I thought I should clarify a portion of my post, in light of the way SuperDaves recent post regarding handling snakes led to confusion.
What I am trying to say is that despite characterizations of those who doubt the DNA findings as clowns and idiots there are experts that disagree.
Therefore, if we take two as an example, Baden and Whect, is Baden the clown, and Whect the idiot, or is it the other way around, is Whect the clown and Baden the idiot.
The point being that there need not be any clowns or idiots, just people who interpret the evidence differently.
After reading the post I thought that the phrase or is it the other way around? might be misconstrued to mean that Roy23 is the clown and idiot, and that was never the intention.