OriginalJerseyGirl
CERTIFIED FLYERS FANATIC!
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2005
- Messages
- 7,203
- Reaction score
- 19
Hi Bobbisangel.
I wanted to address a few things that you said in your post.
First, I remember reading in one of the links that this case will not be closed until they locate the little girl. Here's hoping that they stand by that resolve.
Secondly, from all of the articles that have mentioned anything about it, both males in the home are sons of the foster couple. The elder son owns the house and the parents and their younger son live there. I personally find it odd that this couple was granted a foster care license while living in their son's home. Was that the original situation, I wonder? Would that son/owner have had to have signed something? I don't know - it just seems like a somewhat unstable situation for the actual foster parents to take on children when they don't even have their own home. I guess that the sad reality is that there aren't enough homes for the kids so sometimes they probably have to take what they can get as long as they pass criminal checks. Not that there's anything wrong with a family living with their child, just that I would think that a foster care situation would require the foster parents to prove stability and financial strength.
Finally, the foster parents said that they had cooperated with LE but that they had nothing else to add. Who knows? Maybe they were berated and decided that they would no longer talk to LE because they already told them everything. I'm sure that interrogation can be immensely frustrating for the one being interrogated. I must say, though, that articles have stated that the family stopped cooperating with LE after the first day. That seems kind of early, even if they were frustrated, IMO.
I wanted to address a few things that you said in your post.
First, I remember reading in one of the links that this case will not be closed until they locate the little girl. Here's hoping that they stand by that resolve.
Secondly, from all of the articles that have mentioned anything about it, both males in the home are sons of the foster couple. The elder son owns the house and the parents and their younger son live there. I personally find it odd that this couple was granted a foster care license while living in their son's home. Was that the original situation, I wonder? Would that son/owner have had to have signed something? I don't know - it just seems like a somewhat unstable situation for the actual foster parents to take on children when they don't even have their own home. I guess that the sad reality is that there aren't enough homes for the kids so sometimes they probably have to take what they can get as long as they pass criminal checks. Not that there's anything wrong with a family living with their child, just that I would think that a foster care situation would require the foster parents to prove stability and financial strength.
Finally, the foster parents said that they had cooperated with LE but that they had nothing else to add. Who knows? Maybe they were berated and decided that they would no longer talk to LE because they already told them everything. I'm sure that interrogation can be immensely frustrating for the one being interrogated. I must say, though, that articles have stated that the family stopped cooperating with LE after the first day. That seems kind of early, even if they were frustrated, IMO.