997 users online (169 members and 828 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 189
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Keithville, LA
    Posts
    4,079

    2010.07.01- Motion for Emergency Hearing

    Emergency Hearing Scheduled for 1:30 pm


    Read Motion Here: http://www.clickorlando.com/download...1/24113825.pdf

    http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news...-Against-Casey

    snipped:



    News 13 has confirmed there will be an emergency hearing held Friday in the Case Against Casey Anthony at 1:30 p.m.

    Anthony will be present.
    Last edited by nums24; 07-02-2010 at 12:57 AM. Reason: added snip
    My posts are my opinion only. Praying for Justice for Caylee Marie!
    The Florida Bar summed up the problem regarding Mr. Baez.
    "His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law." (Thank you to TWA) Read their opinion here: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/d...ps/sc95855.pdf

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    778
    9th Judicial Circuit
    JUDGE BELVIN PERRY, JR. / DIVISION 02
    ------------------- Schedule for Friday, July 02, 2010 -------------------

    1:30 pm 1 hr Case: 48-2008-CF-15606-O- Motion: DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO APPOINT SPECIAL MAGISTRATE DURING INSPECTION OF DISCOVERY WITH EXPERT WITNESSES

    STATE OF FLORIDA
    LINDA DRANE-BURDICK
    vs.
    CASEY MARIE ANTHONY
    JOSE BAEZ

    Notes: COURTROOM 23A

    http://www.ninja9.org/jacsatt/attdocketframe.asp (ciminal division 99)

  3. #3
    justbeachy's Avatar
    justbeachy is offline "It's good to see me, isn't it? No need to respond; that was rhetorical."
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    1,561
    Wow, you guys are fast! I just got a text about this and it is already on WS. You guys make me proud....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In my own reality...it's nicer here.
    Posts
    12,006
    Now what could this possibly be?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Keithville, LA
    Posts
    4,079
    Quote Originally Posted by momtective View Post
    Now what could this possibly be?
    The defense would like a special master appointed before the depositions later in the month. They do not want the prosecution to be allowed to be at these depositions with their "expert" witnesses.
    My posts are my opinion only. Praying for Justice for Caylee Marie!
    The Florida Bar summed up the problem regarding Mr. Baez.
    "His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law." (Thank you to TWA) Read their opinion here: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/d...ps/sc95855.pdf

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    357
    snipped:

    Anthony's attorneys are arguing that allowing the officials from the Sheriff's Office to be present while counsel and expert witnesses inspect the items of evidence would unfairly subject statements made between counsel and the expert witnesses to discovery, creating an unfair prejudice against the defendant (Anthony) in her preparation for trial.


    This will never happen. The State needs to maintain custody and control over evidence. If allowing anyone to examine it outside their presence, would compromise said evidence. Unless that is what the defense hopes to do...tamper with evidence.

    Once the evidence chain of custody is broken, evidence is tossed. HHBP won't allow that to happen. And in my opinion, a ridiculous request on the part of the defense, but that is just one of many.
    -Si vis pacem, para bellum.

    -Senatus Populus Que Romanus

    -Why is it, if you help someone get away with a crime before they are arrested you are an accomplice...but if you help them get away with a crime after they are arrested you are a defense attorney?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Keithville, LA
    Posts
    4,079
    Quote Originally Posted by spqr View Post
    snipped:

    Anthony's attorneys are arguing that allowing the officials from the Sheriff's Office to be present while counsel and expert witnesses inspect the items of evidence would unfairly subject statements made between counsel and the expert witnesses to discovery, creating an unfair prejudice against the defendant (Anthony) in her preparation for trial.


    This will never happen. The State needs to maintain custody and control over evidence. If allowing anyone to examine it outside their presence, would compromise said evidence. Unless that is what the defense hopes to do...tamper with evidence.

    Once the evidence chain of custody is broken, evidence is tossed. HHBP won't allow that to happen. And in my opinion, a ridiculous request on the part of the defense, but that is just one of many.
    I would not allow Dr. Lee to be alone with any evidence EVER!
    My posts are my opinion only. Praying for Justice for Caylee Marie!
    The Florida Bar summed up the problem regarding Mr. Baez.
    "His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law." (Thank you to TWA) Read their opinion here: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/d...ps/sc95855.pdf

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,806
    Aw just let them take notes while being observed, no physical contact with the evidence (especially HL), and give them a private room close by to discuss and re-inspect if needed. sheeze ........ I do agree that a special master should be appointed, only to protect the SA and LE officers. Goodness knows after the TES fiasco the state will need the have a court appointed master to cover them when and if JB cries foul.......again.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,285
    Quote Originally Posted by spqr View Post
    snipped:

    Anthony's attorneys are arguing that allowing the officials from the Sheriff's Office to be present while counsel and expert witnesses inspect the items of evidence would unfairly subject statements made between counsel and the expert witnesses to discovery, creating an unfair prejudice against the defendant (Anthony) in her preparation for trial.


    This will never happen. The State needs to maintain custody and control over evidence. If allowing anyone to examine it outside their presence, would compromise said evidence. Unless that is what the defense hopes to do...tamper with evidence.

    Once the evidence chain of custody is broken, evidence is tossed. HHBP won't allow that to happen. And in my opinion, a ridiculous request on the part of the defense, but that is just one of many.
    The Special Master, often a judge, is someone who would maintain the integrity of the evidence chain of custody and control, while not subjecting the defense members to direct observation by LE. Not in and of itself an unreasonable request for certain types of evidence. Especially if it is just for 2 days.

    BUT

    I predict HHJP is going to go b@tsh@t on the defense over this sudden "emergency" motion, with insufficient time for the SA to even properly generate a response. What exactly is the reason this needs an emergency determination? Why was it not included with other more normal motions and proceedings?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,160
    Quote Originally Posted by faefrost View Post
    The Special Master, often a judge, is someone who would maintain the integrity of the evidence chain of custody and control, while not subjecting the defense members to direct observation by LE. Not in and of itself an unreasonable request for certain types of evidence. Especially if it is just for 2 days.

    BUT

    I predict HHJP is going to go b@tsh@t on the defense over this sudden "emergency" motion, with insufficient time for the SA to even properly generate a response. What exactly is the reason this needs an emergency determination? Why was it not included with other more normal motions and proceedings?
    BBM: Hummmm. Wonder what HHJS is doing????


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    270
    I just arranged for childcare! I am going!!!!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Liverpool Branch
    Posts
    5,256
    I am o.k. with the motion as long as it done properly to protect both sides and the chain of custody.

    However, I do not understand why this is an Emergency Motion given months and months have gone by where the Defense could have set this up at their leisure.

    Is this hype to get the attention of the general public and suggest they have something significant? = Propaganda.
    Disclaimer: All posts are my own humble opinion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.



    Justice for Caylee

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    11,613
    Quote Originally Posted by nums24 View Post
    the defense would like a special master appointed before the depositions later in the month. They do not want the prosecution to be allowed to be at these depositions with their "expert" witnesses.
    hahahahahahahaha

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,160
    Quote Originally Posted by cyberborg View Post
    I am o.k. with the motion as long as it done properly to protect both sides and the chain of custody.

    However, I do not understand why this is an Emergency Motion given months and months have gone by where the Defense could have set this up at their leisure.

    Is this hype to get the attention of the general public and suggest they have something significant? = Propaganda.
    My guess is had they done this earlier.....JB would have had to pay them... Also money was spent on experts that would not tell JB what he wanted to hear.. ... JMO

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    11,613
    Quote Originally Posted by nums24 View Post
    I would not allow Dr. Lee to be alone with any evidence EVER!
    I hope his shenanigans are mentioned in the State's argument.

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. 2011.04.28 Emergency Media Motion
    By Aedrys in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 338
    Last Post: 05-08-2011, 02:55 PM
  2. 2011.05.06 Emergency Hearing @ 1:00 PM EDT Re: New Venue Motion
    By Patty G in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 378
    Last Post: 05-06-2011, 02:07 PM
  3. 2010.07.02 Actual Emergency Hearing Thread
    By JBean in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 656
    Last Post: 07-03-2010, 10:53 PM
  4. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 03-11-2010, 07:15 PM
  5. Emergency Hearing re: remains-UPDATE MOTION DENIED
    By SuziQ in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 256
    Last Post: 12-13-2008, 01:55 AM