butterfly1978
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2009
- Messages
- 2,793
- Reaction score
- 10
I am playing devil's advocate here, as much as I beleive that Casey is guilty and as much evidence as the state has and as incompetent as JB may seem, Casey could be found not guilty. I was floored when OJ got off, I was sure that he would be found guilty but he wasn't.
Sadly the states case is circumstantial and although many people have been found guilty with much less, people have been found not guilty with much more.
I would like us to discuss holes in the states case, and evidence they do not have. PLEASE LETS KEEP THIS CIVIL, and if someone posts something and you believe is inaccurate please post a link to refute it, I don't want this thread closed, but we need to look at both sides.
Problems I see at this time, are the lack of Casey's finger prints on anything from the crime scene. I also think it is a problem that CA and GA cleaned the car yet no decomp or hairs were found in the vaccum. I do understand that the state can argue that it was several moths after the car was cleaned that the vaccums were taken however that in its self could be a problem.
Sadly the states case is circumstantial and although many people have been found guilty with much less, people have been found not guilty with much more.
I would like us to discuss holes in the states case, and evidence they do not have. PLEASE LETS KEEP THIS CIVIL, and if someone posts something and you believe is inaccurate please post a link to refute it, I don't want this thread closed, but we need to look at both sides.
Problems I see at this time, are the lack of Casey's finger prints on anything from the crime scene. I also think it is a problem that CA and GA cleaned the car yet no decomp or hairs were found in the vaccum. I do understand that the state can argue that it was several moths after the car was cleaned that the vaccums were taken however that in its self could be a problem.