Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Munchausen by Proxy and the case of Jennifer Bush

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    "The truth is on the march and nothing will stop it" Emile Zola
    Posts
    15,532

    Munchausen by Proxy and the case of Jennifer Bush

    Back in 1999 Kathleen Bush was convicted of harming her child Jennifer.

    It is believed Kathleen suffers from Munchausen by Proxy. A mental disorder where a parent makes their child psychically sick because of some twisted need for attention. Jennifer had been extremely ill for years.

    The Bush case was national news. Featured on 48 Hours and other news programs.

    The biggest evidence in the case was within days of being removed from her mother's care Jennifer improved dramatically. She had been using a feeding tube. It was taken out a few days after her removal from her mother and she has eaten normally ever since.

    According to this Time article nurses were suspicious of Jennifer's mother since 1991 and even reported her to the authorities.

    The last update I can find is from 2005 when the courts allowed 18 year old Jennifer to reunite with her mother.

    http://jacksonville.com/apnews/stori...8BIJ0IG0.shtml

    My question to you my dear Websleuths members is do any of you have a current update for this case?

    Has Kathleen ever admitted to harming her daughter? Has Jennifer ever said her mother made her sick? What are they doing now?

    If anyone knows please post here.

    Thank you.
    `````````````````

    JOIN US EVERY THURSDAY NIGHT FOR TRUE CRIME RADIO ON IHEART. CLICK HERE THURSDAYS 8 PM EASTERN FOR THE LINK TO THE SHOW AND TO JOIN OUR NEW CHATROOM.

    FOR PAST IHEART SHOWS CLICK HERE



    Join Websleuths on Twitter

    Follow websleuths on Twitter

    And Face Book of course
     | 





    ************************************************** **************************************

    Tricia Griffith
    tgrif@xmission.com
    6300 N. Sage Wood Drive
    Suite H # 214
    Park City UT
    84098

  2. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Tricia For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    State of Disbelief. SC
    Posts
    11,856
    http://www.accessmylibrary.com/artic...orn-apart.html

    Mom, teen torn apart by abuse trial are 'reunited'

    Kathy lives in Georgia and daughter Jennifer lives in Illinois -- both deny that Kathy did anything to harm her daughter. "I do not believe that my mother abused me when I was a child," Jennifer said in an e-mail with The Miami Herald
    Say what you mean, mean what you say, but don't say it mean.
    We are all just trying to make sense of an unimaginable crime.

  4. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Lovejac For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    choctaw beach,florida
    Posts
    3,254
    Oh my goodness...i remember this case well, and have often wondered what happened to them...

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to nurselady For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    10,640
    All I can add, Tricia, is that I am the proud permanent foster mother of of a young and brave survivor of horrific abuse by Munchausen's by Proxy. This child came to us in foster care with a stack two feet thick of diagnoses. She'd been in 26 placements in her 14 years and almost died of lithium toxicity. She's suffered through a ridiculous amount of unnecessary and painful procedures.

    I will be very blunt about my first impressions of her at age 14. I did not like her. I did not connect with her. She had strange mannerisms and tics. She picked at her skin until she was bloody. She slept in her closet and refused to make eye contact. She was on four psycho-tropic medications and her mother had her signed up with almost every doctor in our state. If there was an uncomfortable or painful medical process, this kid was on the list. She came to us not long after being released from the ICU where she almost died from a lithium overdose. It took quite a bit of detective work to determine that we were actually dealing with MBP. Our daughter seemed to slough off diagnoses every single day. None of them fit any longer as she gained her sense of footing and safety. When her adoptive parents' rights were terminated, she literally seemed to grow by leaps and bounds. There's no stopping her now.

    Fast forward almost two years. Our daughter (permanent now) is bright and silly, healthy and strong. She has no strange mannerisms, no tics, her body works fine. She takes a single multi-vitamin each day. Gone are the hallucinations and voices. Gone are the strange rashes. She's still a young lady with a cognitive disability but I challenge anyone to go to the park with her or out to lunch. You'd have a blast. She's a hoot. Did I mention that she also lost 30 pounds after coming to us and left her diagnosis of pre-diabetes behind. She delights in pretty clothes after years of oversized sweat pants and t-shirts. She's lovely and will turn 16 this week. She spent the summer at Easter Seals Camp, overnights, the movies, and day-trips. She's a tremendous help with our special needs little dogs and her kindness and tenderness knows no bounds.

    Munchausen's by Proxy is devastating. I've worked with victims two other times and one child did not make it out alive. Almost always, the birth mother or adoptive mother (very common) is a childhood victim of severe sexual abuse. Many mothers also suffer extremely low self-esteem and have volatile and unhealthy relationships with their partners or spouses. Obesity, eating disorders, hoarding, and difficult to diagnose illnesses are the norm. There is a deep self-loathing which is meted out on typically one female child in the family.

    I literally CANNOT recommend too highly the book, "Sickened" by Julie Gregory. Julie is a survivor of MBP. She was lucky to make it out alive. I was entranced by her book and the similarities I've watched play out with our foster daughter. The commonalities are remarkable. Julie was repeatedly told she was retarded and stupid. She was starved, subjected to painful and unnecessary medical procedures, force fed medication she didn't need and was the constant victim of physical and emotional abuse. And yet her book is one of hope. Interestingly enough Julie is currently getting her degree in psychiatry in London. So much for cognitive challenges. She's also a healthy young woman.

    The book was a wake-up call, however. Even though Julie and our daughter are healing, the person with MBP rarely does. Vigilance is required throughout life to prevent the sick person from having any contact with their victim. The dynamics are just too toxic and dangerous. In the book, "Sickened", Julie's mother can never admit her crimes. Tragically, she has used her manipulative ways to gain custody of even more children. As I said, the person ill with Muchausen's by Proxy rarely heals. They literally have too much pain deep inside.

    I'll see what I can find out about this case.


  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    10,640
    Just to be clear, Julie Gregory, the author of "Sickened", also denied her abuse for years. She completely blamed her self for everything that had gone wrong in her family....after all, her mother spent all her time trying to find out what was "wrong" with Julie. She must have loved her, right?

    It was only after Julie became an adult and visited her mother and her new husband and their foster children that she came to the conclusion as to the depth of her mother's illness.

    Julie speaks on the issue and has a website:

    http://www.juliegregory.com/

    [ame="http://www.amazon.com/Sickened-Memoir-Munchausen-Proxy-Childhood/dp/0553803077"]Amazon.com: Sickened: The Memoir of a Munchausen by Proxy Childhood (9780553803075): Julie Gregory, Marc D. Feldman: Books[/ame]

  9. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Missizzy For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    5,685
    How does a MBP mother get a hold of foster children? That is crazy. I don't know what it will take to open the eyes of the world to the horrific things going on out there. Foster children after what she did to Julie is very, very frightening. I don't understand.

  11. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Belinda For This Useful Post:


  12. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,577
    I wonder if any of the foster children in Kathleen's care have any 'issues'? My gawd, that is just plain scary!

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SunnieRN For This Useful Post:


  14. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    10,640
    Kathleen has/had foster children? That totally freaks me out. Women with MBP are typically very conniving and manipulative. They fall into two categories. They are either very brash and pushy and demanding or charming and enticing. Often they can flip back and forth between the tactics. They are masters at setting up situations to make themselves look good. If they lose one child due to their abuse or the child grows up, they will often seek out others as they require that child on which project their own pain. Doctors who are "snowed" by them feel like victims too. They have to live with the knowledge that they played along and medicated or did surgery on a child without real need. Social workers suffer greatly when they miss the signs. Those with MPB are typically quite bright and exceptionally good at what they do. It's awful.

    Julie Gregory was shocked to find that her mother had moved to another state and had been successful in having foster children placed with her--after Julie left home in her late teens. One must remember that Julie grew up in the 70s-80s, long before cross-agency reporting. No doubt her mother simply lied as I don't think she was convicted of child abuse.

    I mentioned that I've had two other interactions with mothers/victims. Both were cases of adopted children. Both women (both happened to be morbidly obese and single too) sought to adopt children with standing diagnoses and so no one questioned the children getting sicker and sicker. Our daughter was also an adopted child. It's far more common than you think.

    Please understand that I personally know and respect hundreds of families who seek out special needs children to adopt and they have NONE of these issues. Large adoptive families and specialized foster homes very commonly seek a specific type of child because they have experience with a particular disability. I know families that have adopted a number of children with Down Syndrome, who are wheelchair bound, or those who specialize in spectrum disorders. Our specialty happened by chance. We sought vibrant, physically healthy children who had suffered prenatal substance exposure and exhibited behavior issues. We also specialized in a older boys of color as they wait the longest.

    One of our sons, though, was not physically healthy. He had a serious chronic health problem. When nothing seemed to work with him and his symptoms made no sense, we made the suggestion to have him placed in the hospital 300 miles from our home. We brought up the issue of MBP. The plan was made that we'd let him stay under the care of the doctors and social workers in Portland for 3 weeks with no visits or calls. It was tough but we needed to make certain that we were not suspected of encouraging his illness. We also had to prove to ourselves that nothing in our home or our family dynamics was contributing to his illness.

    Three weeks later, it was formally decided that we had a very sick boy on our hands and nothing the hospital had tried with him had any different outcome than we'd had in working with our local doctor. He returned home.

    The reason I knew to even suggest this was that I was advocating for a child who'd recently been removed from a placement with an adoptive mom with MBP. I knew that the doctors might be thinking that about me. The irony is that women with MBP absolutely love doctor visits. They most frequently seek care for their children with male doctors and revel in the attention they get. I happen to have a very involved and devoted husband/father of the children and doctors' visits were the bane of our life!! We just didn't fit the profile.

    BTW, I've suggested that all the local DHS case managers and the CASAs read the book "Sickened". There must be more recognition of this insidious mental illness which seriously affects children's health.
    Last edited by Missizzy; 09-12-2010 at 11:43 AM.

  15. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Missizzy For This Useful Post:


  16. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    5,685
    Sorry, I was not clear. I was talking about Julie's mother.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Belinda For This Useful Post:


  18. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    10,640
    Got it. I'm unclear on that Belinda. As you can imagine, that was my and my husband's first concern after reading the book. We did some looking into it. It seems that the children were placed with the mother in Montana on an informal basis. Julie didn't even know about them until she attempted a reconciliation visit. She was shocked that history seemed to be repeating itself.

    I don't know if DHS has been involved. However, the details are clearly spelled out in the book which was published in 2004. Presumably those children would be young adults now. There are some vague comments on Julie's website about being able to educate others about this disorder but not having much luck in preventing children from being harmed by her mother. My assumption is that Julie reported her concerns but I'm not so sure that her mother didn't shout her down. Her mother is/was (not sure she's still living) quite a force to contend with.


    From Amazon:

    "From early childhood, Julie Gregory was continually X-rayed, medicated, and operated on—in the vain pursuit of an illness that was created in her mother’s mind. Munchausen by proxy (MBP) is the world’s most hidden and dangerous form of child abuse, in which the caretaker—almost always the mother—invents or induces symptoms in her child because she craves the attention of medical professionals. Many MBP children die, but Julie Gregory not only survived, she escaped the powerful orbit of her mother's madness and rebuilt her identity as a vibrant, healthy young woman."

    "The realization that the sickness lay in her mother, not in herself, would not come to Julie until adulthood."

    There's 53 reviews on Amazon.

  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Missizzy For This Useful Post:


  20. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    5,685
    It completely breaks my heart to see children put through all of those awful, terrible medical procedures, pain, medication and endless illness all at the behest of their own mothers. It just completely horrifies me. How anyone could stand there and watch their child be put through that for no reason is beyond anything I am capable of understanding. It is heartless and cruel.

  21. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Belinda For This Useful Post:


  22. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    10,640
    Belinda--We can't understand as we don't have this illness. Think of all the odd symptoms and markers for different mental illnesses. If we didn't know them to be well-studied and documented, how could we believe they're real? I wouldn't have readily believed except for the fact that I've seen it in person three times.

    My fear is that many of the young female victims of today could develop this very real disorder. It's up to society to get therapy going immediately for children who disclose abuse. In thinking of Julie's book and the other three cases I know of, none of the mothers received any treatment for their own childhood horrors. There's really only a paragraph or two in "Sickened" which talks of Julie's mother's own abuse but it was horrific and involved electrical shocks. The mother even terrorized Julie with giving her specifics about it.

    I don't believe that MBP is a disorder that can be treated with a self-help book. I would imagine that it requires life time treatment. It's tremendously complex and the abusers have little insight into their own actions. In my personal experience, I'd have to say, none.

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Missizzy For This Useful Post:


  24. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1
    This case has been disproved. http://www.msbp.com/Bushtrial.htm
    To tell the truth, I read many stories on the above website and just cried and cried. The biggest crime here is being carried out by those who use the catch phrase "Munchausens Syndrome by Proxy" as a basis for breaking families apart and convicting innocent mothers of harming or killing their children. It has become a diagnosis that makes the mother guilty until proven innocent.
    And going by this thread, it is also a typical case of even when she has been found innocent, the news goes strangely quiet. It is more exciting to tell the story of a mother hurting her child than it is to report that they got it wrong. That poor woman will go through life with that hanging over her head.

  25. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bigbird For This Useful Post:


  26. #14
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    3,220
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigbird View Post
    This case has been disproved. http://www.msbp.com/Bushtrial.htm
    To tell the truth, I read many stories on the above website and just cried and cried. The biggest crime here is being carried out by those who use the catch phrase "Munchausens Syndrome by Proxy" as a basis for breaking families apart and convicting innocent mothers of harming or killing their children. It has become a diagnosis that makes the mother guilty until proven innocent.
    And going by this thread, it is also a typical case of even when she has been found innocent, the news goes strangely quiet. It is more exciting to tell the story of a mother hurting her child than it is to report that they got it wrong. That poor woman will go through life with that hanging over her head.
    Sorry, but could you provide a mainstream media link showing that the case has been 'disproved'? The page you linked is very long and reports on the mother's conviction, though you refer to her as innocent.
    “Evil begins when you begin to treat people as things.” -- Terry Pratchett

  27. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ArianeEmory For This Useful Post:


  28. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    18,548

    Angry

    Quote Originally Posted by Missizzy View Post
    Kathleen has/had foster children? That totally freaks me out. Women with MBP are typically very conniving and manipulative. They fall into two categories. They are either very brash and pushy and demanding or charming and enticing. Often they can flip back and forth between the tactics. They are masters at setting up situations to make themselves look good. If they lose one child due to their abuse or the child grows up, they will often seek out others as they require that child on which project their own pain. Doctors who are "snowed" by them feel like victims too. They have to live with the knowledge that they played along and medicated or did surgery on a child without real need. Social workers suffer greatly when they miss the signs. Those with MPB are typically quite bright and exceptionally good at what they do. It's awful.

    Julie Gregory was shocked to find that her mother had moved to another state and had been successful in having foster children placed with her--after Julie left home in her late teens. One must remember that Julie grew up in the 70s-80s, long before cross-agency reporting. No doubt her mother simply lied as I don't think she was convicted of child abuse.

    I mentioned that I've had two other interactions with mothers/victims. Both were cases of adopted children. Both women (both happened to be morbidly obese and single too) sought to adopt children with standing diagnoses and so no one questioned the children getting sicker and sicker. Our daughter was also an adopted child. It's far more common than you think.

    Please understand that I personally know and respect hundreds of families who seek out special needs children to adopt and they have NONE of these issues. Large adoptive families and specialized foster homes very commonly seek a specific type of child because they have experience with a particular disability. I know families that have adopted a number of children with Down Syndrome, who are wheelchair bound, or those who specialize in spectrum disorders. Our specialty happened by chance. We sought vibrant, physically healthy children who had suffered prenatal substance exposure and exhibited behavior issues. We also specialized in a older boys of color as they wait the longest.

    One of our sons, though, was not physically healthy. He had a serious chronic health problem. When nothing seemed to work with him and his symptoms made no sense, we made the suggestion to have him placed in the hospital 300 miles from our home. We brought up the issue of MBP. The plan was made that we'd let him stay under the care of the doctors and social workers in Portland for 3 weeks with no visits or calls. It was tough but we needed to make certain that we were not suspected of encouraging his illness. We also had to prove to ourselves that nothing in our home or our family dynamics was contributing to his illness.

    Three weeks later, it was formally decided that we had a very sick boy on our hands and nothing the hospital had tried with him had any different outcome than we'd had in working with our local doctor. He returned home.

    The reason I knew to even suggest this was that I was advocating for a child who'd recently been removed from a placement with an adoptive mom with MBP. I knew that the doctors might be thinking that about me. The irony is that women with MBP absolutely love doctor visits. They most frequently seek care for their children with male doctors and revel in the attention they get. I happen to have a very involved and devoted husband/father of the children and doctors' visits were the bane of our life!! We just didn't fit the profile.

    BTW, I've suggested that all the local DHS case managers and the CASAs read the book "Sickened". There must be more recognition of this insidious mental illness which seriously affects children's health.
    I personally know that the bias can go the other way, like you were afraid of being suspected of. I too have a child with a chronic illness- GERD (acid reflux) which she's had since birth. Her first pediatrician wouldn't prescribe anything stronger than over the counter acid reducers- which weren't effective for her. When I would keep coming back, she was very reluctant to order an x-ray, which did confirm it. We saw her refluxing on the x-ray. Yet, this same pediatrician accused me of having Munchausen's By Proxy. My response to her: Yeah, it's real fun to wake up to a crying baby at 3a.m.! Just because she didn't see her crying for the 10 min. she was in her office.
    Last edited by LinasK; 10-16-2013 at 06:35 PM.
    Please help locate Mark Dribin http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ht=Mark+Dribin and Ilene Misheloff http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...lene+Misheloff and bring them home.



  29. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to LinasK For This Useful Post:


  30. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    1,309
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigbird View Post
    This case has been disproved. http://www.msbp.com/Bushtrial.htm
    To tell the truth, I read many stories on the above website and just cried and cried. The biggest crime here is being carried out by those who use the catch phrase "Munchausens Syndrome by Proxy" as a basis for breaking families apart and convicting innocent mothers of harming or killing their children. It has become a diagnosis that makes the mother guilty until proven innocent.
    And going by this thread, it is also a typical case of even when she has been found innocent, the news goes strangely quiet. It is more exciting to tell the story of a mother hurting her child than it is to report that they got it wrong. That poor woman will go through life with that hanging over her head.
    Bull****! She is guilty..and she knows it.

  31. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to LunaticFringe For This Useful Post:


  32. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2
    [QUOTE=Bigbird;9904608]This case has been disproved. http://www.msbp.com/Bushtrial.htm
    To tell the truth, I read many stories on the above website and just cried and cried. The biggest crime here is being carried out by those who use the catch phrase "Munchausens Syndrome by Proxy" as a basis for breaking families apart and convicting innocent mothers of harming or killing their children. It has become a diagnosis that makes the mother guilty until proven innocent.
    And going by this thread, it is also a typical case of even when she has been found innocent, the news goes strangely quiet. It is more exciting to tell the story of a mother hurting her child than it is to report that they got it wrong. That poor woman will go through life with that hanging over her head.[/oable doubt that Kathy did abuse Jennifer without being able to explain to them what they thought her motive was. The judge decided that the prosecutors had to prove a charge of child abuse by actually proving child abuse, not by proving Munchausen by proxy. And you know what? Kathy was STILL found guilty without the prosecutors being able to explain what they thought was the reason behind the abuse.

    You are entitled to your own opinions and clearly you don't want to believe that MBP is a real thing. That just means one of two things:
    A) you suffer from it yourself (which is extremely unlikely- I only say that because those who are affected by it don't even believe it's real and they believe without a doubt that they are the best parent ever); or
    B) you are a just good person and you cannot imagine ever hurting any child, much less your own, for what seems like such a ridiculous and outrageous reason- i.e. to get the attention of medical professionals, the media, or the community who have not even acknowledged your existence ever before; to feel as though you finally have control over something in your life when there are so many things that can't be controlled; etc.

    The fact that Jennifer doesn't recall this abuse is irrelevant now. She was taken away from her mother when she was 8. Prior to that, being a sick child was the one constant in her life...she lived in hospital for most of that time and when she didn't, she had round-the-clock in-home care. She was constantly getting shots, operations, picklines, IVs, medications, feeding tubes, etc. A trusting and dependent 8 yo child who adores their mother doesn't have the capacity to doubt that her mother would do anything other than protect her and keep her safe. Since her mother was right there hovering over her every time any of those things were happening, she would not even know that many of the things Kathy did kept her ill or made her even sicker (i.e. Making up symptoms that never happened which lead J's doctors to diagnose her with illnesses that actually exhibited those symptoms; giving J dangerously high dosages of anti-seizure meds that she was independently acquiring from home care even though J's prescribing doctor said it had to be discontinued because it would harm her, disconnecting certain medical devices necessary to help J get better, etc)

    Those things became Jennifer's norm. I don't know about you, but the only things I remember from before I was 10 years old were the significant experiences that were outside my everyday life. So of course Jennifer will remember that things like having a major surgery, or meeting her favorite baseball player. But the point is that she's not going to remember the little things that her mother was doing in the background because Jennifer (like every other small child) would assume that everything her mother did was "right" and that Kathy would only ever do things that would help/protect her.

    Jennifer is 27 years old now. It is not some miracle that she spent 8 years on her deathbed and then started getting better immediately when she was removed from her mother's "care". It is also not some coincidence that she has never needed another feeding tube or had another one of her internal organs completely shut down from the time she got away from Kathy.

    Regardless of what any of us believe, the thing that's most important is that Jennifer IS alive today. None of us will ever truly know if she would have made it past the age of 9 if Kathy had been acquitted of all charges, but common sense and medical history point to the inference that the prosecution team saved Jennifer's life.

  33. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jm713 For This Useful Post:


  34. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    14,231
    I fully believe MBP exists.
    I also fully believe some doctors label innocent mothers with it.
    When some doctors can't figure out what is wrong... "the mother is causing it."
    I have seen it happen personally and seen families torn apart by it.

    Again, I believe MBP exists... and also believe people are falsely accused of it.
    You can believe both. :twocentS:

  35. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MsFacetious For This Useful Post:


  36. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    18,548

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by MsFacetious View Post

    Again, I believe MBP exists... and also believe people are falsely accused of it.
    You can believe both. :twocentS:
    Agreed.
    Please help locate Mark Dribin http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ht=Mark+Dribin and Ilene Misheloff http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...lene+Misheloff and bring them home.



  37. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    2
    Not sure what happened to the beginning portion of my post, so I want to clarify.

    The user named bigbird started their post with the belief that the Kathy Bush case was "disproved" and provided a link to a website with some articles about the case. That user's post ended with the sentence: "That poor woman will go through life with that hanging over her head."

    The first few paragraphs of my post were cut out by accident. Here is what my original reply to bigbird said in it's entirety: (to those who read my other post- only the first few paragraphs that were cut out will be new to you. Hopefully, it will make more sense now that it is not combined with the other user's quote):

    Jjm713:
    "Your inference that this case has been 'disproved' based on your interpretation of the articles you read is incorrect. This case has NOT been 'disproved'.

    The link you provided with your post only contains articles about the court proceedings. None of those articles says that the case has ever been disproved. Nor do any of them say that the guilty verdict was overturned or that Kathy's record has been expunged.

    Maybe you were talking about how the prosecution's ability to argue that Kathy suffered from Munchausen by proxy was thrown out before the trial??? If so, that absolutely does not mean the case was disproved.

    Originally, the prosecution planned to use MPB as part of their theory for what Kathy's 'motive' was for the child abuse charges. The judge decided that the prosecutors had to prove a charge of child abuse by actually proving child abuse, not by proving that Kathy suffered from Munchausen by proxy syndrome.

    That was a major blow to the prosecution team. Now they had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Kathy did abuse Jennifer WITHOUT being able to explain to the jury what they thought Kathy's motive was. And you know what? Kathy was STILL found guilty even though prosecutors had to adjust their whole argument at the last minute.

    You are entitled to your own opinions and clearly you don't want to believe that MBP is a real thing. That just means one of two things:
    A) you suffer from it yourself (which is extremely unlikely- I only say that because those who are affected by it don't even believe it's real and they believe without a doubt that they are the best parent ever); or
    B) you are a just good person and you cannot imagine ever hurting any child, much less your own, for what seems like such a ridiculous and outrageous reason- i.e. to get the attention of medical professionals, the media, or the community who have not even acknowledged your existence ever before; to feel as though you finally have control over something in your life when there are so many things that can't be controlled; etc.

    The fact that Jennifer doesn't recall this abuse is irrelevant now. She was taken away from her mother when she was 8. Prior to that, being a sick child was the one constant in her life...she lived in hospital for most of that time and when she didn't, she had round-the-clock in-home care. She was constantly getting shots, operations, picklines, IVs, medications, feeding tubes, etc. A trusting and dependent 8 yo child who adores their mother doesn't have the capacity to doubt that her mother would do anything other than protect her and keep her safe. Since her mother was right there hovering over her every time any of those things were happening, she would not even know that many of the things Kathy did kept her ill or made her even sicker (i.e. Making up symptoms that never happened which lead J's doctors to diagnose her with illnesses that actually exhibited those symptoms; giving J dangerously high dosages of anti-seizure meds that she was independently acquiring from home care even though J's prescribing doctor said it had to be discontinued because it would harm her, disconnecting certain medical devices necessary to help J get better, etc)

    Those things became Jennifer's norm. I don't know about you, but the only things I remember from before I was 10 years old were the significant experiences that were outside my everyday life. So of course Jennifer will remember that things like having a major surgery, or meeting her favorite baseball player. But the point is that she's not going to remember the little things that her mother was doing in the background because Jennifer (like every other small child) would assume that everything her mother did was "right" and that Kathy would only ever do things that would help/protect her.

    Jennifer is 27 years old now. It is not some miracle that she spent 8 years on her deathbed and then started getting better immediately when she was removed from her mother's "care". It is also not some coincidence that she has never needed another feeding tube or had another one of her internal organs completely shut down from the time she got away from Kathy.

    Regardless of what any of us believe, the thing that's most important is that Jennifer IS alive today. None of us will ever truly know if she would have made it past the age of 9 if Kathy had been acquitted of all charges, but common sense and medical history point to the inference that the prosecution team saved Jennifer's life."

  38. The Following User Says Thank You to Jm713 For This Useful Post:

    byo

Similar Threads

  1. Possible Connections To Jennifer Kesse's Case
    By SeriouslySearching in forum Tracy Ocasio
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-27-2009, 11:24 AM
  2. Another Munchausen By Proxy case...
    By bbmcrae in forum Crimes in the News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-25-2005, 03:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •