Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: FBI On To Child Porn Sharer

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CITY OF BROTHERLY SHOVE
    Posts
    17,645

    Thumbs up FBI On To Child Porn Sharer

    Reoffending sex offender alert.

    Brian Radachy is a 50 something Registered Sex Offender. Now he's right up there with the reoffending.

    FBI agents were tipped off after freakazoid was file sharing his perversion with other creepers online. Little boys with adult men. Way to go sc*m bag. He also told LE he's interested in boys from ages 8-16 because of their sexual imaturity. WHAT?

    He's busted and being held for now. I missed the bail. Either way he's my reoffending sex offender of the day.

    http://www.vindy.com/news/2010/apr/0...orn/?newswatch

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Filly For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CITY OF BROTHERLY SHOVE
    Posts
    17,645
    Hmmmmmm, Radachy says he's going to wait for the Grand Jury.

    At least we know he'll remain in prison for a little bit. 60 CD's with pornographic images of kids. Da*n reoffending sex offender.




    http://www.vindy.com/news/2010/apr/1...ail/?newswatch

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Filly For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Silicon Hills
    Posts
    9,230
    Quote Originally Posted by Filly View Post
    Hmmmmmm, Radachy says he's going to wait for the Grand Jury.

    At least we know he'll remain in prison for a little bit. 60 CD's with pornographic images of kids. Da*n reoffending sex offender.




    http://www.vindy.com/news/2010/apr/1...ail/?newswatch
    All these pervs like to waive their prelims - & let the GJ hand up an indictment - so that their sick stuff doesn't come out in court so fast, IMO...as if a GJ won't indict a scumbag w/ 60CDs of CP so it can't be that they're gambling that a GJ won't see there's enough evidence to charge them....they're just delaying the inevitable.

    I hope the creep gets a long, long, sentence.
    What we are doing is just a drop in the ocean.
    But if that drop was not in the ocean,
    I think the ocean would be less because of that missing drop.
    ~~ Mother Theresa ~~



    Where is Rachel Cooke? Missing since 10-Jan-2002
    Rachel's thread - WS
    RachelCookeSearch.org

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    10,640
    I want the long sentences too but I worry about guilty pleas. Without a "messy" trial, how are we going to find all the victims? If you counted up the number of child porn traders/producers we've covered who've been arrested, there would have to be thousands of victims. Where in the heck are these children and teens?

    Without trials, how are communities and families going to know exactly what is going on? This is driving me nuts. I think I've read close to 30-40 cases in the last couple of months where the feds accepted a guilty plea ("saving the victims from testifying") and the guys got somewhere between 10-20 years. It's going to be a revolving door until we get some high profile cases covered in the media with some knock 'em dead witnesses.

    Maybe that will come in the Mohler trial. Maybe.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Missizzy For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    530
    As someone whos brother is waiting sentencing for child porn.....pleading guilty without a trial gets them a lesser amount of time in prison....they will still get 10 plus years....also as for the victims in the photos..they continue to search for them even without a trial. It also saves the taxpayers thousands of dollars by not going to trial.
    My brother did not take the pictures, nor did he molest anyone...but the investigators was still able to identify some of the victims.
    My brother is looking at 20 years.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wildTrose For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    396
    If someone gets popped for kiddie porn, does the state try them, or is it federal?

    We have a perve down the road who was arrested in December for 4 counts of child molestation and he had, literally, thousands of files of kiddie porn on his home computers... Well, he is out on $100,000 bond, awaiting trial. I checked him on CaseNet and all the child molestation charges are posted but there is nothing about the pictures.

    We are also in Missouri... I have heard rumors that there is a HUUUGE ring in IL & MO that is about to be busted. I am not sure if that is true, or not, but if it is I can only pray that they monster is one of the people they put away for a good loooooong time.

    Thanks!

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jenni979 For This Useful Post:


  12. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    10,640
    There's definitely something odd going on in MO. There have been numerous arrests with very little reporting. If you don't check out the local arrests (and not all cities offe that info) and the FBI PR's everyday, you'll miss it. News sources are only covering a tiny portion of the arrests and I've noted that there's very little "chatter" or comments under articles about these arrests. How are community members supposed to know what is going on and keep their kids safe? I'm still waiting to see if these arrests are related.

    I fully realize that the FBI and state police have a game plan. I just want to make certain that each victim gets the attention that he/she deserves. I agree that we're in Spring Cleaning mode and that the FBI has finally caught up to the level of technology the perps are using. The very same mode (the internet) which brought them together is going to be their downfall, IMO. There's great irony in that.

    A little story. About two years ago, there was a young business owner arrested in a nearby city, Medford, OR. He was charged with being part of a child porn exchange group. He pleaded guilty and was whisked away to 12 years. My concern is that the local papers only carried a single line about it. His name did appear on the FBI site if you knew where to look.

    The man owned a coffee service distribution company. In other words, he would go into small businesses and set up and maintain coffee services for employers that didn't have the desire or time to do it themselves. He approached one of my sons at his business to offer the service. At the time, two of my young grandsons were at that business frequently. Thank goodness my son couldn't afford the service and declined it. But how many other children did he have access to? That bothers me. How do parents even know what questions to ask if they are unaware? For all most people know, the man closed down his business and moved. They have no idea he's in federal prison for trading child porn.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Missizzy For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-03-2013, 12:34 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-17-2010, 12:52 PM
  3. 'Despicable' Child Counselor Gets Life In Major Child Porn Ring
    By Michelle Read in forum Crimes in the News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-10-2006, 12:58 PM
  4. Child Online Protection Act; Feds seek Google data in child porn case
    By PrayersForMaura in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-25-2006, 02:46 PM
  5. Ex-FBI sniper sentenced for child porn
    By mysteriew in forum Crimes in the News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-15-2005, 04:52 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •