OK how long would Zahra have had to be dead if all they find are bones? Any experts here? Also why would they say they believe it's her (at this point) when no tests have been run. They wouldn't speculate on the leg without the records so why are they now with this bone?
This bee my opinion
How would Zahra's amputated leg bone be found here in the USA? Wasnt it amputated in AUS?
They don't let you keep those kind of things surely? JMHO
"Three things in human life are important: The first is to be kind; the second is to be kind; and the third is to be kind." ~ Henry James
So bone is not even positively ID'd as human yet, state lab to determine if its human, do I have that right?
Never underestimate the power of love.
Seems like we are pretty early in the "reported" time line to be finding purely skeletal remains. And if they only found one then the bones have been spread by the animals already.
I wonder how long this girl has really been gone.
this has to at least look like it is human for LEO to make a statement, after all I am sure they have found tons of animal bones during these searches.
Hear The Children
Agree. Must look to be human and may have tissue on it ... thus the excitement.
Disclaimer: All posts are my own humble opinion. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.
Justice for Caylee
A new thread has been opened.
Please continue here:
[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=118846"]NC NC - Zahra Clare Baker, 10, Hickory, 9 Oct. 2010 #41 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]
If this bone they found is human and is Zahras it just blew the case wide open.