758 users online (158 members and 600 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oh Captain, My Captain
    Posts
    28,119

    Exclamation Federal In Defense Of Marriage Act Deemed Unconstitutional

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100708/...riage_benefits

    This is HUGE. Martha Coakley spearheaded the challege to the act based upon a state's right to define the institution and the equal protection clause under the constitution.

    Thank You Martha.
    email me


    Long Lost Love: The Bob Harrod Story Disappeared/ID Network
    Amazon: Purchase Long Lost Love $1.99


    Bob Harrod SAR


    “The first time someone shows you who they are, believe them.”
    ― Maya Angelou

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, North Carolina
    Posts
    1,750
    Thank you so much for this link! The button was not thanks enough for me!!
    Find Brian Shaffer!!
    www.findbrianshaffer.com


    Janet Christiansen, Kaiden, and Family, justice WILL prevail!

    JUSTICE FOR AMBER!

    ~*Cancel my subscription, I'm THROUGH with your issues*~

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Rochester, New York
    Posts
    30,559
    Quote Originally Posted by believe09 View Post
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100708/...riage_benefits

    This is HUGE. Martha Coakley spearheaded the challege to the act based upon a state's right to define the institution and the equal protection clause under the constitution.

    Thank You Martha.
    Andrea Lafferty, executive director of the Traditional Values Coalition, called Tauro's ruling "judicial activism" and said Tauro was a "rogue judge." Gay marriage advocates will keep pushing their agenda in the courts, she said, but noted voters consistently have rejected gay marriage at the ballot box, including in a recent California vote.

    "We can't allow the lowest common denominator states, like Massachusetts, to set standards for the country," Lafferty said.

    Tom McClusky, senior vice president of the conservative Family Research Council, said the rulings result in part from "the deliberately weak legal defense of DOMA" that the Obama administration mounted on behalf of the government.

    "While the American people have made it unmistakably clear that they want to preserve marriage as the legal union of one man and one woman, liberals and activist judges are not content to let the people decide," McClusky said in a statement.


    Activist Judge = Judge I don't agree with.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oh Captain, My Captain
    Posts
    28,119
    Lowest common denominator state??? That has to be the most pompous divisive phrase I have read in a long, long time lol. I like it!!
    email me


    Long Lost Love: The Bob Harrod Story Disappeared/ID Network
    Amazon: Purchase Long Lost Love $1.99


    Bob Harrod SAR


    “The first time someone shows you who they are, believe them.”
    ― Maya Angelou

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Rochester, New York
    Posts
    30,559
    Quote Originally Posted by believe09 View Post
    Lowest common denominator state??? That has to be the most pompous divisive phrase I have read in a long, long time lol. I like it!!
    I love the "east coast intellectual" haters. There are 13 stripes on the flag that represent the 13 original colonies. They were all east coast. The continental congress was full of east coast intellectuals and yet so many believe they know better than judges and people with compassion and brains. JMO

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    16,021
    Yippee!
    I do not intend to tiptoe through life only to arrive safely at death!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,784
    Quote Originally Posted by believe09 View Post
    Lowest common denominator state??? That has to be the most pompous divisive phrase I have read in a long, long time lol. I like it!!

    (BTW, love your new "location".)
    Last edited by WhyaDuck?; 07-09-2010 at 05:46 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    82
    Hopefully this is a step in the right directions for the entire country!
    -Michelle

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Hope Valley, USA
    Posts
    239
    Wow. Bout-freakin'-time.

  10. #10
    I agree...it's about time. But has anyone else seen this? Why would the Obama Administration appeal the ruling?

    "President Obama has called the law known as DOMA “abhorrent” and pledged to overturn it. But his Justice Department has defended the law’s constitutionality in court – and is expected to appeal Judge Tauro’s ruling to the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit."

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/313432


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The United States of America
    Posts
    218
    I really enjoyed reading the opinion of Judge Tauro, it was completely LOGICAL!

    This was my favorite part of his ruling:

    In the wake of DOMA, it is only sexual orientation that differentiates a married couple entitled to federal marriage-based benefits from one not so entitled. And this court can conceive of no way in which such a difference might be relevant to the provision of the benefits at issue.By premising eligibility for these benefits on marital status in the first instance, the federal government signals to this court that the relevant distinction to be drawn is between married individuals and unmarried individuals. To further divide the class of married individuals into those with spouses of the same sex and those with spouses of the opposite sex is to create a distinction without meaning. And where, as here, “there is no reason to believe that the disadvantaged class is different, in relevant respects” from a similarly situated class, this court may conclude that it is only irrational prejudice that motivates the challenged classification.As irrational prejudice plainly never constitutes a legitimate government interest, this court must hold that Section 3 of DOMA as applied to Plaintiffs violates the equal protection principles embodied in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

    It was nice to have some good news after Linda Lingle's cop-out!

    Thank you, Judge Tauro!



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-30-2012, 05:20 AM
  2. Court: Heart of gay marriage law unconstitutional
    By Reader in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 06-07-2012, 08:56 PM
  3. Judge Rules California's Gay Marriage Ban Unconstitutional 8/4/10
    By KaylynnCouture in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 12-06-2010, 01:03 PM