Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How odd! I live in South Jersey and heard nothing about it!mjak said:According to our local paper in NJ , the city of perth amboy is renovating an abandoned apartment complex to house 100 refugges familes. While this may not be the finest area its by far not the worst either.
mjak
tipper said:Over the years I've lost confidence in both parties so a bi-partisan commission doesn't fill me with a belief we'll hear the whole story.
I have lived in both North and South Jerrsey and I can tell you the communication lines leave a lot to be desired. It Trully is bizzare. It was the Asbury Park Press which ran this article on its front page. The AP has now picked the story up and if you google perth amboy hurricane it comes up. I too would be much to afraid to go help out in North Philly!!Linda7NJ said:How odd! I live in South Jersey and heard nothing about it!
NJ is such a small state who would imagine such a gap between news flowing north to south?
SieSie said:Michigan was supposed to receive about 300 people (I think), but I haven't heard yet if we actually got the people, and if so, where they were placed. I, too, am very curious about this.
They won't waste time, in doing the clean-up, and bulldozing most of the homes that were submerged, but I think the rush to rebuild will get bogged down by the government beaurocracy. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to throw good money, after bad, by rebuilding New Orleans below sea leavel again. Seems that the amount spent rebuilding New Orleans would be just about equal to recreating New Orleans in a different location. The French Quarter, where the buildings are above sea level, are one thing, but the remainder of New Orleans, built below sea level, is another thing. Hopefully they will spend some time doing a study, to decide what the very best approach would be, before rushing in, and doing anything.poco said:Will New Orleans and even some of the other coastal cities affected by this disaster ever be the same?
I am just sitting here wondering how many people won't return to NO. It will be months before things even return to a semblance of normal. Many of the people who have been displaced will begin new lives - get new jobs, new friends, possibly find new places to live - will they return? I believe I would count my blessings and start a new live elsewhere. What would you do?
In San Diego, we have 600 staying at SDState University - and at least some people saying they don't like it because they're all criminals and thugs and the students shouldn't be exposed (on the other board I read which does have some real nutcases) - I suspect this feeling, fed by the reports of what happened during the disaster, may be leading to the refugees being put in isolated or bad areas. I've heard of at least one other group being placed somewhere very, very isolated.Linda7NJ said:When I first heard they were coming, I was thrilled and looking forward to driving there and helping out. Rumor had it they would be staying in Center City or the Navy Yard.
Well, they placed them in an abandoned middle school in North Philly! For those of you not familiar with North Philly, let me tell you, it's a terrible, crime ridden ghetto, notorious for drug dealers & gangs, shooting all the time, murder rate is astronomical. It's the kind of place where no one wants to live.
I was wondering if the other states that took in survivors placed them in the worst areas or are they staying someplace decent and relatively safe?
I won't be going to North Philly.
Despite the huge number of support personnel; the response is still not well organized. It's overkill in many areas, while other areas, as you mentioned, haven't had any support yet. Perhaps the news media, who seem very adept at locating these unresponded-to-areas will serve that purpose in this disaster. It doesn't seem as if it should take that long to have this rescue/support effort to get organized, but then again the government is involved and they seem to manage to do this frequently.tipper said:On the other hand this morning I saw a brief clip of a doctor who was vaccinating people (I think in Miss.) at her own expense and she had yet to see anyone from FEMA or the state. Nobody had shown up and the area looked pretty well destroyed.
SieSie said:Michigan was supposed to receive about 300 people (I think), but I haven't heard yet if we actually got the people, and if so, where they were placed. I, too, am very curious about this.
Off hand I know my sister told me she handled 10's of thousand of meals donated by Outback Steakhouse. I think they are Cocoa cola..so there was probably some drinks too!Pepper said:During 9-11 I worked for Toshiba. As I recall, Toshiba gave $50,000 to the relief effort, AND donated 1,500 laptop computers to the disaster workers in NYC. They received NO credit for this from the news media.
I also remember Coors donating thousands of bottles of water to NYC.
I'm not saying that corporate America is doing nothing in this crisis, but if they are, we aren't hearing about it.
I would like the media encourage businesses to contribute their products that could be used, with credit-free advertising- being given to those companies highlighting what they are donating. This would be a win-win situation. Companies get a tax deduction, and advertising for their products by putting them in the hands of the users. Those in need would get the things they need to sustain life.
Procter & Gamble could contribute diapers, wipes, soap, etc.
Home Depot could contribute building supplies.
Arrowhead could give bottled water.
You get the idea.
Now I know money is needed, and the American people have been very generous in opening their wallets. But color me suspicious, money can be mis-used. Why should the Red Cross or FEMA have to BUY bottled water, food, clothes, etc. and probably pay market or above-market prices for these goods? Why can't the companies that manufacture and sell these supplies DONATE a portion?
They raised the elevation of Galveston, and that was in the early 1900s. I think they can do the same with N.O.Buzzm1 said:They won't waste time, in doing the clean-up, and bulldozing most of the homes that were submerged, but I think the rush to rebuild will get bogged down by the government beaurocracy. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to throw good money, after bad, by rebuilding New Orleans below sea leavel again. Seems that the amount spent rebuilding New Orleans would be just about equal to recreating New Orleans in a different location. The French Quarter, where the buildings are above sea level, are one thing, but the remainder of New Orleans, built below sea level, is another thing. Hopefully they will spend some time doing a study, to decide what the very best approach would be, before rushing in, and doing anything.
I'm sure corporations are donating things other than money, but the media needs to make sure we all know about it!JBean said:Off hand I know my sister told me she handled 10's of thousand of meals donated by Outback Steakhouse. I think they are Cocoa cola..so there was probably some drinks too!