OK OK - Sharon Marshall, 20, multiple aliases, OKC, 1990 - ID'd as Suzanne Sevakis - #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, you're not crossing cases, it is the one they are waiting for results on, she seems to be the closest we have come to a match in a long time......raindrops300 is in contact with Christina's cousin.

MartieLee that posts on here is Christina's cousin. This is how I know who she is. I think this match is a good possibility....
 
lets hope so i know when all the drama went down Matt b was tracking down a lead or something its mentioned in the archives or something about it and a former poster who was baned at that time dont remember all the details. that was around the time one of the former posters was sending mail to flyod in prison and he was writing back nonsense stuff that made no sense. i think that was when the fourm on sm was still around and then the blow up happened and she was moved back to cold cases regular thread
 
Hi everyone! Glad to see a new thread for Sharon.

Smile - was that the Lori Peugot lead? I'm thinking it was but I could be wrong.
 
moving from the closed thread so it is fresh on the minds of our posters :)

Thanks for the pics jodieo! I see a resemblance. I also see a resemblance with Michael Hughes.

I hope this is the answer so many are waiting for.
 
I keep looking at Christina's nose and comparing it to Sharon's in the picture where she is sitting on Floyd's lap. There is something about it that IMO looks like so much like Sharon's nose.

Does anyone else see that? Or am I just wishing and hoping here?
 
I keep looking at Christina's nose and comparing it to Sharon's in the picture where she is sitting on Floyd's lap. There is something about it that IMO looks like so much like Sharon's nose.

Does anyone else see that? Or am I just wishing and hoping here?

I see it NM, also her hair, the bangs- same type of cut from the crown, the chin, so many similarities.......
 
RE: "The Fiasco" (as one eloquent poster named it)

I've been lurking on this thread for a while now. I hold Sharon's case very close to my heart. It started years ago with the Unsolved Mysteries episode, and it's also how I ended up here at Websleuths. I posted a few times over at Matt Birkbeck's old forum before it disappeared. I was absolutely positive it was Cynthia Sumpter. . . was the first time I ever posted a side-by-side comparison in a forum. . I was that sure.

I just wanted to throw out some words of accolades and encouragement for those of you that keep Sharon's story alive. FDF is never going to come off any information. . . that we know. Despite the drama and undercurrents of ugly, you guys have kept on going for Sharon and Michael like the Energizer bunny. For that, I sincerely thank you. I got nosy yesterday and went back to the archives of the Jury Room to find out what the heck happened way back when. The fact that ya'll are still here doing what you do just goes to show why WS has the reputation it so much deserves.

Thank you posters for keeping Sharon alive in the memories of those that want to know the truth for her. :blowkiss:
 
I haven't read the book, but read all the threads. Something that caught my eye was the discrepancies in Sharon's age.

Her birthdate was supposed to be Oct? 1967. (I realize this is probably made up from a tombstone a name was taken from, but bear with me...)

She was enrolled in first grade? in 1975. That would make her almost 8 years old.

She then gave birth in 1988 at the age of 17. That would place her birth at 1970, 1971.

That's a difference of 3 to 4 years. I can see how it wouldn't be so noticable later in life, but there is a big difference between say a 5 year old vs. an 8 year old, especially to the trained eyes of school faculty, who deal with kids all day, every day.

I had a theory last night before I got finished with the threads today and read about Christine Carter. I think there is a high possibility Sharon was with a good mother, the mother was killed, and Sharon was kidnapped. The reason so many years have gone by with no connection may be because even though woman is killed and child is missing, child is presumed dead, and everyone 'knows' who killed the mother. I just don't think she was sold. Considering everything she went through, she still seems, from all that I have read, reasonably well-adjusted. Michael, on the other hand, having been raised from birth with sicko Floyd, was pretty messed up by the time he made it to foster care. I just don't think Sharon would have coped as well as she did without some kind of stable foundation. I was going to suggest looking into cases where both mothers and small daughters disappeared, and daughter was never found.

I don't know if Christine will turn out to be Sharon, but I see a resemblance, and if not, I still think if her identity is ever found, it will turn out to be something like this. I think Floyd either killed her mother himself, or knew for a fact she was dead.

Lanie
 
MartieLee that posts on here is Christina's cousin. This is how I know who she is. I think this match is a good possibility....

Quoting myself to add that CuriousInAtlanta is the one to be credited with the contact with Christina's family...
 
If this lead dosn't pan out....perhaps trying Rhonda Moore...except she seems to not be listed anywhere? The story seems very much like what could have happened....except she dosn't seem to be listed anywhere.

I just hope that she's not one of those kids that don't get listed for whatever reason but are indeed missing. I've said in one of the previous threads....he was supremely confident he would not get caught...he had pictures taken of her, with her, allowed her to attend public schools.
 
i know something happend with her blood and there was doubts it was her blood one of the children she gave up for adoption her mother or her found stumbled upon the book. they red it and wanted to put the dna issue to rest and contacted Matt B blood was taken from her and it was a match so the blood and dna on file for sharon is sharons

The book said that Blood and Hair was taken at the time of the autopsey....and dna was attained from the harvesting and was given to NCMEC some time ago ......as well as DNA gatherd from Oklahoma for Michael.....
 
I haven't read the book, but read all the threads. Something that caught my eye was the discrepancies in Sharon's age.

Her birthdate was supposed to be Oct? 1967. (I realize this is probably made up from a tombstone a name was taken from, but bear with me...)

She was enrolled in first grade? in 1975. That would make her almost 8 years old.

She then gave birth in 1988 at the age of 17. That would place her birth at 1970, 1971.

That's a difference of 3 to 4 years. I can see how it wouldn't be so noticable later in life, but there is a big difference between say a 5 year old vs. an 8 year old, especially to the trained eyes of school faculty, who deal with kids all day, every day.

I had a theory last night before I got finished with the threads today and read about Christine Carter. I think there is a high possibility Sharon was with a good mother, the mother was killed, and Sharon was kidnapped. The reason so many years have gone by with no connection may be because even though woman is killed and child is missing, child is presumed dead, and everyone 'knows' who killed the mother. I just don't think she was sold. Considering everything she went through, she still seems, from all that I have read, reasonably well-adjusted. Michael, on the other hand, having been raised from birth with sicko Floyd, was pretty messed up by the time he made it to foster care. I just don't think Sharon would have coped as well as she did without some kind of stable foundation. I was going to suggest looking into cases where both mothers and small daughters disappeared, and daughter was never found.

I don't know if Christine will turn out to be Sharon, but I see a resemblance, and if not, I still think if her identity is ever found, it will turn out to be something like this. I think Floyd either killed her mother himself, or knew for a fact she was dead.

Lanie

Hi Lanie, from laini

I don't have anything to add really, except those are good ideas and points. The last time I read Matt's book was awhile ago. I think I need to reread it again. The age differences are interesting. Her identity has to be out there somewhere!
 
I'm sure the answer is no :)/), but are there any front face views of Sharon as a kid for a better comparison to Christina Carter (as opposed to the side view Doe Network has)?
 
I'm sure the answer is no :)/), but are there any front face views of Sharon as a kid for a better comparison to Christina Carter (as opposed to the side view Doe Network has)?

I wondered about that also; its seems like at least there should be a school photo somewhere. Maybe they had an elementary yearbook. Has anyone ever looked for one?
I don't believe I have ever seen another photo of her as a kid except that one.
 
There are evidently others pictures of Sharon as a child, but they are pornographic in nature. From what I understand, they cannot be edited for public release.

The DNA tests will settle this question. As slow as it is, we should wait and rely on those results.
 
I wondered about that also; its seems like at least there should be a school photo somewhere. Maybe they had an elementary yearbook. Has anyone ever looked for one?
I don't believe I have ever seen another photo of her as a kid except that one.
I've contacted the school district in OK several times to request pics and any info available about FDF or Sharon. I haven't received a reply.
 
Does anyone have an idea as to what school she actually attended in OK?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
711
Total visitors
785

Forum statistics

Threads
589,922
Messages
17,927,694
Members
228,002
Latest member
zipperoni
Back
Top