View Poll Results: Should baby K be allowed to see TH?

Voters
258. You may not vote on this poll
  • No, baby K is not safe around TH

    81 31.40%
  • Yes, baby K needs her mother

    11 4.26%
  • Yes, there is not proof that TH committed any crime

    40 15.50%
  • Yes, but only under supervision

    85 32.95%
  • Not sure

    18 6.98%
  • No. She will try to kidnap baby K and it will end badly.

    6 2.33%
  • No, she will manipulate baby K during these visits

    4 1.55%
  • No, there is reason to believe TH committed a crime

    13 5.04%
  • Yes, maybe it will trigger something and get her to finally talk.

    0 0%
Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 214
  1. #1

    Should baby K be allowed to see TH? ***POLL***

    ""The issue is not going to be whether the child's mother, Terri deserves to see the child. The issue is what does the child need and how can we be sure the child's needs are being met," said family law attorney Jody Stahancyk.

    Kaine Horman has mixed feelings about visitation, "Depending on the circumstances, the answer could be yes or no." <snipped>

    http://www.kgw.com/news/local/Terri-...-portland.html

    Should TH be able to see baby K? Vote and discuss!


  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kimster For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    To me, the issue is whether the baby has a right to see and spend time with her mother. It's not about Terri to me. It's about the baby.



  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by BeanE View Post
    To me, the issue is whether the baby has a right to see and spend time with her mother. It's not about Terri to me. It's about the baby.
    Option 2 is supposed to address that but maybe it wasn't clear enough? But there is a write-in poll option too.


  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimster View Post
    Option 2 is supposed to address that but maybe it wasn't clear enough? But there is a write-in poll option too.
    The thread title is about Terri:

    Should TH be able to see baby K?

    I was responding to that.


  6. The Following User Says Thank You to BeanE For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Somewhere out there ....
    Posts
    8,440
    No ... There is a risk factor there as far as I am concerned, I think TH would flee or worse....jmo
    What lies behind you and what lies in front of you pales in comparison to what lies inside of you....
    Ralph Waldo Emerson ~


  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mysticrose For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    36,435
    I think she (the baby) should be allowed to see her mother, with supervision. This baby had spent most of her life with Terri, and in the event that Terri is eventually cleared, it would be shame if she no longer recognized her mother.

    This is a case that could have movement at any moment, or could take years.
    Just my opinion, of course.


  10. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to cluciano63 For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    325
    I wavered between no, not safe and yes, with supervision. Ultimately, I voted yes. We don't know yet if baby K is safe with Terri, because we don't know what happened to Kyron. But SINCE we don't know that, I'd say any visitation should proceed with extreme caution.


  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to PDXMom For This Useful Post:


  13. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    City of Roses, Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,457
    Quote Originally Posted by mysticrose View Post
    No ... There is a risk factor there as far as I am concerned, I think TH would flee or worse....jmo
    And it just so happens I wrote in that option!
    Justice is the constant and perpetual will to allot to every man his due. Domitus Ulpian


  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to gwenabob For This Useful Post:


  15. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by BeanE View Post
    The thread title is about Terri:

    Should TH be able to see baby K?

    I was responding to that.
    Gotcha and I agree so will change the title. Baby K does come first.


  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Kimster For This Useful Post:


  17. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    STEELER COUNTRY!
    Posts
    25,746
    IMO, the baby must be doing fine.
    I'm sure LE and others are looking into the raising of the baby.
    After 4 months and with baby being so young, I do not think she realizes she has no mother.

    [I]My own neice's mother died when she was 18 months and she has no problems being without a mother in her 30+ years.
    Oh yes, there were times she wished for a mother,
    like when she got married, when she had her sons, etc.
    her dad never remarried[I]

    Children do adjust.
    I would rather baby was safe than be with a mother that could and might hurt her.
    I would need proof that TH never did MFH and KYRON's disappearance before I would let her near her baby.

    I vote NO right now.........
    Last edited by passionflower; 10-08-2010 at 10:10 PM. Reason: vote
    Kyron, HALEIGH, ADJI & Gabriel NEEDS PRAYERS NOW TO FIND THEM!. Zahra & Jonathan in heaven
    Justice for Hailey!!!!
    No Justice for Caylee Marie..........


  18. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to passionflower For This Useful Post:


  19. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    43,429
    Not at this time.
    I believe this newest attempt at a new approach by her attorneys is to try to force information out of LE. They did not contest the Restraining Order. It is legal maneuvering and the way I see it not at all about K.. but about what her attorneys want from LE.

    Let the Kyron case go forward and then look at the issue down the road depending on the outcome.

    In that the judge granted 90 day abatement they can't ask for amendment at this time anyway.

    ETA: Baby K has already made a big adjustment and having that change constantly is not good for a small child.
    Last edited by grandmaj; 10-08-2010 at 10:16 PM.


  20. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to grandmaj For This Useful Post:


  21. #12
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    915
    Quote Originally Posted by BeanE View Post
    To me, the issue is whether the baby has a right to see and spend time with her mother. It's not about Terri to me. It's about the baby.
    To me the issue in part lies with a statement that Kaine made, about how different the baby was now that Terri wasn't around. He said this shortly after Terri was no longer in the picture - a few short weeks. It sounded like a positive change in her.

    The baby also has a right to be protected from someone who could bring her great harm.

    So to me, the issue is about the baby, and if she has adjusted so well, why jeopardize that with visitations, supervised or not?


  22. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to AlexisFresca For This Useful Post:


  23. #13
    Kimberlyd125's Avatar
    Kimberlyd125 is offline Softball is for everyone. Fast pitch is for athletes.
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    15,856
    No way Jose!!!!!!
    TH is not stable and has already tried to "see" or "steal" Baby K one time at the Gym.

    As of right now, I say no. Not even with armed guards standing 2 feet from them.
    Not safe.

    WHERE IS KYRON?????
    Glove Findin'
    Uniform Washin'
    Gatorade Gettin'
    Picture Takin'
    Always Cheerin'

    Softball Mom


  24. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Kimberlyd125 For This Useful Post:


  25. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    219
    Quote Originally Posted by PDXMom View Post
    I wavered between no, not safe and yes, with supervision. Ultimately, I voted yes. We don't know yet if baby K is safe with Terri, because we don't know what happened to Kyron. But SINCE we don't know that, I'd say any visitation should proceed with extreme caution.
    My thought process was similar and I voted yes, with supervision. But now I'm backtracking. Of course the baby's interests are paramount. And it crossed my mind that, whether or not TH is guilty, her state of mind might lead her to do something drastic ...shudder. I guess I just wouldn't be willing to take that chance. Maybe with a psych eval. But even then...you just never know. And, boy, wouldn't that just be the worst possible scenario. As if it weren't bad enough already.

    Okay, I talked myself into no. Although I'm not happy about it. Just so sad all the way around


  26. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to germaine For This Useful Post:


  27. #15
    Kimberlyd125's Avatar
    Kimberlyd125 is offline Softball is for everyone. Fast pitch is for athletes.
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    15,856
    Quote Originally Posted by germaine View Post
    My thought process was similar and I voted yes, with supervision. But now I'm backtracking. Of course the baby's interests are paramount. And it crossed my mind that, whether or not TH is guilty, her state of mind might lead her to do something drastic ...shudder. I guess I just wouldn't be willing to take that chance. Maybe with a psych eval. But even then...you just never know. And, boy, wouldn't that just be the worst possible scenario. As if it weren't bad enough already.

    Okay, I talked myself into no. Although I'm not happy about it. Just so sad all the way around
    I doubt she would even do a psych evaluation to see her daughter because she'd be scared to talk to anybody in fear of something slipping about what she did to Kyron.

    JMO
    Glove Findin'
    Uniform Washin'
    Gatorade Gettin'
    Picture Takin'
    Always Cheerin'

    Softball Mom


  28. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Kimberlyd125 For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. If Baez is not allowed to touch KC..why is Lyons allowed to touch KC?
    By affinity in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-28-2010, 02:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •