Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 184

Thread: Defense finds something new in old evidence?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    6,719

    Defense finds something new in old evidence?

    According to WFTV, Jose Baez is saying the defense experts found something new in the evidence they are looking at. Hmmm. Here's a snip from the article:

    The defense claims they've made some discoveries.

    “There's things you see that you can't see in pictures, that you can’t see in pictures that you see in person,” Baez said.

    The defense won't tell WFTV what they've found that they didn't know before or the extent of their discoveries. They do not want WFTV to know exactly what they're looking at, even though the sheriff's office is videotaping and that tape will eventually be released.


    How it can be possible for them find something new after all of this time, especially with the questionable Dr. Lee there? I'm thinking Baez is just saying that to make it look like they've found something. I don't think there's any way that all of a sudden new evidence can show up on the same evidence LE has already scoured.

    What do you guys think? And what possibly could they have found?
    Last edited by Aedrys; 07-14-2010 at 01:25 PM.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    North Hollywood, California
    Posts
    299
    If there really is new evidence, I wonder if Dr. Lee put it there? (I couldn't resist)


  3. #3

    They just want to control the news cycle.

    Aedrey, your instincts are correct. The defense needed something to get Cheney Mason is a jerk news cycle bumped. So they come up with this evasive silly claim. You know b s when you hear it. They want Nancy Grace, et al to lead with Defense finds something new rather than Defense Lawyer Cheney Mason called a reporter a jackass.

    The only reason anything could be new to them, which oddly they do not realize everyone is aware of, is because for two years the evidence has sat there, and the defense while squandering two hundred , seventy five thousand dollars, never brought the experts to inspect it.

    Mrs. Drane-Burdick let Judge Perry know in the last hearing that
    a) The State had offered, many times to send the evidence to the defense experts they would designate and
    b) The State had offered , many times to allow for the defense experts to come to look at the evidence

    In the words of Mrs. Drane-Burdick, "The court should deny the motion without even entertaining arguments on it." That is what I fully expect the judge to do.

    EMERGENCY MOTIONS HEARING
    PART 1 24 minute mark Mrs. Drane Burdick lets the court know that they have offered to send or have defense experts come to view the evidence
    http://www.wftv.com/video/24124701/in...

    For part of 2008 all of 2009 and six months into 2010 the defense has turned down these offers.

    I'll say they found something new. All of it is new to them. You just can't make this stuff up!!!!!
    Last edited by The World According; 07-14-2010 at 02:20 PM.


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    19,672
    Quote Originally Posted by The World According View Post
    Aedrey, your instincts are correct. The defense needed something to get Cheney Mason is a jerk news cycle bumped. So they come up with this evasive silly claim. You know b s when you hear it. They want Nancy Grace, et al to lead with Defense finds something new rather than Defense Lawyer Cheney Mason called a reporter a jackass.

    The only reason anything could be new to them, which oddly they do not realize everyone is aware of, is because for two years the evidence has sat there, and the defense while squandering two hundred , seventy five thousand dollars, never brought the experts to inspect it.

    Mrs. Drane-Burdick let Judge Perry know in the last hearing that
    a) The State had offered, many times to send the evidence to the defense experts they would designate and
    b) The State had offered , many times to allow for the defense experts to come to look at the evidence

    In the words of Mrs. Drane-Burdick, "The court should deny the motion without even entertaining arguments on it." That is what I fully expect the judge to do.

    EMERGENCY MOTIONS HEARING
    PART 1 24 minute mark Mrs. Drane Burdick lets the court know that they have offered to send or have defense experts come to view the evidence
    http://www.wftv.com/video/24124701/in...

    For part of 2008 all of 2009 and six months into 2010 the defense has turned down these offers.

    I'll say they found something new. All of it is new to them. You just can't make this stuff up!!!!!
    I'd just like to repeat that amount...$275,000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Thanks, TWA!

  5. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to RR0004 For This Useful Post:


  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    6,719
    I hadn't considered that, TWA. Good point. I just figured Baez was blowing hot air out his a** again. Like with the "Casey is innocent, you'll see it in court" phrase he kept saying over and over again. Puhleese.

    I know from watching forensics shows that sometimes new evidence is found. But I just don't think that's the case here. It's an insult to LE to say that something new was found. Whatever, Baez. Keep telling yourself that to sleep at night.


  7. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Azeroth
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Aedrys View Post

    I know from watching forensics shows that sometimes new evidence is found. But I just don't think that's the case here. It's an insult to LE to say that something new was found. Whatever, Baez. Keep telling yourself that to sleep at night.
    They found something new! They discovered their client really is guilty!
    Faxing death threats to a location near you!

  8. The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to technicalconfusion For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    19,672
    Quote Originally Posted by technicalconfusion View Post
    They found something new! They discovered their client really is guilty!
    One thing you can be sure they didn't find...the truth.


  10. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    In the sunshine.
    Posts
    9,882
    Cough cough cough hack hack hack.... Ahem Ahem

    Oh......sorry...had to clear my throat. That huge smokescreen (aka the bad press deflective device) that the defense lobbed was a bit thick. Had to catch my breath.


  11. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    In the sunshine.
    Posts
    9,882
    Maybe HL found a fingernail???????


  12. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    6,719
    Quote Originally Posted by sleutherontheside View Post
    Maybe HL found a fingernail???????
    I am going to DIE if it's a fingernail - OMG!

    Seriously...I keep wanting to say the defense wouldn't do that, but I can see their faces like what? why is a fingernail a bad thing? *facepalm*

  13. The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Aedrys For This Useful Post:


  14. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Orlando, FL, USA
    Posts
    766
    Quote Originally Posted by sleutherontheside View Post
    Maybe HL found a fingernail???????
    Anyone know how to get coffee spray off of a monitor?

    ok back on topic... I also think this is a smoke screen to get something in the news besides CM's outrageous behavior. These guys will do anything to make it appear that they have something besides a guilty client.

  15. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Omachka For This Useful Post:


  16. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    19,252
    Well of course they have because they never took advantage of the fact that the evidence has been available to them for inspection for over a year. The real thing is always better to look at than a picture.....hello, Mr. JB??? Or it could be that Dr. Lee said, "Uh oh. Car still stink. Can't be pizza." lol


  17. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    67
    Maybe they found that script Casey was talking about?

    Maybe they found those pesky SIM cards that were missing?

    Maybe they found that post it note with Zanny's phone number?

    Oh wait, I know, maybe they found a note written by Jessie Grund addressed to Roy Kronk outlining the "plan" to frame Casey.

    Okay fine, maybe they found the title on a brand new R.V........

    MOO


  18. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    399
    If they REALLY found something new they would be screaming what it was from the top of a mountain. They are just trying to cast reasonable doubt among potential jurors. They have done this before, remember in court, "we have proof that someone else put Caylee's body there" Never saw that evidence did we. Same thing will happen with this, just another smokescreen from the defense.


  19. #15
    whiteangora's Avatar
    whiteangora is offline I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    5,778
    There is NO WAY the defense found anything new!
    Baez is speaking gobbily-gook. All he said was things looks different in person rather than looking at a photograph. Gee, I could have told him that years ago!
    Neighborhood Watch is...
    NOT the Vigilante Police
    http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigati...PowerPoint.pdf






  20. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    19
    I don't believe it anymore than I believe that I am gonna have an "aha......now I completely understand!" moment during the trial like Mr. Baez promised me.


  21. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    The beautiful roundabout of Context, Veracity, and JUSTICE
    Posts
    11,434
    Maybe the missing vial from the Spector trial showed up.
    You can hold back from the suffering of the world. You have free permission to do so and it is in accordance with your nature.
    But perhaps this very holding back is the one suffering you could have avoided.
    Franz Kafka

    Be not simply good. Be good for something.
    HDT

  22. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to ynotdivein For This Useful Post:


  23. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Dana Point,CA
    Posts
    20,222
    Quote Originally Posted by whiteangora View Post
    There is NO WAY the defense found anything new!
    Baez is speaking gobbily-gook. All he said was things looks different in person rather than looking at a photograph. Gee, I could have told him that years ago!
    I speak fluent gobbily-gook and even I couldn't understand what he was saying.


  24. #19
    whiteangora's Avatar
    whiteangora is offline I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    5,778

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by JBean View Post
    I speak fluent gobbily-gook and even I couldn't understand what he was saying.
    I just hope he talks the same way to the jury. heh
    Neighborhood Watch is...
    NOT the Vigilante Police
    http://www.sanfordfl.gov/investigati...PowerPoint.pdf





  25. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to whiteangora For This Useful Post:


  26. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    698
    Quote Originally Posted by truckengirl View Post
    If they REALLY found something new they would be screaming what it was from the top of a mountain. They are just trying to cast reasonable doubt among potential jurors. They have done this before, remember in court, "we have proof that someone else put Caylee's body there" Never saw that evidence did we. Same thing will happen with this, just another smokescreen from the defense.
    ITA, New evidence but he can't say what it is? Yea, right Did he call the press to announcem this latest piece of BS.
    LE has plenty of real evidence and its all against ICA.

  27. The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to tsitra01 For This Useful Post:


  28. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    4,080
    Quote Originally Posted by tsitra01 View Post
    ITA, New evidence but he can't say what it is? Yea, right Did he call the press to announcem this latest piece of BS.
    LE has plenty of real evidence and its all against ICA.

    Theoretically this is ALL new evidence to them, after 2 years they are just looking at it with experts that aren't even listed on the defense witness list!
    My posts are my opinion only. Praying for Justice for Caylee Marie!
    The Florida Bar summed up the problem regarding Mr. Baez.
    "His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law." (Thank you to TWA) Read their opinion here: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/d...ps/sc95855.pdf


  29. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,303
    Quote Originally Posted by nums24 View Post
    Theoretically this is ALL new evidence to them, after 2 years they are just looking at it with experts that aren't even listed on the defense witness list!
    Crazy question, but since some of the experts in question are not yet on the defense witness list, yet they have been publicly shown the evidence for examination, and since it is the state that will end up paying them anyway... can the state call them as witnesses or hire them as expert witnesses if the defense chooses not to use them?

  30. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to faefrost For This Useful Post:


  31. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    4,915
    Quote Originally Posted by nums24 View Post
    Theoretically this is ALL new evidence to them, after 2 years they are just looking at it with experts that aren't even listed on the defense witness list!
    They can't list the experts until they know what they are going to say. If they did, the pros. could call them.
    I wish this was going to trial already. Seems to be taking forever.

  32. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ohiogirl For This Useful Post:


  33. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,022
    Quote Originally Posted by LambChop View Post
    Well of course they have because they never took advantage of the fact that the evidence has been available to them for inspection for over a year. The real thing is always better to look at than a picture.....hello, Mr. JB??? Or it could be that Dr. Lee said, "Uh oh. Car still stink. Can't be pizza." lol
    This is TOO FUNNY!!!

    This has to be the absolute funniest thread I've read to date. You all are amazing!
    Last edited by Oakley; 07-14-2010 at 04:41 PM.

  34. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Oakley For This Useful Post:


  35. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    399
    Maybe HL found a fingernail, skin cells or hair of a hispanic women, AKA, Zanny the Nanny! Wouldn't that be convenient. If I were on the jury nothing HL testified to would mean squat to me. I hope Baez and Mason lost their lunch when they smelled the car, and I hope that smell stays in their nose for days to remind them of what their client did.

  36. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to truckengirl For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. State Wants Evidence From Casey's Defense Team
    By Spangle in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 334
    Last Post: 09-23-2009, 09:53 PM
  2. Defense defend evidence found?
    By ma2patrick in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 12-17-2008, 05:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •