Page 5 of 30 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 750

Thread: 2010.08.16 Brad Conway Resigns

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    10,480
    Quote Originally Posted by Dear Prudence View Post
    bbm - So Conway realizes that Caylee is deceased. You may be right that the truth that the Anthony's refuse to see is part of why he's resigning.
    And that she was killed! CA said in her interview this weekend that there is no proof she was murdered.

  2. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to strawberry For This Useful Post:


  3. #102
    I think I am now convinced that BC resigned out of embarrassment.
    Justice for CAYLEE


  4. #103
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    251
    BC was representing the Anthony's for FREE too wasn't he? I wonder what CA and GA will do now - I don't think they can afford to pay for one...

    I think it was a smart move by BC. Get out while the gettin's good!

  5. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to suki For This Useful Post:


  6. #104
    IMHO, JB's manifesto is to force anyone whom he feels is not benefiting him to withdrawal from the case. First Judge Stan now BC. We know he called out JStan in filings and now BC but what we don't know is why he felt BC was a threat to his case? Was it because he didn't get the 911 call testimony (team support and lies) he wanted??

    Also explains the no payment (haha - I am sure there was a licensing fee for something) recent media rounds - perhaps the A's needed to drum up some cash for a new attorney or two?

    Okay, more coffee - just my initial thoughts.

    One more thought - my own psychic prediction - JB will go after NeJame next and try to force him to resign.
    Last edited by A_News_Junkie; 08-16-2010 at 10:30 AM. Reason: my psychic prediction - LOL


  7. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to A_News_Junkie For This Useful Post:


  8. #105
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,388
    Quote Originally Posted by Intermezzo View Post
    Sure why not? Didn't bother me that Conway resigned as the A's lawyer publicly on National television...
    and why do I have a feeling Cindy will come out with some nasty comments regarding Brad within the coming months...

    ITA....and I have this VERY STRONG intuition that BC's withdraw is going to, in short order, bring things into the light that have been in the dark for a very, very, long time. (CA really needs to learn to think things through before shooting off her mouth, or her email) In short, BC's withdraw is a GREAT leap forward in justice for Caylee.

    MOO
    Rest in Peace Sweet Caylee


  9. #106
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    19,217
    I think BC has been trying to prepare CA for what will eventually happen when the truth comes out. CA does not seem to be listening to him. I think he saw an opportunity to get out from underneath without making them look bad and so he is taking it, following in the footsteps of MN. jmo

  10. The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to LambChop For This Useful Post:


  11. #107
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In my own reality...it's nicer here.
    Posts
    12,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Intermezzo View Post
    Actually momtective I don't think it is out of the realm of possibility..let's say Casey (as Cindy hopes and believes) does come home. a BIG IF Casey ever comes home...IMO Casey may sue Cindy for control of anything to do with Caylee such as the Foundation ....and not let Cindy have control over her...
    True, but I was thinking more along the lines of Casey suing her to force Cindy to keep her mouth shut...maybe even have the judge issue a gag order for Cindy only....if such a thing were possible CA would literally implode. If she could have no involvement in or comment about the case at all, no TV appearances, no letters, nothing...she would absolutely go insane.

    Not possible I know...but one can dream.
    Last edited by momtective; 08-16-2010 at 10:37 AM.

  12. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to momtective For This Useful Post:


  13. #108
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    9,732

    Quote Originally Posted by doogiesgirl View Post
    ITA....and I have this VERY STRONG intuition that BC's withdraw is going to, in short order, bring things into the light that have been in the dark for a very, very, long time. (CA really needs to learn to think things through before shooting off her mouth, or her email) In short, BC's withdraw is a GREAT leap forward in justice for Caylee.

    MOO
    Okay...if CA does come out and diss Brad will this negate the confidentialty agreement????? I would also think this could open of a can of worms if they continue on this path..this isn't helping the defense at all...if anything causes more to quesiton the "teams" approach and what are they hiding....(I know the truth)

    Still wondering how long HHJP will let this bickering continue?
    jmo

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to zoey For This Useful Post:


  15. #109

    Justice is coming Calyee dear.

    Quote Originally Posted by Phumi View Post
    Sending BC a Teleflora "Congratulations on the Return of your Sanity" basket...
    That is hysterical. I just did that. I wrote "Let your conscious be your guide". I signed it a loyal TES supporter.


    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHSdloGONtU[/ame]

    Mr. Baez, sure up those talk hosting gigs. I'll leave it at that.

  16. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to The World According For This Useful Post:


  17. #110
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,729
    I believe Cindy bypassed BC in the email she sent to MN. In that email, she herself is accusing BC of conspiring with MN to get the Anthony's to sign this conflict of interest waiver. In signing that waiver, MN will allow BC to view the TES records. So, Cindy herself was alluding to her own attorney acting improperly to gain access to information. How could he still represent her if this is truly what she did...I don't have Cindy's email in front of me and I have problems viewing pdf files. If someone can check Cindy's email to MN I'd greatly appreciate knowing if I do have it right! JMHO

    I think she purposely bypassed BC, accused him of impropiety to MN, which is why MN told Cindy, I am forwarding this to your attorney who in turn will forward this to you...she didn't see that coming. She didn't think MN would have included BC since it came straight from Cindy. Little does she know MN knows procedure, knows she is represented by an attorney and did the right thing...JMHO

    Justice for Caylee is getting closer.....

    Justice for Caylee
    Last edited by LiveLaughLuv; 08-16-2010 at 10:33 AM. Reason: error


  18. #111
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    9,732
    Quote Originally Posted by momtective View Post
    True, but I was thinking more along the lines of Casey suing her to force Cindy to keep her mouth shut...maybe even have the judge issue a gag order for Cindy only....if such a thing were possible CA would literally implode. If she could have no involvement in or comment about the case at all, no TV appearances, no letters, nothing...she was absolutely go insane.

    Not possible I know...but one can dream.
    SA tried the gag order and the "team" fought against it....it was also for the "benefit" of the parents as I recall....
    jmo

  19. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to zoey For This Useful Post:


  20. #112
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    9,732
    Quote Originally Posted by The World According View Post
    That is hysterical. I just did that. I wrote "Let your conscious be your guide". I signed it a loyal TES supporter.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHSdloGONtU

    Mr. Baez, sure up those talk hosting gigs. I'll leave it at that.
    kind of O/T but....I wish dh didn't hate you-tube---I really want to see some of the videos that everyone references......
    jmo

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zoey For This Useful Post:


  22. #113
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tampa Bay, FL
    Posts
    1,796
    Quote Originally Posted by Person of Interest View Post
    Unless I missed something, they are not (yet) charged with any crimes so they do not really need a state appointed lawyer do they?
    I wondered about this also. Why do they even have a lawyer?
    They havent been charged with anything. Why not just get on the stand at the trial and answer the questions??? Their daughter is the one who needs the attorneys.

  23. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to feddup For This Useful Post:


  24. #114
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,388
    Quote Originally Posted by LambChop View Post
    I think a big red flag was BC not being there with the A's on the Today Show.

    I also think JB does not care about who searched Surburban and who did not but only in those 4,000 who might have something in their background that they can use for reasonable doubt. Does not matter if this person was 20 miles away, they COULD have had the opportunity to run over to Surburban, see it was a good place to place a body and done so. JB can't point a finger at someone who has no record of ever doing anything wrong.

    If there were someone with TES who searched on their own at that exact spot and found nothing they would have come forward by now, early on, before Kronk was the main focus. But no one will come forward because we know now that this area was underwater at the time of the search. And JB knows this also.....you can't get someone to say they saw no water when everyone else says there was water there.

    jmo

    This is along the lines that I was thinking.....just find any searcher who has skeletons in their closet and hone in on them (and come on, who of us doesn't have some questionable deed in our past, no matter how small or far back, that given to a questionable character like JB, couldn't make something out of it that it wasn't). The only problem with that is that with 4000 searchers it would take lots of money to run background checks on all these people to come up with one. Who knows though, maybe he has a "friend" or someone who owes him a favor in LE/private agency that would do it for free. Ahh....who am I kidding....JB with friends? Nah!

    My intuition also tells me that one day, in the not to distant future, that JB will be dis-barred. If there was a line on this, I would lay every extra cent I own on this.....coz I see it happening, for sure. (If the FLA Bar has any ethics it will at least, and I believe they do.)

    MOO
    Rest in Peace Sweet Caylee

  25. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to doogiesgirl For This Useful Post:


  26. #115
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    North
    Posts
    5,491
    Quote Originally Posted by Numbers View Post
    Jose wants the records because some of the searchers - whose search sites were recorded on the TES papers - may have gone off on their own at some other time and searched near the crime scene.

    No, it doesn't make the least bit of sense.
    Mr Baez, as KC's lawyer, has huge hurdles to overcome ie 31 days, KC's party attitude, Zanny the Nanny but most of all that duct tape.

    The TES records are written proof that the area where Caylee's remains were found were under water. Mr Baez needs to be able to distance KC from those remains and the duct tape. If he cannot get the records to accuse some searcher of wrongdoing or getting someone to state in court that there was no water, Mr Baez wants those records discredited. Perhaps thats why BC included his comment about not 'altering' the records he looked at.

    The SA experts who testify about the time the body lay in the woods, will be attacked in court and contradicted by the defense experts. The jury may be confused by techinical details.

    But the defense's huge stumbling block in proving that KC didn't throw Caylee away like so much garbage, will be the testimony of normal, everyday people who gave their time to search for Caylee. These people will be believable to a jury. The records will be evidence.

    Mr Baez does not want KC to be stuck to that duct tape in any way and is trying to keep those records out of this trial anyway he can.
    JMO



    RIP Travis Alexander

  27. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Paintr For This Useful Post:


  28. #116
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    North
    Posts
    5,491
    Quote Originally Posted by feddup View Post
    I wondered about this also. Why do they even have a lawyer?
    They havent been charged with anything. Why not just get on the stand at the trial and answer the questions??? Their daughter is the one who needs the attorneys.
    'The wicked man fleeth, when no man pursueth' Proverbs 28:1
    JMO



    RIP Travis Alexander

  29. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Paintr For This Useful Post:


  30. #117
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,388
    Quote Originally Posted by zoey View Post



    Okay...if CA does come out and diss Brad will this negate the confidentialty agreement????? I would also think this could open of a can of worms if they continue on this path..this isn't helping the defense at all...if anything causes more to quesiton the "teams" approach and what are they hiding....(I know the truth)

    Still wondering how long HHJP will let this bickering continue?

    With the attorney/client confidentiality thing, I am not sure how things will come to light, but maybe it will be b/c CA speaks publicly of them first (which I believe negates the confidentiality agreement). Or it could come out b/c of some court filing...and testimony has to be given. IDK....I just see it bringing some things that have been in the dark to light.

    I should go to the dreams/visions thread b/c I also see. for the first time, GA seriously considering contradicting CA. Even if it puts himself in hot water. I get this strong feeling.....he is mulling this over in his head, he is fighting himself on this. Hmmm.....who will win???? And I do get the sense that GA, if he ever told the whole truth, would be in hot water. That's just me tho. MOO

    MOO
    Rest in Peace Sweet Caylee

  31. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to doogiesgirl For This Useful Post:


  32. #118
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    19,217
    Quote Originally Posted by Paintr View Post
    Mr Baez, as KC's lawyer, has huge hurdles to overcome ie 31 days, KC's party attitude, Zanny the Nanny but most of all that duct tape.

    The TES records are written proof that the area where Caylee's remains were found were under water. Mr Baez needs to be able to distance KC from those remains and the duct tape. If he cannot get the records to accuse some searcher of wrongdoing or getting someone to state in court that there was no water, Mr Baez wants those records discredited. Perhaps thats why BC included his comment about not 'altering' the records he looked at.

    The SA experts who testify about the time the body lay in the woods, will be attacked in court and contradicted by the defense experts. The jury may be confused by techinical details.

    But the defense's huge stumbling block in proving that KC didn't throw Caylee away like so much garbage, will be the testimony of normal, everyday people who gave their time to search for Caylee. These people will be believable to a jury. The records will be evidence.

    Mr Baez does not want KC to be stuck to that duct tape in any way and is trying to keep those records out of this trial anyway he can.
    Trying to sweep the ocean with a broom......

  33. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to LambChop For This Useful Post:


  34. #119
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,228
    Quote Originally Posted by LancelotLink View Post
    I thought Baez (Mason) claimed BC had no restrictions on his access to files, that he was allowed to copy, take notes, etc. If I understand correctly, BC worked under the same restrictions as placed on everyone else who viewed the files. No copying, no notes, just tab the ones they thought might hold some relevance.
    He most certainly did say that:

    That is that he allowed an attorney, not related to the Defense of Casey Anthony, to view al14,OOO pages of documents, making whatever notes and conclusions he wanted to do, and then allowing the State to do the same thing.

    http://www.wftv.com/pdf/24581279/detail.html

  35. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to CarolinaMoon For This Useful Post:


  36. #120
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Intermezzo View Post
    IMO the unsigned letter from Cindy and George and the emails accusing MN may have played a part in the resignation..after all this letter and the email exchange was included as part of the Motion by Baez..and IMO probably without Brad's knowledge..

    http://www.wesh.com/news/24643776/detail.html

    With regret I am forced to resign as George and Cindy Anthonys attorney. The defense motion filed on August 9, 2010 contains allegations that are not in fact true. As an officer of the court I cannot stand idly by knowing allegations involving me have been misstated. I am now a witness to an innacurate legal pleading filed in our court system. As such, I cannot continue in good conscience as a legal representative. George and Cindy Anthony have done nothing improper, it is the failure of the defense to verify the facts alleged in their motion that forces my withdrawal. I will continue to support the Anthonys, will continue to attend hearings and the eventual trial and most importantly I will continue to search for the full truth regarding the killing of Caylee Marie Anthony.

    Bradley A. Conway, Esq. Law Office of Bradley A. Conway 189 S. Orange Ave. Suite 1850 Orlando, Fl. Office: 407-246-0803 Fax: 407-386-3114

    BBM
    Hmmm...wonder if he believes as Nejame does that the only one who holds the truth about Caylee's killing is Casey and no one else.
    Well, I have always thought that the letter from CA/GA in JBs motion was written by JB. No way would BC have written it as a draft or allowed those words signed by CA/GA. I haven't been impressed with BC since the day he was on the media junket saying there was no duct tape.

    CA lied to BC as much as she lied to LE and the FBI and the SAOs. BC didn't want to know the truth when he represented the As. He wanted only to make a name for himself. Plus get some money out of it down the road.

    Although BC says he now wants to continue to the search for the full truth of Caylee's murder, in my eyes he will need to be completely honest and forthcoming with any inquires from LE and the SAO. Growing half a set, a man does not make.

  37. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to countzero For This Useful Post:


  38. #121
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Foothills of Northern Colorado
    Posts
    2,363
    I loved when Ann Curry asked him if he felt JB was competent and he said "It'd be inappropriate to comment on that"
    100 years from now, it won't matter what kind of car you drove or how big your house was. What will matter is that you were important in the eyes of a child.


  39. The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to YellowSubmarine For This Useful Post:


  40. #122
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tampa Bay, FL
    Posts
    1,796
    Quote Originally Posted by LancelotLink View Post
    I think I am now convinced that BC resigned out of embarrassment.
    yes, when they choose to go on nationwide TV and make statements like: KC didnt mean what she said in that letter, I didnt molest her because Cindy wouldnt allow such things and CA even though she planed huge memorial service says: I dont think Caylee is dead, there is no evidence tied to Casey, etc. wow! yes, get out.
    I could be wrong, but all along he was probably telling them not to talk and they didnt listen.
    BC seems like an intelligent man, surely he can see there is ALOT of evidence leading straight to Casey!
    I know alot wont agree, but I think Lee is smart, he stys out of it and doesnt talk. I think he knows no matter what he says it wont get ICA off the hook.
    He just happened to find himself in the middle of this mess.

  41. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to feddup For This Useful Post:


  42. #123
    Quote Originally Posted by YellowSubmarine View Post
    I loved when Ann Curry asked him if he felt JB was competent and he said "It'd be inappropriate to comment on that"
    Darn it, I had it on - I must have missed it. Anyone got a link or a recap?


  43. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to A_News_Junkie For This Useful Post:


  44. #124
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4,729
    I will continue to support the Anthonys, will continue to attend hearings and the eventual trial and most importantly I will continue to search for the full truth regarding the killing of Caylee Marie Anthony.
    He just blew Cindy's theory to the dogs. Cindy alludes to, she still believes Caylee is alive...Well, Sinnnnnndy, your former attorney states otherwise.

    I believe he knows the truth, uttered things to "please" his client but he is now free to think as he chooses...he doesn't have to tow a line anymore..JMHO


    Justice for Caylee is becoming Caylee's Justice...JMHO


    Justice for Caylee

  45. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to LiveLaughLuv For This Useful Post:


  46. #125
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,388
    Quote Originally Posted by countzero View Post
    Well, I have always thought that the letter from CA/GA in JBs motion was written by JB. No way would BC have written it as a draft or allowed those words signed by CA/GA. I haven't been impressed with BC since the day he was on the media junket saying there was no duct tape.

    CA lied to BC as much as she lied to LE and the FBI and the SAOs. BC didn't want to know the truth when he represented the As. He wanted only to make a name for himself. Plus get some money out of it down the road.

    Although BC says he now wants to continue to the search for the full truth of Caylee's murder, in my eyes he will need to be completely honest and forthcoming with any inquires from LE and the SAO. Growing half a set, a man does not make.
    You are probably right, BC would not give up the full truth on his own. But honestly, I am picking up this sense that they (JB/A's/court) are going to back him to the wall and he's going to be forced to tell. I see him telling to save his rep and b/c he is forced. I'll take any reason. KWIM?
    Just my take.

    MOO
    Rest in Peace Sweet Caylee

  47. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to doogiesgirl For This Useful Post:


Page 5 of 30 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 51
    Last Post: 05-04-2010, 01:21 AM
  2. 2009.06.16--Brad Conway on GMA
    By affinity in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: 06-20-2009, 12:18 PM
  3. 2009.04.08 - Brad Conway under investigation by Bar Association
    By BeanE in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: 05-10-2009, 07:55 AM
  4. Brad Conway Press Conference 1/23/09
    By DAWN TREADER in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 189
    Last Post: 01-24-2009, 08:08 PM
  5. The Anthonys New Attorney - Brad Conway
    By GirlinCentralFL in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 94
    Last Post: 12-16-2008, 08:17 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •