I voted the last even if that's not ...evidence.I don't trust LE when making claims re the fibers,I don't trust those handwriting "experts" which say PR wrote the note,etc
BUT I trust my own eyes and ears and what makes me still have some RDI thoughts are the R's actions&behaviour.
Does that prove anything?To me yes but you can't take it to a court of law so that means pretty nothing.
BUT LE CAN exploit it,they can ask questions about why they did or didn't do this and that and IMO it's the only way to get somewhere if RDI....not the fibers,not the handwriting,ask the right questions (which might be too late anyway).
Last edited by madeleine; 10-04-2010 at 05:31 AM.
M.Beckner: Question: If this case could be solved with your gut instinct as evidence, how would it be solved? Answer: Through a confession.
re DNA:Personally, I believe if the source is ever found, we will discover that there is an explanation other than belonging to the murderer.