1274 users online (240 members and 1034 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 51
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Penn's woods
    Posts
    17,195

    Chelsea's contradictory statements

    I was reading back through our media thread (thank you angelwhocares!) and I saw a couple of articles where Chelsea made contradictory comments (IIRC she did ) over the past year that Haleigh has been missing.

    I'm not sure if this would be the correct thread to post those though.

  2. #2
    Moved the above post. Okay Kat - SPILL!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,701
    How about the one where she says she's a good mother, and the video where she's pregnant and smoking?

    Maybe that's just my own pickyness

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    deep in the countryside of northern Alabama
    Posts
    5,354
    How about Chelsea stating that Ronald was a good father and he took such good care of Haleigh here: http://www.artharris.com/2009/10/05/...s-family-feud/

    snip~“Even though we’re at odds now, because there’s a lot of stress in the family, I’m not going to lie about it,” Chelsea tells The Bald Truth. “I’ve never seen Ronald hit the kids. He’s a very good Dad, and he’s proved it. How often do you see a father get custody over a mother?”~ end snip

    versus her statement about not being surprised if there were drugs laying all around the house here: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIP...3/ijvm.01.html

    snip~VELEZ-MITCHELL: And now Tommy`s wife, Chelsea, confirms there were always pills lying around Misty and Ron`s trailer home. It`s actually Timmy`s wife.

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    CHELSEA CROSLIN, MISTY`S SISTER-IN-LAW: I believe, you know, there`s many more things to it. What happened -- what happens if Haleigh overdosed? Because there were loose pills laying around in that house. and I don`t care what anybody says. I know for a fact there was.~ end snip

    very contradictory in my opinion.
    The depths of which we are able to love will be measured by the depths we are able to love ourselves....et

    There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must NEVER be a time when we fail to protest. Elie Wiesel

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Penn's woods
    Posts
    17,195
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ea#post3475674

    Back in March of 2009 Chelsea comments that she thinks that someone staying at her home had to have taken the van the night that Haleigh went missing. Fair enough, we have since learned who was staying at her house. But this was back in March of 2009. Before MC wrote any letters implicating that relative. After reading a post by Elle this morning I thought to myself could this be the genisis of JO cover story? KWIM?

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ea#post3477795

    The van had a scratch and a broken headlight (hadn't heard about the headlight) here again she states she almost knows who did this (took the van and who might be involved in Haleigh's disappearance). This was March of 2009.

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ea#post4135144
    September 2009

    snip:
    ..."Honestly I think Misty knows something she's not telling. I just don't know what it is. It could be something stupid. Maybe she wasn't home, so be it, but you didn't kill the child."
    Should know a lot better than to look at the choice of words that the two families use in expressing themselves and finding anything particular about them but the word above "KILL" caught my eye. Only because I read the next article.

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ea#post4135319

    In this article she changes the word of Kill to stating stolen. Not a big deal but I thought it interesting.

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ea#post4148239

    snip:
    ...Chelsea Croslin also spoke to us awhile about why she believes Misty has nothing to do with Haleigh’s disappearance.
    April of 2010

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ea#post5070476

    ...Misty Croslin told the same story in letters to her father and a sister-in-law in Massachusetts.

    Chelsea Croslin, said she and her husband got a letter about two months ago from Misty that details the same set of events.

    Misty's father, Hank Croslin Sr., said he got a similar letter but tore it up and threw it away.

    Thursday, Chelsea Croslin said she did not want to provide a copy of the letter for fear of retaliation. Chelsea said her sister-in-law was terrified of Overstreet so didn't tell authorities what happened that night.

    She said she has been urging the Sheriff's Office to search the area off Shell Harbour Road since shortly after Haleigh disappeared. She said that was one of the few areas Overstreet was familiar with when he visited.
    From Feb. of 2009 to April of 2010 Chelsea has been pretty much insisting that JO did something from what I take away yes? But MC didn't initially. I have to wonder if the story came from CC? Just a thought.

    Just another statement by CC.
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ea#post5072842

    I'm sorry I have to go lay down for a bit. (a bit under the weather today) I think that her statements when looked at (including her videos and her NG appearance) are making me evaluate how much she has to do with the JO story? Did she really tell LE to search the dock area for that long?

    I'm not saying she had anything to do with Haleigh missing directly. What I'm saying is she seems to be very vocal very early on about the JO scenario. KWIM?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    deep in the countryside of northern Alabama
    Posts
    5,354
    Excellent post Kat.....please feel better soon!!
    The depths of which we are able to love will be measured by the depths we are able to love ourselves....et

    There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must NEVER be a time when we fail to protest. Elie Wiesel

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,762
    Personally I think both sister-in-laws knows what happened, at least part of it. Who was Misty talking to in jail, when she was saying - "it's gonna hurt two people???" I can't remember if it was Lindsey or Chelsea.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    deep in the countryside of northern Alabama
    Posts
    5,354
    Quote Originally Posted by suspicious1 View Post
    Personally I think both sister-in-laws knows what happened, at least part of it. Who was Misty talking to in jail, when she was saying - "it's gonna hurt two people???" I can't remember if it was Lindsey or Chelsea.
    It was Chelsea and I think she meant Tommy and Joe, one person they care about and the other....well not so much.
    The depths of which we are able to love will be measured by the depths we are able to love ourselves....et

    There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must NEVER be a time when we fail to protest. Elie Wiesel

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,762
    Quote Originally Posted by elle1919 View Post
    It was Chelsea and I think she meant Tommy and Joe, one person they care about and the other....well not so much.
    I thought it was Chelsea..I just wasn't sure.

    But remember the part when Misty says "It'll hurt two people" One person they care about and the other not so much?? Chelsea comments on how she doesn't give a damn about Ron. Misty said something about it not being Ron and Chelsea seemed confused when she said "It's not him?" When Misty told her to "think"...I think she was guiding Chelsea back toward the Tommy and Jo story.

    JMO though

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    In my treehouse, empty nesting.
    Posts
    12,855
    Quote Originally Posted by elle1919 View Post
    It was Chelsea and I think she meant Tommy and Joe, one person they care about and the other....well not so much.
    This may be OT but I always thought she meant both of Haleigh's biological grandmother's... TN and MG? simply because there are SOO many Crosilns in the group why would she only pick just two?
    ~ my opinion only


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    deep in the countryside of northern Alabama
    Posts
    5,354
    Quote Originally Posted by gngr~snap View Post
    This may be OT but I always thought she meant both of Haleigh's biological grandmother's... TN and MG? simply because there are SOO many Crosilns in the group why would she only pick just two?

    Why would Chelsea care if it hurt those two peeps though? Chelsea asked if it was people they cared about and Misty said yeah, well one. I don't think any of them would have been hurt by those two choices. JMO
    The depths of which we are able to love will be measured by the depths we are able to love ourselves....et

    There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must NEVER be a time when we fail to protest. Elie Wiesel

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Liverpool Branch
    Posts
    5,256
    I do agree that there has been a shift towards the 'Tommy and Joe' story since the arrests from the drug sting -- it was given new life as the only out. In the Misty and Ron story if Misty spills then Ron takes her down with him.

    Joe had been floated as the perp a few times over the last year or so but only as a feeble distraction when the heat was on Misty. If Misty was pointing at Joe back then why not support it with some verifiable details since she was already accusing Joe and risking a backlash. Get him locked up then ... if true!! Why now?

    It never did fly but it has become a campaign today that even the Defense attorney's have jumped on, as a way out to minimize their clients role. Fields not so much.

    Chelsea's contradictory statements do lead me to believe that she may have fabricated this story and Misty only went along with it half heartedly originally but .... being in jail she wanted to run with it now to try to get out. Chelsea was confused that Misty was back on the Joe did it and had expected Ron to go down. There is a LOT of loyalty among the sisters in law (SILs) since the guys are struggling.
    Disclaimer: All posts are my own humble opinion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.



    Justice for Caylee

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    8,124
    Well which is it Chelsea?

    If Chelsea has suspected Joe all this time, why in the world would she be confused as to WHO the two people were that Misty was referring to?

    I'm thinking the confusion might be as to which story Misty planned to run with at that particular time.

  14. #14
    Zoe Bogart's Avatar
    Zoe Bogart is offline Let's not ask for the Moon, we have the Stars
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fema Region VI
    Posts
    4,840
    Thanks, kat. Good topic. I hope you're feeling better soon.

    I've been puzzled with what Chelsea's said over time, too, particularly when she visited Misty in jail and they had the "two people getting hurt" conversation, and Chelsea NOT thinking of Joe, but Ronald instead. If Joe was THE ONE, why the confusion? Why did Chelsea have to be told to "think" when Chelsea had already thrown out the damaged van story blaming it on her visitor?

    Obviously, LE has their hands full with this crowd. I don't envy them.

    Everyone has rallied 'round and decided Joe is the one who needs to be under the bus. He's the expendable family member. Even their grandmother, who's willing to throw three grandchildren to the wolves, chose him to be the main target. Is there a fourth grandchild involved and perhaps a granddaughter-in-law or two? Such family loyalty. Ma Barker would be impressed.
    My brain is copyright-protected.
    Please pardon any typos. I'm a lousy typist and an even worse proofreader.


    Big Brother and the Thought Police have arrived
    1984 by George Orwell (1949)

    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,701
    Quote Originally Posted by aksleuth View Post
    Thanks, kat. Good topic. I hope you're feeling better soon.

    I've been puzzled with what Chelsea's said over time, too, particularly when she visited Misty in jail and they had the "two people getting hurt" conversation, and Chelsea NOT thinking of Joe, but Ronald instead. If Joe was THE ONE, why the confusion? Why did Chelsea have to be told to "think" when Chelsea had already thrown out the damaged van story blaming it on her visitor?

    Obviously, LE has their hands full with this crowd. I don't envy them.

    Everyone has rallied 'round and decided Joe is the one who needs to be under the bus. He's the expendable family member. Even their grandmother, who's willing to throw three grandchildren to the wolves, chose him to be the main target. Is there a fourth grandchild involved and perhaps a granddaughter-in-law or two? Such family loyalty. Ma Barker would be impressed.
    Whoa, even Ma Barker stood between her boys and the law. Went down in a blaze of glory protecting ol' Fred. Can't say as I'd see Flo taking a head shot for one of her children or grandchildren.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. JI and DB Statements
    By krimekat in forum Lisa Irwin
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-02-2012, 10:40 AM
  2. LE Statements
    By Prof in forum Gabriel Johnson
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 03-13-2010, 08:40 AM
  3. CA's Specific Contradictory Statements
    By MAMABEAR in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 05-11-2009, 06:41 PM

Tags for this Thread