1286 users online (245 members and 1041 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 54
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    No.California
    Posts
    847

    Can you explain the conclusion you have come to?

    I have been following the Peterson case, but last night I saw the program on JBR. I had followed it originally and was confused because it went in all directions. I guess when it comes to such a beautiful, angel child I didn't want to add pain and focus to what I felt would never be solved. Can the sleuthers give me a short version of who you think did it? I know this is close to Tricia and all of you and I apologize for my ignorance in the case. I need to clear up my own instincts on who I think did it. Thanks WS I can always count on you.


    IMO and JMO etc.
    ________________________________________________
    My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating.
    By Ashleigh Brilliant

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    1,832
    Quote Originally Posted by AmAGypsy
    I have been following the Peterson case, but last night I saw the program on JBR. I had followed it originally and was confused because it went in all directions. I guess when it comes to such a beautiful, angel child I didn't want to add pain and focus to what I felt would never be solved. Can the sleuthers give me a short version of who you think did it? I know this is close to Tricia and all of you and I apologize for my ignorance in the case. I need to clear up my own instincts on who I think did it. Thanks WS I can always count on you.
    I believe a person very close to someone who was fairly close to the Ramseys did it. I do not believe the murder was committed by a stranger, IMO she was selected, stalked and killed by someone who didn't like John Ramsey or the Ramsey lifestyle, someone who is a felon and has served time in prison for other crimes.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    230
    I agree with Sissi. I think it is someone who has a beef with the Ramsey's and also has a connection in some way to child pornography or has a sexual disorder of some sort. I think they intended to actually kidnap the child and wrote the ransom note BEFORE and things went in a different direction.

    I think if the Ramsey's had done this, whether it was a cover up for Burke or Patsy killing her, they would NOT have written the note about kidnapping and then leave the child's body in the house. Also, after listening to the 911 call, Patsy does sounds honestly hysterical and distraught. She is not an actress by any means, and I don't think even Meryl Streep could have sounded so incredibly frightened as she sounded, so how could anyone be that distraught and have just previously written a ransom note, and practiced it a few times. The handwriting would have reflected someone in a panic. It was by far too thought out and written in a calmer manner. It is obvious by looking at it. A parent could NOT write that lengthy and thought out of a cover up ransom note if they had just murdered their daughter and then staged it to make it look like a sexual sadistic crime had occurred. Makes absolutely NO sense. And despite what some believe on here, Patsy DID NOT write that note. Crap, my handwriting could have been linked to it. I have some of the same characteristics as the author of that note and I KNOW I didn't write it.

    They would have taken the child's body out of the house THEN called and reported the note, etc. Why, even Mark H. had enough sense to remove the body before he came up with his phony story. You would have to be nuts to make up a kidnapping story and then not even move the body from the premises, knowing someone could possibly find it within a couple of hours (which didn't happen either, it was several hours). They had plenty of time to take her out of the house, dump her body in any place around Boulder and get home in time to make up this story and hope they didn't find her little body. I just don't buy it. They may be a lot of things but they are not THAT stupid. I realize to some there is so-called "evidence" pointing towards their guilt but it is evidence that could definitely be explained away by the child being murdered in the house where they all lived (fibers, etc.).

    The person that did this was not new to this criminal activity. Murder may have been the ONLY thing new to them but they had sexually molested someone else before. This time, they did it to someone they, in some strange way, cared about but was sick of the Ramsey's for some reason and took this avenue to get to them in some way. Had the perp actually achieved getting JonBenet out of the house and kidnapped her, I don't think she would have made it home again alive and I think that was their intention because they knew she would be able to identify this person. This wasn't about the money, it was about some sicko wanting to make the Ramsey's pay in a different way for something that upset this person. Sounds to me like the perp had a big problem with Patsy and her lavish lifestyle and her putting her little angel out there for all to see, showing her off like a trophy or something. IMO.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    No.California
    Posts
    847
    Twizzler and sissi, Thanks. That is an excellent explanation for me and answered a lot of questions I've had in my own mind. It's a hard one to figure out.


    IMO and JMO etc.
    ________________________________________________
    My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating.
    By Ashleigh Brilliant

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    208
    One or both parents were involved. Without a doubt.

    The case will never be able to be prosecuted.

    The crime scene was contaminated and there were too many initial errors in the investigation. The amount of evidence which was released to the public is unheard of in an open case -- not only did the civil cases open the door to this, but the Ramsey's interviews and the crime scene photos and evidence have been leaked or released to the public in many other ways. This is UNHEARD of in an open case. Even if there was an intruder (which I don't for a second believe) they could NEVER be prosecuted because of the multitude of information which was released, it's a defense attorney's dream.

    Lou Smit, whose status I am unsure of,( according to the documentary and some tabloid articles he is in charge, yet the official notices from the D.A.'s office name Tom Bennett) was in on the latest folly- Tracey's documentary naming a "new suspect who is on the run." (This is the one that the internet sleuths fround with Google in 5 minutes....) The vast majority of the public in the U.K. where the show aired, do not read the internet forums and have no way of knowing what a fraud this show really was.


    These side shows were orchestrated to sway public opinion-- probably timed to be released while John was seeking the political nomination. Because the vast majority of the public is largely uneducated about the case, and criminal investigations in general, they have gotten away with it. The icing on the cake is a bully of a lawyer that threatens to sue every media outlet if they dare say the Ramseys are the prime suspects.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    350
    The person who did this - is the same person who knows that JonBenet was awake and ate pineapple approx. 1.5 hours before her death. They just didn't realize it would show up in the autopsy.
    IMO -

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    394
    Quote Originally Posted by AmAGypsy
    Twizzler and sissi, Thanks. That is an excellent explanation for me and answered a lot of questions I've had in my own mind. It's a hard one to figure out.
    AmAGypsy, go to www.acandyrose.com and read for yourself the history behind the case. You'll see why 80% of the posters here (and a comparable amount of the American public) think the Ramseys are guilty of, in the very least, the cover-up of what happened to JonBenet. Some of us think it was an accidental death, some of us think it was premeditated ... but the outcome was the same. JonBenet died because of something that happened with a family member in the house that Christmas night.

    Patsy Ramsey wrote the "ransom note" to explain JonBenet's dead body being in their house. There is no other reason for a FAKE ransom note, and a staged crime scene to exist. Why would some nefarious intruder STAGE a crime scene??? And why would they stage it in the basement? Why not on the first floor since intruder theorists have to believe the perp spent HOURS in the Ramsey house concocting the scene, in addition to practicing and writing a three page ransom note.

    When you go to the above mentioned web site ... be sure and click on the links to Patsy's handwriting exemplars and the ransom note. Also, read some of the linguistic analysis.

    Next, click on the investigative interview transcripts. Read Patsy's answers (and John's) and see how Patsy wanders all over the shop, never really answers questions, and can't give a straight "yes" or "no" answer to many of the questions. She uses linguistic stiff-arming and verbal slight-of-hand to squirm out of answering the most basic questions from investigators. She is hiding something, and she is lying, and her words prove it.

    The Ramseys have never been truthful about what happened that night. There is a reason for that. Someone in the family (either accidentally, or on purpose) caused JonBenet's death. There is no other scenario that fits all the available evidence.


    IMO

  8. #8
    I couldn't have said it better Cherokee.

    I keep coming back to the pineapple and John's explanation. He said that JonBenet would have screamed bloody murder if a stranger or anyone else for that matter had attempted to feed her pineapple.

    And it is a fact that JonBenet did not like anyone to wake her. She would scream bloody murder!
    ...We have said to ourselves, look, there is never going to be a victory in this, there is no victory...John Ramsey: 6/24/98

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    No.California
    Posts
    847
    Hummm....even better information and I will go read that recommended site. Get back to ya guys. Thanks again. You know I have my own opinion but I want it to be based on accurate information.


    IMO and JMO etc.
    ________________________________________________
    My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating.
    By Ashleigh Brilliant

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    No.California
    Posts
    847
    Whoops....didn't mean you are not accurate...hee hee...you are the experts. I just meant I am once again interested in this case after a long absence. Thanks to all of you for bringing me up to speed. WS is the best.


    IMO and JMO etc.
    ________________________________________________
    My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating.
    By Ashleigh Brilliant


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,384
    As Ive said before theres only two things Im sure of when it comes to this case...........The Ramsey's know what happened and they are involved in a cover up.What facts we know for sure support at least this and imo anyone who cant see that much needs their head examined!!!!!!

    As to what happened and why theyre covering up?I dont know and since there are numerous plausible scenarios I cant say my defenitive theory but I will say OBVIOUSLY they wouldnt do all the lying and staging for an INTRUDER so one must infer its a family member or someone of equal importance to them.
    The saints are the sinners who keep trying...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dumpwater, Arkansas..LOL
    Posts
    5,333
    I feel that Patsy killed JB accidently. Then, she panicked and covered it up and made it look like a sexual homicide (sp). I feel that John didn't want to lose Patsy, so he helped with the cover-up, the cover-up that continues to this day.

    Another good source of info is Steve Thomas's book. I also feel that reading the interviews that were sold by Susan Bennett to the National Enquirer and published in a book are also a good source. But, ACR's site is the absolute best!
    "If at first you don't succeed, skydiving isn't for you!"

    The above post is my opinion and my opinion only. Please do not copy and past to other forums. If I wanted to posted on other forums, I would do it myself. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated in this matter.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by great_tezi
    I feel that Patsy killed JB accidently. Then, she panicked and covered it up and made it look like a sexual homicide (sp). I feel that John didn't want to lose Patsy, so he helped with the cover-up, the cover-up that continues to this day.

    Another good source of info is Steve Thomas's book. I also feel that reading the interviews that were sold by Susan Bennett to the National Enquirer and published in a book are also a good source. But, ACR's site is the absolute best!
    First off, the police couldn't even find anyone to say that they even saw either of the Ramsey's so much as slap Jonbenet's hand if she misbehaved. The idea that Patsy accidently threw her off a second story landing and then garroted her and found some foreign DNA to put in her pants is absolutely rediculous.

    Second, to ever suggest that the National Enquirer is ever a good source of any kind on information is laughable.

    Thirdly,I will defute anything Steve Thomas said in his book, that you are relying on for conclusions.

    I apoligize for the insulting tone. I very much welcome and open thoughts and questions.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    753
    Quote Originally Posted by kimba
    Thirdly,I will defute anything Steve Thomas said in his book, that you are relying on for conclusions.
    Defute is not a word.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,599
    Kimba, what is your theory?

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast