837 users online (129 members and 708 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 66 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 979
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    29,161

    Canada - Marie-France Comeau, 37, & Jessica Lloyd, 27, slain, Ont, 2009 & 2010 - #6

    Please continue here.

    Thread 5
    Thread 4
    Thread 3
    Thread 2
    Thread 1

    Salem

    Link to the Defence's statement: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/St...#ixzz133GhxkWj
    Last edited by OkieGranny; 02-15-2016 at 04:41 PM. Reason: broken links

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,599

    "Don't Destroy Evidence"

    http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/a...e-experts?bn=1

    "Don’t destroy Williams evidence: experts"
    October 21, 2010
    Michelle McQuigge

    The graphic photos and videos documenting the crimes of Col. Russell Williams should be preserved to ensure the convicted killer and sex offender isn’t one day set free, legal experts say.

    As the former commander of Canada’s largest air force base was led off Thursday to begin two concurrent sentences of life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years, the burning question of how best to handle the most disturbing evidence of his actions was put off for another day.

    Prosecutors say they will destroy the Nissan Pathfinder that tied Williams to the murder of Jessica Lloyd, but plan to wait awhile before discussing the possibility of destroying the photo and video evidence, which includes recordings of the two sex assaults and the killing of Cpl. Marie-France Comeau.

    Destroying the evidence would be a bad idea, warn legal experts who say the images could one day prevent Williams from being granted parole, or from engaging in fancy legal footwork to secure a new trial.

    John Rosen, a Toronto-based criminal lawyer who once defended notorious sex killer Paul Bernardo, said it’s unlikely Williams would mount an appeal of his convictions, given the fact that he pleaded guilty and appeared resigned to spending the rest of his life behind bars.

    But just because a scenario is unlikely doesn’t mean it can’t happen, warned Rosen. Williams could change his mind at any time, he said.

    “What if Mr. Williams wakes up one day and says, ‘Wow, I just got railroaded by my lawyer,’ and hires another lawyer?” Rosen said. “Even if you think it’s open and shut, the court would be obliged to consider the appeal.”

    Two sets of evidence are at play, since the rules are different for exhibits that comprise part of the formal court record, as opposed to evidence that investigators used to build a case, but did not present formally.

    Rosen said evidence shown during the plea and sentencing hearings must stay in court custody for the minimum 30-day appeal period — and there’s always the possibility of an extension being granted. Those exhibits are usually returned to the lawyer who submitted them, and held indefinitely.
    Once the appeal windows are closed, evidence that was not shown in court — such as the video recordings of Williams’ crimes — can be destroyed at the discretion of the legal team.

    Prosecutors don’t usually exercise that right, said Rosen. Instead, they choose to put the evidence into storage in case it’s needed at a later date. Police say Williams’ computer, which contains the incriminating images, will remain under lock and key until a formal decision is made.

    Since the Crown did not present the videos as evidence at the hearings, they likely could be destroyed without much legal wrangling. But that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea, Rosen warned.

    “I would be reluctant to destroy original evidence because we don’t know what’s coming in the future.”

    James Morton, a professor at York University’s Osgoode Hall law school in Toronto, described a scenario in which prosecutors would one day regret having destroyed vital evidence.

    “Let’s look ahead 25 years,” Morton said. “(Williams has) survived, he’s been a model prisoner, he’s expressed complete remorse, and we’re now looking at this (elderly) person who’s spent the past 25 years reading the Bible. This video, and the related evidence, is the sort of thing the parole board would look at and say, ‘Yes, we could grant parole, but we’re not going to.’”

    The images could also be used to refute an insanity defence should Williams ever try to mount one, Morton added. Appeals are often filed well after the official deadline has expired, he said.

    It’s not the first time Canadian jurisprudence has wrestled with the contentious issue of graphic video evidence.

    In 1995, when Bernardo was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder in the sex killings of schoolgirls Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy, videotaped recordings of the assaults comprised key evidence that not only sealed Bernardo’s fate, but exposed his ex-wife, Karla Homolka, as a willing accomplice and participant.

    The tapes were also at the centre of a subsequent trial for Ken Murray, Bernardo’s original lawyer, who was charged with obstruction of justice for failing to disclose to the Crown the existence of the tapes, which were not discovered during an exhaustive police search of Bernardo’s southern Ontario home.

    The fact the tapes existed wasn’t revealed publicly until after Crown officials made their infamous plea-bargain deal with Homolka — the so-called “deal with the devil” — in which she agreed to plead guilty to two manslaughter charges and spend 12 years in prison in exchange for her testimony against her ex-husband.

    Murray — who retrieved the tapes at Bernardo’s direction in 1993 and held them for more than 16 months before disclosing them to Rosen, his successor — was acquitted in 2000. Amid pressure from the families of the victims, the tapes were destroyed in December 2001.

    Homolka was released in 2005. Bernardo was declared a dangerous offender, a designation that keeps him behind bars indefinitely. Crown prosecutors say they don’t plan to seek dangerous-offender status for Williams because they don’t believe he’ll ever be set free.

    Rosen, who is among the few people who ever saw the Bernardo tapes, said it’s easy to understand why families would want such evidence destroyed.
    It’s “a violation of the memory of the deceased,” Rosen said. “I’m sure they would feel that they were being used or abused again, and that they were being victimized again. And I can see that there’s a lot of truth to that.”

    Morton said he, too, is sympathetic to the families of the victims, and understands why they would want to see the photos and recordings destroyed. Justice, he warned, would be better served if they were not.

    “It’s highly unlikely that anyone will argue that Col. Williams was a wrongfully convicted individual, but there’s no reason to destroy this evidence.”"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    3,087
    Mr. Williams struggled but ultimately he decided to confess

    Give me a break Edelson! We really do NOT care if the bastard "struggled" AND he only confessed because he knew he was busted! He only started to confess AFTER he found out that LE had him nailed to the crimes!!!!
    Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/St...#ixzz133VG5tPS
    Last edited by flipflop; 10-21-2010 at 11:47 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    10,170
    does anyone have the link handy for the redacted portions of the interrogation?

    someone posted it in the last thread but I've just searched & can't find it

    TIA

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,952
    Quote Originally Posted by LadyL View Post
    does anyone have the link handy for the redacted portions of the interrogation?

    someone posted it in the last thread but I've just searched & can't find it

    TIA
    Redacted transcript of taped police interview of Col. Russell Williams in Feb. 2010 (PDF, 128 pp)
    Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2010/...#ixzz135ZbgvZw
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/pdf/edited-williams.pdf

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Left of Nowhere
    Posts
    1,273
    http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/879404

    Interesting article about RW's 'apology'. I was bothered by the judge's assessment that it was 'sincere'. I didn't hear it, of course, but it reads mechanical, unemotional, distant, shallow, so I was interested to read that this reporter had the same take on it.

    Also interesting to me was her statement that RW lacks people skills, that he does not know how to connect with people, that he is not 'affable' and therefore an odd choice for promotion. Admittedly, I have not had the opportunity to read all the articles linked here, but from what I had read up to now, I had the impression that he was well liked, outgoing, easy with people and that just did not fit together well with the reality that he is a monstrous, vile being.

    This description of him as 'taciturn', that 'it isn’t in his nature to expound or analyze', and that 'he was an odd choice as colonel at the Trenton base', that he is an 'awkward man with no chat or grasp of the appropriate thing to say to other humans'... I find I can much more easily reconcile the man this describes with the horrible truth of what we all now know he is.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9,248
    Mallick: A psychopath’s monotone act of contrition


    "Traumatize”? Williams’ crimes didn’t traumatize the families. He killed their daughters. The families are finished off. They said so to his face in their victim impact statements. As for “family and friends,” that’s a phrase you use in a Christmas newsletter. “As a result of what I’ve done” is what you say when the barbecue explodes at the lake because you bought a discount propane tank.

    In his version, his “assaults” caused his rape victims to “suffer terribly” and the families whose little daughters’ panties were draped over his face were “seriously distressed.”

    No. They were scared out of their wits and sickened to the depths of their souls.

    http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/879404


    Comment by Me: Thank-you, Greenthumb, that was a good article. The paragraphs above were worth repeating, to me.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9,248
    Healing event planned in Belleville, Ont., in wake of Col. Williams crimes

    By: The Canadian Press
    Posted: 22/10/2010 7:28 AM |

    BELLEVILLE, Ont. - The organizer of a “healing event” hopes hundreds of people will show up in the market square today to help the community get over the shocking crimes of Col. Russell Williams.

    Belleville resident Hazel Lloyst says she organized the noon-hour event because people in the community need a way to start the healing process.

    Lloyst says it will also be a chance for Belleville-area residents to show their support for the victims’ families.

    It will start with people joining hands in a circle, with some uplifting music and words of comfort from a minister who specializes in helping people through this kind of trauma.

    http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/can...105517128.html

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    645

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,599
    Quote Originally Posted by greenthumb View Post
    http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/879404

    Interesting article about RW's 'apology'. I was bothered by the judge's assessment that it was 'sincere'. I didn't hear it, of course, but it reads mechanical, unemotional, distant, shallow, so I was interested to read that this reporter had the same take on it.

    Also interesting to me was her statement that RW lacks people skills, that he does not know how to connect with people, that he is not 'affable' and therefore an odd choice for promotion. Admittedly, I have not had the opportunity to read all the articles linked here, but from what I had read up to now, I had the impression that he was well liked, outgoing, easy with people and that just did not fit together well with the reality that he is a monstrous, vile being.

    This description of him as 'taciturn', that 'it isn’t in his nature to expound or analyze', and that 'he was an odd choice as colonel at the Trenton base', that he is an 'awkward man with no chat or grasp of the appropriate thing to say to other humans'... I find I can much more easily reconcile the man this describes with the horrible truth of what we all now know he is.
    No doubt linguistics experts and others will analyze this to pieces before long. One thing I noticed was that he brought it back to himself, and his family being destroyed, using a passive tone.

    "I stand before you, your honour, indescribably ashamed. I know that the crimes I've committed have traumatized many people. The families and friends of Marie-France Comeau and Jessica Lloyd, in particular, have suffered and continue to suffer profound desperate pain and sorrow as a result of what I've done. My assaults of (publication of name prohibited) and Ms. (Laurie) Massicotte have caused them to suffer terribly as well, I know.

    Numerous victims of the break and enters I've committed have been very seriously distressed as a result of my so having invaded their most intimate privacy.

    My family, your honour, has been irreparably harmed. The understandable hatred that was expressed yesterday, and has been palpable throughout the week, has me recognize this. (There are) those who will find it impossible to accept, but the fact is, I very deeply regret what I have done and the harm that I know I have caused to many. I've committed despicable crimes, your honour. In the process, betraying my family, my friends and colleagues, and the Canadian Forces.

    I shall spend the rest of my life regretting, above all, that I've ended two vibrant, innocent and cherished lives.

    My very sincere hope is that my detailed confession on the night of Feb. 7, my full co-operation with investigators since, and ultimately my guilty pleas earlier this week have, in some way, served to temper the very serious harm I caused my victims, and their families and friends."

    From: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/can...105510193.html


    I think remorse involves directly taking accountability and responsibility for your actions, and stating quite clearly in a direct and active tone what you have done (JMO). A better speech writer might have written, "I have destroyed the lives of my victims and their families. For that, I am solely responsible. I cannot take back my actions, which I deeply regret. I do not deserve your forgiveness, and you do not owe it to me. Nothing I do will ever restore the lives I've taken and the people I've damaged..."

    A better speech writer would have done that, IMO, and wouldn't have brought it back to him and his family. But that speech wasn't written by a better speech writer.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9,248
    Russell Williams Confession Video: Part 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzh3a...layer_embedded


    Russell Williams Confession Video: Part 2

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah51v...layer_embedded


    Russell Williams Confession Video: Part 3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mQA2...layer_embedded


    Redacted Transcript of Russell Williams Video Confession (128 of 309 Pages) to Det.-Sgt.Jim Smyth OPP Behavioral Science Division

    Link Here


    Agreed Statement of Facts:
    Warning Graphic Content

    Day 1 (*Note: Original CBC version is now gone. Toronto Star Version here)

    Day 2


    Evidence Photo: Crime Map of Jessica Lloyd’s House:

    Link Here


    Evidence Photos: Boots, Tires, SUV

    Link Here


    Evidence Photos: Russell Williams, Lingerie; WARNING: Graphic Content

    Link Here


    Evidence Photos: Russell Williams Letters to Victims, Wife

    Link Here


    Williams Charge Sheet:

    Link Here


    Photos of Williams wife here, Mary Liz, which are screenshots from the Fifth Estate Documentary, Above Suspicion.

    Link Here


    Fifth Estate TV Show

    Above Suspicion

    Link Here
    Last edited by KateB; 05-24-2015 at 09:27 AM. Reason: repair url tags.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,599
    Has anyone heard of the Macdonald triad, which I believe now has a fourth component?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,599
    So many questions remain unanswered.

    http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/...b-98b97ea44958

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    1,392
    Quote Originally Posted by Summersolstice View Post
    Has anyone heard of the Macdonald triad, which I believe now has a fourth component?
    I had been wondering about RW's concern for his cat when he absolutely has no concern for human life.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,599
    Quote Originally Posted by Wondergirl View Post
    Russell Williams Confession Video: Part 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzh3a...layer_embedded


    Russell Williams Confession Video: Part 2

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah51v...layer_embedded


    Russell Williams Confession Video: Part 3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mQA2...layer_embedded


    Redacted Transcript of Russell Williams Video Confession (128 of 309 Pages) to Det.-Sgt.Jim Smyth OPP Behavioral Science Division

    Link Here


    Agreed Statement of Facts:
    Warning Graphic Content

    Day 1 (*Note: Original CBC version is now gone. Toronto Star Version here)

    Day 2


    Evidence Photo: Crime Map of Jessica Lloyd’s House:

    Link Here


    Evidence Photos: Boots, Tires, SUV

    Link Here


    Evidence Photos: Russell Williams, Lingerie; WARNING: Graphic Content

    Link Here


    Evidence Photos: Russell Williams Letters to Victims, Wife

    Link Here


    Williams Charge Sheet:

    Link Here


    Photos of Williams wife here, Mary Liz, which are screenshots from the Fifth Estate Documentary, Above Suspicion.

    Link Here


    Fifth Estate TV Show

    Above Suspicion

    Link Here
    The Fifth Estate will be doing another show on this tonight:

    http://www.throng.ca/documentary/cbc...ssell-williams

Page 1 of 66 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. GUILTY Canada - Marie-France Comeau, 37, & Jessica Lloyd, 27, slain, Ont, 2009 & 2010 - #7
    By Salem in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 301
    Last Post: 10-12-2016, 07:53 PM
  2. GUILTY Canada - Marie-France Comeau, 37, & Jessica Lloyd, 27, slain, Ont, 2009 & 2010 - #5
    By Salem in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 637
    Last Post: 10-22-2010, 11:12 AM
  3. GUILTY Canada - Marie-France Comeau, 37, & Jessica Lloyd, 27, slain, Ont, 2009 & 2010 - #4
    By Salem in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 830
    Last Post: 10-19-2010, 07:41 PM
  4. GUILTY Canada - Marie-France Comeau, 37, & Jessica Lloyd, 27, slain, Ont, 2009 & 2010 - #3
    By Patience in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 757
    Last Post: 10-09-2010, 05:49 PM
  5. GUILTY Canada - Marie-France Comeau, 37, & Jessica Lloyd, 27, slain, Ont, 2009 & 2010 - #2
    By hoppyfrog in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 877
    Last Post: 05-11-2010, 09:36 PM

Tags for this Thread