hello!
ok, so im not trying to stand up for anyone here but here is how i see it. The article says "approximately 108,498 pictures depicting deviant acts,” and then says about the memory stick containing “320 images and videos of a pornographic nature.”
firstly it says that deviant images were taken from the computer from SA's moms, but it doesnt mention *advertiser censored* on that one. the police will have done a deep search and removed all information from deep within the hard drive clusters, which i would assume if they are doing thier jobs properly, it wouldnt be just "downloaded" images, it will be downloaded images, but also imprints and fragments, cookies and cache, deleted things etc. ie. in my computer now if they were to take it away and remove all "stored" images, every single one of you guys avatars would be stored, all images of buttons, logos, any images off pages i've looked at, any thing i've saved and deleted etc etc would be there - thus to me, though it sounds like a huge amount, it could be easily explained. also, it depends on what deviant images are discounting the word *advertiser censored*. i read on one law site - " The types of deviance considered include homicide (individual and mass), spouse and child abuse, illegal drug use, sorcery" which if he goes on horror movie sites a lot, that would count, all those silly drug videos and pictures would count, fake blood and gore, pentagrams and occult things, the mask pictures with weapons, even the suicide girls who are a sort of tattooed nudey girls site got threatened with a deviant imagery lawsuit also, they all might count, you see what im getting at?
secondly, i have noticed nowadays that wether you personally agree or not, *advertiser censored* is becoming more and more accepted and so many times i've read problem page things where a wife is upset at discovering her husbands *advertiser censored* use and the response? "indulge in it with him my dear, spice up your sex life" - i thinks its bad but thats just me, many people my age (in thier 20's) think its completely normal. which brings me to my third point - if BD had a memory stick with *advertiser censored* on it in a drawer in her bedroom then instead of chastising her, maybe she was making sure it wasnt availiable on the home computer for the kids to see, in the same way that when i was little i found a joy of sex book in my mums bedside drawer when i was sneaking - i wasnt meant to see it but i sneaked, she didnt keep it on the coffee table for all to see! finally, if it was anything illegal, which as the fbi have an anti *advertiser censored* campaign im sure it would be easy to classify - the MSM would be shouting it from the rooftops as that would be really exciting to them! hope this gives a fair perspective on another side of the debate.
MOOOOOOOO
