06-02-2010, 04:41 AM #1
FL - Madison, WhtMale 1119UMFL, 21-55, hit & run victim, Aug'80
The Doe Network:
Case File 1119UMFL http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/1119umfl.html
NamUs Case #795 https://identifyus.org/cases/795
Unidentified White Male
* The victim was discovered on August 20, 1980 in Madison, Madison County, Florida
* Cause of Death: A pedestrian struck by vehicle.
* Estimated Date of Death: 3 days prior
* Estimated age: 21-35 years old
* Approximate Height and Weight: 73"; 112 lbs.
* Distinguishing Characteristics: Brown, straight hair, light brown mustache and beard. Circumcised.
* Clothing: Pants that appear to be jeans, t-shirt, long-sleeved shirt with button cuffs, socks, and leather-like, imprinted belt with buckle. 2 socks. Personal effects included $0.28 (coins).
* DNA: Not available
The victim was a pedestrian, and apparent victim of a hit and run accident on US Highway 90, eight miles west of Madison, FL.
He was last seen on August 17, 1980 hitchhiking in an easterly direction east of Greenville, FL.
Three days later his decomposed remains were found in a ditch on the side of the road.
He had a blood alcohol level of 0.15% when found.
Last edited by CarlK90245; 03-21-2013 at 09:30 PM.
06-02-2010, 04:41 AM #2
Daniel Fogg looks like a good possible.
Age: UID 21-35, DFogg 24 Within Range
Height: UID 6'1", DFogg 6'0"
Eyes: UID Blue, DFogg Blue Match
Ears: Both DFogg and UID have Attached Lobes and have very similarly shaped ears.
Timeframe: 31 Days between DFogg's DLC and UID's Estimated DOD.
Circumstances: UID was hitchhiking eastbound through FL panhandle - Consistent with Austin TX origin.
Appearance: Both have similar hairlines, noses, and pointy chins.
- UID's hair is listed as brown, DFogg's hair is listed as blonde (although it looks light brown in color photo)
- Where are his glasses?
- Would a man with the mentality of an 8-year-old be able to hitchhike from TX to FL, and take care of himself for a month while on the road?
- Would he be a drinker of alcoholic beverages?
- He gave his name as "Gerald L. Hill" to a store clerk.
Last edited by CarlK90245; 10-09-2012 at 04:57 PM.
06-02-2010, 09:43 AM #3
I think it looks very possible. If Fogg was capable of handling a transaction to buy pizza off the campus of the ranch, it's possible he could have done the same during his travels and bought meals for himself. His Charley Project page mentions he was friendly and enjoyed talking to strangers; I can picture his new acquaintances buying him coffee or some food, maybe sensing he was having trouble getting by.
I can't find much about post-mortem BAC online. Would his BAC at time of death have been significantly higher than 0.15% or does alcohol not break down in the body after death?
Even if he hadn't been in the habit of drinking (I would assume it wasn't permitted at the ranch) he might have shared a few drinks with someone he'd been traveling with in the hours before the fatal accident.
It's a mystery as to why he would have given his name as "Gerald L. Hill" to a clerk. I had the odd idea it might be a character or actor from his favorite TV show, Gunsmoke, but I don't see any reference to the name on gunsmoke.net, which appears to be the largest fansite for the program. Maybe there was someone at the ranch called Gerald Hill?
06-02-2010, 11:04 AM #4There but for the grace of God go I
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- New England
While mentally challenged individuals are sometimes victimized on the road, more often they're treated kindly and helped along. Somebody might well have taken him under their wing for a while.
It sounds like he might have run into the not-uncommon problem for developmentally disabled individuals -- emotionally wanting to have a normal adult life, even if not necessarily capable of handling it. He seems to have had enough ability to plan to leave, anyway.
If he was hit by a car and thrown into a ditch, his glasses might have flown anywhere.
06-02-2010, 11:25 AM #5Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Upper Midwest
I'm a little confused. The doe network says he is mentally retarded, but the charley project site says he is autistic and living and at a ranch for the mentally retarded.
Isn't the major definer of autism that people with the disorder have a hard time / don't really communicate with people?
which site tends to have more accurate info?
06-02-2010, 12:16 PM #6
Just yesterday, I e-mailed the NamUs case manager on a case where there was a photo of a woman (Ronda Harney) standing in front of measuring lines on a wall showing that she was 5'7", but NamUs (and consequently DoeNet, which got it from NamUs) said that she was 5'0".
On another case NamUs indicated that a female UID was 102 inches tall. That calculates out to 8 feet 6 inches, but DoeNet for the same case indicated a more reasonable 4'7" to 5'2".
Last edited by CarlK90245; 06-02-2010 at 01:38 PM.
06-02-2010, 12:22 PM #7Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
This Doe was listed as 6'1" and 112 lbs. Can that be right?
I'm that height and not a very big frame and even with no body fat on me at all I'd be 140.
Even as a rake-thin 19-year-old, I don't think I ever weighed less than 133 - and that was 50 lbs ago.
That's so thin in fact that I'm sure it is either an error or someone with severe malnutrition or other wasting disease.
06-02-2010, 01:20 PM #8
06-02-2010, 01:23 PM #9
I called this in to Texas DPS, and left a message with Analyst Alice Buchanan.
I normally call the UID side, but I know that Texas DPS is very thorough in following up on leads.
06-02-2010, 07:34 PM #10Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Golly, I can't tell you how many people I've looked at and then said to myself, oh wait a minute, even though everything else makes sense, that can't be him/her; waay too short or waay too tall. What if there was a typo in one of the website? And I didn't realize that one website "fed" another. So if one's got inaccuracies, then so will the next. I guess there's not much can be done about human error, but when something is this important.....I mean this is the "last thing these persons own" their descriptions, no name, just a description, you'd think they'd get it accurate.
06-03-2010, 06:42 AM #11Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
Last edited by KateB; 04-29-2015 at 10:50 PM. Reason: repair url tag.
06-03-2010, 07:25 AM #12
Good find, Reasy. It's possible that Fogg remembered the name from news coverage of the assassination. Maybe he was primarily interested in Gunsmoke for the law enforcement element of the program and would have tuned in to a program on the Kennedy assassination as well.
Had he just given his name as something generic like "John Smith" it might not have meant anything, but giving a middle initial sounds like he didn't make it up on the spot but had heard the name before. He must have talked to the clerk at least a while if they got around to exchanging names and I wonder if the clerk got an overall impression of his condition: did he appear to be taking care of himself, was he well-nourished, etc? Did the clerk remember him wearing glasses?
06-04-2010, 05:35 PM #13
Just spoke with Alice Buchanan of Texas DPS. She says that she will pass on the info on Daniel Fogg to "the University" (I am guessing Univ of East TX), and they will look into it. She says that it doesn't normally take very long for them to get an answer on these things.
06-04-2010, 05:53 PM #14Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
06-04-2010, 08:40 PM #15Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Probably just me but Daniel Fogg doesn't seem to have the same jaw line the Doe does. Fogg's is sorta' sqaured and the sketch of the Doe is quite long and more pointed.
I am wondering about what Namus shows as dentals, they only show 3 teeth, all three missing) Does that mean that there aren't any more, or that the rest are all there and natural with absolutely no dental work? It looks to me like someone did a darn quick job when they did the autopsy of this poor man. It also says "prior surgery", but doesn't bother to list where on the body the scar is. "imprinted belt with buckle" what imprint?
Namus also says this man was probably struck by the vehicle only 3 days prior, yet it says "Not recognizable - Decomposing/putrefaction". (Perhaps again, there was animal damage?)
I find this weird and very frustrating. The long chin and receding hairline remind of David Bird Thompson. http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/...son_david.html
Except I think his jaw, again, is too square to be the Doe.
I do think this man has potential, William Anthony Marshall: http://www.geocities.ws/missingwam/
It's obvious also from the pictures here that Bill was a drinker, and the Doe had a blood alcohol of .15. I don't see a receding hairline as in the Doe's sketch though.
I know the height is off a little, but the more I look at the height and weight and other particulars of this case, I think it may be in error.
By dotr in forum The UnidentifiedReplies: 82Last Post: 11-03-2016, 01:17 PM
By Kimster in forum The UnidentifiedReplies: 10Last Post: 06-18-2016, 01:00 PM
By Lady Stardust in forum The UnidentifiedReplies: 19Last Post: 05-19-2016, 01:01 AM
By JerseyGirl in forum Identified!Replies: 1Last Post: 03-14-2016, 11:06 PM
By Ambercat in forum The UnidentifiedReplies: 45Last Post: 06-14-2015, 05:31 PM