11-03-2010, 11:48 PM #1
All things wood chipper
Interested to hear all WSer thoughts about the wood chipper. Did AB or EB use the one in their yard, or the one at his workplace, to dispose of physical evidence, or not?You can hold back from the suffering of the world. You have free permission to do so and it is in accordance with your nature.
But perhaps this very holding back is the one suffering you could have avoided.
Be not simply good. Be good for something.
11-04-2010, 02:25 AM #2Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
why it could matter
Graphic discussion alert
Chipper no longer considered a 'solid lead'. I get that and have posted about same.
I don't have any interest in just being gory-for-the-sake-of-gory in a post but the
possibility of a chipper was put forth in MSM & it was said that cadaver dogs hit
on the chipper and a mulch pile many times. From experience of past cases where some of our
search & rescue members posted that these dogs will not hit on things other than
on body decomp scent I took this lead very seriously.
I think LE did too because if I remember right the news report spoke of around 50 investigators
going over that property.
Why does it matter whether or not a chipper was used on her remains? The requirements
for transporting a full sized body are quite different than to transport and dispose of chips of bone.
For instance you can take a conrete rock with the bone chips mixed in and dump it
into the edge of a pond or lake or stream and people could walk right over it for years without
knowing what was in it.
You can transport a bag of mulch and bone chips in a burlap bag without arrousing suspicion
as easily as you might if you were to carry a full sized body. And a body with flesh on
it may smell bad and this too adds to the difficulty of transporting and where you can hide it.
From a news report I learned that LE took out the plumbing of the bathroom,
and I think also the kitchen, and this too matched up with previous cases that I have read
in which the perp(s) dismembered and/or defleshed a body in order to make transportation
and disposal of the remains easier.
One might be willing to take a chance on being seen to toss a luggage bag with body pieces
into the brush but one might not risk using the same spot to dump a full sized intact body.
Knowing what happened to the body can matter in knowing where to look for its disposal.
Thinking of such things is not easy and if I did not think it essential in some cases I would
never do it. I don't even watch horror movies because I don't want that stuff floating
around in my subconcious mind.
In every case there are always some that think certain possibliltes should not be
posted about or considered because it conflicts with their feelings about the victim.
For example: Adult runaway cases always have some that don't want the runaway possibility
spoken of because it seems to them to reflect poorly on the missing person.
In murder cases some always don't like reading about what was done to the body
even if it might help solve where the body is.
And some don't like reading about a victim that hung out with a rough crowd because
it seems disrespectful but that same rough crowd might be where the killer is eventually
No wants us to post gore-for-the-sake-of-gore or to be purposely disrespectful
of a victim but I would caution that we don't allow emotions to cause us to assume
a post is bad just because it seems unpleasant to us. When I see a post I feel queasy about
I ask myself if there might be good reasons for the post that I just do not yet see
and sometimes I learn from the experience.
11-04-2010, 03:18 AM #3Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
I can not imagine a wood chipper being used to dispose of an actual body or body parts and then being made clean enough that a cadaver dog hit only on the the engine. The metal work of those things isn't even produced to food processing standards let alone surgical standards, it is designed to be able to be cleaned to the standard that gobs of sap and wood fibre aren't going to stop stuff moving through and that you can make it look nice for a new buyer if you sell it, not to any sort of real standard of cleanliness. Everything from the way bits are joined together to the paint or powder dipped finishes involved is designed with that low standard in mind.
Not that he may not have chipped her and all, it is a possibility even though my mind says just burying her deep would cross a practical man's mind as making more sense, but I'm guessing if he did it was not with those particular chippers.
11-04-2010, 03:46 AM #4
IMO, now that it is being reported that a bone likely/possibly belonging to Zahra has been found, I'm finding it less likely that a woodchipper was involved in this way. To me, "bone" implies a whole or nearly whole bone, not a bone chip or fragment. Of course, there are a lot of facts not yet verified/being released to the public, so.... And docwho3 brings up an interesting point about the plumbing. The fact that LE keeps saying "pieces of evidence" rather than talking about recovering intact remains makes me think maybe her body was dismembered in some way.
The fact that a woodchipper even has to be considered in any way makes me sick. What happened to poor Zahra?
11-04-2010, 04:25 AM #5Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
developments change things
were 'hit' on but mentioned the chipper and a mulch pile both being hit upon repeatedly.
(If I remember it correctly.)
That having been said, it now appears that perhaps something other than chipping
might have been done if the bone reported to have been found was indeed Zahra's.
I still do not know if that rules out other things such as a more normal dismemberment or defleshing.
I do not hang on to an idea if new evidence comes forth that changes things.
(Although I do like to make sure to confirm the new evidence.)
11-04-2010, 04:31 AM #6
Earlier this week, a K-9 unit alerted police to a wood chipper on the property. A K-9 unit dog handler told Channel 9 that the hit was not on the wood chipper itself but the engine, and the blood could have come from a cut on a worker’s hand.
K9 crews indicated earlier in the week that traces of human remains were found on wood processing equipment in an area where Baker's father once worked, but detectives with the Burke County Sheriff's Office said that is no longer a solid lead.
Investigators also told us canines gave positive indication in Burke County at the wood pile they searched, but Thursday evening, investigators said that was not an accurate "hit" and that it wasn't a valid lead in their case.
11-04-2010, 04:50 AM #7Registered User
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
go with what you have at the moment
I have since seen these other links such as the ones you provided in your post. I went
with the information I had at the time when originally posting and as I have already said,
developments change things.
11-04-2010, 05:49 AM #8
I am one of the ones who had posted about the wood chipper many threads ago. In fact; I posted two or maybe three times on the subject and certainly did not do it for the shock and awe of it.
The finding of the bone today may show that the chipper was not involved in little Zahra's disposal. BUT, I do believe that either the splitter or a saw was involved in at least the disposal of evidence because of the small pieces of things we saw LE bagging from the back yard.
I am sorry to say that I think there may be some dismemberment involved here. IIRC, there was a smell reported around an area and it was thought to be from the sewer. I do not have a link, so IIRC, someone stated that they saw EB and AB driving around late one night in the area of the mobile home they (EB and AB) had lived in. Then there was a really bad smell. It was then stated by a poster somewhere that no, there was a smell around different sewer manholes in different areas. Well, that would make sense if different parts were placed in manholes in different areas.
Absolutely NOTHING would surprise me out of these two people, or even a third person. I have stated more than once that I believed there to be a third person involved, and that person would be someone EB trusted and is someone from her past. And I mean it is someone local.
I hope I am very wrong. I really do, but something LE found out seemed to shake them and made it become a homicide investigation. There had to be a reason for that change so early on.
We will see what other bones LE can find, but I personally feel that what was found today was the stump leg bone.
Sorry for my graphic post. It sounds unfeeling of me, I know, but I have agonized over little Zahra. She was a precious child who had overcome seemingly insurmountable health problems and was still cheerful in spite of it.
11-04-2010, 05:56 AM #9
I know the cadaver dog hit on the engine only, but some engines can be changed from another piece of equipment. IOW, the engine may have been on another piece of equipment prior to that one. I wonder if the woodchipper and the woodsplitter has the same size engine.
I still keep in mind the glove that was found in the back yard with the bad smelling 'goo' all over it.
11-04-2010, 08:21 AM #10Fly high and free, Jhessye ~
My posts are meant to help think through possibilities and are strictly an additional opinion under circumstances when many points of view need to be considered. I apologize in advance to anyone whose potential involvement is contemplated in error. Please understand that much of what is happening is merely brainstorming during unfortunate events.
11-04-2010, 08:40 AM #11
IMO, dogs hitting BOTH woodchippers 12 miles away and AB knowing how to use the heavy equipment, EB's letter saying something horrifying happened after the fact, yes
I think something went through the chippers and if a large bone is found by pond, other large bones may be there also.
From reading from another thread here, AB/EB liked violent games.
Fantasy became reality. JMOOKyron, HALEIGH, ADJI & Gabriel NEEDS PRAYERS NOW TO FIND THEM!. Zahra & Jonathan in heaven
Justice for Hailey!!!!
No Justice for Caylee Marie..........
11-04-2010, 08:42 AM #12
I think the woodchipper IS involved somehow in this case. I'm not sure how, but I believe it/they is/are involved!
11-04-2010, 08:47 AM #13
11-04-2010, 09:05 AM #14Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- between black and white
I'm not glued to the idea that the woodchipper was used, but it seems likely to me, because it was available and for all of the reasons posted up to now, by me and others. It's possible that they tried it, found it wasn't a good method for disposal, and changed strategies.
I would also like to add, that experts who come on the Levi Page show have mentioned it repeatedly. I don't think we're way off in thinking it's a strong possibility, and clearly, LE doesn't show their whole hand.
11-04-2010, 10:30 AM #15
By UKGuy in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 4Last Post: 10-18-2010, 01:35 PM
By pixies in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat NewsReplies: 11Last Post: 05-19-2008, 02:55 PM
By graybar hotel in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat NewsReplies: 3Last Post: 02-28-2007, 11:37 AM
By PlasmaFiend024 in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat NewsReplies: 0Last Post: 04-16-2006, 03:34 AM