1103 users online (237 members and 866 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 131
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752

    Contempt of Court :Revealing Sealed Docs

    There are several issues with the document filed today and this is the basis for the contempt of court.
    Let's try and discuss the fact that Terri revealed the docs to Mike Cook here and the potential ramifications.
    I wonder who Mike shared the information with? Certainly he knewthis was highly sensitive information.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Kaine Horman's attorney asked a judge to hold Terri Moulton Horman in contempt of court for showing a then-sealed restraining order to Michael Cook.
    The filing alleges that Terri took the restraining order to Cook's home, where she showed him the document and allowed him to take cell phone photos of the document, which included Kaine's new address. The filing also states that a police search of Cook's phone found that Cook had done a Google search to map the new address.

    http://www.kgw.com/news/local/Court-...-98270654.html

    http://www.kptv.com/download/2010/0712/24229769.pdf

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Penn's woods
    Posts
    17,195
    A reporter in a video about this report stated that Mr. Cook has decided he needs to retain his own lawyer now that he has found himself in the middle of this high profile case.

    I agree. He could find himself with legal problems of his own if the information that is put forth is correct. JMHO.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ontario but a trucker so everywhere.
    Posts
    14,984
    Quote Originally Posted by JBean View Post
    There are several issues with the document filed today and this is the basis for the contempt of court.
    Let's try and discuss the fact that Terri revealed the docs to Mike Cook here and the potential ramifications.
    I wonder who Mike shared the information with? Certainly he knewthis was highly sensitive information.
    And it is apparently two people. Goodness what a mess.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,072
    I thought KH's new address was not going to be disclosed to TH, for his own protection.

    I must be wrong, right?
    My posts contain my opinions only.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,701
    What if, in Terri's zeal to get to MC's house, she brought the newly delivered documents with her. What if, while she's in the powder room, MC decides to take a peek, and because she's not gonna be in there long, takes pictures to review later?

    I'm only posing this as an alternative to the immediate response that Terri had to have shown him the documents. Just to keep possibilities open, I guess.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    3,716
    Quote Originally Posted by RoughlyCollie View Post
    I thought KH's new address was not going to be disclosed to TH, for his own protection.

    I must be wrong, right?
    In my own experience, when I had to file a RO in Oregon due to domestic abuse, I had to list my home address- an address he did not know about since I was in hiding. I was told the reason was because the respondent needed to be informed of every place they need to stay away from. Strange isn't it? It's such a scary feeling...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    43,418
    Debs Mr. Cook stated in his interviews with LE that the respondent (Terri Horman) made the RO available to him to read and in fact pointed out to him particular sections that were of interest to the respondent.

    It goes on to state that he told 2 other people and that the respondent allowed Mr. Cook to take cell phone pictures of the document.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Kat View Post
    A reporter in a video about this report stated that Mr. Cook has decided he needs to retain his own lawyer now that he has found himself in the middle of this high profile case.

    I agree. He could find himself with legal problems of his own if the information that is put forth is correct. JMHO.
    He did not find himself there, he put himself right smack in the middle all on his own.
    you bet he needs a lawyer LOL.

    I don't think how or if he saw the docs is in question. seems Cook told them plenty, including he was asked to lie to the attorney by Terri.
    Last edited by JBean; 07-12-2010 at 10:35 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    219
    Here’s a question.. if Kaine and baby K were at an undisclosed address (on a SEALED document), then why does Terri’s copy of the RO have that address on it? I smell a rat (set up) and it really stinks.
    The timeline of the served document comes into question as well.

    Did MC go to LE or did they call him in for questioning and do a LDT on him too??? Unless they have proof of her using the cell phone at the time of allegedly showing him the RO and sexting then it is another he said/she said until it is proven a fact and not hearsay. IMO


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    LOL let's not forget the foundation for the RO is a murder for hire plot. I mean it doesn't look to good when the accused is passing sensitive information like where Kaine is located to the person you are sexting with.
    What was Cook thinking?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Penn's woods
    Posts
    17,195
    Quote Originally Posted by JBean View Post
    He did not find himself there, he put himself right smack in the middle all on his own.
    you bet he needs a lawyer LOL.

    I don't think how how saw the docs is in question. seems Cook told them plenty, including he was asked to lie to the attorney by Terri.
    No kidding on the he's in trouble JBean I think I worded that too carefully huh?

    I wonder if she texted him to ask him to lie? Hooboy. Just curious.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Penn's woods
    Posts
    17,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Ladybulldog View Post
    Here’s a question.. if Kaine and baby K were at an undisclosed address (on a SEALED document), then why does Terri’s copy of the RO have that address on it? I smell a rat (set up) and it really stinks.
    The timeline of the served document comes into question as well.

    Did MC go to LE or did they call him in for questioning and do a LDT on him too??? Unless they have proof of her using the cell phone at the time of allegedly showing him the RO and sexting then it is another he said/she said until it is proven a fact and not hearsay. IMO
    This is being discussed on another thread. I'll go see if I can find you the post.

    IIRC a member here has had to take out RO's before and her address was listed because the other person had to know the address in order to stay away from it.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    3,594
    Man.... If I sleep I miss everything! Who the heck is MC and his r/ship to TH?
    TIA

    ETA: Never mind. I thought the link was a d/load pdf which I didn't have the time or patience for. I read the article and I get it now.
    Last edited by butwhatif?; 07-12-2010 at 10:54 PM. Reason: add

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    52,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Ladybulldog View Post
    Here’s a question.. if Kaine and baby K were at an undisclosed address (on a SEALED document), then why does Terri’s copy of the RO have that address on it? I smell a rat (set up) and it really stinks.
    The timeline of the served document comes into question as well.

    Did MC go to LE or did they call him in for questioning and do a LDT on him too??? Unless they have proof of her using the cell phone at the time of allegedly showing him the RO and sexting then it is another he said/she said until it is proven a fact and not hearsay. IMO
    http://www.kptv.com/download/2010/0712/24229769.pdf

    I suppose that both Mr. Cook and the landscaper could be in cahoots to make Terri look bad, but not very likely.

Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 66
    Last Post: 12-23-2015, 04:12 PM
  2. judgement in Bennett vs mccann contempt of court
    By brit1981 in forum Madeleine McCann
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-25-2013, 07:05 AM