View Poll Results: Why would theRamseys need to stage?

Voters
170. You may not vote on this poll
  • Fear of Prison (includes all LE, including social services)

    94 55.29%
  • Fear of Reactions of Relatives

    2 1.18%
  • Fear of Losing Status

    40 23.53%
  • Theatrical Impulse/Make the Crime Sensational (Fame)

    7 4.12%
  • Insanity/Break With Reality

    8 4.71%
  • Other

    19 11.18%
Page 4 of 30 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 746

Thread: Why would the Ramseys need to stage?

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    11,238
    Quote Originally Posted by MurriFlower View Post
    Staging was only 'introduced' as an explanation for the things that LE could not fit into the RDI theory.
    Really? Because that's not the impression I got at ALL. I always thought it had something to do with little things like "evidence" and "crime scene experience." Silly me!

    DD's right: forensic and law enforcement experts have weighed in, and they are trained specifically to know these things.
    All posts made by me are MY exclusive property, and are NOT to be used or reproduced without my permission. DAVE SMASH THIEVES!

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SuperDave For This Useful Post:


  3. #77
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Really? Because that's not the impression I got at ALL. I always thought it had something to do with little things like "evidence" and "crime scene experience." Silly me!

    DD's right: forensic and law enforcement experts have weighed in, and they are trained specifically to know these things.
    You are assuming the R's hadn't had a chance to pay them off?

  4. #78
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    11,238
    Quote Originally Posted by WHITEFANG View Post
    You are assuming the R's hadn't had a chance to pay them off?
    Far as I can tell.
    All posts made by me are MY exclusive property, and are NOT to be used or reproduced without my permission. DAVE SMASH THIEVES!

  5. #79
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Really? Because that's not the impression I got at ALL. I always thought it had something to do with little things like "evidence" and "crime scene experience." Silly me!

    DD's right: forensic and law enforcement experts have weighed in, and they are trained specifically to know these things.
    Perhaps I misinterpreted (that ole language barrier again) the term 'staging'? I understood it to mean that a killer (murderer really I suppose in this instance) uses items unnecessary to the killing to make it look like something it wasn't. For example in this case, where the ligatures on the hands are supposed not to have been tied until after her death in order to make it look as if she had been restrained. Or the supposedly totally unnecessary sexual abuse, to make it look as if a sex fiend had killed her. Are you saying that this is not correct?

  6. #80
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    11,238
    Quote Originally Posted by MurriFlower View Post
    Perhaps I misinterpreted (that ole language barrier again) the term 'staging'? I understood it to mean that a killer (murderer really I suppose in this instance) uses items unnecessary to the killing to make it look like something it wasn't. For example in this case, where the ligatures on the hands are supposed not to have been tied until after her death in order to make it look as if she had been restrained. Or the supposedly totally unnecessary sexual abuse, to make it look as if a sex fiend had killed her. Are you saying that this is not correct?
    No, I'm saying it IS correct. Which is why I'm completely puzzled as to why you'd think I wasn't saying that.
    All posts made by me are MY exclusive property, and are NOT to be used or reproduced without my permission. DAVE SMASH THIEVES!

  7. #81
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee249 View Post
    Yes, but that was STAGED evidence of an intruder.
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee249 View Post
    We don't know FACTUALLY whether the crime was staged ...or NOT.
    I don't know but this looks like it could be...

    Yes it is...

    A breakthrough.

  8. #82
    Originally Posted by Holdontoyourhat View Post
    Thats funny because for years RDI has been insisting that there is zero evidence of an intruder.

    "...and an explanation of why JonBenet is dead."

    Is the explanation that a left-leaning (Victory!) anti US (but not the country that it serves), anti-capitalist (fat cat) killed JBR?

    Quote DD: Yes, but that was STAGED evidence of an intruder.

    Quoted Holdontoyourhat: Pardon me, but how the @#$ do you know?

    QuoteDeeDee: A real intruder wouldn't stage it. Wouldn't cover her up, wipe her down, probably not even hide the body in the wineceller. It is widely thought she wasn't killed in the wineceller itself. An intruder would have left her where she was killed.

    Quote SuperDave: YGG!

    Quote Holdontoyourhat: There is no known staging.

    Quote DD: Not according to LE and forensics experts.

    Quote Holdontoyourhat: They have only speculated. Staging isn't a case fact.

    Quote DD: Yes, true. We are ALL speculating. We don't know FACTUALLY whether the crime was staged ...or NOT. But the opinions of professionals who see this kind of thing regularly mean a lot.

    Quote MurriFlower: Staging was only 'introduced' as an explanation for the things that LE could not fit into the RDI theory.

    Quote SuperDave: Really? Because that's not the impression I got at ALL. I always thought it had something to do with little things like "evidence" and "crime scene experience." Silly me!

    DD's right: forensic and law enforcement experts have weighed in, and they are trained specifically to know these things.

    Quote MurriFlower: Perhaps I misinterpreted (that ole language barrier again) the term 'staging'? I understood it to mean that a killer (murderer really I suppose in this instance) uses items unnecessary to the killing to make it look like something it wasn't. For example in this case, where the ligatures on the hands are supposed not to have been tied until after her death in order to make it look as if she had been restrained. Or the supposedly totally unnecessary sexual abuse, to make it look as if a sex fiend had killed her. Are you saying that this is not correct?

    Quote SuperDave: No, I'm saying it IS correct. Which is why I'm completely puzzled as to why you'd think I wasn't saying that.
    Bugger, now I'm even more puzzled than you are.

  9. #83
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    11,238
    Quote Originally Posted by MurriFlower View Post
    Bugger, now I'm even more puzzled than you are.
    Well, do we start over?
    All posts made by me are MY exclusive property, and are NOT to be used or reproduced without my permission. DAVE SMASH THIEVES!

  10. #84
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Well, do we start over?
    Dunno if the old head can handle it!

  11. #85
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    11,238
    Quote Originally Posted by MurriFlower View Post
    Dunno if the old head can handle it!
    I know what you mean.
    All posts made by me are MY exclusive property, and are NOT to be used or reproduced without my permission. DAVE SMASH THIEVES!

  12. #86
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    400
    Where were the Whites at the night of the murder?? I know the showed up the next morning but where where they in the early morning hours?? Also, has it ever been thought of that maybe the intruder was a Female and its just been assumed the intruder or person is interest was a male?
    __________________________________________
    If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. ~Mark Twain

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to FIND'HER For This Useful Post:


  14. #87
    believe09's Avatar
    believe09 is offline For nothing is secret that will not be revealed
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oh Captain, My Captain
    Posts
    26,799
    Quote Originally Posted by FIND'HER View Post
    Where were the Whites at the night of the murder?? I know the showed up the next morning but where where they in the early morning hours?? Also, has it ever been thought of that maybe the intruder was a Female and its just been assumed the intruder or person is interest was a male?
    I would think that this would make the perp pretty unique...I mean if you accept the premise that an intruder climbed in the basement window and took the child from her bed to murder her in the basement, then wrote the ransom note and left it upstairs...I admit that I would be puzzled about the motivation. It seems easy I suppose to ascribe some kind of sexual motivation to a male, or sexual obsession. But a female intruder-I mean someone completely outside the Ramsey circle? Wow.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to believe09 For This Useful Post:


  16. #88
    believe09's Avatar
    believe09 is offline For nothing is secret that will not be revealed
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oh Captain, My Captain
    Posts
    26,799
    Is it reasonable to assume the ligatures on her extremeties and the paintbrush were anything other than staging?

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to believe09 For This Useful Post:


  18. #89
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    35
    If your an intruder, once you have Jonbenet in your hands, your job is done.

    All you have to do is walk out the front door into your car and do whatever your heart desires to Jonbenet.

    Which has always puzzled me as to why this intruder made his job much harder than it had to?

    Why bother writing this poorly composed ransom note? He can simply call them later if he choses or write the note more carefully and concise at home. There is no real pressing urgency to write this damn note in the house.

    Nor is it necessary to molest her in the house. He can take her into a van or even his own home and do all types of disgusting acts to her.

    This guy already succeeded in the three most hardest parts of this caper.
    1. breaking in
    2. avoiding detection
    3. subduing jonbenet.

    All of which is pretty impressive from a criminal perspective.

    but, Yet this guy decides to make this thing even tougher with the ransom note and garotting her in her own house.

  19. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Mastermind For This Useful Post:


  20. #90
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    11,238
    Quote Originally Posted by believe09 View Post
    Is it reasonable to assume the ligatures on her extremeties and the paintbrush were anything other than staging?
    Not to me.
    All posts made by me are MY exclusive property, and are NOT to be used or reproduced without my permission. DAVE SMASH THIEVES!

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SuperDave For This Useful Post:


  22. #91
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Far as I can tell.
    Well, how does that fit into your theory?

  23. #92
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    7,752
    Quote Originally Posted by FIND'HER View Post
    Where were the Whites at the night of the murder?? I know the showed up the next morning but where where they in the early morning hours?? Also, has it ever been thought of that maybe the intruder was a Female and its just been assumed the intruder or person is interest was a male?
    Male DNA was found that has not been identified. May or may not be associated with the crime. But no stranger female DNA or evidence has been found anywhere on the body or crime scene.
    THIS time, we get it RIGHT!

    This post is my constitutionally-protected opinion. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to DeeDee249 For This Useful Post:


  25. #93
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee249 View Post
    Male DNA was found that has not been identified. May or may not be associated with the crime. But no stranger female DNA or evidence has been found anywhere on the body or crime scene.
    However we don't know about any 'friendly' female DNA do we?

  26. #94
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by MurriFlower View Post
    However we don't know about any 'friendly' female DNA do we?

    LHP
    access
    handwriting
    familiarity
    jealousy
    dislike
    capacity
    motive?

  27. The Following User Says Thank You to WHITEFANG For This Useful Post:


  28. #95
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    7,752
    Quote Originally Posted by MurriFlower View Post
    However we don't know about any 'friendly' female DNA do we?
    You mean like Patsy's? We haven't been told of any of her DNA. Though there should have been, especially on the longjohns Patsy dressed her in.
    THIS time, we get it RIGHT!

    This post is my constitutionally-protected opinion. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  29. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DeeDee249 For This Useful Post:


  30. #96
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperDave View Post
    Not to me.
    No, no, no. What is wrong with you? This is the scheme the R's came up with to make their lives easier. Sure, they could have done a zillion other things to hide the killing and their accountability, but they thought it best to fake strangulation, fake a kidnapping note, let her die right in front of them instead of seeking medical help. They had it all figured out to avoid detection and you can see how well their ideas worked. No one suspected them. No one bought the note. No one accepted the staging. So, it was really the R's fault that everything fell apart.

    Don't forget the key to understanding this murder mystery. They, the R's, were doomed from the beginning. When the BBBBBB and the Coroner destroyed any chance for a proper investigation, the R's paid the price and would keep on paying.

  31. #97
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee249 View Post
    You mean like Patsy's? We haven't been told of any of her DNA. Though there should have been, especially on the longjohns Patsy dressed her in.
    What do you think about looking at LHP more closely?

  32. #98
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    In the Federal Witness Protection Program
    Posts
    7,752
    Quote Originally Posted by WHITEFANG View Post
    What do you think about looking at LHP more closely?
    I know many IDI look at her that way. I understand she had access, familiarity with the house, etc. But I just can't see a reason for her killing JB deliberately, and I can't see her kidnapping JB and thinking she would get away with it. Did she really think JB wouldn't tell anyone who took her? How did she think she'd get the money? Where to make the drop? WHO would pick up the money and deliver JB? Then, too, she was ruled out for handwriting match and gave DNA and hair samples.
    So once again, no matter which path I'd go down as far as LHP, there is a dead end.
    THIS time, we get it RIGHT!

    This post is my constitutionally-protected opinion. Please do not copy or take it anywhere else.

  33. The Following User Says Thank You to DeeDee249 For This Useful Post:


  34. #99
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee249 View Post
    Male DNA was found that has not been identified. May or may not be associated with the crime.
    But don't let the fact that this unknown male DNA was found exactly where a criminal had been handling things fool you.

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeDee249 View Post
    But no stranger female DNA or evidence has been found anywhere on the body or crime scene.
    More accurately: of the evidence found at the crime scene, none has yet been attributed to a female. The ransom note handwriting could be female, the garrote could've been tied by a female, JBR could've been murdered by a female.

  35. #100
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,070
    Quote Originally Posted by Holdontoyourhat View Post
    But don't let the fact that this unknown male DNA was found exactly where a criminal had been handling things fool you.



    More accurately: of the evidence found at the crime scene, none has yet been attributed to a female. The ransom note handwriting could be female, the garrote could've been tied by a female, JBR could've been murdered by a female.
    Who else had

    Access?

    similar handwriting

    knowledge of the floor plan

    knowledge the alarm wasn't armed

    how deeply JR slept

    asked for money

    disliked J

    knowledge where she slept

    where P would find note

    knowledge of $118,000

    had possessions of R's in her home including writing pads and felt tip pens

    knowledge of rope

    access to P's credit cards?

    where secret room was

Page 4 of 30 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Madonna's Stage Collapses
    By arielilane in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-19-2009, 10:09 PM
  2. Broken Window - to stage or not to stage?
    By Voice of Reason in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 99
    Last Post: 06-04-2005, 04:00 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •