1349 users online (252 members and 1097 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 96
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    21,748

    Odds of the SA having solid proof?

    I'm thinking that since they are tossing out a lot of evidence, that MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, they have some solid proof that we are not aware of?
    Thoughts?
    Media thread for Abby and Libby.


    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...5#post13163455

    WebSleuths Lingo thread.

    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...bsleuths-Lingo

    Unless I provide a link, every one of my posts are to be considered rumor, Speculation, or simply MY OWN OPINION.

    We are the watchers. We are witnesses. We see what has gone before. We see what happens now, at this dangerous moment in human history. We see what's going to happen - what will surely happen - unless we come together: we - the Peoples of all Nations - to restore peace and harmony and balance to the Earth, our Mother.


    THE IGNORE BUTTON IS YOUR FRIEND!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    7,118
    What did I miss? What are they tossing out?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,160
    I could think of but one reason and that would be CA suddenly realizing the only way to keep KC from the DP is for CA to admit there was a big fight on June 15th and that KC flew into a rage and may have hurt Caylee and then tried to cover up. Someone telling the truth in this case would be refreshing and it might make KC realize she needs to avoid the trial at any costs and try to plead out. jmo

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Between the beach and the river
    Posts
    6,552
    Quote Originally Posted by Tulessa View Post
    I'm thinking that since they are tossing out a lot of evidence, that MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, they have some solid proof that we are not aware of?
    Thoughts?
    I hope so ?

    Actually ,I have the utmost confidence in LDB and JA. I'm not sure there is absolute proof,but I think they have a solid case.
    Always ,just my opinion





    *****************************************
    We never saw it coming .Please talk to your teen even if you don't think you need to !
    Far more teens commit impulsive suicide without chronic depression
    Miss U James

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,807
    Quote Originally Posted by LolaMoon08 View Post
    What did I miss? What are they tossing out?
    I would also like to know what is being tossed.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Waterford Canada
    Posts
    232
    IMO there is ample evidence that ICA is guilty and a liar and therefore I think the SA could not put too much emphasis on her statements as truth given her history. If her statements are BS anyway why even go there.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    631
    Quote Originally Posted by Tulessa View Post
    I'm thinking that since they are tossing out a lot of evidence, that MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, they have some solid proof that we are not aware of?
    Thoughts?

    Oh, I think the prosecution wants to keep it simple.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    11,611
    They're just not going to use the 12/11/08 video of her reaction, or Maya's testimony.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Waiting
    Posts
    4,523
    Quote Originally Posted by strawberry View Post
    They're just not going to use the 12/11/08 video of her reaction, or Maya's testimony.
    No biggie! They don't need them, IMO. They have enough with the 31 days, partying, tattoo, and all of the lies.




    It Was Ancient Aliens!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    7,118
    Quote Originally Posted by strawberry View Post
    They're just not going to use the 12/11/08 video of her reaction, or Maya's testimony.
    The video - I never thought it was going to be seen by a jury anyways and I don't think it is that much of a loss anyways. I think Casey's phone call home where she talks to Cindy, Lee and Kristina is much more important and trumps the video of her learning about Caylee's (or a childs) remains being found on December 11th, 2008.

    As for Maya... she just isn't trustworthy and I don't think the SA needs her.

    Now if the duct tape gets tossed... I will panic!


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    919
    Quote Originally Posted by Tulessa View Post
    I'm thinking that since they are tossing out a lot of evidence, that MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, they have some solid proof that we are not aware of?
    Thoughts?
    I was pleased to see the State drop some of the "nonsense" evidence ... I'm very sure they don't need it ... IMO Maya didn't come across as truthful, the 10/14 conversation after her indictment but before her booking when Baez wasn't present didn't reveal anything about the crime anyway .. just what a cold witch KC was, and the 12/11 video also, IMO, didn't prove any facts and could have been interpreted in different ways ...

    It's great that the state is taking some of the focus off of what happened after KC was arrested and not giving Jose the chance to focus on it as a part of the big conspiracy against his client ... I think it's extra special that Jose's spent so much time chasing his tail and it won't even be used ... LOL

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    11,611
    Quote Originally Posted by chefmom View Post
    No biggie! They don't need them, IMO. They have enough with the 31 days, partying, tattoo, and all of the lies.
    Exactly.

  13. #13
    kaRN's Avatar
    kaRN is offline Verified Health Professional - Registered Nurse
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    4,752
    I don't believe Cindy's word on anything to be credible so admitting to a fight now is right up there with suggesting there was an accidental drowning. Means nothing to me. I don't care one way or the other if the jailhouse tape is introduced ior not. Sounds pretty circumstantial IMO anyway. Maybe she got a sudden cramp and started her period while the news was on- "Oh no." Who knows.
    The jury will have enough dealing with all ICA's innapropriate gestures, facial expressions and tics as is without the jail tape. I have full confidence that relinquishing a tape now, the state probably never intended on introducing anyway is all part of some brilliant prosecution strategy. JMO

    Injustice for Caylee Marie Anthony.

    Copyright that Cindy

    Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to get better. It's not. Dr. Suess

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Bytown
    Posts
    10,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Tulessa View Post
    I'm thinking that since they are tossing out a lot of evidence, that MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, they have some solid proof that we are not aware of?
    Thoughts?
    Tulessa,
    bbm
    I don't think they do...this is a IMO strong circumstantial evidence case and the ASA's are tossing out evidence/discovery they don't need or are unable to use for whatever reason..

    We now know the State is not going to use 1) Maya D's statement 2)the statements she made to LE (the chit chat) after being indicted when Jose wasn't around and 3) video of her reaction the day Caylee's remains were found.
    ----------------------------------------------------



    --------------------------------------------------
    "There are three kinds of intelligence: one kind understands things for itself, the other appreciates what others can understand, the third understands neither for itself nor through others. This first is excellent, the second good, and the third useless.

    --Niccolo Machiavelli"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    423
    Quote Originally Posted by denjet View Post
    I was pleased to see the State drop some of the "nonsense" evidence ... I'm very sure they don't need it ... IMO Maya didn't come across as truthful, the 10/14 conversation after her indictment but before her booking when Baez wasn't present didn't reveal anything about the crime anyway .. just what a cold witch KC was, and the 12/11 video also, IMO, didn't prove any facts and could have been interpreted in different ways ...

    It's great that the state is taking some of the focus off of what happened after KC was arrested and not giving Jose the chance to focus on it as a part of the big conspiracy against his client ... I think it's extra special that Jose's spent so much time chasing his tail and it won't even be used ... LOL


    And I'm hoping LDB's Motion in Limine results in Baez' conspiracy innuendo being severely curtailed during the trial.

    I predict a very one sided affair.
    "I need someone that'll take the information that I'm giving them" Casey Anthony July 25th 2008

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Man gave up solid food for Lent - lives on beer
    By Donjeta in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-29-2014, 12:49 AM