769 users online (98 members and 671 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 121
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Keithville, LA
    Posts
    4,079

    2010.11.18 - Hearing on Clarification of DNA Testing

    The defense requested this hearing, here is the Motion for Clarification, JAC Response and Notice of Hearing:

    http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hig...%20Testing.pdf
    My posts are my opinion only. Praying for Justice for Caylee Marie!
    The Florida Bar summed up the problem regarding Mr. Baez.
    "His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law." (Thank you to TWA) Read their opinion here: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/d...ps/sc95855.pdf

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    778
    The JAC is correct in their response. They were not notice by Baez, on the Sept 27 Motion for DNA testing.

    http://www.docstoc.com/docs/56021806...t-DNA-Evidence



    CJPerry's ruling.

    http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hig...20Evidence.pdf

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Keithville, LA
    Posts
    4,079
    Now that I've read the motion, my first instincts were correct, JB filed another "flawed" motion. The defense was given an inch and IMO they are trying to take a mile, now the inch has been taken away by the JAC, for now.
    My posts are my opinion only. Praying for Justice for Caylee Marie!
    The Florida Bar summed up the problem regarding Mr. Baez.
    "His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law." (Thank you to TWA) Read their opinion here: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/d...ps/sc95855.pdf

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    downtown Orlando
    Posts
    1,066
    Does this mean the hearing will take place by telephone in the courthouse at 1:30? I was going to attend!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Keithville, LA
    Posts
    4,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Amil View Post
    Does this mean the hearing will take place by telephone in the courthouse at 1:30? I was going to attend!!
    The order states that the defense and JAC will appear via telephone.
    My posts are my opinion only. Praying for Justice for Caylee Marie!
    The Florida Bar summed up the problem regarding Mr. Baez.
    "His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law." (Thank you to TWA) Read their opinion here: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/d...ps/sc95855.pdf

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,806
    Quote Originally Posted by nums24 View Post
    The defense requested this hearing, here is the Motion for Clarification, JAC Response and Notice of Hearing:

    http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hig...%20Testing.pdf
    Thanks nums24 for this link. I am bookmarking this one as my only official motion viewing website now. Because of all the carp JB has pulled with sending motions to media outlets, I only trust this site and what Musikman puts in the doc store. Everything is right there is a neat and orderly fashion and is the courts official record, not what JB wants the media to see.

    This link should be a sticky somewhere, it is that good.

    Thanks again.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    11,612
    Why does the defense get to appear via telephone? The JAC I could see but why the defense?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by strawberry View Post
    Why does the defense get to appear via telephone? The JAC I could see but why the defense?
    Because the judge can no longer stand the sight of Baez, and is considering conducting the entire trial via texts if it will keep that clown out of his sight?

    Blaise
    YOU PEOPLE ATE CHILI WITHOUT MEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Bytown
    Posts
    10,180
    Quote Originally Posted by strawberry View Post
    Why does the defense get to appear via telephone? The JAC I could see but why the defense?
    Maybe because of the 2-3 day notice?

    Judge Perry signed the Notice of Hearing on Nov. 15 and it is scheduled for Nov. 18.
    ----------------------------------------------------



    --------------------------------------------------
    "There are three kinds of intelligence: one kind understands things for itself, the other appreciates what others can understand, the third understands neither for itself nor through others. This first is excellent, the second good, and the third useless.

    --Niccolo Machiavelli"

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Keithville, LA
    Posts
    4,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Sun View Post
    The JAC is correct in their response. They were not notice by Baez, on the Sept 27 Motion for DNA testing.

    http://www.docstoc.com/docs/56021806...t-DNA-Evidence

    CJPerry's ruling.

    http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/Hig...20Evidence.pdf
    HHJP didn't copy the JAC on this order either, but included LKB.
    My posts are my opinion only. Praying for Justice for Caylee Marie!
    The Florida Bar summed up the problem regarding Mr. Baez.
    "His overall behavior, they wrote, showed "a total lack of respect for the rights of others and a total lack of respect for the legal system, which is absolutely inconsistent with the character and fitness qualities required of those seeking to be afforded the highest position of trust and confidence recognized by our system of law." (Thank you to TWA) Read their opinion here: http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/d...ps/sc95855.pdf


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Bytown
    Posts
    10,180
    Quote Originally Posted by nums24 View Post
    HHJP didn't copy the JAC on this order either, but included LKB.
    I wonder if it's because Baez didn't include or notify the JAC in that motion and thus they were not present at that hearing regarding the DNA testing of the 2 items but the SAO's were present.
    ----------------------------------------------------



    --------------------------------------------------
    "There are three kinds of intelligence: one kind understands things for itself, the other appreciates what others can understand, the third understands neither for itself nor through others. This first is excellent, the second good, and the third useless.

    --Niccolo Machiavelli"

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    778
    Quote Originally Posted by nums24 View Post
    HHJP didn't copy the JAC on this order either, but included LKB.
    Yes, HHJP didn't copy the JAC on the original order, as Baez's original motion didn't include the JAC. Baez's original motion also didn't address the specifics of costs to the State of Florida.

    I do wonder what may happen, as the JAC is now asking to have HHJP's original order vacated.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,806
    I suspect HHJP will grant the JACs motion and have the DNA testing done on those two items in Florida. I was somewhat surprised HHJP at the last hearing did grant the DNA testing could be done in PA.

    What I am glad about is JAC is keeping smack on top of this and JB isn't getting away with what he thought he could.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In my own reality...it's nicer here.
    Posts
    12,006
    Quote Originally Posted by Blaise View Post
    Because the judge can no longer stand the sight of Baez, and is considering conducting the entire trial via texts if it will keep that clown out of his sight?

    Blaise
    Love it!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    897
    Quote Originally Posted by countzero View Post
    I suspect HHJP will grant the JACs motion and have the DNA testing done on those two items in Florida. I was somewhat surprised HHJP at the last hearing did grant the DNA testing could be done in PA.

    What I am glad about is JAC is keeping smack on top of this and JB isn't getting away with what he thought he could.
    I was led the believe.....

    that the lab in PA was one of few that did "Touch DNA" testing, which is why HHJP let it go through. Better there than Holland.

    Now Baez is trying to sneak regular DNA to that same lab.

    I think.

    I've been wrong before.
    We have enough youth. How about looking for a Fountain of Smart?

Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. 2010.10.21 - Casey Attending Status Hearing 2010.10.29???
    By Jomo in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 123
    Last Post: 10-31-2010, 03:22 AM
  2. Hearing 10/1/2010
    By Dr. Doogie in forum Jaycee Lee Dugard
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-11-2010, 11:50 AM
  3. 2010.09.27 Status hearing - Ext to 2010.11.19
    By sumbunny in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 497
    Last Post: 09-28-2010, 10:27 AM
  4. Replies: 163
    Last Post: 08-06-2010, 11:52 AM

Tags for this Thread