I agree with you nora, in that having no "probable cause" sounds to me like a political decision based on money and not at all the truth.
After all, a gunshot heard in the residence is then "not" probable cause?
This past week it was reported that The Los Angeles County District Attorney won’t be pursuing the case against Wagner and Cox because deputies did not have probable cause to search the home where the drugs were found.
How about a license for that gun? How about disturbing the peace of the neighbors,
let alone the drugs confisgated.:waitasec:
Since they are getting off "scott-free" then, I'd love to know does that mean the drugs will be returned to their rightful owners just like a watch might be?
No cause, no broken laws, no reason to hold someone's property
Seems to me, that LA in it's tonier neighborhoods have an awful lot of this going on, the unwillingness to prosecute rich folks or the well connected.
Even if some (like the agent gunned down on that Beverly Hills corner) became in lickety-split, a "case closed" after the man told his neighbor before killing himself, he was to collect a $10,000.00 fee or expected this sum of money. She's dead, the family doesn't press the subject, (whoever was left that is) she had no children, hence, case closed very quickly after the shooter (on a bicycle) kills himself, how convenient.
What a bunch of bunk! Noticeable I'm sure by many in this country besides myself.
Maybe by some miracle, the Katie Wilkins case will be different , as
there is a family who cares and is willing to be the squeaky wheel who requires the oil.