1396 users online (262 members and 1134 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    613

    Can Cindy invoke the 5th amendment at the 7/15/10 hearing about the 911 call?

    The [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution"]Fifth Amendment [/ame]protects the rights of an accused as well as the witnesses. To invoke the fifth is to avoid self incrimination. It implies that to answer the question the witness must say something that might subject themselves to criminal prosecution. It means that they can't make a person testify as to what he may or may not have done. Since it is widely believed that CA obstructed justice can she just not answer anything and let Judge Perry decide about the 911 call without her input? If she refuses to answer anything she won't make Casey mad! lol lol--I know I shouldn't be laughing..but my real question is CAN CA consider the fifth amendment (legally) under these circumstances? Can the Judge require her to answer if she invokes the fifth?

    I elected to ask this question in a thread of it's own, it's worthy of discussion but if it is more appropriate in a different place, of course, I have no objection to moving it. Thanks!
    Last edited by affinity; 07-12-2010 at 11:21 AM. Reason: added link

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    5,658
    Good question!! I don't know the answer but it will be interesting to see what the situation is with that. I have often wondered why the Anthonys have not seemed more concerned about going to jail themselves.
    Justice for GEORGE!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    390
    Great Question Affinity! I am eagerly awaiting any of our legal helpers thoughts here at WS, however if IRC, Conway stated that Cindy would be telling the truth. So, for some reason I highly doubt that she would plead the 5th. You never know though with Cindy.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,959
    Doesn't the immunity she was granted earlier mean that the fear of self incrimination is unfounded and the real motive might be to avoid testifying against her daughter which could be tantamount to obstructing justice and being held in contempt?

    Just asking.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,042
    I know in her deposition that in the civil trial, she refused to answer questions because it would incriminate her daughter and limit the possibility of her getting a fair trial...

    I'd like to see her try that one on Thursday. The worst part is the her lawyer Brad Conway was encouraging her not to answer!? He was overly involved in that interview and exchange. What role will he play on Thursday? I know he said his client will testify truthfully (We'll see!).
    It's the journey, not the destination.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
    Posts
    17,918
    She can only invoke her 5th amendment right against something that might incriminate her personally. The scope of questioning will (should be) limited to the 911 calls. Nothing she said on those calls should incriminate her personally. Even if she goes with the 'I just called to get them out there faster' excuse, she would be protected under "use immunity". In FL "use immunity" is automatically given to anyone formally subpoenaed. The prosecutor essentially agrees to never prosecute the crime that the witness might have committed in exchange for evidence/testimony.
    Last edited by beach; 07-12-2010 at 12:18 PM. Reason: add word

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    23,796
    Quote Originally Posted by beach2yall View Post
    She can only invoke her 5th amendment right against something that might incriminate her personally. The scope of questioning will (should be) limited to the 911 calls. Nothing she said on those calls should incriminate her personally. Even if she goes the 'I just called to get them out there faster' excuse, she would be protected under "use immunity". In FL "use immunity" is automatically given to anyone formally subpoenaed. The prosecutor essentially agrees to never prosecute the crime that the witness might have committed in exchange for evidence/testimony.
    I agree. You cannot use the 5th to protect someone else (even though some unmentioned names may have tried to use it to protect others.) The 5th is basically that you cannot be made to answer questions that incriminate yourself. But incriminating your husband, your child and your best friend is required.

    In her telephone call Cindy provided info about her daughter and missing grandchild. Info that has since been verified. Her car did stink, her granddaughter was missing. So I don't see anything that she could use the 5th for anything from the call. Now any actions that may or may not have happened after that point could be subject to the 5th. Of course to invoke the 5th you tell the world that you are guilty of something! It should be interesting to see if she does invoke the 5th at any point during her testimony either during the hearing or the trial.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
    Posts
    17,918
    Just to clarify - "use immunity" does NOT protect one from perjury. However, it would have to get quite serious - very bad - before she would be formally charged with perjury.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,841
    I'll let those that know answer directly, but I remember in a recent thread where this was asked and the answer was an emphatic NO SHE MAY NOT!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by beach2yall View Post
    Just to clarify - "use immunity" does NOT protect one from perjury. However, it would have to get quite serious - very bad - before she would be formally charged with perjury.
    I guess your definition of "very bad" would be key; however, I know here in Michigan the former mayor of Detroit was charged with perjury for lying under oath in a civil trial about having an affair. Some thought that was not that bad. The Wayne County prosecutors thought otherwise.

    It might not need to be "that bad" to land a perjury charge. Just saying.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    613
    Quote Originally Posted by Gnatcatcher View Post
    I'll let those that know answer directly, but I remember in a recent thread where this was asked and the answer was an emphatic NO SHE MAY NOT!
    Oh sorry it was asked somewhere else and I didn't see it. The threads get so long, it is difficult to read them all.

    If the prosecution asks CA about what she meant when CA stated "it smells like there has been a dead body in the damn car" or questions about "soft pedaling" situations to mold the circumstances into Anthony favor CA COULD take the 5th...right? CA would have to believe the State is going to charge her with a crime in order for her to invoke the 5th. Do I have that correct?

    (This helps me! thanks for explaining).

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,841
    Oh don't you dare apologize! I know how impossible it seems sometimes to read everything!! Personally I only absorb/comprehend about 75% of what's written here anyway, haaa.

    I think it was discussed in the Cindy Subpeanaed thread, but I'm sure others will answer here anyway, it's a good place to break it out.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Orlando, FL, USA
    Posts
    771
    I read in a thread here somewhere (sorry but I can't find it) that unless she has been charged with a crime, she can't plead the fifth and that is the possible reason that none of the Anthonys have been charged with obstruction or false reports.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
    Posts
    17,918
    Quote Originally Posted by affinity View Post
    Oh sorry it was asked somewhere else and I didn't see it. The threads get so long, it is difficult to read them all.

    If the prosecution asks CA about what she meant when CA stated "it smells like there has been a dead body in the damn car" or questions about "soft pedaling" situations to mold the circumstances into Anthony favor CA COULD take the 5th...right? CA would have to believe the State is going to charge her with a crime in order for her to invoke the 5th. Do I have that correct?

    (This helps me! thanks for explaining).
    If Cindy's testimony on the stand on Thursday differs from what her already sworn testimony is in her previous statements to LE, the FBI and/or depo, LDB will drag out the sworn statement or depo and confront her with the conflicting statements. She will then be 'impeached'...making her appear a much less credible witness. If that happens at the hearing, HHJP can find fault with her character and pretty much disregard her as being a truthful witness. Same thing for the jury at trial.

    I am not saying there is no chance in he!! that she will not be formally charged with perjury, I just think the chance is very, very slim. It isn't what MY interpretation of perjury is, it is going to depend on HHJP - how strict he is going to be and to the degree he wants to enforce it.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    the Plains & Jordan-Hare stadium
    Posts
    17,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Ms.Curious View Post
    I guess your definition of "very bad" would be key; however, I know here in Michigan the former mayor of Detroit was charged with perjury for lying under oath in a civil trial about having an affair. Some thought that was not that bad. The Wayne County prosecutors thought otherwise.

    It might not need to be "that bad" to land a perjury charge. Just saying.

    Hi Ms.Curious and WELCOME TO WS!

    You are correct and not that it matters legally, but just curious - was the former Detroit mayor the defendant or plaintiff in the civil suit? Or was he (she?) a witness?

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Picture on Cindy's Purse @ 2010.12.20 Hearing
    By Macushla in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 12-27-2010, 03:40 PM
  2. Cindy's Testimony at 911 Tapes Hearing
    By Pattymarie in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 335
    Last Post: 07-20-2010, 07:17 PM
  3. Casey thanked Cindy for calling 911 after first call
    By sua_sponte in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 225
    Last Post: 04-27-2009, 08:31 PM
  4. Will Cindy attend the Motion Hearing Friday
    By ThoughtElf in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 133
    Last Post: 01-30-2009, 11:33 AM
  5. Phone call with Cindy and phone call with Leonard
    By Hailiejade77 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 126
    Last Post: 09-04-2008, 11:46 PM