD… based only on OP's unchallenged word
Although, if OP is driving his "legal boat," would he have stood still for a scan and, if positive for brain injury, been willing to use that as a defense?
I would think not. It isn't an image of himself that he could tolerate nor would it have have been acceptable to his sponsors.
Sponsors? Yes, I really think OP feels he has a great chance of walking or serving minimal time and then returning to his sponsors' and the public's embrace.
I don't know whether his family believes that, too, and / or may be humoring / misleading him so he can "get through" the trial.
If the latter, above, it would be reminiscent of families and friends who conspire against the revelation of a terminal diagnosis to a loved one. "It's for their own good. "
By the way, if he does get a light sentence I will feel very angry.
"Justice" for the rich and well-connected, while no-doubt a factor, will have been trumped by politics.
I wonder what Masipa will do if she is pressured to go light on him. My guess is that she'll buckle. Such is the nature and power of politics.
Look at it already. He got bail, he is having a trial quickly, in the limelight, and was allowed to have his mental health eval as an outpatient. I understand they are typically, if not always, done inpatient. With so few beds, accused are jailed for years before their evals.
I think his bail should have been revoked and OP taken into custody as soon as the application was approved. How many other accused are smilingly told by the judge that "they don't want to punish him twice. "
It was grossly inappropriate for Masipa to be that casual, especially after, appropriately, admonishing Nel and the gallery for similar behavior, and was detrimental to the cause of challenging the stigma around mental illness.
That's all that people who struggle and suffer with the disease DON'T need to believe - that being evaluated about their health and receiving treatment as an inpatient, is humorous and/or a "punishment". It is beyond detrimental. I have a problem with those who focus on activism and awareness in one area (for Masipa, violence against women) while being completely blind, insensitive, and damaging in other just causes.