http://www.hcso.tampa.fl.us/About-HCSO/Press-Releases/Releases/2010/February/10-041.aspx
Sheriff Gee placed his death as sometime between 4/6 and 4/7/09. At .54 on the first video, Sheriff Gee states he is reading from the affidavit that:
"Between April 6, 2009 and April 7, 2009, at an unknown hour, Abraham Lee Shakespeare was murdered within the residence located at 5732 Highway 60 east in Plant City, Florida".
So, that was my question. If they knew he was murdered between 4/6 and 4/7/09, then why didn't they put 4/6 or 4/7/09 on page one of the criminal affidavit where it said date of offense. It made no sense to me at all why they charge her with murder and then don't put the date they later say he was murdered on. So, ACR provided me with a very plausible explanation. The charge is premeditated murder and that may be the first date they can prove she did something to plan for this murder, such as bought a gun or made the video of Abraham. It is the only thing that has made sense to me as to why they would put a different date on the cover of the criminal affidavit. If that is the case, which it sounds right, then why didn't they follow it up within the criminal affidavit and say something like, "On 4/1/09, Dorice did (whatever the premeditated act was)"? Maybe they did and I just missed it, but I couldn't find it. The criminal affidavit has already been shown to be in error on the property transfers. But the explanation ACR gave is a pretty good one.
I don't know why they decided date of death was 4/6 - 4/7/09. I'm pretty sure that after that much time, they couldn't pinpoint it by the condition of the body to a specific date. I thought it was possible that they could have found something in his clothing or in his wallet with a date on it, like another lotto ticket with a 4/6/09 date on it. There were several people who said they saw him alive on 4/3/09 when he supposedly signed the power of attorney, including the person who notarized it or witnessed it, whichever it was. There may be a cell phone call he made to someone that they found in the cell phone records who remembers the call and can say it was definitely him. I think some of the answers we will have to wait until the trial to get, if ever.
Sheriff Gee placed his death as sometime between 4/6 and 4/7/09. At .54 on the first video, Sheriff Gee states he is reading from the affidavit that:
"Between April 6, 2009 and April 7, 2009, at an unknown hour, Abraham Lee Shakespeare was murdered within the residence located at 5732 Highway 60 east in Plant City, Florida".
So, that was my question. If they knew he was murdered between 4/6 and 4/7/09, then why didn't they put 4/6 or 4/7/09 on page one of the criminal affidavit where it said date of offense. It made no sense to me at all why they charge her with murder and then don't put the date they later say he was murdered on. So, ACR provided me with a very plausible explanation. The charge is premeditated murder and that may be the first date they can prove she did something to plan for this murder, such as bought a gun or made the video of Abraham. It is the only thing that has made sense to me as to why they would put a different date on the cover of the criminal affidavit. If that is the case, which it sounds right, then why didn't they follow it up within the criminal affidavit and say something like, "On 4/1/09, Dorice did (whatever the premeditated act was)"? Maybe they did and I just missed it, but I couldn't find it. The criminal affidavit has already been shown to be in error on the property transfers. But the explanation ACR gave is a pretty good one.
I don't know why they decided date of death was 4/6 - 4/7/09. I'm pretty sure that after that much time, they couldn't pinpoint it by the condition of the body to a specific date. I thought it was possible that they could have found something in his clothing or in his wallet with a date on it, like another lotto ticket with a 4/6/09 date on it. There were several people who said they saw him alive on 4/3/09 when he supposedly signed the power of attorney, including the person who notarized it or witnessed it, whichever it was. There may be a cell phone call he made to someone that they found in the cell phone records who remembers the call and can say it was definitely him. I think some of the answers we will have to wait until the trial to get, if ever.