Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 135

Thread: State's Response to Order RE: Deposition Schedule

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,568
    Quote Originally Posted by sunsetbeach View Post
    Not sure where to ask this question but when is this next hearing?
    There is a status hearing on 06/21/2010 @1:30 PM. Unless another hearing is scheduled before then OR I missed a date!
    Pekingese "Best Of Show" 2012

  2. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Patty G For This Useful Post:


  3. #102
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Central FL
    Posts
    2,435
    Quote Originally Posted by Patty G View Post
    There is a status hearing on 06/21/2010 @1:30 PM. Unless another hearing is scheduled before then OR I missed a date!
    You know it would be great if we had a sticky thread showing all the scheduled court dates. I know I have trouble keeping track of them too.

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cher352 For This Useful Post:


  5. #103
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,568
    Quote Originally Posted by Cher352 View Post
    You know it would be great if we had a sticky thread showing all the scheduled court dates. I know I have trouble keeping track of them too.
    If we don't have a Court Date Thread, you can start one and then ask a mod to make it a sticky.
    Pekingese "Best Of Show" 2012

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Patty G For This Useful Post:


  7. #104
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
    Posts
    13,908
    Quote Originally Posted by Cher352 View Post
    You know it would be great if we had a sticky thread showing all the scheduled court dates. I know I have trouble keeping track of them too.

    Per JBean's suggestion, I have posted all of them on the Caylee calendar in the Resource forum. I try to keep up with them through the Today's News thread and the Ninth Circuit website. If anyone sees a new one that I haven't added, go ahead and stick it on there, please! Or, pm me with it and I will be happy to add it.


    As of now, they are all on there all the way through April 2011. So far, all are Status hearings left that have been ordered.


    Here is the link to the Calendar.

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/cal...r=2008&do=&c=4

    If you add a hearing date, just be careful what month/year you enter it in. The default is set for 2008 (when the case began). At the bottom, there is a 'Jump To' option where you need to select the month/year.
    Last edited by beach; 05-18-2010 at 12:19 PM.
    Never interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake.

  8. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to beach For This Useful Post:


  9. #105
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    313
    Quote Originally Posted by beach2yall View Post
    Per JBean's suggestion, I have posted all of them on the Caylee calendar in the Resource forum. I try to keep up with them through the Today's News thread and the Ninth Circuit website. If anyone sees a new one that I haven't added, go ahead and stick it on there, please! Or, pm me with it and I will be happy to add it.


    As of now, they are all on there all the way through April 2011. So far, all are Status hearings left that have been ordered.
    Where is the Resource forum?

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Kathy1964 For This Useful Post:


  11. #106
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
    Posts
    13,908
    Quote Originally Posted by Kathy1964 View Post
    Where is the Resource forum?


    Look up, one post above.

    Sorry, I should have thought to do that in the first place. I edited to add the Calendar link.

    HTH
    Never interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to beach For This Useful Post:


  13. #107
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
    Posts
    13,908
    Quote Originally Posted by Kathy1964 View Post
    Where is the Resource forum?
    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=233"]http://www.websleuths.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=233[/ame]


    I added the calendar link to my earlier post, but this is a direct link to the Resource forum. Lots of good stuff in there!
    Never interrupt your opponent when they are making a mistake.

  14. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to beach For This Useful Post:


  15. #108
    Reagan's Avatar
    Reagan is offline How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?!
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    817
    Quote Originally Posted by The World According View Post
    Hi Muzikman,

    He purposely left the depo incomplete, so he could call him back at another date. Sneaky little move, since clearly he had gotten everything he needed out of him already. I must find it for you, the epitome of him knowing what he did with the Kronk family members would never be admitted into evidence. Finally a reporter asked him a follow up question that we all are throwing things at the TV screen , yelling , ask him this, for the love of God. He had the cat that got the canary look while excited the news stations were playing these selected interview clips. Finally the host asked him, sir...ah...these could never come into the trial because the situations they are recounting are heresay and far too remote in time, right? A look of fear shot across his face for just half a second, he quickly recovered and just shrugged his shoulders, careful not to admit it audibly so as not to be quoted. It was the ok, you got me shrug. I must find that clip and put it in my signature line or post it once a month until everyone has seen it. I laughed so hard when he did that, some of my co workers down the hall came into my office with that I'll have what Julia's having look.
    I wanted the look of "I'll have what Julia's having", but the link I watched in your sig was Cheny M stating that now that Caylee's body is found, it is easy to predict LWOP for Casey. That they could plea now and get it over with, or have a circus and a trial.
    Funny that he jumped on the circus bandwagon. And not funny ha-ha, but funny wtf-is-the-matter-with-people.

  16. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Reagan For This Useful Post:


  17. #109
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,320
    Wow TWA - you're so on it, Bluebonnet! I think you are in the running for MVP!

    That is really valuable stuff. Actually, what I meant was a post that RH made here a while back (IIRC) or something in print, in which he described a specific case he worked on in which a client had to file for indigency in the middle of things (the defendant's mother had taken out a second mortgage on the house and it ran out). He said that many attorneys refuse to take such cases because of the herculean effort it takes to document and justify the expenditures. He described how specific he had to be in verifying what had already been spent to the JAC and that if an attorney was deemed by the JAC to have misspent the original funds or the monies spent did not show prioritizing of client and case needs, that disciplinary action up to and including disbarment could occur, IIRC. I went back through his posts and couldn't find it but may look again when I get more time to browse. Thanks again though for your excellent compendium of research you put together for us each and every day!
    "Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices" - Voltaire

  18. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to cecybeans For This Useful Post:


  19. #110
    kaRN's Avatar
    kaRN is offline Verified Health Professional - Registered Nurse
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Where the Mayor smokes crack
    Posts
    4,415
    Quote Originally Posted by technicalconfusion View Post
    I have to disagree. Considering there were defense experts (Henry Lee, the Bones Lady, a couple of others) at the scene on the day Caylee was found tells me they knew zactly what they needed...
    Poor Koby. He had such a good thing going for himself on NG nightly pleading KC's guilt for months on end until he jumped ship, prolly with the promise of a big financial payoff. How much money does it take for a scientific expert to betray a murdered 2 year old I wonder?

    Injustice for Caylee Marie Anthony.

    Copyright that Cindy

    Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to get better. It's not. Dr. Suess

  20. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to kaRN For This Useful Post:


  21. #111
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    8,821
    Quote Originally Posted by kaRN View Post
    Poor Koby. He had such a good thing going for himself on NG nightly pleading KC's guilt for months on end until he jumped ship, prolly with the promise of a big financial payoff. How much money does it take for a scientific expert to betray a murdered 2 year old I wonder?
    Yes, NG was shocked, as was her audience, to hear him so publicly backtracking on what he said. He hasn't appeared on her show since.

  22. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ZsaZsa For This Useful Post:


  23. #112
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    2,117
    Quote Originally Posted by whiteangora View Post
    I'm a bit surprised that Baez has not included James Thompson on his depo schedule. JT is on the State's witness list and if he really saw what he claims I believe he will be a key witness.
    Link to State's witness list:
    http://www.docstoc.com/docs/31909330...-March-28-2010
    FYI, that is not an official list, it is one someone put together and included people interviewed, etc. There are names on it that are not on the State's official witness list.
    www.amazon.com/shops/Grand_Media
    http://stores.ebay.com/grand-media-usa36


    "This pretense of ignorance is getting old." - JA

  24. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Muzikman For This Useful Post:


  25. #113
    whiteangora's Avatar
    whiteangora is offline I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    5,778
    Quote Originally Posted by Muzikman View Post
    FYI, that is not an official list, it is one someone put together and included people interviewed, etc. There are names on it that are not on the State's official witness list.
    ARGH! That's the second time that list has fooled me!
    I'll delete my post.
    ETA- Ya know there's a link to that hinky list here in the Resource Forum
    Neighborhood Watch is...
    NOT the Vigilante Police
    http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigati...PowerPoint.pdf





  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to whiteangora For This Useful Post:


  27. #114
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    2,117
    Quote Originally Posted by Patty G View Post
    You would think that the press would remove the addresses of the witnesses.
    You would also think that Baez would at least get correct addresses!

    There are several that are WAY out of date. Looks like he just took them from the State's list, which came out in Nov 08 IIRC.


    I'd be willing to bet that he has not contacted some of those people and set up their depos. Just put them down as ones he WANTED to depo.
    www.amazon.com/shops/Grand_Media
    http://stores.ebay.com/grand-media-usa36


    "This pretense of ignorance is getting old." - JA

  28. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Muzikman For This Useful Post:


  29. #115
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    2,117
    Quote Originally Posted by whiteangora View Post
    ARGH! That's the second time that list has fooled me!
    I'll delete my post.
    No need to delete, it is kind of a handy reference.

    I'll look around, I'm sure I have the official list somewhere....
    www.amazon.com/shops/Grand_Media
    http://stores.ebay.com/grand-media-usa36


    "This pretense of ignorance is getting old." - JA

  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Muzikman For This Useful Post:


  31. #116
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    2,117
    Quote Originally Posted by The World According View Post
    Hi Muzikman,

    He purposely left the depo incomplete, so he could call him back at another date. Sneaky little move, since clearly he had gotten everything he needed out of him already. I must find it for you, the epitome of him knowing what he did with the Kronk family members would never be admitted into evidence. Finally a reporter asked him a follow up question that we all are throwing things at the TV screen , yelling , ask him this, for the love of God. He had the cat that got the canary look while excited the news stations were playing these selected interview clips. Finally the host asked him, sir...ah...these could never come into the trial because the situations they are recounting are heresay and far too remote in time, right? A look of fear shot across his face for just half a second, he quickly recovered and just shrugged his shoulders, careful not to admit it audibly so as not to be quoted. It was the ok, you got me shrug. I must find that clip and put it in my signature line or post it once a month until everyone has seen it. I laughed so hard when he did that, some of my co workers down the hall came into my office with that I'll have what Julia's having look.
    J, did you ever find this video? Would love to watch and catch what you were referencing...
    www.amazon.com/shops/Grand_Media
    http://stores.ebay.com/grand-media-usa36


    "This pretense of ignorance is getting old." - JA

  32. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Muzikman For This Useful Post:


  33. #117
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    In the sunshine.
    Posts
    9,882
    Quote Originally Posted by Muzikman View Post
    You would also think that Baez would at least get correct addresses!

    There are several that are WAY out of date. Looks like he just took them from the State's list, which came out in Nov 08 IIRC.


    I'd be willing to bet that he has not contacted some of those people and set up their depos. Just put them down as ones he WANTED to depo.

    I'd be willing to bet that he did just that............and what would be HIGHLARIOUS would be if the SA in the future, purposely misspelled or transposed numbers to trip him up. HeeHee

  34. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to sleutherontheside For This Useful Post:


  35. #118
    Bobo's Avatar
    Bobo is offline Avoid Contempt Before Prior Investigation
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Hither & Yon
    Posts
    174
    Snipped respect MM
    Quote Originally Posted by Muzikman View Post

    I'd be willing to bet that he has not contacted some of those people and set up their depos. Just put them down as ones he WANTED to depo.
    Over on the Ask the Lawyers thread, recent posts seem to indicate that this very thing did happen.

    The fact that they have about 9 depos "scheduled" (riiiight) on the Fridays before major holidays does not sound right. Also noticed that nearly all depo dates are on Fridays. Can only remember one depo day not on a Friday.

  36. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bobo For This Useful Post:


  37. #119
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    2,117
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobo View Post
    Snipped respect MM


    Over on the Ask the Lawyers thread, recent posts seem to indicate that this very thing did happen.

    The fact that they have about 9 depos "scheduled" (riiiight) on the Fridays before major holidays does not sound right. Also noticed that nearly all depo dates are on Fridays. Can only remember one depo day not on a Friday.
    Yeah, I saw that on the Lawyers thread.

    I would bet big money that if Judge Perry were to call the people on Baez's depo list tomorrow, IMO he would find a number of them that have no idea they're about to be depoed.
    www.amazon.com/shops/Grand_Media
    http://stores.ebay.com/grand-media-usa36


    "This pretense of ignorance is getting old." - JA


  38. #120
    Quote Originally Posted by Muzikman View Post
    Yeah, I saw that on the Lawyers thread.

    I would bet big money that if Judge Perry were to call the people on Baez's depo list tomorrow, IMO he would find a number of them that have no idea they're about to be depoed.
    Do you remember when the defense produced, literally, a copy of the state's witness list as their own? The state made a motion to strike it, and the judge promptly did so. I agree with you about Judge Perry. Where Judge Strickland had the style of trusting the lawyers, as officers of the court, I think this judge is more of the Ronald Reagan theory, "Trust but verify". There will be no nonsense tolerated. If Baez has not figured that out, I know Mason has. How much rope he will give Baez to hang himself so that he can take over the case is my only question.

    Obviously the proper service to Tony would be not only his last known address, but to his lawyer. What in the world?!!!!!!

  39. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to The World According For This Useful Post:


  40. #121
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,033
    Quote Originally Posted by Muzikman View Post
    This is what I've found:

    Already deposed, they want to depose again:
    Anthony Lazzaro - Oct 2008
    Richard Cain - March/April 2009
    Roy Kronk - November 2009
    John Allen - March 9 2010 (not sure if this was actually done, filed a notice to)
    Eric Edwards - March 10 2010 (not sure if done, filed a notice to)


    Also deposed:
    Tow-yard people: Catherine Sanchez, Simon Burch, Nicole Lett, and Gary Ridgeway - Oct 2008

    Sergeant Dennis Moonsammy, Lt. Billy Richardson, Lt. Tammy Uncer, Officer Marlene Baker, Awilda McBryde, and Jerold White; Kio Cruz, Jim Hoover, Alex Roberts - March/April 2009

    Phillip Graves, William Procknow, Edward Turso, Leonard Turtora, and Adriana Acevedo - May 2009

    Adriana Acevedo, Matt Irwin - March 8, 2010
    Appling Wells - March 11, 2010

    A number of FBI analysts - April 2010

    .
    Which depositions were for the civil case and which were for the murder case? I would think that they would be allowed to do two separate depositions for the two different crimes.

    I remember some of these people being called because ZFG's lawyer was trying to prove that KC made up the Zanny the nanny story to prove damages.

    I'm really looking forwards to some of these depositions (grandma and uncle in particular) even though I have read the statements.

    I think Baez & co. delayed taking these depositions because they want time to go by and then can claim to the jury that it is nearly impossible to rely on such stale memories...reasonable doubt. He probably didn't want to dip into his share of blood money to pay for them either and waited for state to pay for it.

    I have a question here as well.

    As I understand it, depositions are meant to explore what people know so the lawyers can best plan their cases. How is a deposition more important than statements taken at the time of the reported crime? What is the big deal about all of these depositions? Do they even need to happen if a prior statement exists? Save money and only depot people what have no prior statements!
    It's the journey, not the destination.

  41. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Jomo For This Useful Post:


  42. #122
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,568
    Quote Originally Posted by Jomo View Post
    Which depositions were for the civil case and which were for the murder case? I would think that they would be allowed to do two separate depositions for the two different crimes.

    I remember some of these people being called because ZFG's lawyer was trying to prove that KC made up the Zanny the nanny story to prove damages.


    I have a question here as well.

    As I understand it, depositions are meant to explore what people know so the lawyers can best plan their cases. How is a deposition more important than statements taken at the time of the reported crime? What is the big deal about all of these depositions? Do they even need to happen if a prior statement exists? Save money and only depot people what have no prior statements!
    IMO, The Civil Trial has a different lead attorney representing Casey Anthony so if the Civil attorneys want to depose any of the witnesses in the Murder Case, then they are allowed to do so. I have not heard that Casey filed "indingency" in the Civil Trial.


    Here is a link explaining the difference between "statements" and depositions".
    http://www.whitfieldlaw.com/document...E5439B025D.pdf
    Pekingese "Best Of Show" 2012

  43. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Patty G For This Useful Post:


  44. #123
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    2,117
    Quote Originally Posted by Jomo View Post
    Which depositions were for the civil case and which were for the murder case? I would think that they would be allowed to do two separate depositions for the two different crimes.

    I remember some of these people being called because ZFG's lawyer was trying to prove that KC made up the Zanny the nanny story to prove damages.

    I'm really looking forwards to some of these depositions (grandma and uncle in particular) even though I have read the statements.

    I think Baez & co. delayed taking these depositions because they want time to go by and then can claim to the jury that it is nearly impossible to rely on such stale memories...reasonable doubt. He probably didn't want to dip into his share of blood money to pay for them either and waited for state to pay for it.

    I have a question here as well.

    As I understand it, depositions are meant to explore what people know so the lawyers can best plan their cases. How is a deposition more important than statements taken at the time of the reported crime? What is the big deal about all of these depositions? Do they even need to happen if a prior statement exists? Save money and only depot people what have no prior statements!
    All of those were depos for the murder trial.

    To my knowledge, the defense has not depoed anyone for the civil trial. Don't think they depoed anyone for the Fraud trial either.

    A lawyer will have to answer your question about statements vs depos... I'm interested in the answer to that myself!
    www.amazon.com/shops/Grand_Media
    http://stores.ebay.com/grand-media-usa36


    "This pretense of ignorance is getting old." - JA

  45. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Muzikman For This Useful Post:


  46. #124
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,033
    Quote Originally Posted by Patty G View Post
    IMO, The Civil Trial has a different lead attorney representing Casey Anthony so if the Civil attorneys want to depose any of the witnesses in the Murder Case, then they are allowed to do so. I have not heard that Casey filed "indingency" in the Civil Trial.


    Here is a link explaining the difference between "statements" and depositions".
    http://www.whitfieldlaw.com/document...E5439B025D.pdf
    Thanks for that Patty, (from another Patti )

    Just a note that I had read a response from AZlawyer that it is not possible for someone to file indigency in a civil trial.

    [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5145816&postcount=738"]Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Legal questions for our VERIFIED lawyers on the board[/ame]
    It's the journey, not the destination.

  47. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jomo For This Useful Post:


  48. #125
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    2,117
    Here is the defense's Motion for Transcription filed 5/14. They want transcripts from 8 LE depositions that they've done.

    a. Appling Wells
    b. Adriana Acevedo
    c. Matt Irwin
    d. Lome Gottesman
    e. Steven Shaw
    f. Karen Lowe
    g. Elizabeth Fontaine
    h. Heather Seubert

    http://www.docstoc.com/docs/39566240...-Transcription


    Anyone remember Michelle Medina, esquire? She's listed on the fax page along with Baez.
    .
    www.amazon.com/shops/Grand_Media
    http://stores.ebay.com/grand-media-usa36


    "This pretense of ignorance is getting old." - JA

  49. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Muzikman For This Useful Post:


Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dominic Casey: Motion to Strike Notice of Deposition & Motion for Protective Order#2
    By The World According in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 566
    Last Post: 07-10-2011, 07:49 PM
  2. Dominic Casey: Motion to Strike Notice of Deposition & Motion for Protective Order#1
    By The World According in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 557
    Last Post: 05-18-2010, 01:57 PM
  3. Does the State's Case Have Any Weaknesses? What Are They?
    By Mendara in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 161
    Last Post: 04-17-2009, 03:19 PM
  4. Another Infant Dies While in State's Care
    By Alice253 in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-22-2006, 09:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •