1186 users online (246 members and 940 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    458

    Canada - Baby girl, 3 wks, mauled to death by dog, Monteregie, QC, June 2010

    Here is the link to the article from CBC News.
    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/st...ed-by-dog.html

    The 3 week old infant girl was left inside, strapped in a carseat while mom and grandmom stepped outside the door. One of three dogs in the house attacked the poor little baby who died from her injuries.
    I am surprised at the quick laying of charge of manslaughter against the mother.
    Horrible, horrible tragedy.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CITY OF BROTHERLY SHOVE
    Posts
    17,500
    O.K. what was it? The mom and gram stepped outside for a smoke or to see the roses? Does it matter?

    God forgive me as this is a horrific tradgedy, but it could have been avoided. Why didn't one person step outside and the other watch the baby? Then switch? Let alone with three dogs in the house.

    Sorry. I'm sick of people not having the sense they were born with. I'm sick of people not watching their kids. You don't leave an infant strapped in a seat alone even for a few minutes when ya got dogs in the home.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    7,504
    I dunno even know what to think. Except that at 17 she was awfuly young to have had a baby much less to have this happen. I had two huskies in my house last month as my family members moved and needed me to keep the dogs. We also had a friend & 2 week old baby here staying and I have wlked out of the room leaving the baby in the swing or laying on the bed as the dogs wandered wherever. Not that i think it was a good idea I did it without even thinking about it,and I am a think every possible accident that can happen over type of mom. I wouldnt of left a walking or crawling baby. They said the door was left open. I always did this when I was moving bags from the car to this house when my kids where infants, Take the baby in set the carseat down and run out and grab my stuff.
    If people cannot reasonable asume their dog in harmless then they should have that dog. It sounds like in this case they asumed the dog to be harmless(most people do) and had no reason to believe it would attack now to charge her for something millions of people do leaving harmless dogs(btw I do not think any animal is harmless ) in rooms with babies because it resulted in the death of an infant is unfair.( Unfair in the legal sence not the that not fair sence) She walked out of her front door leaving the baby in a carseat...Normal not illegal...she left a dog in the house ...Normal not illegal. Where is the criminal intent or what law did she break?
    Maybe they should make a law so no one who has an infant or small child can own a dog that they keep in the house?
    Now if something changes and the baby had been crying for four hours and the dog decided to tend to it or if the car seat fell off the chair and landed on the dog causing it to flip out then maybe she does need a charge.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CITY OF BROTHERLY SHOVE
    Posts
    17,500
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulmagent View Post
    I dunno even know what to think. Except that at 17 she was awfuly young to have had a baby much less to have this happen. I had two huskies in my house last month as my family members moved and needed me to keep the dogs. We also had a friend & 2 week old baby here staying and I have wlked out of the room leaving the baby in the swing or laying on the bed as the dogs wandered wherever. Not that i think it was a good idea I did it without even thinking about it,and I am a think every possible accident that can happen over type of mom. I wouldnt of left a walking or crawling baby. They said the door was left open. I always did this when I was moving bags from the car to this house when my kids where infants, Take the baby in set the carseat down and run out and grab my stuff.
    If people cannot reasonable asume their dog in harmless then they should have that dog. It sounds like in this case they asumed the dog to be harmless(most people do) and had no reason to believe it would attack now to charge her for something millions of people do leaving harmless dogs(btw I do not think any animal is harmless ) in rooms with babies because it resulted in the death of an infant is unfair.( Unfair in the legal sence not the that not fair sence) She walked out of her front door leaving the baby in a carseat...Normal not illegal...she left a dog in the house ...Normal not illegal. Where is the criminal intent or what law did she break?
    Maybe they should make a law so no one who has an infant or small child can own a dog that they keep in the house?
    Now if something changes and the baby had been crying for four hours and the dog decided to tend to it or if the car seat fell off the chair and landed on the dog causing it to flip out then maybe she does need a charge.
    I don't think the girls age has anything to do with it. If it's from lack of experience on what to do with an infant her own mother was present.

    Making a law that no dogs can be in a household with an infant is backward and will never happen.

    It comes down to common sense and knowledge. This was a brand new spanking baby. The dogs were there first. How a dog interprets a baby crying or flailing it's arms and legs obviously isn't how a human interprets it. This isn't the dogs fault. It's known that dogs who particularly chase down small prey are more apt to not socialize with an infant immediately. There has to be alot of time taken to introduce the baby to the household and show the dog how that works.

    It doesn't matter if the carseat was way up on a bookshelf. A chair? What's that to a dog? It doesn't matter if the baby was crying for two minutes or an hour. They left the baby alone. Two people. It's a very sad, sad thing that happened and it could have easily been avoided. I also don't think she should be charged with manslaughter. The site of seeing her brand new lovely baby mauled is punishment enough for the rest of her life for making that mistake.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,994
    It seems like there needs to be blame for every accident and unforseen horror that happens - someone will damned well take the blame. Too bad our justice system doesn't always see it that way in regard to REAL abusers and molesters.

    That woman should NOT go to jail.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,427
    As I read the article about the baby being mauled by a dog, I thought perhaps there was a PitBull in the house. I have nothing against PitBulls as my son has one and she is as gentle as can be and love everyone.

    Now that I read the dogs are Huskies and that the infant was strapped in a car seat on a chair, makes me think the Huskies were just trying to remove the baby from the car seat in order to play.

    I had two Huskies and never once did they ever harm a child. If anything, they wanted to play all the time as the child was lower to the ground and easier to play with. Huskies have a tendency to protect a child in a household if a parent seems to be really annoyed. The Huskey will step in-between the child and parent and just sit there.

    I do hope charges are properly filed against the mother and I hope that the dogs are placed in a loving home.

    In this case, it's not the dog fault, it's the people caring for a child. You never leave a child unattended. The child could have easily slipped off the chair, fell on the floor with the car seat attached and could have resulted in death.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CITY OF BROTHERLY SHOVE
    Posts
    17,500
    Quote Originally Posted by Patty G View Post

    In this case, it's not the dog fault, it's the people caring for a child. You never leave a child unattended. The child could have easily slipped off the chair, fell on the floor with the car seat attached and could have resulted in death.
    That's right. Patty, what got me even more was there were TWO people there. The mother and the grandmother. Take the baby outside with you or take turns going out.

    Too late for that. Hindsight 20/20. I don't want to see the girl in jail though. She has to be suffering enough now. It's too sad.



    O.K. here's an update. Defense lawyer says the charges were too hasty. Agreed.

    The dogs did not belong to the couple who just moved there last week. The two Huskies belonged to another couple they moved in with. There is also another couple living in the home. There was also a third large dog in a cage with puppies.

    Dad is not blaming the child's mother. He said he had been out applying for welfare when he got the call about his little girl.



    http://www.vancouversun.com/news/goo...215/story.html
    Last edited by Filly; 06-10-2010 at 07:59 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    6,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Patty G View Post
    As I read the article about the baby being mauled by a dog, I thought perhaps there was a PitBull in the house. I have nothing against PitBulls as my son has one and she is as gentle as can be and love everyone.

    Now that I read the dogs are Huskies and that the infant was strapped in a car seat on a chair, makes me think the Huskies were just trying to remove the baby from the car seat in order to play.

    I had two Huskies and never once did they ever harm a child. If anything, they wanted to play all the time as the child was lower to the ground and easier to play with. Huskies have a tendency to protect a child in a household if a parent seems to be really annoyed. The Huskey will step in-between the child and parent and just sit there.

    I do hope charges are properly filed against the mother and I hope that the dogs are placed in a loving home.

    In this case, it's not the dog fault, it's the people caring for a child. You never leave a child unattended. The child could have easily slipped off the chair, fell on the floor with the car seat attached and could have resulted in death.
    I would never leave any dog with an infant, any dog, but I do Malamute rescue and we absolutely warn people that dogs with high prey drive (like Malamutes and Huskies) can take the screams and squeals of a newborn as the sound of a small animal. They are wired to be stimulated by that sound.

    Prey drive in pairs of northern breed (any prey driven animal) is greatly increased. They respond to each others hunting behavior.

    I have a Malamute, adore her, think she would be fine with a baby after she understood it wasn't a critter, but I wouldn't test the theory. She loves kids and responds to them much like you have described in your post.

    I think what this mother did was negligent. Common negligence as in it happens every single day and most people get lucky, but it was negligent none the less.

    That being said I would MUCH prefer that we start prosecuting mothers that let their boyfriend of the day torture and rape their children and then play the victim card when the cops finally get involved.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    6,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Filly View Post
    That's right. Patty, what got me even more was there were TWO people there. The mother and the grandmother. Take the baby outside with you or take turns going out.

    Too late for that. Hindsight 20/20. I don't want to see the girl in jail though. She has to be suffering enough now. It's too sad.



    O.K. here's an update. Defense lawyer says the charges were too hasty. Agreed.

    The dogs did not belong to the couple who just moved there last week. The two Huskies belonged to another couple they moved in with. There is also another couple living in the home. There was also a third large dog in a cage with puppies.

    Dad is not blaming the child's mother. He said he had been out applying for welfare when he got the call about his little girl.



    http://www.vancouversun.com/news/goo...215/story.html
    She left her newborn with dogs she didn't even know? In a house where the dogs are being bred? I think that makes it even more idiotic.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CITY OF BROTHERLY SHOVE
    Posts
    17,500
    Quote Originally Posted by impatientredhead View Post
    I would never leave any dog with an infant, any dog, but I do Malamute rescue and we absolutely warn people that dogs with high prey drive (like Malamutes and Huskies) can take the screams and squeals of a newborn as the sound of a small animal. They are wired to be stimulated by that sound.

    Prey drive in pairs of northern breed (any prey driven animal) is greatly increased. They respond to each others hunting behavior.
    Thank you for that information, IR.

    I didn't want to post that I was bitten by my grandmother's Huskie. Beautiful, beautiful animal. I just didn't want to start the breed specific posting. However, I was not the first person the dog bit.

    That being said the Vet explained to my grandfather that they are prey driven. They are also strong willed and because of the pack factor you have to absolutely from get go let the dog know who is boss. It had been my Uncle's dog first and left all day long alone in a cage. We are animal lovers so my grands took the dog so she wouldn't be alone all day. Somewhere in there the poor dog got confused and took run of my grandparent's home. This was two frail people in their 70's.

    I so do not blame the dog. I was only bit on the hand at the dinner table as I reached for a bowl. After that we never, ever took the kids up to my grandparent's home again. My gram refused to put the dog into another room if the kids visited. We all had little kids at the time and knowing the dog bit three times already it was just too risky.

    I appreciate your explanation. It was basically just what the Vet told my grandpop. We were raised with German Shepherd's and rule #1 was for us never to put our faces down by our dogs. Along with the other common sense rules a responsible dog owner follows.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    6,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Filly View Post
    Thank you for that information, IR.

    I didn't want to post that I was bitten by my grandmother's Huskie. Beautiful, beautiful animal. I just didn't want to start the breed specific posting. However, I was not the first person the dog bit.

    That being said the Vet explained to my grandfather that they are prey driven. They are also strong willed and because of the pack factor you have to absolutely from get go let the dog know who is boss. It had been my Uncle's dog first and left all day long alone in a cage. We are animal lovers so my grands took the dog so she wouldn't be alone all day. Somewhere in there the poor dog got confused and took run of my grandparent's home. This was two frail people in their 70's.

    I so do not blame the dog. I was only bit on the hand at the dinner table as I reached for a bowl. After that we never, ever took the kids up to my grandparent's home again. My gram refused to put the dog into another room if the kids visited. We all had little kids at the time and knowing the dog bit three times already it was just too risky.

    I appreciate your explanation. It was basically just what the Vet told my grandpop. We were raised with German Shepherd's and rule #1 was for us never to put our faces down by our dogs. Along with the other common sense rules a responsible dog owner follows.
    I think breed specific conversations are fine and needed for people to understand the dogs they are looking at bringing into their homes. I would much rather someone who is reading this and thinking of getting a Husky or Malamute because they're pretty know that they have very specific traits that are in the wiring. They are pack oriented, food possessive (which is why you got bit reaching for the bowl, messed up pack order combined with food), prey driven, prone to digging and escaping. If you know that going in and still want one then lets talk! Then we can talk about all the wonderful traits that in that package too.

    People get mad at me when they apply and have a 2 year old, one on the way, two cats, and a four foot fence and I suggest that it probably isn't the right time to introduce a Mal to the household. I will take the heat though and say no rather than find out the kid got nipped, the cat got killed, or the dog is out running around in traffic.

    We do occasionally get the lab-in-a-mute-suit as I have dubbed them, nothing malamute about them except the paint job. Those are the rare ones I have placed with little kids (if the owner has had big dogs in the past and sounds reasonable).

    But this mother, leaving her child with dogs she doesn't even know takes it to a whole nother level to me. I get that people think they know their dog and what it will and won't do in any given situation, this one I can't even wrap my head around the "logic".

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    6,178
    Quote Originally Posted by impatientredhead View Post
    She left her newborn with dogs she didn't even know? In a house where the dogs are being bred? I think that makes it even more idiotic.
    I agree with you completely. I wouldn't leave a newborn alone with my friendly little beagle, or any dog period.

    An infant can't give a dog commands, "down," "no," or "off." The poor baby can't even just move away, or go to another room if the dog is acting or playing too aggressively.

    Any child needs to be in control of a dog before being left alone with it, and an infant: most definitely NO WAY!
    I started out with nothing, and I still have most of it left.


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    575
    The women were about three metres away from the home with the door open when the baby was mauled.



    How could they they not hear the baby cry if it was being attached? I don't think the dogs would have silently attacked, would they? I wonder how long the baby was left alone.

    In my mind, this is more negligence, than manslaughter, but I do not know Canadian law.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CITY OF BROTHERLY SHOVE
    Posts
    17,500
    Quote Originally Posted by KariKae View Post
    The women were about three metres away from the home with the door open when the baby was mauled.



    How could they they not hear the baby cry if it was being attached? I don't think the dogs would have silently attacked, would they? I wonder how long the baby was left alone.

    In my mind, this is more negligence, than manslaughter, but I do not know Canadian law.
    KK, Impatient Redhead could answer that better I think. However, I do know Huskies are quiet dogs. They are not prone to barking. They sort of "talk" if you will.

    I know they can growl something fierce. At least my grandP's did.

    An attack maybe that's different. Plus, who knows if they were actually really as close as they say they were? If you were that closse wouldn't you have put the baby carrier where you could see it? Again, the people made a huge mistake. Maybe everybody in this world wouldn't have had to keep their eyes on the baby. I sure did when I had an infant. Maybe too obsessively if there's such a thing.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    6,476
    Quote Originally Posted by KariKae View Post
    The women were about three metres away from the home with the door open when the baby was mauled.



    How could they they not hear the baby cry if it was being attached? I don't think the dogs would have silently attacked, would they? I wonder how long the baby was left alone.

    In my mind, this is more negligence, than manslaughter, but I do not know Canadian law.
    I hate to be graphic, but if the child was not actually strapped in and it was prey drive over the high pitched noises the dog would probably not make much noise unless it was fighting with the other dog over the "prize". The baby I would think would make some noise that would alert a parent that was trying to listen.

    If the dog grabbed the baby and the did the "death shake" that they do to small prey it may have been over so quickly that there wasn't much noise.

    I guess that is possible, but that would mean the child was not secured in anything and was probably laying on a blanket on the ground (in a house with three large dogs the mother doesn't know well).

    Huskies are smart but I am guessing their first go with a child seat would take a bit of time to figure out.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. AR - Ayden Evans, 5, mauled to death by dog, 9 June 2013
    By Satch in forum Crimes-Spotlight on Children
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-29-2015, 08:47 AM
  2. GUILTY TX - Toddler girl, 2, beaten to death, McAllen, 26 June 2010
    By tk71texas in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-02-2015, 04:52 PM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-18-2012, 09:47 PM
  4. CA - Nicholas Faibish, 12, mauled to death by dogs, San Francisco, 3 June 2005
    By mysteriew in forum Crimes-Spotlight on Children
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 10-11-2006, 05:08 PM

Tags for this Thread