Kimster
Former Member
Yes, the prosecution said they wanted to reserve the right to bring him back and JP approved the request.
George's testimony at trial
- Thread starter Kimster
- Start date
Yes, the prosecution said they wanted to reserve the right to bring him back and JP approved the request.
helenann2k
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2009
- Messages
- 87
- Reaction score
- 283
I've lurked for years, literally, but finally decided to open my mouth. This has been bothering me all evening. I felt GA was lying when he said Cayle replied "To Zanny's." If the DT now admits there was no Zanny, then GA just helped them out by discrediting his own honesty. Makes my head spin.
Kimster
Former Member
Baez asked GA if he has a problem with his vision, regarding not knowing she was pregnant at the time of the wedding. I'm wondering where he's going with this since I missed all of this testimony earlier today.
Kimster
Former Member
:welcome:
Glad you came out of hiding!
I totally agree with your post! :thumb: This is all very confusing!
tlcya
Old and Re-Tired Websleuth
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 42,293
- Reaction score
- 66,365
We all have agreed that the denial or refusal to see what was apparent to all of us is odd behavior. What was weird to me today was not GA's testimony about it though as at least it remained consistent with previous statements. What was bizarre to me was how much time JB spend grilling him and ostracizing GA about that subject. And yet never asks the one question his own opening statement begged! That told me volumes.
I think George kept his composure very well.
tlcya
Old and Re-Tired Websleuth
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 42,293
- Reaction score
- 66,365
Welcome! Glad to hear your thoughts on the matter!
Kimster
Former Member
Baez is asking if GA told the FBI that he wasn't sure that KC worked for the last two years. GA admits he did. Seems like Baez is trying to discredit GA as being a truthful person.
SoCalSleuth
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2008
- Messages
- 1,729
- Reaction score
- 381
JB stated in his opening that this family's MO was to lie and to deny--and he gave as an example a photo of a very pregnant KC at her Uncle's wedding --and then related how the Anthonys denied KC was pregnant--when obviously they knew better. He used this to show why it fit within the familys MO to lie and deny Caylee's accidental drowning. So, where he was going with this was to establish the statements he made in his opening.
Well,I have been travelling all day in our RV and managed to catch quite a lot .Wow! What a day !Thank goodness I invested in an aircard,wouldn't have wanted to miss that!All I really have to say is "Casey,you've just been thwarted by your Dad".Thank you George,now it's your turn Cindy.Stand up for Caylee!
Kimster
Former Member
Baez asks what KC spent her paycheck on. GA says insurance for her car, gas for her car, things like that. GA never had contact with the nanny nor did the nanny ever call the house. (I spose he thought KC was paying for the nanny too....)
Kimster
Former Member
GA went to KC's work to surprise her for lunch, but it was twofold, he also was hoping she was working there. (At Sports Authority). GA is trying to explain and Baez interrupts. I'm surprised GA didn't get pizzy, like many of you have mentioned on the threads today! Wow.
Even when Baez gives him a smirky look, too.
Even when Baez gives him a smirky look, too.
goldleaf
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2009
- Messages
- 212
- Reaction score
- 0
A lot of this could have been avoided if GA had been more truthful from the beginning, instead of parroting ICA's lies.
I'm glad he manned up and give him credit for that, but this farce would not have gone on so long if CA and GA had admitted there was no nanny and ICA was lying from the start.
If I sound harsh it's because my tax dollars have been wasted by JB and the DT with ICA's help while our county is looking at cutting services to victim support programs, among many other things.
Yes, I hold CA and GA accountable for this mess, they should have spoken the truth a long time ago. So whoopee that he speaks it now to save his own *advertiser censored**
I'm glad he manned up and give him credit for that, but this farce would not have gone on so long if CA and GA had admitted there was no nanny and ICA was lying from the start.
If I sound harsh it's because my tax dollars have been wasted by JB and the DT with ICA's help while our county is looking at cutting services to victim support programs, among many other things.
Yes, I hold CA and GA accountable for this mess, they should have spoken the truth a long time ago. So whoopee that he speaks it now to save his own *advertiser censored**
Kimster
Former Member
JP says a witness should not be discredited by talking to a lawyer about his or her testimony.
Then Baez asks about GA consulting with an attorney and seeking Paul Kelly for advice within 48? hours of finding out Caylee was missing. Mr. Kelly is a workman's comp attorney and a friend, says GA.
Then Baez asks about GA consulting with an attorney and seeking Paul Kelly for advice within 48? hours of finding out Caylee was missing. Mr. Kelly is a workman's comp attorney and a friend, says GA.
Tuffy
Not really that tough...
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 6,178
- Reaction score
- 19
Kimster
Former Member
Baez was questioning GA about hearing about duct tape in his opening statement. JP said you can't question about the opening statement as that isn't evidence. (Wouldn't that be elementary knowledge for attorneys? :waitasec
LCoastMom
JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE MARIE - STILL WAITING
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 7,517
- Reaction score
- 40
I thought GA did as best he could answering JB without allowing him to goad him or get riled up. His answer was already out there and didn't GA first say he had suspicions or intuition on the subject? He had also said he caught it from CA for acting like a detective at the Sport's Authority - to the point he just dropped the whole thing. It could not have been easy living in that house, under those rules... No wonder ICA has no respect for authority.
He appeared to me that he was not playing Baezs' game today and JB was barely holding his disgust for GA during questioning - JB needs to be smacked down if that is the attitude he is going to take with all the witnesses.
The look on ICA's face when GA said "If I were there (when Caylee died) we wouldn't be here today" was priceless. Princess was so pizzed - like she was saying 'See? Did you hear that'
Wise Old Owl
Retired WS Staff & Founding member of AFKBPOFPOPL
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2008
- Messages
- 13,866
- Reaction score
- 2,312
IMHO JB came across as .......inept?........green?.........incompetent?......Baez was questioning GA about hearing about duct tape in his opening statement. JP said you can't question about the opening statement as that isn't evidence. (Wouldn't that be elementary knowledge for attorneys? :waitasec
I couldn't count how many objections were sustained in a row at one point. JB wanted to ask a question and he had no clue how to forumlate the question that would be acceptable in a court of law. It was silly and certainly didn't make JB look good.
Things that make you go Hmmm.
JB accuses GA of the most disgusting abuse of his daughter, then does not even mention it while questioning him. That alleged abuse, according to JB was at the root of all ICA's problems, but he doesn't ask him one question...
JB accuses GA of the most disgusting abuse of his daughter, then does not even mention it while questioning him. That alleged abuse, according to JB was at the root of all ICA's problems, but he doesn't ask him one question...
bogeygal
Registered User
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,830
- Reaction score
- 16
I thought that part of GA's testimony was interesting. I don't know the exact time line this falls into, but right away though...I thought GA's hinky meter was going off, as far as Caylee actually having a real job!