itsthevibe
Verified insider - Allison Baden-Clay case
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2012
- Messages
- 766
- Reaction score
- 0
Originally Posted by Mouse Detective:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudra
Apologies, I don't post often, but try to read all the comments when I get the chance. I'm puzzled by the strong emphasis on DV in this case which has been brought up in many of the posts. I am not denying that DV may have been an issue in the marriage, and I am not denying that DV is a bad thing; but what confuses me is that it seems DV at times is being put forward for the motive of the murder, or even the cause of death.
DV may have resulted in ABC's death, but speaking technically it was not the cause of her death: cause of death would be a blow to the head; drowning, suffocation etc. An as yet we don't know what COD was.
A trickier question is whether DV by itself is the motivation for murder. I can see some people would believe it so; that there are men who are naturally inclined to inflicting violence on their spouses for the sole purpose of having control at any cost. But even then I would argue that DV is an outcome of a control issue. That is, the spouse who wants more control uses violence to get it. In fact there are many people who use violence to get control over others.
I think I am trying to say that when it comes down to the basics, someone wanted to get control over ABC, and they did. When it comes to motive, the question is why did they want / need that control over her?
I realise that this has been implicit in many of the discussions before, but I have never really seen the question of motive explored in detail so far.
I agree "control" is at the heart of many of these more complex cases. Who may have become frustrated by the control Allison had? or Who felt that they had no control over Allison or the domain that she controlled?
Motive - well there were a range of financial and relationship reasons. GBC had a mistress who the BC parents favoured and they possibly saw her as someone who could help revitalise the failing business, whereas Allison had already turned her interests to something that was more humanitarian and something that would benefit the girls directly, as well as other children - the Pathways program.
The family name and strong and successful image was very important to the Baden-Clays, evidenced by their adoption of the Baden prefix, and the touting of NBC's hunting prowess. I feel the elder BC's saw themselves as leaders and above others. A big financial fall and business bust might have been the ultimate humiliation for this family. Gerard had for some reason decided to expand and take on larger premises at a time when people were downscaling or consolidating, and a lot of money was risked including the BC seniors money.
They had invested everything into this, it wasn't working out well enough, and Allison had abandoned ship and gone her own way - possibly a way of feeling like she was doing something more worthwhile, and removing herself from the environment where the mistress had worked and staff had possibly known. Maybe Allison was sick of the financial problems and just wanted Gerard to get out of it all and simplify their life.
Family pride and pressures on Gerard by his parents, particularly father, to live up to the standards and image set would have been a big issue. If he and Allison had been arguing and she was speaking about the affair, the money problems, the control of his parents etc, it could easily have escalated into him killing her. The expression 'the truth hurts' is taken to extreme in a sociopath or narcissist, (IMO) and when they hear things they don't want to hear, especially about themselves, they come to hate the source of that information and can easily go into a rage and have to immediately silence the person, eliminate them, the source of all their pain and problems as they see it. I believe that is what happened on that night. This would have been part of GBC's motive whether it was pre-meditated or not.
If it was pre-meditated, there was the insurance policy and possibly also the issue of a divorce and settlement which would not be financially beneficial to the BC's, and there may have also been some sort of position in the company held by Allison, which if she withdrew would have a detrimental effect.
If it wasn't premeditated, if Gerard got himself into problems with body disposal and needed help, help would have been provided by NBC, a choice to cover up would have been made to try to ensure the family name and image was preserved.
This of course, is JMO. If it is true, makes me so sad to think of how someone can be considered so disposable, and used as a scapegoat for everyone elses mistakes and failings.
Have considered other options but I can't see anything unless the entire police case is wrong.