Page 6 of 20 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 16 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 297
  1. #76
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,093
    Quote Originally Posted by For The Kids View Post
    In my opinion...trespassing still isnt as bad making a young child disappear.

    JMO
    Well, if someone has any proof that she did that, I myself and I am sure LE, also, are more than ready to have that presented!

    jmo


  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to raeann For This Useful Post:


  3. #77
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    6,496
    TH clearly has absolutely no/zero/zilch/nada compassion for Kyron. This is evident from her blank expression. I wonder what her attitude would be if it were her baby K that was missing? Probably a WHOLE different persona in that situation, I bet.



  4. #78
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,093
    Quote Originally Posted by wondering1 View Post
    Maybe, but the only person's rights being techinically violated are the landlord's, not TH's, and I doubt he/she/it really cares.
    LOL....probably will depend on whether the owner of the building is TH's attorney. If it is his private office facility....I am sure he might have something to say about the whole thing.

    jmo


  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to raeann For This Useful Post:


  6. #79
    Wise Old Owl's Avatar
    Wise Old Owl is offline Retired WS Staff & Founding member of AFKBPOFPOPL
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South FloriDUH
    Posts
    13,585
    Quote Originally Posted by southern_scout View Post
    Her attorney has probably advised her to stay silent. Anything she says can be spun against her at this point, and I am sure she's been told to stay away from this case as much as possible.
    BUT, if you are innocent - the truth doesn't change. And see, that's the crux of this whole dilemma. Terri isn't telling the truth. She can't prove where she'd been, what she did, who she saw, etc. etc. because....................well, again, the truth doesn't change and obviously, the truth will implicate Terri Horman and she can't have that.

    JMHO



  7. #80
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,323
    I would have asked questions that were much less nice. Like....Did you KILL Kyron? Where have you stashed him? Did you hire someone to KILL your husband?

    Oooohhh....I would have LOVED to see her snap. Dang. Ice Queen fits perfectly. And yeah...she's innocent until proven guilty in the court of law....but the court of public opinion....not so much. And IMO, that's fine. If someone thought I was guilty...so be it, as they say "put up or shut up". Show me the proof you aren't guilty to change my opinion.
    Last edited by mrsu; 07-09-2010 at 10:53 PM.


  8. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to mrsu For This Useful Post:


  9. #81
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    962
    Quote Originally Posted by gwenabob View Post
    I think they were walking to a car, then when he was questioning her, they turned around and went back to the office they came from.
    ah...thank you. For some reason I assumed they were coming, not going.


  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to wondering1 For This Useful Post:


  11. #82
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    36
    Oh I think the media is just getting warmed up. This story has intrigue now...and the person of public interest now (TH) not talking...the media starts doing some odd stuff when it is offended...for instance they start breaking stories about murder plots...we just need them to get a wiff where the boy is.

    This story keeps making People, and the Morning shows (like Today show), then isn't it on Nightline tonight? Of, course Nancy Grace has it plastered everywhere. It won't go away for TH.

    She needs to say something.

    I hope more than anything he is in the least found alive.


  12. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Lokiza For This Useful Post:


  13. #83
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    962
    Quote Originally Posted by raeann View Post
    LOL....probably will depend on whether the owner of the building is TH's attorney. If it is his private office facility....I am sure he might have something to say about the whole thing.

    jmo
    Maybe they checked that out beforehand, but maybe not.


  14. #84
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh,PA
    Posts
    898
    Quote Originally Posted by raeann View Post
    Well, if someone has any proof that she did that, I myself and I am sure LE, also, are more than ready to have that presented!

    jmo
    Do you have proof that she didn't?


  15. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to pghbrandi For This Useful Post:


  16. #85
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    250
    Quote Originally Posted by raeann View Post
    If the garage is part of a privately owned building, it is PRIVATE property. We happen to own an office building that housed my FIL's law offices before he passed away. There is a 15 space parking area enclosed by a brick and wrought iron fence with two entry/exit points. We can restrict anyone that we want to from entering the lot or from parking there day or night, even when the office is closed. The police can and have called tow trucks to remove cars that were there illegally. It is clearly posted as private property as are dozens of others in the downtown area. My FIL frequently was involved in high profile cases as he specialized in business law. Believe me, if he didn't want the media there, they were definitely informed that they would be prosecuted for trespassing.
    We don't know if the garage in question is private property, however. We merely have one person's statement that it is (and if I wanted the press to go away, I'd say the same thing...even if it weren't true).

    To me, it looked like a garage under an office building...many of which in the city I live in are open to the public as well as to tenants/visitors to tenants in the specific building. I've worked in office buildings where the garage was totally private, marked as such, and one had to have an employee pass to get in...if this was the case with this building, then the reporter was trespassing. I've worked in office buildings that had tenant parking but also visitor parking in relation to the tenants...the reporter could have scheduled a meeting with another tenant to make it legal (I saw this tactic in action at the building I worked in as mentioned before). I've worked in office buildings that had tenant, visitor, AND public parking (this is the most common configuration in the city I currently live in, as it makes the most income for the property owners...they charge an arm and a leg for the public...it could be very different in Portland). I've worked in office buildings where the owner of the garage was different than the owner of the building and could have given a rats rear end about reporters being on their property...they only cared about getting the fees from the people parking in the garage.

    We don't know for sure what the situation is in this case.

    I still maintain that the reporter was being jerkish. I really do not like these kind of attempts at interviews. It reeks of tabloid journalism, but the media will pursue what sells...and what gets the highest ratings.


  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rosiebean For This Useful Post:


  18. #86
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    282
    Quote Originally Posted by raeann View Post
    According to two attorneys and a judge (husband's golf group) sitting right here at my patio table......the reporter was technically trespassing the minute he stepped off of the street and into the parking garage, unless he had an appointment or business relationship with a tenant in that building. There are very specific places that TH is restricted from, along with very specific people. Other than that, she is free to go anywhere that she wants to. The press has no more right to enter that building than they do to enter any ones yard or home....refer back to the beginning of the case where LE repeatedly told media to STAY OFF OF PRIVATE PROPERTY. Freedom of the press does not allow media to enter your home uninvited just because your kid left the door open. Same goes for entering an enclosed parking garage and refusing to leave when clearly told that it was private property.
    I have not read the entire thread, so please forgive me if I am posting redux:

    We do not know that the reporter DID NOT have permission.... do we?


  19. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to SacreBleu For This Useful Post:


  20. #87
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5,074
    Terri acts just like Casey.

    But the the truth is her lawyer told her not to speak to anyone.... I pretty sure of that.

    Misty Croslin never listen to her lawyer ever... look were that landed her.
    "LIGHTING THE WAY HOME"


  21. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to tfrohning For This Useful Post:


  22. #88
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    36
    I bet they start sending her with a security guard soon.


  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lokiza For This Useful Post:


  24. #89
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    6,719
    Quote Originally Posted by southern_scout View Post
    Her attorney has probably advised her to stay silent. Anything she says can be spun against her at this point, and I am sure she's been told to stay away from this case as much as possible.
    I understand her not saying anything. That is not what bothers me the most. She also didn't flinch, not even once. No reaction to the questions whatsoever. I'd at least expect signs of her being upset. Those questions should have hurt her inside if she was innocent. Instead she treated it like the reporter was an annoying cockroach. I bet she would have smashed him with her foot if she could have. There wasn't any concern for Kyron misisng, just annoyance that the reporter dared to inconvenience her with questions. That is what really bothers me.



  25. #90
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    5,093
    Quote Originally Posted by gwenabob View Post
    Well that is good to know. I think Terri should sue KATU for some kind of violation of her rights. Of course you realize that KATU would have to explain why they were there trying to question Terri, and the background of her suspicious behavior. And there would be all kinds of discovery flying about and depositions, too (which are not allowed in criminal court) and all kinds of evidence being requested. We could find out lots and lots of interesting things that will probably be barred in criminal court.

    Terri would have to state a claim for damages. What would those be? Public humiliation? Had to see a doctor and get tranquilizers? Great. Hand over your complete medical history including your psych records. Prove this incident caused your anxiety and not the allegations that you disappeared your step-son. I'm all for Terri suing KATU. ALL FOR IT!


    The only information that would be allowed by a judge would be whether the reporter had an appointment in the building, or verbal or written permission to enter the property, or a standing business relationship with a tenant that could be substantiated. WHY he wanted answers has nothing to do with the illegal physical act of entering private property without permission. It is a simple did you or did you not have a right to be there. Since LE has gone to great lengths in this case admonishing media to stay off of private property, and these very media sources have been showing video of those statements, it would be a bit difficult for them to play dumb and pretend they didn't know.


  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to raeann For This Useful Post:


Page 6 of 20 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 16 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 2010.05.29 ~ Tommy and Lindsy video ~ Early April
    By Montana in forum Haleigh Cummings
    Replies: 225
    Last Post: 06-04-2010, 09:56 AM
  2. 2010.05.12 Video Revisited. Lindsy and Lisa Croslin.
    By grandmaj in forum Haleigh Cummings
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-12-2010, 09:15 PM
  3. 2010.04.21 If it's Ron, why won't they talk?
    By Maryann123 in forum Haleigh Cummings
    Replies: 180
    Last Post: 04-23-2010, 08:43 PM
  4. Replies: 346
    Last Post: 04-22-2010, 01:23 AM
  5. 2010.04.14 - Today Show video, includes TN interview
    By Kimster in forum Haleigh Cummings
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 04-15-2010, 10:06 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •