Reactions to Child advertiser censored Discovery

SurfieTX · Feb 25, 2011

"With regard to this evidence and digital computer information, we want to reserve comment on that until further investigation and information is made available by law enforcement."

More at link: http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=346566

brighidin · Feb 25, 2011

SurfieTX said:
"With regard to this evidence and digital computer information, we want to reserve comment on that until further investigation and information is made available by law enforcement."

More at link: http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=346566

"We don't want anymore information drawn to them as we have to."
I don't get that part of the statement.

IMO, I also can't believe he didn't strongly condemn the child *advertiser censored* found in his missing daughter's mother's house.:waitasec:

SurfieTX · Feb 25, 2011

brighidin said:
"We don't want anymore information drawn to them as we have to."
I don't get that part of the statement.

IMO, I also can't believe he didn't strongly condemn the child *advertiser censored* found in his missing daughter's mother's house.:waitasec:

Maybe because some of it was of Hailey? I'm just speculating.

concernedmother · Feb 25, 2011

I wonder if LE has discussed whats on them with Clint? Maybe he is just trying to process this. If LE hasn't told him anything his imagination is probably going to some really bad places about this.

mysticrose · Feb 25, 2011

brighidin said:
"We don't want anymore information drawn to them as we have to."
I don't get that part of the statement.

IMO, I also can't believe he didn't strongly condemn the child *advertiser censored* found in his missing daughter's mother's house.:waitasec:

I take it as saying " We want them to have as little information as possible, or be exposed to as little info as possible " Does that make sense :crazy:

SurfieTX · Feb 25, 2011

mysticrose said:
I take it as saying " We want them to have as little information as possible, or be exposed to as little info as possible " Does that make sense :crazy:

I tend to agree given the crash at the volunteer dinner. I think he knows that the less information given to everyone, the better the outcome. I'm really thinking CD has a new appreciation for LE since he tended to be on the opposite side there for a while. MOO...JMO...all that.

strach304 · Feb 25, 2011

brighidin said:
"We don't want anymore information drawn to them as we have to."
I don't get that part of the statement.

IMO, I also can't believe he didn't strongly condemn the child *advertiser censored* found in his missing daughter's mother's house.:waitasec:

I think what he is saying is that he doesn't this info getting to the other children.

gngr~snap · Feb 25, 2011

I strongly believe that when CD was in jail he was advised about this finding, that it would be released to the public and even received counseling on how to handle media inquiries.

MOO :cow:

Penelope · Feb 25, 2011

brighidin said:
"We don't want anymore information drawn to them as we have to."
I don't get that part of the statement.

IMO, I also can't believe he didn't strongly condemn the child *advertiser censored* found in his missing daughter's mother's house.:waitasec:

IMO he meant to say -- "We don't want anymore attention drawn to them as we have to." I believe that, because the images are pornographic, he does not want to focus on them because of the content. MOO

gngr~snap · Feb 25, 2011

:waitasec: I wonder if BD went to the dinner as SA's eyes and ears? Just to see if there was any mention of the images found by LE. Her stopping the media presentation IMO proves she was worried that's where they were headed. I REALLY don't think she had no knowledge of the *advertiser censored* etc
If she did she's not gonna admit guilt! Which is why she's not been looking. Why would she assist LE convict her?:censored: :shutup:

cluciano63 · Feb 25, 2011

I can't believe Clint knew about the *advertiser censored* before it came out yesterday...he had just said the day before that he was thinking SA was innocent...I can't believe he would make that conclusion after learning about the child *advertiser censored*, etc...

tiredblondy · Feb 25, 2011

I'm thinking he is following LE's advice and plan. One thing for sure is that if there are pictures of Hailey on there this was to see what BD and SA would do. It's also letting the Grandmother and other supporters of SA and anyone else involved know what SA is really like. Perhaps there are others involved that are on the pictures?

NSS · Feb 25, 2011

SurfieTX said:
"With regard to this evidence and digital computer information, we want to reserve comment on that until further investigation and information is made available by law enforcement."

More at link: http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=346566

That's lawyer speak if ever I heard it.

concernedmother · Feb 25, 2011

CD probably doesnt know what to think right now. He said BD didnt have her hobby when she was married to her. Now to find out about these images. He is probably seeing her becoming someone he didnt know and wondering just what she is capable of. Then there is DD to think about and I believe he loves him like his own. He is probably very confused right now.

katydid23 · Feb 25, 2011

NSS said:
That's lawyer speak if ever I heard it.

Yup. Sounds like it. But I don't blame Clint for seeking direction from here on out. This has got to be overwhelming and gut wrenching.

I hope someone is keeping an eye out. I know if my husband were to suddenly figure out who was to blame for our child's disappearance, and that person was free and living in the same town, even hanging out across a field....I would worry what he would do. KWIM?

katydid23 · Feb 25, 2011

gngr~snap said:
I strongly believe that when CD was in jail he was advised about this finding, that it would be released to the public and even received counseling on how to handle media inquiries.

MOO :cow:

Yep. They knew the FOI Act was pending and they would not want that info to go out without giving Clint a heads up, imo.

concernedmother · Feb 25, 2011

Where is Lenny ? Maybe if he bought BD a hamburger she would talk.

Texas Mist · Feb 25, 2011

<snip>

"It's definitely a shock," said Dunn, adding, "I've talked to him [Adkins] about it a little bit and I'll talk to Shawn a little more [later]."

"Of course, he didn't put anything like that on there," insists Dunn about the *advertiser censored* accusations.

more here - including "Dunn admits Adkins was the one who brought over the memory stick that was confiscated"

+ video

http://bigcountryhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=346806

MD MOMMY · Feb 25, 2011

concernedmother said:
Where is Lenny ? Maybe if he bought BD a hamburger she would talk.

Yeah since that worked so well for him the first time.:floorlaugh:

TexasTNT · Feb 25, 2011

here we go.

Reactions to Child *advertiser censored* Discovery

Well-Known Member

remember me as a time of day

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

The key to change... is to let go of fear

Well-Known Member

New Member

Verified Pediatric Nurse Georgia

Active Member

Verified Pediatric Nurse Georgia

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Retired WS Staff

Active Member

New Member

DNASolves

Online statistics

Forum statistics

Reactions to Child advertiser censored Discovery